Forum:Sockpuppet image

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Sockpuppet image
Note: This topic has been unedited for 1529 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

On Image:Carlb-sockpuppet-02.jpg, it is being heavily reverted, so can we discuss whihc version we like better here? ThrowSomeds 00:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

The old one is better. Case closed. --General Insineratehymn 00:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
One person's opinion alone is not enough to close the case like this. ThrowSomeds 00:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
The old one is better. Case closed. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes it is. Case closed. --General Insineratehymn 00:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
You have a right to your personal opinion, but we need more people to vote to close this. ThrowSomeds 00:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
2 against 1. Case closed. --General Insineratehymn 00:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This is redundant. We've been over this against several single users on the normal Sock template and Stop Hand.png. Let's just stop arguing, Carlb got it right the first time. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
There are many other Uncyclopedians that have a right to vote in this. We need to wait. ThrowSomeds 00:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
No we don't. Case closed. --General Insineratehymn 00:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes we do. Case closed. ThrowSomeds 00:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Shut up! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
No, you shut up! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Lol. Yelling at yourself. ThrowSomeds 00:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
That's what we do around here. Now shut up. --General Insineratehymn 00:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
“Shut up!”
~ Me on telling myself to shut up.
ThrowSomeds 00:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you should shut up. --General Insineratehymn 00:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Wups, sorry. I didn't know you three were, um, in flagrante. Lock the door next time. /me leaves. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

If I could come up with a clever-er way to say what MO said, then I would. But as I am but a pathetic whelp, I will instead say the following: Get a room! LOLzorzzzzzzzz!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I am going for number 1. Last time I checked it was that ThrowSomed's third revert. Now it's already AAAAAAAAA! --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 13:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

There's been another one since by someone else...(?) Reverted. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Which version of the sockpuppet image is better?

The poll was created at 13:26 on June 18, 2007, and so far 25 people voted.

On the images: why would we need a skewed-looking sock when we could have the original one? As the person who wants to change it, the onus is on you to persuade us, not just keep reverting and hope someone comes in to back you up. As it is, you've just ended up looking like a vandal. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

CASE, yeah. I second that.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

As arguments go, this is pretty lame. Who could possibly be so invested in making a picture of a sockpuppet look slightly more to the left? Try creating some new pictures, instead of trying to replace old well-established ones. And I'm going to kiill the next person who says case closed. Spang talk 10:40, 19 Jun 2007

Investigation shut.  :-) --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

FU SPANG. Now that was exhilarating. ~Jewriken.GIF 10:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Case closed (I just wanted to do that) —Braydie 17:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

/me smacks Braydie on the back of his head Get back to your books! ~Jewriken.GIF 18:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I should train to be a lawyer. I'd be able to say it irl then. —Braydie 18:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I voted #3 "Upload them both and let people use them as they like". Indexes6 20:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Why do we need a Sockpuppet image?

Aren't they called Bunburys now? --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Only among a select cadre of Uncyclopedians. Ones who have, y'know, read books 'n' shit, mostly. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
A.k.a losers, nerds, geeks, freaks, bookworms, four-eyes, james, etc. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey! I read books! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey! I'm not a loser, nerd, geek, freak, bookworm, four-eyes, james, etc! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I resent the fact that my rugged and dignified name is placed along side the losers who say "Bunbury!!" WTF is that, huh? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Have some respect people. Bunbury is terribly, terribly ill. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

This section of this forum page is making me swell up with joy. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 22:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

We should start a PAC advocating the use of the term Bunbury. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

If you aren't terribly well read, of course, one of the more random things to be found in the vaults of Uncyc is this, which might help. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

My favourite is still the first in the series. That bit where he's hopping on the ladder, trying to fix the sign in The Importance of Being Earnest Goes to Camp was awesome. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools