Forum:Can someone give me feed back on my song in the gay pirates post

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 14:21, March 29, 2013 by Spike (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Can someone give me feed back on my song in the gay pirates post
Note: This topic has been unedited for 822 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

It's the song about the faggot pirate its my second post so be kind please The preceding unsigned comment was added by Parodyparadox (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts with 4 tildes like this ~~~~. I will check your contributions and see if I can figure out which post you mean. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:55, March 28, 2013 (UTC)
On reviewing it, that was crude, unfunny, homophobic, and basically vandalism. We get too many "gay" and "anus" jokes around here, and have seen way too many of them to find this sort of thing funny in the least. Once your ban expires, try for ORIGINAL humor, not stuff you have heard elsewhere (this sounds like something someone made up on a playground), and try to be clever and subtle. I am giving you a second chance, since you didn't cyberbully a specific person, so don't blow it. One week should give you plenty of time to read HTBFANJS, along with several of our features to see what we are looking for.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:04, March 28, 2013 (UTC)
The guy got blocked for writing a stupid song? Even if the initial infinite ban was so mercifully reduced to a mere week, this is ridiculous. It's not just abuse of power, it's more like raping, murdering, and then cannibalizing it. You say it was crude, if meaning offensive, then yes and so is 99% of Uncyclopedia. If meaning poorly written, then yes and so is 99% of Uncyclopedia. Unfunny, most certainly, and so is 99% 50% of Uncyclopedia. Homophobic? Hardly. If that was homophobic, then two dudes kissing might as well be classified as homophobic too, a paradox which would put Schrödinger's cat to shame. Also, so is 99% 50% 10% of Uncyclopedia. Finally, basically vandalism ≠ vandalism. And of course, 100% of Uncyclopedia is basically vandalism. In summation, the song was as poorly written as restroom graffiti and could have been more expertly composed by a mentally challenged parsnip, but to ban someone for writing a stupid song, even for a week, makes the Mexican police force seem competent. I've never paid much attention to the inner workings of law and disorder before, so I truly hope this kind of treatment to newcomers isn't a common occurrence here.
◄► Tephra ◄► 12:00, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your speech. Vandals do earn bans here, and dumping in a large, unoriginal, unfunny song parody revolving around anal sex, then opening a Forum to call attention to it, is a large and deliberate demonstration that the user's goals are not the goals of the site, nor the goals of the typical reader. Happily, Simsie reduced my permaban and had the energy (which I think will be wasted) to try to instruct this editor. Sometimes vandalism does equal vandalism. Spıke Ѧ 13:17 29-Mar-13
I disagree that this was an act of vandalism. While his contributions were, to be as nice as possible, lame, I do not see any indication of intentional misconduct. He made two contributions before this song and his contributions, while no literary works of art, were relatively consistent within the preexisting context, meaning that he cared enough about the subject material he was editing to have actually bothered reading it first, which is more than I can say about many editors. He then started a topic asking for feedback, which seems perfectly legitimate to me. The feedback should have been; "Your song sucks worse than a vacuum cleaner fetish gone wrong, now go read HTBFANJS and try again." If he then kept making moronic edits and new topics, I'd consider him a vandal. It seems here the powers that be prefer to assume the worst and jump to conclusions without any real evidence demonstrating ill will.
◄► Tephra ◄► 14:00, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
You're wrong to portray this as the typical case, but your argument is valid. I'll resurrect him. I would appreciate your help if necessary in guiding him away from the Dark Side of the Force. Spıke Ѧ 14:21 29-Mar-13
Personal tools