Forum:A present from the admins for 2012

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 23:31, January 9, 2012 by Dannehvirus (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > A present from the admins for 2012
Note: This topic has been unedited for 987 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Red

Notice how when we visualise one person having greater power, they stand out, but not so in the digital world where assemetrical power is hidden in the 0s and 1s

My brothers, how are you? Did you have a nice time with your family this holiday? Drunken uncle said a joke that offended everyone? Drank 12 bottles of champagne and finished in jail? Caught up on your japanese porn comics?

Anyways, a little birdy told me that the admins where planning on dropping their draconian byzantine machevelian practice of having more votes than users...especially on VFS. This is a really lovely idea and I think as a user base, we should support them in this bold decision. Im not sure which admin leaked this out, but you can be sure that whichever admin it was, was a proud brother of the uncyclopedia collective. Lets all join hands in harmony and equality and over look the white lie in this forum I started.

Auqlity

Even if one of the female admins have breast that would knock your eyes back into your brain and nasal cavities, it doesnt mean that you should lower your expectation (about voting that is) let alone lower your voice (about voting that is)

2012 !!! The year of equality, fraternity and the Scandanavian dream. --ShabiDOO 04:59, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Yes. We're going to drop down to 1 vote and ban you plebs from voting altogether -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:27, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
I approve of this greatly. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 05:29, January 2, 2012 (UTC)


normal_monkey_cowboy.jpg

This image is relevant to this discussion. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:36, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
The blurs could be better. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 05:42, 2 January 2012

OH MY GOD THEN ITS OFFICIAL

Oh wow ... democratic principles reign and the admins have decided to make further votes fair and with equality. THANKS SO MUCH ADMINS ... THIS AWARD WILL DO WONDERS for destroying the myth of the cabal ... which we all know doesnt exist ... except those places where it does exist ;) --ShabiDOO 07:06, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

I see no agreement nor lawyers. What is this??? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 07:07, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
My beloved Frosty...don't you get it...making random and improvised decisions seem totally logical and the only solution is the job of Admins :) So...bascially I've just done what they have taught me to do :) LET FREEDOM AND ENDIVE SALADS REIGN!!!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 07:14, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Basically, Shab. Basically. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 10:16 6 January 2012
  • Against... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • Against What's with this obsession with being an Admin? It worked a lot better when it was admins choosing admins. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:18, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
    Matt...the last thing in the world I want is to be an admin. Its revolting watching the admins pick the admin without users participating. It makes me gag. --ShabiDOO 16:05, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I'm not sure what the big deal is. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:27, 6 January 2012
  • UnAbstain I don't even know what the page is about. Like the chimps though. Aleister 16:53 6-1-'12
  • The big deal socky is...when the community as a whole chooses a user who will have the power to block us, delete our articles and make arbitrary decisions...it would make a lot more sense that the entire userbase would fully participate in that decision. As of now...users can only nominate them and then send a couple users to the final round and watch a group of admins decide who they will invite to share their control with. Its a very stinky process. If it isnt a big deal socky, then theres no particular reason to keep the whole admins make the final decision nonsense anyways. --ShabiDOO 03:26, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
    It's just a safeguard that obviously doesn't work anyway given that a useless user like myself got through it. But why does it matter since ultimately admins and users have always agreed on who gets opped? --Black Flamingo 13:57, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
    This is the second time someone has said why does it matter. Indeed...I say...why on earth should we keep this rule at all if it doesnt matter to everyone. The only other place this happens is on wikipedia...and I thoguht we were parodying them...not copying them. That being said...Im not sure where you get this idea as to how users and admins agreed on anything as the admins have 2 votes in the first round and the only votes in the second round. Its impossible to corralate the voters intentions. --ShabiDOO 17:23, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote Abstain. Because I have no idea what we're voting for. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 05:23, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

We aren't voting for anything. We are celebrating the most amazing thing in the history of forever. A group of people voluntarily sharing their own power! HURRAH!!! --ShabiDOO 07:11, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

  • For The most amazing thing in the history of forever. -- 2K12_DAN.VRS Bacteriophage 23:31, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects