Featured Article Candidates

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 21:46, April 26, 2011 by Fnoodle (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cscr-candidate
Here, we determine which articles are to be featured on Wikipedia. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, should maintain utmost literary care, and should, above all, enlighten readers. Please see "What is a featured article?" for featured article criteria.

If you nominate an article, you will be expected to make a good-faith effort to address objections that are raised. Laziness will not be tolerated. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination, so we can promptly delete it, and ban you from the website. Please do not place more than one nomination at a time — this makes it difficult to do each article and its objections justice. Users who nominate more than one article will have their ISP called and their internet service terminated. You may nominate your articles here at Featured Article Candidates, but nobody will vote for them, so why bother?

Consensus must be reached for an article to be featured, or a power hungry admin has to change the front page on his own. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates list and your article will be deleted.

Purge page cache

Featured content:

Featured article tools:

Nomination procedure

  1. Check the featured article criteria and make sure the article meets all of them before nominating. Be careful; failure to do so may result in a permanent ban from this Wiki!
  2. Place {{fac}} on the talk page of the nominated article.
  3. From there, click on the "leave comments" link.
  4. If you are resubmitting an article, use the Move button to archive the previous discussion. For example, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/TelevisionWikipedia:Featured article candidates/Television/archive1
  5. Place ===[[name of nominated article]]=== at the top.
  6. Include name, date, Social Security number, mother's maiden name, name of first born child and your credit card number.
  7. Below it, write your reason for nominating the article. Bad reasons will result in a permanent ban from all MediaWiki websites.
  8. Copy this text:{{Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/name of nominated article}}, then edit this page, pasting the template at the top. Replace "name of..." with the name of your nomination.

Supporting and objecting

Please read nominated articles fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination, so other users don't have to.

  • To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link). Clicking the incorrect 'edit' button could cause your computer's CPU to melt; you were warned.
  • If you believe an article meets all of the criteria, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons.
  • If you oppose a nomination, write '''Object''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed in addition to random, vitriolic abuse. Failure to abuse a nominated article at least one (1) time a month will result in the termination of your Wikipedia account. If nothing can be done in principle to "fix" the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored. If you don't feel like addressing an objection, you may ignore that as well. This includes objections to an article's suitability for the Wikipedia Main Page, unless such suitability can be fixed (featured articles, despite being featured, may be marked so as not to be showcased on the Main Page).
    • To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

edit Featured Article Candidates

Score: +4 failed nominations
  • N+F. Especially liked the Romania part. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. etc etc ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh God, which page am I looking at? My eyes are crossed. And I laughed. Support, in the alternate universe lingo--Shandon 18:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NotM|+S 19:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 19:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Self-Interested Forgive me. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Why on earth wouldn't you vote for this? Support with every ounce of voting power I can muster. Wehpudicabok 00:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I would rather feature VFH itself, but it was alredy voted down too many times. Once featured it'll be a great link for Featured Articles.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong support --Sbluen 08:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Another formatting challenge for Moneysign (if this makes it).--Procopius 22:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 07:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Nice one. And love the tatt pic. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 11:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I think it's funny, and what i think is fact! To me at least! --ZniLe 11:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. --12.34.567.8 20:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For! --Thetoastman 04:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong against. Most inside jokes are signified by their blatantly low quality, and this one is definitely no exception. I don't know how long I still have to put up with VFH articles that no one in the world understands (except a few people), but I think it's about time to put an end to this kind of nonsense. -- The Colonel (talk) 04:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. As per Col.Swordman, except the bit about nonsense. I like nonsense, just not on the mainpage. Modusoperandi 04:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. It's funny but I don't think it's good for the front page. Plus it's lacking in continuity: some nominations have scores, some have nomination reasons, some don't. There were also some other things. Oh yes, there were other things. La la la. I'm going to stop typing now.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 06:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Hopefully it isn't catching...do i need to see a doctor? --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 20:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Denied--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 21:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against-This is just stupid.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 13:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support.-With undisclosed reason.--Wit (tawk) 16:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • STRONG NEG-A-TIVE. If the Block Log can't get featured, this doesn't stand a chance. Besides, the operative word in the compound term "Featured Article" is "article." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
    "Article"? Are you pushing for the to get featured again? --Falcotron 09:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • WTF? what kind of horseshit trash gets into VFH is beyond me. I mean come on people these are supposed to be featured, you know the best that uncyclopedia can spew out...not Grue-vomit. A joke VFH page as a candidate, come on quit wasting my time...you effing posers...other than that it's funny as hell...so For. --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 20:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I was about to lambast you and use your small intestine as a jump rope, but now I think I want to have your children instead. --UtarEmpire 15:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


edit Fisher Price

Score: +1
  • Nomination go eat shit fuckers 12.34.567.8 18:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. What? This must be a joke. And I've just listed the article for deletion. Nonsense. ~ Just some random person, like
  • No! Don't delete! I did not create the article! I have literatic skillz! Feature! 101.123.32.92
  • For A profound psychological and sociological concept. Must be featured immediately. - Bananaman
  • No this article needs more cowbell -- Ed
Please use conventional voting terminology. ~ Rool Enforcer >:-(
Buh? -- The previous unsigned comment was left by a complete idiot User:Ed on 19:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Forum:BENSON IS HERE

Score: +3
  • Nomination and Support because Benson is better than you! Benson 18:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support This is the funniest thing I ever saw here --Hrodulf 15:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support LOL,man. --ThegrætsockpuppetofBobBoozerDriveinOmaha 22:25, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Against. Sorry if I'm missing something here, but articles from the forum cannot be featured, as clearly stated by WP:SUCK and WP:FART. Aside from this, totally non-notable person and vanity, fancruft and Complete Bollocks rolled into one. ~ Some Random Bloke Talk
  • Comment Who cares? It's funny! --Hrodulf 21:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • STRONG FOR ANYTHING BENSON. BECAUSE BENSON IS BETTER THAN ME. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

edit euroipods

I think this article would be really good on the Wikipedia front page because euroipods saved my life. Thank you euroipods! IF YOU SUPPORT THIS ARTICLE YOU GET A FREE IPOD! User: www.euroipods.com

Score: euroipods
  • Comment Dude. This isn't even a real article, it's just a bunch of random letters. I'll have you know that Wikipedia has exacting quality standards. Wikipedia4Life
  • SUPPORT EURIPODZ CHANGED MY LIFE TOO THANKS YOUROIPODS AND REMEMBER ALL YOU NEED IS A) MONEY and B) TELLING YOUR FREINDZ TO DO THE SAME THATS WWW.EURIPODS.COM 4 FREE IPODS AND DRUGS AND PENIS ENLARGEMENT PILLS AND V14GRA User: www.euroipods.com
  • Object You did not properly cite your sources in MLA fashion, there were numerous opinions mixed in with the 'facts' and the article itself was of low quality. In fact, you seem to have been high on paint when you nominated this terrible article. Austerian
  • Against This is like a micro-stub of a stub of an article I stubbed my dick on. No way. Stubby
  • Object This seems to be advertising of some sort. BASKETBALLISGOOD
  • Support I want a free iPod! iPodsisGods

God Hates Euroipods

  • Comment No pictures in Featured Articles since the 'incident' involving the horse porn that was placed in the votes for George Bush. Thanks in advance, your loving Wikipedia admin. WikipediaIsLovely 44:44 15th September, 2000

God Hates Euroipods

  • Hello Since it seems you missed my first advisory notice, I thought I'd kindly post again. But not to sound like I' "Coming down on you". I hate "The man" as well. Thanks! WikipediaIsLovely 55:44 15th September, 2000

God Hates Euroipods

  • Careful Further abuse of the Wikipedia voting system will require e-mail notification to Jimbo Wales. I don't think either of us wants that. Thanks! WikipediaIsLovely 66:44 15th September, 2000

edit Goa Tse

Score: +1

My friend sent me a link to this, and I found it very 'surprising'. Worth taking a look at it, just don't fall in. The Open One

