Forum:Pee review question

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Pee review question
Note: This topic has been unedited for 644 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.


What should we do with the pee reviews from before January 5th? AKA all of them. While we should review them in theory, we lack the manpower, any many of the editors have gone elsewhere. I wouldn't make sense to do pee reviews that are never going to be read, and even less to do redundant pee reviews. However, deleting all (or almost all) the pee reviews would break the "continuity" of the site. Any opinions? --Mn-z 16:56, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

I would not risk wasting time giving editing advice without first confirming via user talk page that the author is still on-site and interested. That every single Pee Review request be treated consistently despite the fork is a lesser concern. Spıke ¬ 17:04 14-Jan-13
What should we do with the abandoned old ones, close/delete them, or allow them to linger? --Mn-z 17:34, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
It was my intention to go through them and close the older ones at some point. As far as doing reviews that are still wanted I have considered simply doing them and passing that on to the person who requested the review. Obviously there then comes the issue of people from this wiki assisting the other wiki in improving its articles whilst the article here stays the same. Ultimately I think most of them will need closing down unless the requesting user has remained to edit this wiki. If someone who has moved to the other wiki wants a review from someone who is still here then they can always email or ask them. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 13:29, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects