Forum:Pee review aid
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Revision as of 22:49, January 27, 2009 by Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk | contribs)
Note: This topic has been unedited for 1572 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
This article has been on pee review for four days without food, ware or comments. Please assist.--Snake7 01:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Snake7
- The best way I know to get someone to review something is to do some reviews of other articles yourself... Try it. ;) MrN
Fork you! 01:17, Jan 26
- Also, have a little patience, yeah yeah, just a little patience, yeah yeah... Four days is not a huge length of time for an article to be on the pee queue - note the oldest request is from the 3rd Jan? As MrN says, help out, tackle a review yourself, and your chances of getting a review will increase. --UU - natter
09:57, Jan 26
- Also, have a little patience, yeah yeah, just a little patience, yeah yeah... Four days is not a huge length of time for an article to be on the pee queue - note the oldest request is from the 3rd Jan? As MrN says, help out, tackle a review yourself, and your chances of getting a review will increase. --UU - natter
- Have patience. Pee Reviews are hard. Besides my abs, they're the hardest thing here. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. Your "abs." Yes. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 22:26, Jan 27
- Yes indeed. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. Your "abs." Yes. - T.L.B.
