Forum:Ok, ok - time out!

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 08:15, June 16, 2006 by OsirisX (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > BHOP > Ok, ok - time out!
Note: This topic has been unedited for 2999 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.


Look, people - have we not had enough with this "Benson" nonsense? Do we really need to pay so much attention to a retard that generates rubbish articles ([1], [2]) and useless scat ([3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10])? If having too many pictures is a problem, if no one voting at VFD page is a problem, and if vandalism is a problem, then why are we encouraging a pest to carry on with his shenanigan? As long as we continue this "joke", we are simply showing everyone in the world that we are contradicting ourselves and we all seriously need a girlfriend (or whatever you prefer). Plesase, my friends, enough is enough.

For more Benson's "contributions", see here. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Col.swordman (talk • contribs)

That's all older stuff though. As long as he keeps it in this forum and other non-articles, as he has for the past week, it's not a big deal in my opinion. And self-contradiction is an honored Uncyclopedia pastime. —rc (t) 18:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm glad you're a fan of Benson... You'll take the fact that he's making us seem quite ED-like (only less mature) with a sense of humour. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 18:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay, granted, that is on the un- side of cool. —rc (t) 01:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Benson condones his actions on wikipedia. it will not happen again. BENSON WILL ONLY RULE ON UNCYCLOPEDIA! Benson 02:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

You do realize that pointing him out like this, and trying to make a big deal out of it, just like countless others have already done, is only making him get more attention, right? Maybe you shuold think about these things next time before you go off and post another entry on a topic that I'm sure has already been discussed. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
HOW DARE YOU CALL BENSON A RETARD! HE IS THE ONE, THE ONLY, BENSON. AND EVEN IF BENSON WASN'T COOL, WE'VE ACTUALLY FEATURED RUBBISH ARTICLES IN THE PAST. SHAME ON YOU FOR MOCKING HIS HOLINESS. --User:Nintendorulez 22:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Congrates! Benson now has a vandetta with you! Benson 22:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

What Nintendorulez said. - Sir Real Hamster {talk} {contribs} 02:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

This really doesn't help remove BENSON (not that anyone would want to remove BENSON). If somebody cared, BENSON wouldn't be here. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects