Forum:Uncyclopedia Protectors

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Uncyclopedia Protectors
Note: This topic has been unedited for 2530 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.


Someone has to do something. Take a look at many articles. You can see that two-thirds of it is filled with stupid things such as, "The Enormous Penis then fucked everyone in its range including Tom Hanks".

I wish for someone here to talk or communicate with the moderators and admins and tell them that the Uncyclopedia Protectors wants them to delete every spammer on the site and rid them forever. --The Unknown Hitchhiker 20:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

sign your post, THEN we will talk. -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer


Oh brother..../me shakes head

First of all, SIGN YOUR POSTS

Look at the recent changes and you can see the amount of work put by admins and users to maintain this place clear, however - this being a wiki, it is a never ending task. Read the links left on your talk page. learn how to work this wiki, and you can help as well. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey, hey! I just remembered and was going to. Maybe this place shouldn't really be a wiki afterall. Who's with me? Protect! --The Unknown Hitchhiker 20:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah ok, Ermmm...OLI! Can you protect all pages from editing and ask Famine to huff the internet? Thanks. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

To huff the World Wide Web, you need to destroy the World Wide Spider. -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer

See, now that's what people should put on Uncyclopedia. Now, what's with the OLI? And what's with huffing the internet? --The Unknown Hitchhiker 21:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Stop complaining. If you see a crappy page, make it better. If you see a good page, dumb it down. Then someday we'll reach a happy medium that no one will enjoy. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure...I guess...I'm sure we'll reach that time when no one will enjoy Uncyclopedia --The Unknown Hitchhiker 21:28, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not enjoying this little corner of it right now, that's all I know... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, you've got it all wrong. Uncyclopedia is going in the opposite direction, albeit slowly. A while ago, we had a nice little community campaign to remove certain irrelevant templates from pages. The list of featured articles continues to grow, and even if not everyone agrees that all of them are funny, at least you aren't apt to find anything outrageously bad. What makes it difficult to raise the overall quality of Uncyc is the fact that it depends on the creativity of its contributors, unlike Wickedpedia, which is more or less based on factual information that doesn't have to be especially funny, entertaining, or even useful–it just has to be true. Creativity can't be turned on like a faucet, so basically those crappy two-thirds of Uncyc that you mentioned are people's attempts at being creative/funny, and every once in a while something good turns up. In a nutshell, what I'm trying to say is that you're depressing the lot of us who have contributed to the one-third of Uncyc that isn't shitty. Also, you're not the first to make this observation. Also also, this discussion is totally not making Uncyclopedia better, so how about we all just go get drunk and write a few funny articles or something? --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 23:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead of you, Cnaidnads!!! Did i mention yore my beeeeeeeeest friend??? Heehee. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects