Forum:Let's do porn

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 01:57, May 14, 2009 by Todd Lyons (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > Let's do porn
Note: This topic has been unedited for 1803 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I've been thinking about this issue for a while, and some latest issues I've dealt with (specifically a user who hosted hundred of porn pics under his space - just so he can have quick access to his pics) made me think that we need some sort of guidelines of how to deal with porn-ish pictures.


The way I see it there are several decisions to be made here:

  • What is considered to be porn? Is every naked picture is considered to be one? Personally, I don't think that this is the case but we need to think about when a picture stops being funky/artistic/passable and becomes pornography.
  • What if this picture does add value to the an article? Kamasutra for example? Do we allow it?
  • Do we need to do a rampage on existing porn pictures and remove them or just decide that we deal with it from this day forward.\


Also, it might be the case that the majority don't think we have an issue, in which case we can leave the subject all together.

Let's discuss. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcum to Wankopedia

There seems to be the perception that porn is okay here, and particularly porn that is collected under a userpage, ostensibly for the individual's own enjoyment. I'm not sure how this idea became entrenched, but I think it needs to disappear. Userpages are obviously not private, and like accounts they are a privilege that can be suspended for misuse. Uncyclopedia is a public website that makes no serious effort to determine the ages of it's users. And fundamentally, we're here to provide humour and parody, not serve T&A to wankoholics.

Any erotic picture here should justify it's own existence, and there should only be as many on the site as there absolutely need to be. If we have to flag them on an individual basis for VFD, fine. But any that are just in userspace being linked between the like-minded can go immediately.

Regarding the Kamasutra article, that choot picture should go, in my opinion.

--T. (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what you have against toupees. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Bald is beautiful, baby. Believe it. --T. (talk) 01:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
If the picture if funny, keep it. If you don't want to keep any of it, be thankful that it has been helpfully OCD-organised into one convenient place. Spang talk 01:33, 14 May 2009
Personal tools
projects