  • Oppose I very much doubt the historical accuracy of this article. Its sources are not properly attributed, and I could not find this persons name in any of my books on Chinese philosophy. I don't think it accurately portrays Eastern philosophy at all, and I seemed to notice some sexual undertones that, to be honest, both disturbed and intrigued me. I decided to Google this 'philosopher' and discovered that his philosophy is nothing more than a disgusting joke. CulturesRGreat
  • OPPPOSE! WHERE DID YOU PEOPLE COME FROM!? WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO WIKIPEDIA!??! THERE HAS TO BE A LAW AGAINST THIS SORT OF THING! White Eyes!
  • Support Very infomrative. Hadn't heard of this guy before, but I'll definitely check out his philosophy now. Thanks for the great article! DeepThink9 514:2, -4 June 20043 (UTC)
  • Oppose This article is not anatomically correct. Dr. Dipshit
  • Support Goa Tse is really, deep, deep, deep, down, about the children. Intarweb God 22:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Beauty is in the 'eye' of the be-hole-der! ownsurASS 57:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose I think I can see his stomache! Terrible! Gromit 57:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Talk:Euroipods

It's a very intellectual discussion, but simple enough that it would work on the main page.

Score: euroipods
  • Oppose No nominating talk pages. This is the Featured Article section, not a section where you can exhort your discussions with your moronics 'friends' (read: garbage collectors.) Will Beback 18:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • YOURIPODS YOURIPODS IS GOD! YOURIPODS 18:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose QUIT BEING STUPID, WIKIPEDIA! THIS ISNST EVEN LAK AN ARTICL Evidently a user 18:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Down with the Cabal! Free Nintednorulez! Not Nintendorulez 14:26, 32 June 2004 (UTC)
  • I Agree with that other guy! This article sucks! Still Not Nintendorulez 19:66, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose This is a talk page, of an article that deserves to be deleted. I'm trying to be civil here, but I think everyone who supports this article is ignorant ape. There, I said it. My psychiatrist will just have to put me back on my meds, because I will not deal with this anymore! Peaceful_Soul 7:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Amen What that guy said! NotNintendoRulez 11:66, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose I don't get it... Is there, like, an article there? 'Cuz it just looks like a talk page... User: Nintendorulez 14:26, 32 June 2004 (UTC)
The joke is that there isn't an article, just a talk page. User: Flammable 14:26, 32 June 2004 (UTC)
I don't get it... That's just like one joke, and it's not very funny... User: Nintendorulez 14:26, 32 June 2004 (UTC)
What's there not to get? That's the joke. Someone posted this as a joke. User: Flammable 14:26, 32 June 2004 (UTC)
How's it a joke? It's not funny. User: Nintendorulez 14:26, 32 June 2004 (UTC)

edit Main Page

Dude, this article will totally fuck with your heads. Vote for it! Un-Cyc-Lo-Peed-is-da-Weed 15:14 5 March 1300

Score: +1,000,000
Has someone been tampering with the vote tally? ElectionErection
No. fuckedwithurvotes


  • Oppose! What is this? Some sort of joke? This is a page for highlighting good articles not for posting lame joke pages like the Main Page of some shitty Wiki. It wasn't funny the first time, or the 15th, and it sure as hell isn't funny now. Malcontent 15:14 5 March 2006
  • SAPORT UNCYLOPEEDZ 4 LYFE NUKKAZ RCMurphy
  • Oppose Ever since those guys from Urinecyclopedia or whatever it's called showed up, Wikipedia just hasn't been the same. Cherechonsky
  • Oppose Some joker posts this on here every few weeks, and gets voted down every time, yet it keeps coming back. Some people. AboveTheRest

15:14 5 March 2006

  • Oppose It reads too much like a list, and it makes the mistake of using biased sources. I don't think it's ready for prime-time. crazysexygrrl 15:14 5 March 2006
  • Support A lot of very fine people put in a lot of work on this page, and I think we should thank them for it; thanks guys! Happenin-Hal 15:14 5 March 2006
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA

edit AAAAAAAAA!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! AAAAAAAAA!

