User talk:MoneySign

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 00:54, July 6, 2006 by MoneySign (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Verbal nostalgia? Check the archives.

Users who are D-BAGS

I think that the template should stay there, just to rub it in this ED morons face.. At least let it stay for a day or two so he can see it. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --22:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


You won a free You have new messages. template at the top of the next page you visit! -- The Village Idiot♠(talk to me) 22:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

WOO! And awwwwww, all I have for you is the (noob) advice to change your signature prefrerences to say {{SUBST:nosubst|User:Villahj Ideeut/sig}}, as to prevent your signature hardcoding every time... :( --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 22:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I say, that is a brilliant idea! --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 22:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
... Shut up! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 22:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
No, you shut up, you #wikia madman! --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 20:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
If this does not work, please ban me for ten minutes. kthxbai --Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 21:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


Deletion Award
Mega Deletion Award!

This Admin has successfully beaten the crap out of many,
many articles in rapid succession. Fear them greatly.

Somebody told me to, I don't know why. —rc (t) 02:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Haha! You're rubbish, I tells ya! But thanks for the award, anyways. ^_^ --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 02:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


For coming into #unnews and banning the crack vandal, even if it was riscinded later by Oli and Barry. They'll figure out soon enough that fairness is a one-way street with him.  ::sigh:: Oh well.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


Deletion Award
Mega Deletion Award!

This Admin has successfully beaten the crap out of many,
many articles in rapid succession. Fear them greatly.

Oh my god. The Recent Changes have been filled with you're huffs for hours. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh and by the way: I wasn't sure if I was aloud to hand out this award, but Spang said I could. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Heh, thanks... And sorry about the recent changes hijact... Let this be a lesson to all you you: an image is not just for Christmas. ^_^ --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 00:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Temporarily rescinded. Zombiebaron is only KUN and not an admin, and therefor is not capable of awarding this award, which is based on a technical number of deletions in a certain timeperiod. Awaiting a GUN (preferrably User:Rcmurphy) to give the award. --Splaka 01:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

From me to You

Just to show i care that you were nice to me right at the begining of my waste of time on here I have especially hand picked this fine gift for you. A 100% Eygptian cotton, Machine wash at 40o, Do not Tumble dry T-Shirt straight off the back of a lorry.I hope you wear it with pride.--Usewho'sname? 23:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

This user went to Wikipedia and all he got me was this lousy T-shirt
Erm... Hmmmm.... Thanks, I s'pose... I think the cat will love it to sleep on. ^_^ --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 08:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


i really need help making a good template for a new thing i want to have. Can you help can see my meagher attempts on making one by to you later. The HRH MuCal. Tayor Lz4MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)

Newcookie Tayor has decided to grace you with her presence.

She likes cookies and apprently you too.

So she, (Yes, I am a she), has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Kinds sucks huh...isn't even a template...I think I am going to delete it later...i have already gotten a "Stop making vanity templates" warning thingy....The HRH MuCal. Tayor Lz4MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)

Nuclear Holocaust

Nuclear missile was ugly but now it is slight less so, and still freaking tasteless, hence the tag. --Severian 20:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I thought I would save space since, we need alternative sources of space and our addiction to foreign space is getting to great, anyway, when I put an *asterick in front of the --~~~~ my signature does something dumb and it's annoying and wouldn't look good on the VFH page, would it now? Example: *-- Severian Germanflag MUN (talk) 03:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC) See the pain I have to live with?

Ok well, first of all, go to your preferences and put, instead of {{User:Severian/sig}}, {{nosubst|User:Severian/sig}}. Secondly, I've altered your sig, so it shouldn't happen anymore. Good luck. ^_^ --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 05:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

--It worked, all I had to do different was {{Subst:Nosubst|User:Severian/sig}} because subst part always added itself...Vielen Dank Mein Herr!

Oh, well, I thought you were talking about the linebreak that occured... But yeah, ok. Bitte shön, or something like that. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 07:22, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Can you help me to copy

Can you help me to copy? Are Tompkins in holiday?--Hant 23:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Done and done. As for Tompkins... I dunno... Maybe... But we'll manage just fine without him. :D --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 23:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


methinks anidnmeno has a slight obsession over this whole mess......The HRH MuCal. Tayor Lz4MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)


Thanks for that comment in my userpage... it's inspired me to actually try to be funny again. It really means alot to me. --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 23:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Additional thanks for saving on Steinbeck. When I'm funnier I'll probably fix him up. Much appreciate it. Nullius in Verba 00:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

inferiority complex

you deleted the original stub as being too short but had potential, i've tried again but i'm just not good enough to write it properly. please help...--Usewho'sname? 10:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, to be honest, I'm not the world's best writer... But I think I just might have a go at this one. If I fail miserable, I'll get someone else to help.
Of course all this exciting new stuff will have to be postponed a bit, as I now have to head off to work. But I promise I'll get back to you on this. In the mean time, why not try brainstorming a couple of concepts to put into it (like forms of inferiority, examples, ... whatever). And also try to keep with one flow and style of writing (you start off with beng a patient with the complex, and then go off into pseudo-technical talk). Oh, and please, for the love of anything that you hold dear, avoid Chuck Norris, Oscar Wilde, iPods, randomness and toilet-humour.
Take care, have a good one, and talk to you later! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 10:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Well i've altered it a bit but have now run out of steam, looks like i'll need more drugs before i can continue. Enjoy your work.--Usewho'sname? 13:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

do i reply to you here or on my talk? oh this is just too confusing...--Usewho'sname? 15:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

If I've left you a message on your talk page, you answer there. If I'm replying (on my talk page) to a message you've left on my talk page, answer on... you guessed it... my talk page. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 19:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Binary Joke

No, I don't think it has any potential at all. It's been done, again and again and again. I'm absolutely sick of those pages, as I'm sure everyone is. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS  15:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

The offspring of

you and a gwax-like female would surely be the end of humanity as we know it. Dude, you are a few years shy of breeding the HYPNOHITLAR... i believe you should calm down some.... Please? for the Earth's inhabitants? Remember, you aren't Cthulhu, and taking his job could make him angry... --Anidn. Me? NO! MUN FC4 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 02:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry about me... I actually am quite calm today. Thing is, though, you need a time-out. Kind of like VI, I s'pose. Only I'm quite confident yours will be much shorter... Hope you prove me right. Take care! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 02:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
May 04 22:38:08 anidnmeno and clearly you are a 40-year-old guy that lives with his mom
May 04 22:38:11 MoneySign And I'M the 13 year old, then?
May 04 22:38:12 *Singaporekid dances
May 04 22:38:12 MoneySign Hahaha!
May 04 22:38:14 MoneySign Great...
May 04 22:38:27 MoneySign Okidoki, anid... It's time for your time-out.
May 04 22:38:33 *anidnmeno is almost a 20 year old guy that lives with his mom
May 04 22:38:38 *MoneySign is now known as DoNOTremove
May 04 22:38:42 *DoNOTremove sets ban on *!*i=500@*
May 04 22:38:45 Singaporekid Not in #@Uncylopedia !
May 04 22:39:00 *You have been kicked from #uncyclopedia by DoNOTremove (I'll let you know when your time    out is over)

Come on now, I've said worse to more powerful admins and not been banned for > 36 hours. --Anidn Needs Ignorant Dumbasses to Not Meaninglessly Exile him from InterNet MeetingrOoms MUN FC4 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 15:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

How convenient of you to leave out the events that lead up to your kick-ban. It's a good thing that I too keep logs, or I wouldn't have had a leg to stand on.

Your chat-log extract placed in context

* anidnmeno is now known as Zombiebaron
* Zombiebaron hits on Katie
* Zombiebaron hits on Katie again
* Zombiebaron hits on Alia some
* Zombiebaron hates on Anidn and Adam
* Zombiebaron pisses off MoneySign
* Zombiebaron hits on Katie some more
* Zombiebaron is now known as anidnmeno
<Dzugavili> Playing out fantasies again, eh, Meno?
<anidnmeno> oh, yeah
<anidnmeno> it works best when nobody is paying attention
* ChanServ sets mode: +o MoneySign
<Dzugavili> Caught with your pants down being literal is never a pretty sight.
* anidnmeno was kicked by MoneySign (OOPS!)[1]
* anidnmeno has joined #uncyclopedia
* MoneySign sets mode: -o MoneySign
<Roger_The_Bum> qdb?[2]
<anidnmeno> MoneySign, a little vagina will fix that
* anidnmeno hands MoneySign a fifty
<Dzugavili> Cuntymints!
<SgtDano> a b3tan o.o
<anidnmeno> MoneySign, the corner of 5th and Johnson.... ask for 'Cinnabunnz'
<anidnmeno> MoneySign, i promise you'll feel better afterward
<anidnmeno> .... aside from the VD
<anidnmeno> CUNTYMINTS\
<anidnmeno> FUCKSHITS
<MoneySign> What?
* ChanServ sets mode: +o MoneySign
<anidnmeno> omg.. i hate it when IRCers ask 'what' like they cannot read just a few lines upward...
<MoneySign> Uhm... Your lines still don't make sense, dimwit.
<MoneySign> Well... Kinda, I s'pose.
<MoneySign> If you're like 13 or something.
<Singaporekid> :(
<anidnmeno> well, MoneySign, you HAVE been acting 13 lately
<MoneySign> :o
<MoneySign> :'(
<MoneySign> LOL!
<MoneySign> J/K!!!
<MoneySign> LOLOLOL.[3]
<anidnmeno> * You have been kicked from #uncyclopedia by MoneySign (OOPS!)
<anidnmeno> thats 13-year-old shit to do
<MoneySign> * anidnmeno is now known as Zombiebaron
<MoneySign> * Zombiebaron hits on Katie
<MoneySign> * Zombiebaron hits on Katie again
<MoneySign> * Zombiebaron hits on Alia some
<MoneySign> * Zombiebaron hates on Anidn and Adam
<MoneySign> * Zombiebaron pisses off MoneySign
<MoneySign> * Zombiebaron hits on Katie some more
<MoneySign> * Zombiebaron is now known as anidnmeno
<MoneySign> And I'M the 13 year old, then?
* Singaporekid dances
<anidnmeno> and clearly you are a 40-year-old guy that lives with his mom
<MoneySign> Hahaha!
<MoneySign> Great...
<MoneySign> Okidoki, anid... It's time for your time-out.
* anidnmeno is almost a 20 year old guy that lives with his mom
* MoneySign is now known as DoNOTremove
* DoNOTremove sets mode: +b *!*i=500@*
<Singaporekid> Not in #@Uncylopedia !
* anidnmeno was kicked by DoNOTremove (I'll let you know when your time out is over)


  1. See the joke? You just said it works best when nobody is paying attention. So I proved your point in an evilly humorous fashion. The "OOPS!" signifies something along the lines of "Oops, you assumed nobody was paying attention, but somebody WAS"...
  2. Roger_The_Bum got the joke in aforementioned kick.
  3. This is another example of the "proving one's point per illustration" form of humor.

Closing thoughts

I agree that banning you (or any user, for that matter) on the grounds of one (1) simple, verbal attack would be gross abuse of power. The ban illustrated here, however, does not belong in that category.
The reason for your "time-out" has several dates of origin. Most of them are instances of you throwing metaphorical rocks at people whilst living in a metaphorical glass house. Note that I'm not denying (nor confirming) your less than flattering statements about me, I'm just saying that you weren't really one to talk. The ban was therefore meant to bring you down a notch.
On a sidenote: I had planned not to give you much/any background-information about the time-out because I reckoned it would have been more effective and helpful if you figured it out for yourself. Silly me for believing you'd actually give it some thought as oposed to reducing yourself to an exemplar of immature behavior. Never going to make that mistake again...

Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 06:48, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

'S what I THOUGHT. --Anidn Needs Ignorant Dumbasses to Not Meaninglessly Exile him from InterNet MeetingrOoms MUN SLACK10 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 19:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

What??? What's what you thought??? And anyways, I'm quite sure you didn't think, but you assumed. There's a big difference. And in case you don't know: Assuming means you take it as a truth. Thinking leaves room for doubt and might/should lead to further investigation. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 21:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I get it. Still no reason for 3 day bannination. And i believe if it weren't for Chronarion, it would've been longer. --Anidn Needs Ignorant Dumbasses to Not Meaninglessly Exile him from InterNet MeetingrOoms MUN SLACK10 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 02:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
It wasn't my intention to ban you for 3 days. That was entirely up to you. Alas, you just got worse. And yes, if it wasn't Chron that unbanned you, I would have rebanned you in a heartbeat. Never the less, consider yourself warned. And don't think that because Chronarion unbanned you, that your safe from future bans. (Also, don't think because now that I've said that, I'm going to ban you for No Good Reason™.)
In closing: change your signature so you don't have to frickin' hardcode it anymore!!!! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 02:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Yes, use {{nosubst|your sig}} --Splaka 03:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
I 'reverted' it, did it not work? --Anidn. Me? NO! MUN FC4 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 02:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
The problem is your sig is being put in as raw code (as of the 1.7 upgrade), which is the proper method for wikipedia, but probably not what you intend (since you've made a user/sig subpage). --Splaka 04:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Like this? --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Icons-flag-az 03:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Verily! --Splaka 03:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Workers day

I suggest a promotion of syndicalism for the front page at Workers Day 1:st May . Are you or anyone working on it? --Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 08:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

No sir... No I am not... Are you? :D --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 08:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Maybe the next one...;)--Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 08:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't even think it's an international holiday thing... So wouldn't really work well... Oh, and another thing: read Forum:Signature bug please. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 08:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Likes and dislikes

I liked it when there was funny things here. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Dissociative Identity Disorder

Huh? I checked the edit history of it, and the "vandalism" is still there. (Not to mention there's a new one on the discussion page as well...) So you mean you're willing to cut that off? Cool. Well, if the article is to remain as I originally wanted it to, it would need to stop after my first 13:30 12 April 2006 edit. (Since the PLS contest is over and it doesn't need to be on my user page, I mean the first edit for that time) That is before everyone got to it. Discussion page would need to cut off everything but my edits too. A reason for protecting it... how about, "Protecting from inevitable vandalism"? Thanks, I honestly didn't think I could get it protected! Much appreciated, in advance. --So So 06:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Uhm... I've done the deleting and restoring and protecting stuff to the article, but I'm afraid I'm not going to do all that with the talk page... I find article discussion pages are meant to discuss the article, and not to act as an extention of the article. I hope this doesn't ruin the whole basic idea...
Also, the article is up for deletion. So... if all goes horribly wrong, it will still get deleted (protection or no protection). You can thank Isra for that one... --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 20:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
It's cool man, you've already done exactly what I requested, and that's a lot more than I can ask for, or something. Yeah, I see what you mean, so that's fine to keep the discussion page open then. Whatever fate becomes of the article now is out of your hands. I don't have one of those template things or whatever, so let me express my thanks with this:

User:So So awards you with a letter p


Thanks. --So So 14:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

You two're so-o cool!


Hi MoneySign, I have discovered the reason for banning a single IP and many get banned. StarHub, a Singapore ISP with a few hundred thousand customers, leases a few proxy lines from SingTel, which owns the whole internet network and maintains it. Banning an IP would mean banning the proxy, which means that those StarHub users who are unfortunately connected to that proxy by StarHub will be affected. Therefore, the ban probably affects a few thousand StarHub users, as the IP which shows up is the proxy IP, which appears to be the same. --Terrancommander 12:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Hope you realise that if some Starhubian decides to seriously get on sysops' nerves, we won't give a care about the other Starhubbards... But let's just hope it never comes to that, eh? --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 20:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

An anti-pox be upon you

... WTF??? You don't expect me to put that ugly thing on my user page, do you? I mean, look at it! It's like something even the dog wouldn't eat... EWWW! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 15:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Concentrated Orange Jews

Depleted uranium penetrator Bloopy would like to award this depleted uranium penetrator to MoneySign for for creating this image. Don't use it all at once.

It lasted less than an hour on VFP when PseudoChron nominated it, but I thought it was great. I can understand why people would vote against when they're offended though. Bloopy icon Bloopy 01:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Heh, thanks for the award... I think... As for the image: I would have voted against it as well if I was awake at the time. Featuring it would have indeed crossed the line of what is acceptable and what is just going too far. I don't want Uncyclopedia to be known as the wiki that makes light of the holocaust.
So yeah, once again, thanks for the award and take care. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 09:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I do think that the image deserves to be featured, though I would have had to vote against for the reasons that are very clear to all. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Ah well, it's featured now anyway... on my user page instead, just because I find it so funny. Bloopy icon Bloopy 11:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

F@H / Thanks

I appreciate the great job you did in catching up on the F@H award backlog. I started looking through the list, assuming there'd be some that were missed, but it looks like you were very thorough.  :) I could use the continued help if you can spare the time. The active roster is over 50 users now. ~ T. (talk) 14:28, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome, and sure, no problem. It has pretty much become a (daily) ritual anyways... Especially with the upcoming 1000th team position (WOOOO!!!). --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 18:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Nazi Cow

You tagged this page as ugly, Nazi cow, I rewrote almost all of it. It was ugly and dumb, now it's tasty and delicious. --Severian 04:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Oooo, good job! I like it when members pay attention to tags, and I love it when they do something about it!
Also, looking at your contribution history, you're rather new here... So I guess a sincere welcome is in order. WELCOME! Good to have you on board! You look like one of the good kind of Uncyclopedic n00bs, so I'm sure we'll get along just uberly fine. ^_^ --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 13:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
P.S.: Funny story: I first thought you were one of the thousends of other members that called me a nazi cow... ;)

F@H Ninja-tasticness!

