Note: This topic has been unedited for 1565 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Why the hell was I just laughing at this image when all of a sudden this forum pops up?
Is it just me, or is there getting to be an awful lot of pregnancy on this wiki lately? Like... 10 new pregnancy-themed articles? Did anyone notice that? pillow talk 16:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
No. We've also got one on Link, one on teenage boys, one extremely disturbing page on a Nikelodeon show, twoon fictional superheroes, one that looks like the pregnancy article but isn't, one on Bristol Palin, and even a super-secret girly page on pregnant women, which I am not going to link you to, because it's fucking super-secret. Can't you read? pillow talk 17:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
The supergirl/superboi one is vore & fart fetishism, not pregnancy. And the ICarly article is about various animals living in a girl's uterus, not pregnancy. And in my defense, I had to fight to keep it that tame. --Mnbvcxz 23:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Btw, what did you upload that image for? Its only being used on one page, well, now, 2. --Mnbvcxz 23:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
To be used on preggo pages, and maybe the Britney Spears article. And because you had a picture of a pregnant Christina Aguilera, but not yet of Britney Spears. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
You shouldn't upload images preemptively because you think you might need them later, espeically copyrighted ones. There is a chance it will be deleted, or shoehorned somewhere to save it. --Mnbvcxz 23:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
I needed to create the super secret girlie page in order to stop the ICarly page from turning into a preg-spam page. I explained it on the talk page. Basically, its better to a preg-spam page in userspace than on an article about a pre-teen actress. --Mnbvcxz 23:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Solution
I wrote this. Just a reminder. —SirSysRq (talk) 21:23, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
You are a bad man. pillow talk 21:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad you liked it. —SirSysRq (talk) 22:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Um, by raising the topic, aren't you just asking for more content on the subject? --Mnbvcxz 23:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Either I'm asking for more content, I'm asking for less content, I'm merely making an observation, or I'm subliminally trying to get you to mail me several pairs of jeans. pillow talk 00:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Behold, another prego pic in this forum --Mnbvcxz 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Lemme rephrase: fuck you, but only if you're preggers. —SirSysRq (talk) 04:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
If you have a better idea, go ahead and change it. The current version is a "joke article based on a comment post" anyway. It was an altered version of an existing article. --Mnbvcxz 04:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Pff, I don't care. Current version seems fine to me. —SirSysRq (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, I really don't care about the current version either, right now, its one of those "funny because it exists" articles. --Mnbvcxz 04:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Erm, what's the purpose of this?
Really, I don't see the purpose of this. 10 "bun in the oven" articles. Whoop-dee-f*cking-doo. If they aren't hurting anyone, at least Pee Review them.
My guess is Hyperbole wants moar preggo articles, but doesn't want to look by pervert by asking for them. So, he brings up the topic, complains about it to cover himself, and behold! it inspires moar preggo articles. --Mnbvcxz 17:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Either that, or Hyperbole is wondering if there's another Slappy Squirrel situation brewing. pillow talk 18:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Ahh, I see. One article influences others to make different articles on the same topic. SPARTAN-984|Chat here|What I've Done 19:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, in my defense, I have largely retired from article writing. Also, I'm not creating some self-contained multi-article epic saga, nor am I spamming preggo pics into random articles or random forum posts. (Unlike some people who need to insert a certain flying mammal into every discussion.) Ok, I did to it that one time to the Sonic the Hedgehog article, but that was to provide some consistency to the article, and annoy 10 year old fanboys. --Mnbvcxz 19:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Hehehehehe. I give you a bit of credit Mnbvcxz. Everyone likes to piss a few people off by doing something like that. :) SPARTAN-984|Chat here|What I've Done 21:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)