Score: -AAAAAAA
  • Oppose You. Cannot. Be. Serious. Stop nominating these horrendous 'articles'! Kilistine 21:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • Comment I don't get; is it in a language that my browser does not have the typeface for? Is that why it's all one character? Inquisitive Inquisitor 21:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • Support We've needed an article on the letter 'A' for quite some time. The alphabet list was incomplete. Deltron 21:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • BBBBBBBBB! BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB! BBBBBBBBB! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • BBBBBBBBB! BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB! BBBBBBBBB! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • BBBBBBBBB! BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB! BBBBBBBBB! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • I Give Up I can't deal with this anymore. BadmintheAdmin 21:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • .nettirw llew yreV .troppuS

BoB 81:18, 4 JunuJ 2002 (UTCTU)

WTF Are you smoking crack? The articles is one letter! It's totally incomprehensible! Am I the only sane person left !??!?! BadmintheAdmin
AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
There is no God BadmintheAdmin 21:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
AAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! AA:AA, A AAAA AAA (AAA)
  • Super Duper strong support possibly the greatest article of all time. SOADLuver 00:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

edit Flying Spaghetti Monster

Score: +1
  • Nom, Support so that all may be touched by his Noodly Appendage. --Pastamancer 18:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. The Flying Spaghetti Monster is dead. --Zarathustra 03:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. This is exactly the deity I've always been worshipping. ~~Voltaire 03:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. What a coincidence! Me too! ~~Pat Robertson 03:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Blasphemous!. How dare you challenge my worldview!? I'll have you know that I am contacting my God about this! I will have this slander removed from the internet! Behe 06:6, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Dude! This rocks! Kansas 03:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Eh. Seems pretty mediocre to me... God 03:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


edit Finding Your Inner Sock Puppet

  • Sockpuppets are the new green! Normal Person 18:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Score: 0
  • What is this shite? Against. -- User:YouKnowWho
  • Funniest Article Ever, I am so For this, my sides have actually split. -- User:ButDoYou? 12:19 41 May 2006
Not as funny as the time I porked your mom! Bam, score one for UNCYC MAHFUCKAHS! UncycOWNSYOURMOM
  • Oppose How about we find our inner talent and come back with something that doesn't suck? ObeytheRay 3:19 33 May 2006
  • Support My uncle always used to do sockpuppets. I liked them until he started using that extra sockpuppet on his '3rd hand'. It just weird then... Daisy Sunshine 32:19 61 May 2006
  • This article actually makes a lot of sense and heck, might just be WP:V, as well as actually not violating WP:NOR. It's a good article, with some good insight. Therefore clearly unsuitable for a featured article at THIS hellhole. Transwiki to Wikipedia. Oppose Some Loser 32:19 61 May 2006
TRANSWIKIE!?? MORE LIKE TRANSEXUAL!!!! M I RIGHT? M I RIGHT? 2 13:37 4 U M. I. Wright 32:19 61 May 2006

edit Romania

Score: +rv
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 86.34.243.19 to last version by 83.103.150.233) --Splaka 08:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 86.120.166.109 to last version by Ovidiu uc) --Codeine 09:51, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 86.104.216.14 to last version by 85.27.56.217) --Rcmurphy 15:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 89.33.64.47 to last version by Gspbeetle) 12:09, --Codeine 17 April 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 193.226.105.45 to last version by 204.101.186.130) --Mhaille 11:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 87.65.200.254 to last version by Tudy77) --Codeine 19:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 86.34.225.181 to last version by MoneySign) --Codeine 18:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 80.96.196.3 to last version by Splaka) --MoneySign 10:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 80.97.190.191 to last version by 83.103.132.21) --Splaka 06:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 65.211.7.140 to last version by Darcken) --Todd Lyons 21:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 58.178.131.15 to last version by 141.85.0.89) --Splaka 09:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 86.125.22.62 to last version by 84.243.85.61) --Rcmurphy 19:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 81.57.32.54 to last version by 66.133.198.49) --Codeine 12:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 194.105.1.4 to last version by Hisservant4ever) --Codeine 17:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 82.208.178.44 to last version by 86.124.93.42) --Codeine 16:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 82.79.247.247 to last version by Splaka) --Splaka 09:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 62.162.194.175 to last version by 80.97.214.22) --Codeine 20:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 141.85.5.6 to last version by 86.104.244.12) --Codeine 18:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 193.231.19.6 to last version by Rcmurphy) --Codeine 13:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 82.76.33.157 to last version by Splaka) --Rcmurphy 08:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 82.76.33.158 to last version by Codeine) --Splaka 08:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 81.57.32.54 to last version by 66.133.198.49 ) --Codeine 21:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 80.97.216.173 to last version by Splaka) --Splaka 09:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 81.180.209.204 to last version by Splaka) --Codeine 13:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 82.77.224.116 to last version by Splaka) --Splaka 10:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 193.231.40.4 to last version by 80.96.82.199) --Codeine 16:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 83.76.167.232 to previous one by 141.85.252.100) --Volte 13:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 81.89.10.163 to last version by Volte) --Codeine 12:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  • m (Reverted edit(s) of 193.231.140.65 to previous one by Codeine) --Volte 20:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

edit The Enigmatic Mr. Grumpikins

Score: -2
  • Nomination Extremely prolific.
  • Oppose This belongs on Livejournal. Frank 02:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. Very original take on the problem of workplace misanthropy and kleptomania. Your Concerned Co-Slave 32:44, 5 June 2006
  • Oppose. I don't see what the big deal is... The Enigmatic Mr. Grumpikins 02:34, 4 June 2006
  • Oppose. This article is clearly biased against Mr. Grumpikins. Remember, NPOV. The Ruler 12:32, 6 June 2006

edit Niggers

Score: 0
  • Nominated Definitely worthy of feature. Noble Patriot 18:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose With such a sensative subject, you'd need to put this through another round of peer review to try to remove the POV. -- Self-righteous bastard 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. It's been through peer review three times. I think it's finally ready for feature. Noble Patriot 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. This still has a POV. Until it's NPOV, it doesn't belong on the front page. NAACP leader 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. If it has a POV, then YOU fix it! It has already been to peer review three freaking times! NRA4evar 02:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. I care about Niggers. My favorite team. Kanye West 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Well, this also has citation issues. I move this be put back on peer review. King 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Voting closed. Sent to peer review. --THX1138 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Nobody cares

edit Voice chat

Score: -3
  • Nomination Crucial information about the history of communication in an extremely well-written article. Centaur 18:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. This article seems to have bad sorces. This needs to have its facts checked in the Peer Review. Todd Lyons 02:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. This article completely lacks about the inventor of voice chat, Alexander Graham Bell. A grave omission indeed. Bananaphone 02:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. I doubt the factual accuracy of this article. I've had a mobile phone with this 'voice chat' feature for years. Tele-e-Copter

edit Zork

Score: +2
  • Nominated FAC has been eaten by a grue. GruesYouLose 18:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. I'm confused.... how is this an article, exactly? Shouldn't this just be in the Department of Fun? Is there any way to NOT get eaten by a grue? -- Eaten by a Grue 02:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
No. GruesYouLose 02:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes. But you have to be Chuck Norris.
  • VOTE FOR TURN LEFT. STAB GRUE WITH FORK. SUCCUMB TO GRUE. PUNCH MAILBOX 02:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Plugh. A Hollow Voice 00:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

edit I Fucking Hate the Bermuda Triangle

Score: -2
  • Nom, For I hate the Bermuda Triangle so god damn much. Pirates of the Bermudean 18:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose :- This author needs to do some more research before posting. He is clearly showing on his map that the Bermuda triangle starts in the Manat Municipios De Puerto Rico, when all reputatable sources place it as starting in the Areciro Municipios De Puerto Rico. Sir Picky B'Stard 17:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose Blantant NPOV violation. You can't 'fucking hate' the Bermuda triangle, you have to stick to facts. Bimbo Whales 11:0*, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose I fucking hate the Hoagie Triangle. King_George_VI 13:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Nihilism

-Nihilist

Score:
  • Oppose To nominate an article you must list reasons for support, not simply post the article on this webpage. Stentorian 99:99, 7 June 2601
  • Support This article makes a very interesting point about Heideger's (as opposed to Nietzsche's) conception of nihilism. Also, I like how it makes its point in a post-modern or, dare I say, deconstructionist manner! I crack myself up sometimes. DerridaIsGod 14:39, 7 Julio 0 B.C.
  • Support Deconstructionist? More like post-reconstructionalist! Kilistine 155:31, 51 January, 2000
  • Support Amen to that, Kilistine! Or should I say "So be it"! RexDaIntellectual 14:39, 7 June 2006
  • Oppose It's just a blank page... JoeUser 14:39, 7 June 2006
  • Comment The blank page is supposed to summarize our lives, philistine! Kilistine
But it's a blank page... JoeUser 14:39, 7 June 2006
And it's a blank life! Kilistine 14:39, 7 June 2006
Are you retarded or something? You just voted for a blank page; it doesn't mean anything. JoeUser 14:39, 7 June 2006
Maybe it doesn't mean anything...or maybe it means everything! Kilistine 27:13, 1 June 2006
Are you blind? It's a blank page. JoeUser 14:39, 7 June 2006
  • Oppose Numerous unverified sources, quotes that are not properly attributed, and entire sections that gravely misrepresent nihilism. A college professor, not a mildy retarded chimp, should write a page on such a deep philosophical topic. Philosophos 14:39, 7 June 2006
Don't be so hard on your mom! Score one for Uncyc! UncycOWNSYOURMOM 16:49, 4 June 2006

edit The Most Quotable Smackdown of All Time

Score: -2
  • Nominate. This is one of the most-rearched and best-written articles on the site. I am quite proud of how it's turned out, after the peer review. --Oscar Wilde 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose This article violates NPOV --Mark Twain 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose This article needs more detailed citation. Not only that, but I, too, think it violates NPOV. --Winston Churchill 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
You would think that, wouldn't you Winston? Oscar Wilde 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Why yes I would Oscar. I'd also think your mom was hot, if I didn't no for a fact that she wasn't. Winston Churchill 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
That wasn't my mom Churchill, that was a couch you flirting with. Oscar Wilde 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hahahaha, it was! Mark Twain 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
You stay out of this Twain. I would take a couch over that thing I saw you with. Winston Churchill 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
That was your mom! Oscar Wilde 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey Oscar, why don't we get off moms? I got off yours. Winston Churchill 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Man Oscar, he totally burnt you. Mark Twain 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Even I have to admit that I got 'totally burnt' by that one. Good show, mate. Oscar Wilde 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Not as good a show as your mom... Winston Churchill 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

edit World War I (video game)

Score: -1
  • Nom PWNED. SerbiaROLLZ 18:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose - This hasn't come out for Sega Genesis so it can't be that significant. Besides the transcript reads like a Diplomacy game where the weed ran out early. WorldWarFour 00:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • SUHPORT THANKS WIKIPEDIA FOR THE HELP ON MY COLLAGE PAPER IGOTINTOCOLLAGE 04:20, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
  • OPPHOSEDUDE! I FIALED! MY PROFAH SAID 'MEXICOOL' WANST THE PRESIDENT OF GERMANY AT THE TIME!?? HE SAID THSI WANST ACcURATE?! I"LL HAVE YOU KNOW THAT HT EINTETNET IS NOT A PLCACE FOR JOESKING AROUND MI FREIND! IGOTINTOCOLLAGE 04:20, 4 April 2004 (UTC)

edit Ipod Nano 200gb Instructions

Score: -1
  • Oppose. This article is spam. Why not just buy an iPod Giga? Also, Apple is non-notable. -- Just Some Guy, You Know? 02:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Didn't you read the article? The Nano is smaller and has better battery life! That's why you buy it instead. crApple 31:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Wikipedia

Score: -1
  • NoMiNATIOn DUdE, My SITe oWns AlLs YOu! JiMBOSAURs!
  • Oppose, citations need to be bigger.-- Lolz 00:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Citatations aren't the only thing that 'need to be bigger', if you know what I mean, *wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge* say no more! --Monty Python 83:41 4 July, 1975 (BBC}
  • Support. This is the most accurate and comprehensive representation of Wikipedia on the internet Today. --Britney Spears 02:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. This 'Encyclopedia' is shit. Total shit. Encyclopedia Britannica 02:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid 'tis your Encyclopedia that partakes of shit. Nature 02:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey dude, you stay out if this! Encyclopedia Britannica 02:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Dude, don't make me kick your ass. I'm fucking reputable; you can't even beat 'Wikipedia'. Nature 02:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Bring it on, bitch! Encyclopedia Britannica 02:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Ha, that's what I said to your mom last night! Me and Wikipedia tag-teamed her. Fuck, you don't even have an article on tag-teaming! Wikipedia does. Nature 02:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Oldest trick in the book

Score: +8

Excellent cataloguing of a difficult to chronicle subject.

  • Oppose I highly doubt the veracity of the events highlighted herein. It's a well known fact that Egyptians did not have shoulders; how then, could a 'should tapping' trick have been devised by them? I rest my case. Esteemed Scholar
  • Oppose Where did you get this information? It seems as if it were merely made up, or perhaps gleaned from one of those pornographic magazines young dopeheads such as yourself read. Evil Lord Disectamune
  • Support ahomosezwut? Uncylopeedz4Lyfe
  • Oppose Some young rapscallions accosted me with a consortium of these repacious schemes. I'll have you roustabouts know that tom-foolery will not be permitted! T.S. Heliot
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. 210.413.87.255 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Commment I believe that some of these votes originated from the same person. An admin should check the Internet Protocol Address Database for verification. WikisisTricky
I checked it out; they were all original. 210.413.87.255 18:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Great, thanks! WikisisTricky 518:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Worst 100 Ways to Deliver Bad News

Score: +3
  • Nom+Support. This article is great... I think I love you. --Not Kakun 02:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support We weren't able to save her. Dr. Love 02:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Support I don't think yo u realize how u seful this a r ticle could be. Wi th some f airly e xtensive e d iting i t could be f e ature d . Sorry 17:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • WORLDLIFE!!!!RadarfishFlutter21px-Fan_girl_1.jpg Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 21px-Nuke_explosion.gif 05:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

edit vandalism

Score: DONGS! HAHAHA!

FO!!!R

OPPOSEEEEE //////////////////// Spamm


Spamm

Spork This page was originally sporked from ad.


YAYS For V4anDALIs!M!!!</span

4444$$$$$

NONONONONONO!!!!NO!ON!NO!

edit FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR FoR

x2 poopy

You have nude massages.

FoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoR FoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoR Spamm


Spamm

FoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoR FoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoRFoR A3anintni!in!

GRRLSSSSSS ROCKz0rx


huh? NO!, PIE!CAN you hear me NOW!?  !this 4rt1cl3 is totaLLY 1337

Cowbell2 This article needs more cowbell.

You can help by adding more cowbell.
Cowbell2 This article needs more cowbell.

You can help by adding more cowbell.
Cowbell2 This article needs more cowbell.

You can help by adding more cowbell.


Cowbell2 This cowbell needs more article.

You can help by adding more article.
BIG 5ig!LOL0L0L0L0L. G

I DON't like IT!@*(^@(*)^!

SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!

YEAH!

__EDITSECTION____EDITSECTION____EDITSECTION_ ___EDITSECT ION____EDI TSECTION ____EDITSECT ION____EDITSECT ION____EDITSECTI ON____EDITSEC TION____EDITSECTION____EDITSECTION____EDITSEC TION____EDITSECTION____ EDITSECTION____EDIT SECTION____EDITSECTION__

Personal tools
projects