I could've sworn I copied that thing to my user page… I probably was using tabs again, got tired from staying up to late and just closed the whole goddamned window instead of saving the pertinent page. Uh… long story short: thanks for the ninja star and thanks for re-adding it. —Xoid (MUN F@H Talk) 17:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Aaaah, right... Makes sense... At least more than just removing a positive award. However, I don't remember re-adding it... I remember adding a cookie, but not another star... Meh, whatever. Glad to see you've accepted your protein-ninja-heritage, take care, and have a good one! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 19:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Edit: I've readded the ninjastar now. I guess you might just be one of the few award-blind people in the world. You know, like can't tell the difference between awards. Enjoy! :D --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 09:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Gah! I'm as blind as a bat. Knowing Uncyclopedia there's probably a user box template for that somewhere… Probably would help if I wasn't wasting my time at the Urban dead wiki — greater than 850 constructive edits there in less than 1 month. WTF am I doing it for?! >_<
I need to get back to being a grammar nazi and general maintenance minion at Uncyc, I fear I'm regaining my sanity. —Xoid (MUN F@H Talk) 16:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Mind Flayers

Yeah, the previous article was a list of D&D stats, not even trying to be funny. I tried to make something worth (maybe) keeping or editing. Seeing as you were the one who said that the original article sucks, I figured I'd go to you for the go-ahead on removing (or pushing back) the NRV tag.Buffalo elf 22:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I've gone and removed the NRV. Uhm... As for what I think of the article... Erm... Hmmm... I know it's our fault, really. We're not doing enough to stop it, and we sure aren't doing enough to remove it. But I'm thinking you've might be making a bit too much use of the ol' memes (like Bush and Grues). Also, it strikes me as a bit tadd too random. But I'm really not one to judge. I've only wrtten three full articles and they're all cruft. Luckily I can compensate my lack of talent with bit of imaging.
Oh, and you might want to check out Wikipedia's wiki-editing guide. 'Cause maybe it's a coincidence, but you seem to have wikilinked words that only begin with a capital letter. Thing is, every article has to begin with a cap, and so the software automatically links to the correct article, even if the word is written in all lower-case. However, this only counts for the first letter. Any other caps in the artile name must be matched in the word you're linking with. Anyways, just have a good browse through that helpful page there.
Oh, and quotes follow this example: {{Q|The quote of somebody|Somebody|subject}}
There, hope that helps you out a bit. Good luck with further editing. Take care and have a good one! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 22:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Yeah, maybe I tried a bit too hard, but something had to be done :p. And yeah, too much Grue. But thanks for the tips, MoneySign. Good luck to you too! Buffalo elf 03:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

New Mein Kampf Article

I just thought I'd inform you. I'm working on a rewrite of Mein Kampf, currently at User:Epynephrin/Mein Kampf, and it's using your orange jews pictures. Just a heads up --epynephrin 17:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Heh. Of course I have no problem with that what so ever. But I wonder if you're aware of the first bit in the series of Orange Jews, namely the regular kind...? Whatever the case may be, thanks for using one of my images. :D --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 18:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


Since the UD wiki is down, I thought I might as well come and ask you, can I use that image elsewhere? (i.e. outside Unyclopedia) I've been a bad boy, and already done it, please don't kill me. I've been using it as an unsubtle hint that an article is shit. Why does that seem familiar… —Xoid (MUN F@H Talk) 03:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Short answer: yes, you may. But I insist (and I think you have to) you provide its source on the image-page (preferably linking to the image-page here). Other than that, enjoy. :D --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 11:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
No problem. And… done. Hell, I even linked to your page, hinting that I was spending years behind bars for my misdeeds. —Xoid (MUN F@H Talk) 05:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Could you help me

I'm trying to make a userbox for belgian people

image: Belgian

with the text: Ceci n'est pas un Belge

Hmmmm... You're a Walloon, ain't ya? Damn you francophones! WE FLEMISH ARE THE MAJORITY!!! But all that aside: Ok, fine, guess I'll help you out... :D What do you want? Just the coding for the template? Or is that image not one you're proud of? (Not that I see anything wrong with it.) Tell me. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 21:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
P.S.: Please sign your messages so I don't have to check the history...

