Great American novel

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edit(s) of Matt11111 (talk) to last version by SPIKE)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Evileye.jpg|right|100px]][[File:Cloyster.jpg|right|100px]][[File:Gashgashgashgash.PNG|right|100px]][[File:Cunt 2.jpg|right|100px]][[File:CHOCOLATE-PUDDINGPOOPOO.JPG|right|100px]] [[File:CHOCOLATE-PUDDINGTOO.JPG|right|100px]][[File:Ssammich.jpg|right|100px]]
+
The '''Great American novel''' has been the [[Holy Grail]] of literary development in the [[United States]] since Colonial days. Experts have always thought that, given America's linguistic innovation, it was only a matter of time before the nation produced quality fiction.
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
<div style="text-align: center; width: 100%; border: 1px solid #aaa; background: #fff;margin-bottom:9pt">'''Disclaimer:''' Please note that this page is not funny. A study at your preschool shows, however, that it does have a coarse beauty.</div>
 
   
  +
The classic was created, on March 9, 2005 by a Dr. Johnston, given name unknown, on this very [[website]]. Its original title was the thought-provoking: '''Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit'''.
  +
  +
==Status==
  +
The novel is featured on the [[Uncyclopedia:About]] page. Thanks to the Creative Commons agreement, the entire text of the novel — awesome in its brevity — can be reproduced here, and the reader is free to use it, fully or in part, whenever appropriate in everyday life. This is felicitous, as every attempt to contact the genius Dr. Johnston has failed, and [[Wikia]] representatives asked to identify him via <code>checkuser</code> in order to give him his [[Shit|just dues]] have replied that we should file a formal request at [[Special:Contact]] instead.
  +
  +
==The novel's entire text==
  +
{{cquote|
 
'''Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit'''
 
'''Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit'''
 
cunt cunt cunt cunt crap [[crap]] shit
 
cunt cunt cunt cunt crap [[crap]] shit
Line 9: Line 16:
 
cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit semprini.
 
cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit semprini.
   
==Cunt Cunt Cunt Cunt Crap Crap Shit (On Cunting)==
 
{{cquote|
 
 
Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit
 
Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit
 
cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit
 
cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit
Line 41: Line 46:
 
cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit.
 
cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit.
 
Honestly, what were you expecting? An extra cunt for good measure, you cunt?}}
 
Honestly, what were you expecting? An extra cunt for good measure, you cunt?}}
 
==History==
 
This page was one of the first to be produced by the good people at Uncyclopedia, and is featured on the [[Uncyclopedia:About]] page.
 
   
 
==Literary analysis==
 
==Literary analysis==
The author of the above statement shows clear [[James Joyce|Joyce]]an influences, especially in his intelligent use of the '[[stream of consciousness]]', a device whereby the author foregoes the use of traditional storytelling, [[punctuation]], and coherence to attempt to indicate to the audience a greater truth. This shows the audience exactly what is in the character's mind, and is particularly applicable in the above case, where it becomes clear that the author is, in an ironically literal sense, full of shit.
+
The [[anonymous]] author of the above statement shows clear [[James Joyce|Joyce]]an influences, especially in his intelligent use of the '[[stream of consciousness]]', a device whereby the author foregoes the use of traditional storytelling, [[punctuation]], and coherence to attempt to indicate to the audience a greater truth. This shows the audience exactly what is in the character's mind, and is particularly applicable in the above case, where it becomes clear that the author is, in an ironically literal sense, full of shit.
   
 
There are also hidden messages in his work, in a similar way to [[Shakespeare]]'s famous 'secret insult', whereby the first letters of the names of all the main characters in his plays, put together, make up the phrase, "MARLOWE DOTH BE GAY." The subtext for ''Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit'' may be difficult to glean for the casual viewer, but for anyone with an associate degree in literature, the writing is not simply made up of the phrase, "cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit." One can posit that the semantic linking of "cunt cunt cunt cunt" and "crap crap shit," is a thoroughly symbolic comment on the inescapable path from life until death. "Indubitably, we all emerged from the cunt," says DeVry professor Irving Washington in his two hundred and page treatise on the subject, "and unto crap crap shit we all shall fall."
 
There are also hidden messages in his work, in a similar way to [[Shakespeare]]'s famous 'secret insult', whereby the first letters of the names of all the main characters in his plays, put together, make up the phrase, "MARLOWE DOTH BE GAY." The subtext for ''Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit'' may be difficult to glean for the casual viewer, but for anyone with an associate degree in literature, the writing is not simply made up of the phrase, "cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit." One can posit that the semantic linking of "cunt cunt cunt cunt" and "crap crap shit," is a thoroughly symbolic comment on the inescapable path from life until death. "Indubitably, we all emerged from the cunt," says DeVry professor Irving Washington in his two hundred and page treatise on the subject, "and unto crap crap shit we all shall fall."
   
Notice also how the word "crap" is repeated multiple times throughout this text. Washington continues: "once, surely, would be enough? That would have got the point across so the page could return to, say, repeating the word 'cunt' again.". This, however, overlooks one important detail. There is a lot of crap on this page. And repeating the word 'crap' is a cue for the reader to be sub-consciously reminded just how much [[shit]] there actually is on this page. The sheer repetition of the words—twice for "crap" and quatrice for "cunt"—raises further questions about the [[Redundancy|nature of repetition]] itself; is there any significance that there are four "cunt"s and only two "crap"s, let alone one "shit"? This train of thought has been a dead end for deep readers, leading most critics to grudgingly accept an underlying dadaist metaphor for the inherent ridiculousness of the living.
+
Notice also how the word "crap" is repeated multiple times throughout this text. Washington continues: "once, surely, would be enough? That would have got the point across so the page could return to, say, repeating the word 'cunt' again.". This, however, overlooks one important detail. There is a lot of crap on this page. And repeating the word 'crap' is a cue for the reader to be sub-consciously reminded just how much [[shit]] there actually is on this page. The sheer repetition of the words—twice for "crap" and quatrice for "cunt"—raises further questions about the [[Redundancy|nature of repetition]] itself; is there any significance that there are four "cunt"s and only two "crap"s, let alone one "shit"? This train of thought has been a dead end for deep readers, leading most critics to grudgingly accept an underlying [[autism|dadaist]] metaphor for the inherent ridiculousness of the living.
   
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
Line 56: Line 58:
 
*[[Fisher Price]]
 
*[[Fisher Price]]
   
{{incoherent}}
+
[[Category:Self-reference]]
+
[[Category:Cunts]]
[[Category:Self-reference]][[Category:Cunts]][[Category:Crap]][[Category:Shit]]
+
[[Category:Crap]]
[[Category:Uncyclopedia In-Jokes]][[Category:Belgium]]
+
[[Category:Shit]]
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia In-Jokes]]

Latest revision as of 18:46, February 28, 2014

The Great American novel has been the Holy Grail of literary development in the United States since Colonial days. Experts have always thought that, given America's linguistic innovation, it was only a matter of time before the nation produced quality fiction.

The classic was created, on March 9, 2005 by a Dr. Johnston, given name unknown, on this very website. Its original title was the thought-provoking: Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit.

edit Status

The novel is featured on the Uncyclopedia:About page. Thanks to the Creative Commons agreement, the entire text of the novel — awesome in its brevity — can be reproduced here, and the reader is free to use it, fully or in part, whenever appropriate in everyday life. This is felicitous, as every attempt to contact the genius Dr. Johnston has failed, and Wikia representatives asked to identify him via checkuser in order to give him his just dues have replied that we should file a formal request at Special:Contact instead.

edit The novel's entire text

Cquote1

Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap john wood crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit semprini.

Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap friend shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit Belgium cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit. Honestly, what were you expecting? An extra cunt for good measure, you cunt?

Cquote2

edit Literary analysis

The anonymous author of the above statement shows clear Joycean influences, especially in his intelligent use of the 'stream of consciousness', a device whereby the author foregoes the use of traditional storytelling, punctuation, and coherence to attempt to indicate to the audience a greater truth. This shows the audience exactly what is in the character's mind, and is particularly applicable in the above case, where it becomes clear that the author is, in an ironically literal sense, full of shit.

There are also hidden messages in his work, in a similar way to Shakespeare's famous 'secret insult', whereby the first letters of the names of all the main characters in his plays, put together, make up the phrase, "MARLOWE DOTH BE GAY." The subtext for Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit may be difficult to glean for the casual viewer, but for anyone with an associate degree in literature, the writing is not simply made up of the phrase, "cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit." One can posit that the semantic linking of "cunt cunt cunt cunt" and "crap crap shit," is a thoroughly symbolic comment on the inescapable path from life until death. "Indubitably, we all emerged from the cunt," says DeVry professor Irving Washington in his two hundred and page treatise on the subject, "and unto crap crap shit we all shall fall."

Notice also how the word "crap" is repeated multiple times throughout this text. Washington continues: "once, surely, would be enough? That would have got the point across so the page could return to, say, repeating the word 'cunt' again.". This, however, overlooks one important detail. There is a lot of crap on this page. And repeating the word 'crap' is a cue for the reader to be sub-consciously reminded just how much shit there actually is on this page. The sheer repetition of the words—twice for "crap" and quatrice for "cunt"—raises further questions about the nature of repetition itself; is there any significance that there are four "cunt"s and only two "crap"s, let alone one "shit"? This train of thought has been a dead end for deep readers, leading most critics to grudgingly accept an underlying dadaist metaphor for the inherent ridiculousness of the living.

edit See Also

Personal tools
projects