Note: This topic has been unedited for 331 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
The decline of Zork
> Zrkfrm.bat /p /w
Since it was featured, Zork has been edited, amended, and extended several billion times. While it has an element of kitsch to it, these constant changes are... well... stupid. We've killed most of the clones. Does anyone object to this being "restored" to the featured version? SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM04:09 22 Jul
Comment. At a glance, the "featured" version of Zork seems to be a brief stub filled with red links. Saberwolf116 (talk) 07:05, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Against For the simple reason that it would be too much effort for too little benefit. The featured version of every single subpage of the game would be ludicrously difficult to find, not to mention the fact that a lot of the coding (including the text adventure background right here) was added post-featuring. Besides, I think the game's just fine as it is, and the reversion could take away a lot of content that I may have found funny. Long story short, not worth the trouble. --LordScofieldStark 18:21, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Abstain. To be honest I'm all for huffing all games including Zork. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 07:57, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
Against It needs a rewrite. Bring back Lord Dimwit Flathead and his Zorkmind Coins so he can fund a new version. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 18:40, July 23, 2012 (UTC) > vote for; --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team ZombiebaronTw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 15:43, July 23, 2012 (UTC)