Forum:A poll: Uncyclopedian political slants (2)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > A poll: Uncyclopedian political slants (2)
Note: This topic has been unedited for 1551 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Forum:A poll: Uncyclopedian political slants has been unedited for roughly 250 days. There will have been alot of changes since then, so I'm wondering again where all yew uncyclopedians stand politically?

For this I direct yew to, and hope ywl take the test. I'd love to know how uncyc has changed in nearly a year. I'm also going to add this poll to see the general trend.

Which "quarter" do YEW stand in in the Political Compass?

The poll was created at 15:00 on December 11, 2007, and so far 65 people voted.

Just a note, "Authoritarian" and "Libertarian" are both two extremes that will not define ywr political stance, it just tells yew which "extremity" as such ywr leaning more towards.

Under this headline, yew can, if yew want to, stick ywr exact place on the axis (e.g. Economic Left/Right: -9.85 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.05 [that example stolen from a random user on the original page so as to not be biased])



Sorted by Social Libertarian/Authoritarian rating, from Rebel, potentially with a cause of some sort at top, to "Please Mistress, may I have another?" at bottom (you know who you are)

  • Premier Tom Mayfair Economic Left/Right: -9.85 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.05
  • Rcmurphy: Economic Left/Right: -4.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.26
  • Contestant: Economic Left/Right: -6.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.64
  • Codeine: Economic Left/Right: -8.50 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
  • RAHB: Economic Left/Right: -2.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.56
  • Electrified mocha chinchilla: Economic Left/Right: -4.12, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.46
    • last time: Economic Left/Right: -6.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.67
  • Fag: Economic Left/Right: -5.12 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.31
  • Radioactive afikomen: Economic Left/Right: -7.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15
    • retook the test: Economic Left/Right: -8.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.74 (I answered the 2nd time from my idealistic side)
  • Zombiebaron: Economic Left/Right: -4.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95
  • sannse Economic Left/Right: -3.50 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74
    • last time I was: Economic Left/Right: -5.13, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.79 OMG! I'm going all facist!!!1
  • Modusoperandi: Economic Left/Right: -6.62 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.64
  • pieface: Economic Left/Right: -1.38, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.44
  • Under user Economic Left/Right: -5.00, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.38
  • Mordillo: Economic Left/Right:-5.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian:-4.41
  • Orion Blastar: Economic Left/Right: -7.38, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.95
  • One-eyed Jack Economic Left/Right: -4.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64.
  • Uncyclopedian Economic Left/Right: -4.38, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.59
  • Savethemooses: Economic Left/Right: -3.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.13
  • Starnestommy: Economic Left/Right: -4.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.77
  • TheLedBalloon: Economic Left/Right: 0.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.77
  • MrN9000 Economic Left/Right: -3.62 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.46
  • Boomer: Economic Left/Right: -3.38, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.59
  • Bradaphraser: Economic Left/Right: -4.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.31
    • last time: Economic Left/Right: -2.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.26
  • Kip the Dip Economic Left/Right: -2.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.15
  • Jim Groovester: Economic Left/Right: -2.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.10
  • Leoispotter:Ecomomic Left/Right: 0.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.05
  • Thekillerfroggy: Economic Left/Right: -0.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.10
  • 333pet: Economic Left/Right: 1.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.10 (It appears I'm the most right-wing person on the page. TheLedBalloon, Leoispotter, and I should form a gang. --PET Darth_Maul.gif 02:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC))
    • I will only form a gang if we can exclude gays, pro-choice people, and those who believe in evolution. I don't like them, you know, conservative fellow that I am. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:44, Dec 20
      • Yes, of course, no fags, pro-death people, or god-hating evolutionists allowed. Your fellow conservative, --PET Darth_Maul.gif 02:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Capercorn: Economic Left/Right: 1.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.95 (I beat you 333pet) --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 04:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Curse You! At least I'm still tied for 1st in the economic right category. Anyways, welcome to the right-wing gang fellow conservative. --PET Darth_Maul.gif 18:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
      • If I recall correctly, Capercorn has a userpage at Conservapedia, so not being conservative would make him a hypocrite. Of course, I can't personally imagine going there and being serious; I'd be unable to type from laughter. Laughter at their INCURABLE LIBERAL BIAS! Honestly, removing content because of "racism"??? Everyone knows that we must show the non-whites their place! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:13, Dec 21
        • Well to be honest, I mostly go to Conservapedia to flame the Young-Earth Creationists (Theistic Evolution / Social Darwinism all 'da way! heelz ye4h). --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
          • I tried to go there once, but apparently "AllScienceIsWrong" is a "bad username" worthy of a 5-year ban. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:33, Dec 22
          • "Social darwinism"? <lengthy pause> Um, that's generally a term that assholes use to justify treating people like shit. It's, essentially, the opposite of what that Jesus fellow taught. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
            • Yes....I totally know what you' guys are talking about...yes.... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:58, Dec 22
            • Fine, I'll go to *sigh* wikipedia. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:58, Dec 22
            • Oh, I see, it's that thing that Nazis say makes the holocaust ok. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:02, Dec 22
            • The Social Darwinism thing was a joke, except in the buisness world (Bad business fails, good buisness survives). --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 04:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
              • ...And then we put all the "bad" businesses on trains, corralling them into separate camps so they don't taint the purity of our "master business"? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:48, Dec 23
                • This is all perfectly okay, as long as "businesses" is not a euphemism for "Jews". If it isn't, then, could be fun. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 09:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
              • Oh. My bad. If you're going to parody a stereotype, you have to go all the way. You're a six day/6k creationist and feel that Conservapedia is too liberal. Then add a passage or two from Leviticus and a Pauline one that prove your position to be the only correct one...and for God's sake, don't get caught doing meth with a homosexual prostitute or choke to death on a ballgag while wearing two wetsuits with a dildo inserted back there. Or do, everyone else seems to. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
                • Dam, it's getting difficult to find a forum these days which has not already degenerated into a series of rather poor sexually related pseudo homosexual puns. /me slaps Modusoperandi on the bum, I mean pun MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 18:16, Dec 23

Insert personal insults here

  • God Fag, you're a true bleeding heart liberal aren't you?? ~Jewriken.GIF 15:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Meh, I'm actually confused about left/right liberal/not now. I'm a very liberal person... yet APPARENTLY the belief in PERSONAL freedom is not? O.o User:Fag/sig
I'm a true green! Let the fags mary and leave the women alone about all their personal choices, end war, and go save the planet or at least Savethemooses! --BlueflatcapsigMajor'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 15:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, what if I don't want to marry? ^^ lol. Yeah, I do believe generally leftist things, other than the whole idea of state regulation. That's not liberal at all, that's, at least defined by the compass, "left authoritarian" :P whereas I'm "left libertarian". Hmmm, is the whole thing gonna be generally the same (i.e. everyone's roughly in the left libertarian area?) If it is I'd be happy really, 'cos people having the same beliefs as me generally restores my faith slightly in humanity :p User:Fag/sig
"PERSONAL [sic] freedom" is a traditionaly Libertarian belief, as far as my understanding goes. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, i get that. it's just that libertarianism is traditionally associated with being right-wing, which makes no real sense to me... User:Fag/sig
Libertarianism is right-wing economics (pro-free market) combined with left-wing social policy (pro-personal freedom). I personally found the explanation on the site to be unnecessarily confusing, and found our version much simpler. User:Wehpudicabok/sig2 02:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, I don't give a shit about free market, so where does that leave me standing =P


