Forum:This website in general

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 12:11, July 29, 2013 by SPIKE (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > This website in general
Note: This topic has been unedited for 387 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

The thing is, I am a big comedy fan and I have seen nothing remotely funny about your website. I have visited it at least two or three times and have not had so much as a chortle or a snicker. This website appears to consist of nothing but geeky internet references that normal people cannot understand, the sort of ignorant, 'casual' racism that has clouded many a crap pub and a ridiculous degree of infantile homophobia which most boys will have grown out of by the time they are old enough to vaguely understand and respect other people and slip out of their acne-ridden solipsistic casing. It's quite sad and pathetic. I find it more depressing than funny. Pete Beale (talk) 01:29, July 29, 2013 (UTC)

No You.

If you have SUCH a problem with the content, YOU try writing humor. I for one, have never been offended by ANY of the content here. I think you're looking for wikipedia. And if you think we're bad, look at Encyclopedia Dramatica. Now, stop spamming facts into here, and stop linking to external sites. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 01:33, July 29, 2013 (UTC)

Exactly what you said. ~[ths] UotM Eclipse Craproll MotM BePrepared 01:43, 07/29/2013
The website can be very broad and uneven in quality but I suggest you look at some of the random features (see that link on the left hand column. That is 'random' as in which ones will come up if you click there, not that the articles themselves are random). We also have a process where articles other users find can be deleted - but only if it gets enough 'against' votes. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:27, July 29, 2013 (UTC)

You aren't looking hard enough

If anyone says there isn't a ridiculous degree of infantile jokes available on Uncyclopedia, they are sorely mistaken. However, the articles here have been written by a vast number of people, and everyone has their own style (well, except for the acne-ridden pubescent teenagers whose skulls are filled with more hormones than brain matter and think all jokes somehow related to sex are inherently funny). So if you keep looking, odds are you'll eventually find an article which suits your sense of comedy. Though if it takes too long and you have trouble reaching that point, you may consider that it is not this site at fault, but rather you are German er... I mean lack a sense of humor (that's humour for the poor spellers among us). Or, that you are also a pubescent teenager with a wet and sticky brain who's just in denial, and you're looking up pages you should know full well are going to be immature just so that you can express your narcissistic and elitist opinions that they are beneath you when you actually blow out a few additional neurons laughing every time you see the word "penis". You may consider reading articles written by me, as in my not even remotely immodest opinion with all due humility intact, think they are some exemplar works of more highbrow parody with only a few token immature jokes tossed into the mix lest I be excommunicated from the internet for being too mature. <shameless self-promotion>You can find them all on my user page</shameless self-promotion>.
◄► UnUnUn ium ◄► 09:32, July 29, 2013 (UTC)

Debate closed

See also Talk:Uncyclopedia#Too many cooks.... Pete Beale's own attempts to write "comedy," overnight and two years ago, were no better. I do not view his claims as authentically motivated, and believe that further navel-gazing here on the topic of, "Is Uncyclopedia Complete Crap?" can only detract from the job of improving it. Spıke ¬ 12:10 29-Jul-13

Personal tools
projects