Forum:Before we start featuring articles that get +3 positive votes

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 02:37, September 25, 2009 by Colin "All your base" Heaney (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > Before we start featuring articles that get +3 positive votes
Note: This topic has been unedited for 1816 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I think moving back to an alternate day feature would be a good idea for a while. Anyone against? ~Jewriken.GIF 08:16, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Works for me. - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 10:34, Sep 8
Feature either every day or when one gets enough votes. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:34, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

The only way any of my articles are getting featured is if we start featuring articles that get +3 positive votes


Let's just decide we play it on the fly, if we drop to a low number of votes, we do alternate, otherwise we keep as it is. Also, more sex for everyone. ~Jewriken.GIF 11:52, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

... Umm... Is that an offer? MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:07, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Mordillo

furthermore, I would propose that +10 be a sort of cutoff when deciding whether to alternate-day feature or not. Thus, we must have a vote. Try to refrain from hurling rotten vegetables. Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:17, Sep 21

Totally, Necro, that's like brilliant

Score: 1
  1. Well, I came up with it... Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:17, Sep 21

Dude, you trippin'

Score: 0

I can't make up my mind because my mother never really loved me. I'm very depressed about this.

Score: 1
That's because you weren't a cute enough baby to sell for crack. Colin Explode fireALL YOUR BASEExplode fireHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:36, September 25, 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects