Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > Disambiguation philosophy
Note: This topic has been unedited for 441 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I plan to make a disambiguation page. The major topic and article would be "Burrito". There is an article for that. The one and only current "may also refer to" subject would be "Mission Burrito".

Is this situation considered to be sufficient cause to create a dab page? -- Nigel Scribbler (talk) 07:22, July 31, 2017 (UTC)

It would need more than one article for that in my view. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:31, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. Now moving more electrons to the writing part of my brain. -- Nigel Scribbler (talk) 00:49, August 1, 2017 (UTC)
The disambiguation page is really meant for articles that have the same name but need to be differentiated. Since this isn't wikipedia, you can jumble them up a bit but they should be linked in someway. For example if we have a Donald Trump disambiguation page (we might need one soon) it could include article links to Agent Orange or Russia for example. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:05, August 1, 2017 (UTC)