Forum:A poll: Uncyclopedian religio-spiritual slants
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Whilst we are ignoring the general rule to NEVER speak about politics, should we move on to the next obvious no-no....RELIGION. I'm sure people can find other examples online, but I've just filled out the following test.
- Mhaille: Neo-Pagan (100%)
- Braydie: Theravada Buddhism (100%)
- Sikon: Secular Humanism (100%)
- Nonymous: Scientology (100%) Not really.
- Mr. Briggs Inc.: Orthodox Quaker (???) I was thinking Manostology.
- Modusoperandi: Unitarian Universalism (100%)...w00t! The quasi-christian sect where they never mention god. Still, I'll stick with secular humanism (94%), although I'm pretty sure it's not a religion...
- Hardwick Fundlebuggy (97%) "non"-theist. Basically your average radical atheist. They squeezed in that 3% on me through loaded questions. Jeez - they'll get you any way they can - grab you off the street before your cold. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 20:00, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nintendorulez (BENSON%) BENSONist. --User:Nintendorulez 21:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Jamtrousers: Secular Humanism (100%), which seems about right, although apparently I'm 83% quaker, which I'm not so sure about. --Sir Jam 00:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- NeedABrain: Non-theist (100%).
- Crazyswordsman: BENSONIST (100%)
- Cainad: Liberal Quaker (100%) Excellent, I love oatmeal. Finding out that I'm only 43% Sikh was kind of a bummer though.
- David Gerard: Family tradition thirtieth-level Dawkinsian hedge atheist. Not only am I entitled to my opinion, EVERYONE ELSE IS TOO.
- Elvis Secular Humanism - as expected
- Codeine: Unitarian Universalism 100% (whatever the merry fuck that's supposed to be)
- ENeGMA: Secular Humanism (100%) We're all a bunch of god-damned heathens. I also got 97% self-worship, if that counts for anything.--Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Composure1: Unitarian Universalism came out as 100%. Interestingly "Roman Catholicism" was at the bottom of the list for me, despite the fact I was raised in that religion. --Composure1 16:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- flyingfeline: Unitarian Universalism. United and, erm, universal, wahey. -- 19:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Berogen: Talking Chicken (100%). How I'm typing this, I don't know, but what I do know is,
milletthe internet is never wrong. BerogenVFH 00:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Insineratehymn: Secular Humanism (100%) -- 01:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Algorithm: They put me under Unitarian Universalism, even though I'm an agnostic humanist who believes in quantum immortality. Hmph. --Algorithm 01:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Mowgli: Hinduism (100%) -- and i thought my beliefs were a mixture of mostly Sikhism (scored 56%) and a bit Mahanaya Buddhism (scored 75%). -- mowgli 06:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Rataube. Secular humanism (100%). Please don't tell my rabbi.
- Oy vey! Liberal Christian Protestant?!?! My rabbi will gun me down! 18:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- I too, am a secular humanist. 19:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Bradaphraser. Baha'i (which I'd never heard of before Today). Luckily, I just like to be different.-- 23:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm particularly proud of being farthest from Scientology. ;)-- 00:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- --Scott 03:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)BENSON(100%)
- -BENSON WHAT?! BENSON IS NOT A REFORM-JEW(100%)! BENSON IS BENSON! THIS TEST IS FAULTY!!! ALL RESULTS ARE REJECTED BY BENSON'S ONE TRUE FAITH: BENSON Benson 06:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Squiggle - Secular Humanism (100%). -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Did anyone think that they were a Conservative Protestant, but turn out to be Pastafarian? Granted, the Unitarian Universalist thing caught a bunch of people off guard, but that hardly counts.--19:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't expect to be the only Quaker, that's for sure. Unitarian Universalist came second, which didn't suprise me at all. -- 00:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Brother! Mr. Briggs Inc. 19:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?