Forum:Speaking of things sucking...

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '{{Forumheader|Village Dump}} ...VFH has been doing that a bit lately: # Uncyclopedia:VFH/Papercuts of Doom # Uncyclopedia:VFH/I love pudding # [[Uncycloped...')
 
Line 13: Line 13:
   
 
Now, it doesn't cause all that much disruption, as blatantly stupid, no-effort articles get voted off pretty quickly. But it really gets people riled up for no good reason, which is the part that sucks. I really wish there was a way to discourage these sorts obviously stupid nominations, because it makes good contributors feel pretty cheated. Having an article up for VFH takes a lot of effort, usually, whereas these rather idiotic nominations represent virtually no effort and collect annoying amounts of votes that more sensible people have to beat down with '''against'''s. In short, it was funny at first, now it's bloody annoying and even more insulting. Can't we set some sort of [[ban|way to discourage these things]]? {{User:Dr. Skullthumper/sig|00:33 Aug 31, 2007}}
 
Now, it doesn't cause all that much disruption, as blatantly stupid, no-effort articles get voted off pretty quickly. But it really gets people riled up for no good reason, which is the part that sucks. I really wish there was a way to discourage these sorts obviously stupid nominations, because it makes good contributors feel pretty cheated. Having an article up for VFH takes a lot of effort, usually, whereas these rather idiotic nominations represent virtually no effort and collect annoying amounts of votes that more sensible people have to beat down with '''against'''s. In short, it was funny at first, now it's bloody annoying and even more insulting. Can't we set some sort of [[ban|way to discourage these things]]? {{User:Dr. Skullthumper/sig|00:33 Aug 31, 2007}}
  +
:Terrible idea. All users have the right to nominate an article to the VFH. Abuse of the system is worthy of a ban, but there's not much you can really do. --{{User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig}} 01:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:45, August 31, 2007

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Speaking of things sucking...
Note: This topic has been unedited for 2554 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

...VFH has been doing that a bit lately:

  1. Uncyclopedia:VFH/Papercuts of Doom
  2. Uncyclopedia:VFH/I love pudding
  3. Uncyclopedia:VFH/Ralphenheimer
  4. Uncyclopedia:VFH/Main Page
  5. Uncyclopedia:VFH/Holiday Hawk
  6. Uncyclopedia:VFH/Giga Bowser
  7. Uncyclopedia:VFH/Fisher Price
  8. Uncyclopedia:VFH/This page does not exist
  9. Uncyclopedia:VFH/Talk:This page does not exist

Now, it doesn't cause all that much disruption, as blatantly stupid, no-effort articles get voted off pretty quickly. But it really gets people riled up for no good reason, which is the part that sucks. I really wish there was a way to discourage these sorts obviously stupid nominations, because it makes good contributors feel pretty cheated. Having an article up for VFH takes a lot of effort, usually, whereas these rather idiotic nominations represent virtually no effort and collect annoying amounts of votes that more sensible people have to beat down with againsts. In short, it was funny at first, now it's bloody annoying and even more insulting. Can't we set some sort of way to discourage these things?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:33 Aug 31, 2007

Terrible idea. All users have the right to nominate an article to the VFH. Abuse of the system is worthy of a ban, but there's not much you can really do. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects