Forum:Ok, ok - time out!
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Look, people - have we not had enough with this "Benson" nonsense? Do we really need to pay so much attention to a retard that generates rubbish articles (, ) and useless scat (, , , , , , , )? If having too many pictures is a problem, if no one voting at VFD page is a problem, and if vandalism is a problem, then why are we encouraging a pest to carry on with his shenanigan? As long as we continue this "joke", we are simply showing everyone in the world that we are contradicting ourselves and we all seriously need a girlfriend (or whatever you prefer). Plesase, my friends, enough is enough.
- That's all older stuff though. As long as he keeps it in this forum and other non-articles, as he has for the past week, it's not a big deal in my opinion. And self-contradiction is an honored Uncyclopedia pastime. —rc (t) 18:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Benson condones his actions on wikipedia. it will not happen again. BENSON WILL ONLY RULE ON UNCYCLOPEDIA! Benson 02:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- You do realize that pointing him out like this, and trying to make a big deal out of it, just like countless others have already done, is only making him get more attention, right? Maybe you shuold think about these things next time before you go off and post another entry on a topic that I'm sure has already been discussed. 18:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- HOW DARE YOU CALL BENSON A RETARD! HE IS THE ONE, THE ONLY, BENSON. AND EVEN IF BENSON WASN'T COOL, WE'VE ACTUALLY FEATURED RUBBISH ARTICLES IN THE PAST. SHAME ON YOU FOR MOCKING HIS HOLINESS. --User:Nintendorulez 22:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Congrates! Benson now has a vandetta with you! Benson 22:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
This really doesn't help remove BENSON (not that anyone would want to remove BENSON). If somebody cared, BENSON wouldn't be here. -- 08:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)