Forum:Pee Review

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 12:23, March 20, 2006 by David Gerard (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Pee Review
Note: This topic has been unedited for 3037 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.


I'm trying to clean up the Pee Review so that more people will use it. If you've submitted an article to be reviewed, and feel like you've had enough help, please go find it and add {{Thanks!|~~~}} to the bottom of the entry. This way there will be fewer articles to choose from, and more reviewing.

If you want to help with making the layout more better, and/or have a bot, and/or are Carlb, feel free to do so. --KATIE!! 12:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Why don't you just archive everything that's had a reply? Or, for that matter, just get rid of it. I don't know if it's one of those things that really needs to be archived, especially considering how long some of those articles just sit there. Tompkinssig   Smallturtle  t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 17:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm kind of curious to know if Pee Review has had any success stories at all; it never did me any good, so I stopped using it. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 05:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
I think there has been a few.. maybe... Well, Tod posts there alot, so there's probably been at least one. Tompkinssig   Smallturtle  t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
User:Some user came up with the perfect title for My Own Private IPO - David Gerard 12:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects