User talk:Some user

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(hello Somey)
m (hello S.)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
:::Just as well - I always hated that dog. (Children too, now that you mention it...) {{user:some user/sig}} <small>21:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
 
:::Just as well - I always hated that dog. (Children too, now that you mention it...) {{user:some user/sig}} <small>21:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
   
== hello Somey ==
+
== hello S. ==
   
I understand that you are Somey from Wikipedia Review. You probably know me as jdrand, HappyWanderer, etc. who created sockpuppets and was banned because of my age. I had been wondering why I was not receiving replies to my messages to you. Now I have realized: I had Gmail blocked for about 5 years and didn't even remember! You probably have me on ignore right now, but I was not getting Gmail and it caused major problems, and I kept thinking that Gmailers have some sort of aversion to replying, and then (since I do not use Gmail) that Gmail was only for receiving, not for replying, which just doesn't make sense. The mail must be re-sent.
+
Did you send me any e-mail responses, Somey? If you did, could you please send them to me? Also, not to be rude, but could you respond to what I said above? [[Special:Contributions/68.96.213.118|68.96.213.118]] 18:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
   
My e-mail is joeyyuan@cox.net
+
* Not really. This isn't the place for this sort of conversation... In fact, there isn't a place anywhere on the internet for this sort of conversation. I'm afraid that a while ago, we concluded that your real name isn't "Jonas" at all, it's "Linda," and that you're not a 12-year-old boy in a private school either, but rather a 47-year-old divorced woman who owns (or once owned) a portrait-photography business. (Not that there's anything ''wrong'' with that.) Why you're doing all this remains utterly unclear, and of course, since we don't even know if "Jonas" actually exists, it would probably be pointless to speculate. This is also why I don't acknowledge, respond, or admit to receiving these alleged "e-mails." Sorry if this bursts your bubble in any significant way! {{user:some user/sig}} <small>20:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
 
I would like to come back to Wikipedia Review, but Herschelkrustofsky did something unnecessary. He changed WR's "age limit" to 16, when COPPA only requires it to be 13. He also imposed it unilaterally, and then discussion came later. COPPA doesn't require any age limit actually, it only says that you cannot reveal personal information (even about yourself, which incorrectly presumes that children universally are unaware of the potential harm that could be done by revealing such information.
 
 
I also believe that you should just ban ColScott (Don Murphy), as he is posting the same unconstructive rants that got Joseph100 banned, and the only reason you are allowing him to post is because you think his presence gives WR good publicity because he is famous. He has been there for quite some time, which opened up a large window of time in which Wikipedia Review could have became famous. Surprise! It didn't. He doesn't contribute to any coherent criticism of Wikipedia, or even WR. He justs rambles on, calling people names here and there, and complaining that he is not notable. He is definitely notable, because his movies are. Have I heard of Daniel Brandt? No. Have I heard of PIR? No. Have I heard of Don Murphy? No, but have I heard of the Transformers movie and Natural Born Killers? Of course. Don has his own board, where he can post when he feels like it, and bring Joseph100 over to do so as well.
 
 
I should be allowed to post under my real name, or at least not make it a secret as to who I am, as I do not feel comfortable hiding. I do not like having to hide from Herschelkrustofsky. Yes, there is the unlikely event that WR is sued. What can they possibly sue for? If I don't post my age, then they either saw it on an external site, or asked someone if I was so and so. That means that the site is not violating COPPA, but that they did some personal research (which wouldn't take long, but is not WR's fault) and found out that I was a child. So what would possibly be the basis for the suit?
 
 
In addition, don't lie about me. I'm sorry to come off as rude, but please get your facts straight before posting that stuff. I never had a birthday whilst I was on WR as Jdrand. I came in late July, my 11th birthday (May 8th, 2007) was almost 2 months before that. Unless I got my birthday wrong, which, if I did, feel free to inform me about, you have been lying about me in the WRR, saying that the "Users celebrating birthdays" read "jdrand (11)". I did not come to WR when I was ten years old.
 
 
Jonas D. Rand
 
 
* Somebody made a ''movie'' based on "Transformers"? This is the first I've heard of it, and I must say I'm ''shocked!'' Who on Earth would ''do'' something like that? As for the other thing, I know there's a rock band called "The Killers," but I'm pretty sure they were all born via Caesarian Section. {{user:some user/sig}} <small>07:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
 
 
Did you send me any e-mail responses, Somey? If you did, could you please send them to me? Also, not to be rude, but could you respond to what I said above? [[Special:Contributions/68.96.213.118|68.96.213.118]] 18:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 20:51, January 22, 2009

Subox   Fun Facts   Subox   Articles   Subox   Images   Subox   Awards   Subox   Hello?   Subox



Energy
This user is on vacation, sabbatical, administrative leave, or is otherwise goofing off with the knowledge and/or consent of the Admins. Or, more likely, they've buggered off without saying boo to anyone. Their expected date of return is uncertain. If you're lonely, or you miss them, leave a message.


Holy Moly

Is that all you were waiting for?


It's safe to come back


There. Now start writing again, or I'll ban ya ;). -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll second that! Spang talk 17:38, 09 May 2008
Regret Tenenbaum does not know you nor wants to know you. Regardless, Regret Tenenbaum apreciates the silliness your userpage. Regret Tenenbaum wants you to return. So... yeah. Regret Tenenbaum 06:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Good to see you

Right, you almost certainly don't know or recognise me, but I like seeing old Uncyclopedian names I recognise editing the wiki again, so I thought I'd say hi, and I like your stuff. Now stick around, dammit! --UU - natter UU Manhole 18:36, Dec 31

I'm sort of trying to "ease my way back in," surreptitious-like, but I haven't been able to think of anything good over the last year or two. Still, as I've learned many times, it's awfully hard to reject the appeal of Codeine's mum!  c • > • cunwapquc? 18:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
HOLY SHIT! Some user is back! Maybe this truly is the Uncyclopedia renaissance that was foretold.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 20:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Darling! You've come back! Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Imagine the two of us returning almost on the same exact day, the rumors are true :) Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 23:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppets! Conspiracy! Murder! Welcome back! Happy new year! Spang talk 20:41, 01 Jan 2009
Well, seriously folks... thanks for all the well-wishes and all, but this isn't helping me be surreptitious. And I meant the bit about "easing" my way back in - it isn't easy to change modes from the dopey wisecracks and not-especially-witty repartee that I've been doing for the last two years, back to original encyclopedia-like-website article parodies.
Kidding! Had ya goin' there, didn't I? Heh heh... Still, I should try to come up with an idea or two before anybody gets too curious. Besides, inflated expectations are always a bad thing.  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
You never wrote, you never called. The children don't even know who you are! And the dog...we had to eat him. Sorry about that. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Just as well - I always hated that dog. (Children too, now that you mention it...)  c • > • cunwapquc? 21:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

hello S.

Did you send me any e-mail responses, Somey? If you did, could you please send them to me? Also, not to be rude, but could you respond to what I said above? 68.96.213.118 18:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Not really. This isn't the place for this sort of conversation... In fact, there isn't a place anywhere on the internet for this sort of conversation. I'm afraid that a while ago, we concluded that your real name isn't "Jonas" at all, it's "Linda," and that you're not a 12-year-old boy in a private school either, but rather a 47-year-old divorced woman who owns (or once owned) a portrait-photography business. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.) Why you're doing all this remains utterly unclear, and of course, since we don't even know if "Jonas" actually exists, it would probably be pointless to speculate. This is also why I don't acknowledge, respond, or admit to receiving these alleged "e-mails." Sorry if this bursts your bubble in any significant way!  c • > • cunwapquc? 20:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects