Forum:The decline of Zork

“I SAY, BOY! KNEEL BEFORE ME AND OPE THY MOUTH!”

~ SPIKE, to all new users

“The other day I found a sperm flavoured lollipop at my favourite sex shop. Most sperm flavoured products use artificial flavouring and have a nasty "fake" taste. This one was imported from Italy so it used the real thing. It was far too expensive but I had been a good girl that week so I thought Id treat myself. Right outside the shop I lost my grip on the slippery thing and it went through a strom grate. A policeman was nearby and I offered to suck his cock right there if he would help me get it out of the storm sewer but he just laughed at me. I had to wait until night fall and then crawl into the sewer. I was bitten by a rabid raccoon down there but I found my lollipop so it all evened out in the end”

~ PuppyOnTheRadio on perseverance

Forums: Index > Village Dump > The decline of Zork

Zork

left

The decline of Zork	Score: -283	Moves: Lots
> Zrkfrm.bat /p /w Since it was featured, Zork has been edited, amended, and extended several billion times. While it has an element of kitsch to it, these constant changes are... well... stupid. We've killed most of the clones. Does anyone object to this being "restored" to the featured version? Sir CPT Dr PuppyOnTheRadio GUN UmP WotM NotM FP VFP VFH CM POTM UGM 04:09 22 Jul > Zrkvote.bat Restoring Zork to featured version Score: -2% complete For Restore Sir CPT Dr PuppyOnTheRadio GUN UmP WotM NotM FP VFP VFH CM POTM UGM 04:09 22 Jul Comment. At a glance, the "featured" version of Zork seems to be a brief stub filled with red links. Saberwolf116 (talk) 07:05, July 22, 2012 (UTC) Against For the simple reason that it would be too much effort for too little benefit. The featured version of every single subpage of the game would be ludicrously difficult to find, not to mention the fact that a lot of the coding (including the text adventure background right here) was added post-featuring. Besides, I think the game's just fine as it is, and the reversion could take away a lot of content that I may have found funny. Long story short, not worth the trouble. --Lord Scofield Stark 18:21, July 22, 2012 (UTC) Nah. I like it. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:26, July 22, 2012 (UTC) Abstain. To be honest I'm all for huffing all games including Zork. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:57, July 23, 2012 (UTC) Against It needs a rewrite. Bring back Lord Dimwit Flathead and his Zorkmind Coins so he can fund a new version. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:40, July 23, 2012 (UTC) > vote for; --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 15:43, July 23, 2012 (UTC) Against. Because the featured version clearly isn't the "best" version. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:47, 23 July 2012