Your not standing anywhere Fag. Your still walking on 4 legs and swinging from the trees with the other primates. Yew needs sum stuff to make people evolve yews knows.... ;) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 12:45, Dec 13
  • Where does anarchist fit? Is it allowed by the authoritarians? Is it tolerated by the libertarians? Pieface 15:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Anarchism is by definition anti-authoritarian, and could be considered an extreme version of libertarianism :) User:Fag/sig
I thought anarchists where people who try to force communism onto others by blowing things up? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 12:52, Dec 12
Correct, minus the Communism part :) --Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 06:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I would be interested to know why you think that Hans Johnson... For me, you don't have any government in communism, the state naturally withers away as it becomes not needed. This has not happened so far in the places which have claimed to be communist. If it did, the end result would be the same as what the anarchists want. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 12:41, Dec 13
Being facetious, MrN9000. That's why I put the smiley face. It was intended as a humorous reference to the spate of anarchist terrorist bombings in the twenties. By the way, that's very utopian of you. If everyone believed that, it might actually work. Unfortunately, politicking seems to be inherent to humanity (witness Wikipedia, where in the absence of politics, people invented some), which means the idea of a peaceful anarchy would never come to fruition, kind of like world peace. Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 20:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Well let's just hope Mr Gene Roddenberry comes back from the dead and invents the replicator sometime soon before we nuke ourselves. Sorry I misinturpreted your comment. I'm always doing that around here! MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 23:15, Dec 13
  • Hmm. I've made a tiny shift to the right, authoritarianwise. Y'know, the Republican platform has some good...(/me gets drunk, curls up into ball in corner) Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • It seems I've made a +2 leap towards authoritarianism. Other than that, its basically the same. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • And I've made a +5 leap towards the "this test is still very flawed, not to mention obviously biased" point. Spang talk 20:00, 11 Dec 2007
    Spang: Spang Left/Right: -7.88 Social Spangarian/Spangitarian: -7.95. No, you're biased. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Sides with Spang. You can't test this sort of thing like this. You have more chance of getting an accurate assessment of intelligence from an IQ test (which you can't). Even though they make these things to try and catch us lying buggers out, they always fail. If you want to know if your racist, try reading The Colour Problem and see how you feel about it... (OK, that was a whore).  :) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 12:52, Dec 12
Haha =P yew got basically the same as my friend Jon (ywl know him as HelloolleH from ?pedia) User:Fag/sig
And apparently I'm the Dalai Lama =P User:Fag/sig
  • I went from Economic Left/Right: -6.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.67 to Economic Left/Right: -4.12, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.46. That's cute. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Cute as a bug's ear :) Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 20:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I think the way the questions are asked naturally leads to leftist, libertarian answers. Like this question: "It's a sad reflection on our society that something as basic as drinking water is now a bottled, branded consumer product." With a question phrased like that, how could I not agree? I'm with Spang on the test being biased and flawed. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 09:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Actually, I think it's brilliant that somebody figured out a way to sell water, something everyone in the 1st World has, and still make a profit. But, there are a lot of 3rd World countries with no clean water, where bottled water probably makes a lot more sense. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:55, Dec 12
    • Speaking of biased questions... "It is regrettable that many personal fortunes are made by people who simply manipulate money and contribute nothing to their society." and "People with serious inheritable disabilities should not be allowed to reproduce." Isn't a political quiz supposed to have questions that people could realistically pick either side on?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 21:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Also, I stumbled on "If you want my body, and you think I'm sexy...come on, baby, let me know." which is neither a question (despite the "if" at the start), nor is it on the quiz. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I didn't understand a lot of the questions. Also, I accidently voted on the wrong poll option. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 10:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • All polls are biased, for a given value of 'biased'. And some questions I nearly answered in a more righty authoritarian fashion because of the wording, until I thought about them more. But yeah, it's hardly accurate. Still kinda interesting though. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • None of you are as leftie as me. You fascists! RabbiTechno 20:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Oh, dear. I'm a right wing nutjob, aren't I?-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Dost my eyes deceive me, or is Codeine (-8.5) the only one further left than me (-7.62)? Orion Blastar (-7.38) is pretty close though. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 06:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Meh. I much prefer the Moral Politics version, which probes the reasoning behind your stances on issues. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 06:33, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
According to that moral thingy of yours, I'm, apparantly, a "Moderate Socialist", and am, apparantly, "93.01% like Jimmy Carter". It also says that I'd have voted for some "Ralph Nader" chap. And here I always thought I was more of a Lester B. Pearson. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
You should be proud of being like Jimmy Carter and Ralph Nader, even if they are both total losers. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 19:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Good quote for the Moderate Socialist article should we ever write one. I think personally that such an article would be comedy gold. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 19:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

This poll is too fucking stupid. Like there're only four ideologies. Fucktard. The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs)

Yeah, for starters there's the ideology that disbelieves in questionnaires and calls people fucktards a lot. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Fucktards would be a good name for a candy. Wouldn't you love to tear open a packet of Fucktards? Yum. But I digress. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Did anyone else get a question that said, "It is morally valid to shove bananas up your nose" with the choices "Very stupid", "Macaroni", "Less Soy Sauce", and "Albatross!"? I mean, what the hell does a poll like this end up meaning? Nothing. NOTHING. ----OEJ 22:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
  • How could you, Leoispotter! You were always such a nice guy. What happened? What turned you down the path of darkness, to make you the only one with both variables positive? You, you... right-wing authoritarian! */me goes to sob quietly in the corner of bar* We've been betrayed by one of our own! </hysteria> --CUN RA Talk to me _ 22:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Who wants to bet Famine is a right authoritarian?

I know I do! --CUN RA Talk to me _ 06:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

From last time: Famine Economic Left/Right: -5.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.36 (I am ashamed. Very ashamed.). He was ashamed, apparently. Very ashamed. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
So, how much do you owe me? Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia is...

Full of Commie Libertarian bastards. Disregarding the test's apparent bias, I think it speaks volumes about out us and the age group(s) we appeal to. Most of our user base consists of teenagers and young adults. Or, perhaps, it is simply the means of which we communicate? For example, who uses the internet the most?: teenagers and young adults. And look at all the support for Ron Paul (a Libertarian) on the internet. It's crazy. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Vote for Ron Paul, the Ralph Nader* of Republicans! </sarcasm>
* And by Ralph Nader I mean "guy with no hope of winning, but will siphon votes away from other candidates, making whoever should've won lose." --CUN RA Talk to me _ 02:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
/me has a persevering feeling that it won't be a republican in the US's '08 election...unless the Republican is Huckabee. He was on the Colbert Repore, and is therefore amazing. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:54, Dec 15
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!1!1!!! Ron Paul will save our freedom! Ron Paul will save us like Jesus Christ! </sarcasm>
Brought to you by neo-Nazis and 9/11 conspiracy theorists for Ron Paul. Ron Paul, the only candidate with 5,000 shills spamming internet polls and Digg. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 10:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I think Ron Paul is the new Ross Perot, only 300% more crazy, 200% more nutty, and 200% less charts and graphs. Instead of stealing votes from the Republicans, as Perot did, Paul should be able to steal votes from the Democrats and help his neocon buddies take control of the White House in 2008. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Kinda ironic that if we are all so in favour of personal freedom, where big brother is not watching that we actually quite enjoy playing in an area where all our actions are recorded, the ruling class is a dictatorship and there is no such thing as personal privacy. Maybe what libertarians really want is fascism, they just don't want to admit it? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 15:51, Dec 15
Well, remember that here you are not just a number, Citizen #9000. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
While we're at it, a glaring issue has been brought to a head by the proximity of your signatures. Both of you are highly unoriginal in your choice of purple bold. Modusoperandi! How dare you steal from MrN9000! --CUN RA Talk to me _ 16:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
How so? MrMo 9000 Icons-flag-caSir|GUN]]HalIcon.png 17:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, well, limits give art its form; the form of art challenges limits. That eternal tension is not only necessary to art, it is art. (Please note: the preceding is gibberish. The eternal tension is actually between the desire for beer versus the desire to seek the company of coneys.) ----OEJ 17:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
It does appear to all come down to the acquisition of the afore mentioned coneys, I'm convinced the whole Hippy thing was really just a clever way of getting the girls to take their skirts of... Dam, how come I missed the 60's! grr. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 20:45, Dec 15
Actually the whole Hippy movement was an excuse to get girls to take off their skirts and bras and trick them into sex via "free love", use drugs, bring about anarchy, dress up like clowns with long hair, and most Hippies became Yuppies with MBAs in the 1980's and run our country now as the Neocons. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 17:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
That's because, at heart, all of us find facism kinky. The forbidden fruit. Kinda like that one refrence that I could make to recent US politics, but I forget his name, and I'm too lazy to look it up. You know what I mean? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh you kinky dominatrix Zombie... Shall I do some statistical comparison between where admins are on the list, and how they wield the ban stick? Naa, better not, I might get banned... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 19:29, Dec 15
You'd probably find nothing of intrest anyway. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Except that while they profess a libertardian bent, vis-a-vis their political compass coordinates, they are intolerant when people exercise their freedom of speech. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 22:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Ballgags. Yeah, you heard me. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
/me gags on ZB's balls. But that's another story. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:38, Dec 16
Uhh... User:Uncyclopedian/sig
You heard me. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:24, Dec 21
So Uncyclopedia, including me, is communist. DON'T LET TOM LOOK AT THIS!!! User:Uncyclopedian/sig


What in the hell is going on here, exactly? I swear, I am going to Fucking Kill politics.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   Throwing a wrench into the well-oiled machine, once again  

You've just been indicted on one count of over-large font abuse. I'll see you in court, dear sir or madam. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 04:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
*makes the font larger and more annoying* I'll see you in the mud wrastlin ring!. On a more serious note, politics suck. I want them all to go away and die somewhere. Seriously.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   04:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)  

Is it just me

Or did the poll magically disappear?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 04:30 Dec 20, 2007

It's just you. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Ooh, ooh, me! I want some, too! */me has no idea what they're talking about* --CUN RA Talk to me _ 08:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
(still can't find the poll)  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 20:50 Dec 21, 2007
(that's what she said) Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
You could try switching browsers. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 22:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Did you shake the screen? I've got an Etch-a-sketch brand monitor, and if I shake the screen, I have to start all over again. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Is it just me, or is it hot in here? *Looks suggestively over at Modus*

I may even go so far as to say that it's stifling. Gee, it's so hot, I feel like taking off my clothes (nudge, nudge, wink, wink). --CUN RA Talk to me _ 08:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Eww. I'm no prude, but there's no reason to bring that out at the dinner table. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry. Despite the suggestive statements above, I am actually quite the prude. You can pretty much count on me to chicken out before anything even gets started. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 09:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Your words would carry more weight if you weren't cradling my balls right now. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
That isn't me. That's... uh, my twin brother. My evil twin brother. I can't be sure. Does he have blonde hair and green eyes? 'Cause that's him. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 11:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd continue this, but I took it in a direction I now regret (as though this forum couldn't get any more off topic). Plus, your hands are cold. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
That's really weird... I have blonde hair and green eyes. User:Fag/sig
And a purdy mouth. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Dammit! I ruined my own joke. That last sentence "'Cause that's him" was never supposed to be there. Then you were supposed to say, "Yes", to which I'd respond, "Ha! It can't be me, because I have green hair and blonde eyes!" Curse you for killing my joke setup! --CUN RA Talk to me _ 19:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Am I supposed to put "fail" here? It just feels like it belongs somehow. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools