Forum:The Greek Squad

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > The Greek Squad
Note: This topic has been unedited for 459 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I just created a new article titled, Greek Squad. It's a parody of the Geek Squad and 300, combining the two. Feel free to edit/add in more crap. I'm done for the night. I'll maybe write some more tomorrow. -Solidsnk65 03:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Respectfully decline. I am fresh out of crap. --Pieface 04:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I, however, am full of crap. You don't want it. Frankly, I'm planning on flushing it. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Ehh, well I put alot of time into it, believe it or not. I'd appreciate if someone contributed to the article somehow. I didn't just try to dump off some garbage for the mods to delete or whatever. Okay, going to sleep. 'night Uncyclopedia. Solidsnk65 08:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I just came to my senses after becoming aware of this event. I have run around in blind panic, mind numbing fear, raging fury, fierce feelings and a multitude of emotions of uncertainty and doubt for the last couple of hours. The magnitude, the humanity the shear scale and implications of this here happening. It just sank in, An ARTICLE has been created !!!. pffha wwoo, whooo kkKKakaka .. YES !. It has BEEN created and we may all feel FREE to edit in more crap.. What a mindbogglingly insanely great super brilliant concept.--Vosnul 14:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
My sarcasm-meter just exploded. Again. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Burp. Is there any more beer in the refrigerator? --Pieface 16:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
/me tosses a half-litre can of Heineken in the general direction of the Intarwebs. There ye go -- di Mario 17:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Wait! I get what Vosnul (is that like a real name??) is saying! Solidsnk65 (is that like a real name??) has ACTUALLY CREATED SOMETHING! And we can share in his(?) glory!! All we have to do is improve what he(?) wrote (well, all right, typed) by about, well, one million percent, and let him:(?) take the credit! What could be easier!? Well, I am tired now. I will write some more tomorrow. Or the next day. Or not. Pieface 17:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC) (Is that like a real name?)
/me just been hit between the ears by a half litre can of Heineken piss! Pieface 17:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
My name is a perfectly good name just like "Your majesty" and "God, our lord" are. And on behalf of the Netherlands i apologize for that scheisse heineken piss, amstel bile and Oranjeboom poison. ( On behalf of Canada I apologize for Celine Dion and on behalf of Germany I apologize for not making German beer more available instead of dutch piss)--Vosnul 18:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Wait! Pay attention! While pretending to be a asleep, Solidsnk65 (Is that like a real name??) has just turned a "bit red in Helsinki!"Pieface 18:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)


Okay you know what, this is why n00bs remain n00bs, flame wars start, and people get banned. Because of assholes like you guys. I was just trying to be cool and nice but all of the above comments were completely unnecessary, seriously. Grow up you bunch of dicks. Oh and pieface, the shit you added in has no relevance at ALL to the article. So I'll feel free to remove it. You know what? Actually, I don't care any longer. Solidsnk65 20:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

And your cool was respected to the fullest in the best, oldest and most honoured tradition that could have been bestowed upon it. Normally, you see, Such a shameless plug a prime example of blatant article whoring would be dismissed with a simple "You should put this on pee review" or a more harsh "Huff this tripe ASAP". But your coolness about it was so evidently present that most of us read the article and then started ranting on this forum topic. Getting taking the piss out of, is an award kinda thing.. yeah think of it as an award. Plus you can not brute force the incremental stages of wikivolution by demanding more crap, crap shall take its own sweet time. Oww, and sorry for you not caring any longer, to compensate I vote for us to stop caring any shorter. --Vosnul 20:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Group hug!

Sheesh! c'mon, people. Let the healing begin. This is a wiki where people (who are silly) write things (that are silly). Chill out. You're harshing my mellow. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm so sorry for them marshing your mallows, will they be ok? Well, you can always make s'mores.... P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Maybe this is what that whole "n00b-unfriendliness" topic was about... who knew that being dickish could put people off? --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 07:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Since when is being sarcastic the same as being dickish? The latter is being mean for the sake of it, the former being opportunistic when it comes to humour. --Katievanity.jpg 17:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Since <sarcasm> tags were dropped from standard HTML. Some people have a hard time with sarcasm even with real-life vocal inflections. Granted, we may say that we don't necessarily want people who can't understand sarcasm, but that brings us back to the original point of being dickish. Or, if you insist on arguing semantics, then perhaps "poo-head" is a better word than "dick". --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 18:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
I think extreme sarcasm (at least in the face of people you don't know) just sounds nasty. I mean, if it even gives a grue pause for thought, you know you've got some pretty strong shit right there. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

After a nice round of Bite the n00b, I enjoy a nice tall glass of melon-aid, myself.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects