Conformity bounce theory

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 02:20, October 12, 2010 by Magic man (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

A pillar of most modern scientific work on education, the conformity bounce theory is a corrolary of the laziness principle, and represents one of science's best efforts to understand how and why humans can act so f**king retarded most of the time.[1] An incredible amount of work remains to be done on this subject. However, the conformity bounce theory is a great leap, in that it may explain why normally intelligent people can accept existing ideas on principle, no matter how contrary to common sense they may be. The reason is essentially that they are trained from childhood not to even bother trying to come up with better ones.[2]

edit Overview

The conformity bounce theory hypothesizes that in a classroom consisting of any given number of students (X), only a certain number of original ideas and/or valid discussion points (Y) will be able to survive. Furthermore, the theory states that these two numbers are directly proportional, and that the Y/X ratio is incredibly small. If the exact mathematics behind the theory are are worked out, it becomes apparent that the intelligence of the students in the classroom and the skill of any teacher that may happen to be present are, surprisingly, totally irrelevant. The theory goes on to propose that any additional ideas that may otherwise have formed once the so-called "group knowledge limit" is reached become cancelled. [1] [3]Instead of actually contributing original material for discussion, therefore, students begin to restate the pre-existing expressed ideas. In small classes with ample time given for discussion, this can result in a single idea being restated hundreds of times over, and is a major cause of teacher suicide. These deaths are usually considered the results of an occupational hazard.[4]


The practical upshot of all of this is that in a classroom discussion, no matter how smart the people within the classroom are, the conversation will go around in circles, covering the same ideas over and over ad infinitum. After a certain, mathematically determinable number of points have been made, students are simply incapable of introducing any more, no matter what the consequences may be. Instead, they simply conform to the existing ideas. The theory gains its name after the soon oft repeated phrase that drives most teachers to insanity, namely: "Well, just to bounce off of what _______ said..."[5]

edit History

Hazegh

Groziny comparing Martin's findings with his own work, "My Students Seem to be Unable to Work for More Than 96 Hours Straight, No Matter How Much I Beat Them. I Wonder Why."

A child of the modern scientific age, the conformity bounce theory was conceived in many different corners of the globe at once, via the Internet. The original concept was put forth by an American educational theorist named Dr. Brandon Martin in December of 2005. [6] Dr. Martin was at the time working to explain just why the American educational system was still crap, no matter how much money was (promised to eventually be maybe) thrown at the problem. [7] Martin was working in collaboration with Dr. Alex Rabaa, Professor of Retard Studies at UCLA, when he noticed the trend that would eventually become his most famous acheievement. [8] Excited, the young doctors reached out to others around the world, and were soon buried in evidence supporting their new theory. Of particular interest were the findings of Dr. Adam Kinney, former head of the East German Academy for the Children of Crack Whores; Dr. Boris Groziny, previous director of discipline in the Siberian Center for Learning and Forced Manual Labour for the Glory of Mother Russia; and Dr. Fred Kitzmiller, once dean of the School for the Advancement of Knowledge for Cadavers. All claimed to have extensively seen the results of Martin's theory at work during their tenures. [9] With such prestigious backing, it was not long before the conformity bounce theory was accepted by the scientific community as nearly solid fact. [10] (Which is as close as anyone gets to declaring an absolute in the scientific community, anyway. They must be really afraid of becoming sith or something.)

edit Applications

The conformity bounce theory has come as an unexpected boon to penal systems worldwide. The great usefulness of the theory towards solitary confinement is that one can stop an intelligent prisoner from "getting any funny ideas" simply by putting him in a classroom full of talkative idiots. [11] High-tech simulated classrooms have been set up in The Hague, and cheaper versions are expected to be developed soon for widespread use.

The educational systems of many countries have responded by paying "faux students" to attend schools in order to raise group knowledge limits. In accordance with the theory, however, the actual students must be unaware of the falseness of some their classmates in order for this to work. [12] A great number of students are therefore never told where most of their education budget goes, or why half of their class seems catatonic for most of the year.

edit Refrences

  1. Martin, Brandon. "I'm a Really Important Guy. No, Really, I Swear I Am." Shut Up. Really Legitimate Convention Event. Middle of Some Street, Brooklyn, New York. 45 Nov. 2006.
  2. "People are Stupid." Whiny Bitches Journal of Science 1 (2006): 67-69.
  3. Surprising and Little Known Rules of Magic: the Gathering. Renton, Washington: Wizards of the Coast, 2006.
  4. Spellings, Margaret. United States of America. Secretary of Education. Department of Education. Annual List of Common Causes of Death for Teachers That are Probably Our Fault, But Damned If We're Going to Take Responsibilty for Them. Washington D.C.: Halliburton P, 2007.
  5. Ibid.
  6. Scientist, Actually A. "List of People That We Actual Scientists Think Ought to Be Dragged Out Into the Street and Shot (But We Don't Have the Balls)." Scientific American 218 Octobuary 2007: 17-45.
  7. Martin, Brandon. Shit, I'm Good. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. New York, New York: H-Town-Mifflin', 2006. 309-345.
  8. Rabaa, Alex. "I Worked On Conformity Bounce Theory, Too. I Don't Care What That Asshole Claims." Diss. UCLA, 2005.
  9. Canadian, Some. "Five Idiots Merits a Genius Now?" Cartoon. Scathing Political Cartoons Post [Montreal, Canada] 87 July 2006: 5a.
  10. The Scientific Bible. 2 Pet. 23-35. 4i ed. Boston, Massachusetts: Scientific P, 2006.
  11. Cop, Lenny. Funny-Ass Things to Do with Prisoners. Colorado State Penitentiary. Denver, Colorado: Some Guy's Basement P, 2007. 34-36.
  12. Spellings, Margaret. United States of America. Secretary of Education. Department of Education. Shit You Shouldn't Know About. Washington D.C.: Halliburton P, 2007.
Personal tools
projects