I'm Flemish actually & francophone... I need the coding PLZ THX

MC_Kloppedie 21:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Righto... Done and done... Adding {{BelgianUser}} to your user page will now do everything it's supposed to. ^_^ Enjoy! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 22:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

You must have huffed one tonne of kitten by now

I'm curious as to what are you going through, clean-up of orphaned images or? Educate me :O Gnu32 - 64 - 128 - 16? -00:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Yup... Clearing up a huge chunk of serverspace by removing all images (and sounds) not used by anyone at all. I haven't checked recent changes, but you should see Spang in there somewhere, chizzling away at the beginning of the alphabet... But the poor thing only has a play-doh hammer and a wooden spoon to work with... --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 00:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
But they're top quality play-doh and wood. Just doesn't make them any more effective... Spang talk 04:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Get Banned

I noticed that you deleted some of the images from HowTo:Get Banned. You also left red links in the article. Please restore the images or fix the red links. --Sbluen 03:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Sbluen, see: Forum:Gallery_fire_week:_a_modest_proposal_(OMG_eating_babies!). --Splaka 03:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Restored. Those weren't even unused images! See, $, that's why I was checking that! Spang talk 04:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh cry me a river, will you? Did I ask for the list CarlB generated? No. I would have been content working with the special page (which never makes a mistake if users apply the correct procedures). And besides: if I didn't go ahead and delete at uber-speeds, I wouldn't have ruled Recent Changes, and possibly wouldn't have earned the MDA. So :P to you all. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 11:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Huffing

The picture you huffed, Image:Flag of New York City.png, was in fact used. It was on the New Yorker User template. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tripod2282 (talk • contribs) 13 June 2006

It was in fact, not used, as it was only ever used on that template in a <choose> randomizer, which prevents images being listed on the description pages. Images such as these require {{notorphan}}. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Splaka (talk • contribs)


I would never have put up an image without approval, which I got. What's the deal? --Witty Guy bitch at me 17:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

You got approval to use the image, yes. But you did NOT get Chron's approval to put it on VFP (you got the opposite). Much less did you get the approval to claim credit (which you did in the nomination template). For someone with such high standards, you've sunk quite low, in my opinion. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 17:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Agreed 200%. You can't claim you had doubts. You are not a N00b, you know damn well that non-original images aren't featurable. You know CHRONARION himself told you specifiaclly that this specific image won't be featured either. And above all, you know you didn't make it and you have no right to take credit for it. You are lucky I don't hold the banstick.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 17:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • jumps back and looks surprized at Rataube* ... errrr... I'd loan you mine, but they have these things surgically attached upon receiving *holds up body part to which the banstick is connected* See? *checks the admin's rules history again* ... *confirms it's the same guy* ... You ok there? *backs off* --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 17:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
You shouldn't be surprised. From rule number 2: "Before taking any step against an user, consider wether the foult was commited intending to make harm or not". What Acid did was no doubt done deliberately and intentionaly. I was not proposing to stop the bans, just to remind ourselves we must control the little famine we all have inside of us, and use it only in the apropiate case (and I think this is one of this cases).---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Well judging by his reactions, I'm sure he thought he was "drawing within the lines" concerning the VFPing it... The credit-claiming... That truly disgusts me... Suppose Chron even DID give permission to claim credit, I can think of a dozen sewer rats with more integrity than that. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 18:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Chron said that if I got the guy's approval, he was OK with it. He just wanted to avoid an eBaum episode. And that's that. --Witty Guy bitch at me 18:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

<AcidAmmo> hey, chron lemme ask you something
<chronarion> ok
<AcidAmmo> i found this image at a brazilian site, original work of the poster.
<AcidAmmo> its a great image: Image:Braile.jpg
<AcidAmmo> i just emailed the author (i know my away around portuguese)
<AcidAmmo> can we feature the image?
<chronarion> did he OK it yet?
<chronarion> specifically regarding CC licensing?
<AcidAmmo> im waiting his reply
<chronarion> you cannot feature it until it is clear
<chronarion> and it has to be CC license
<chronarion> you gotta make that clear
<chronarion> not just "display on our website"
<chronarion> if those two hurdles are clear
<chronarion> then it's OK, but has to go through VFP as usual
<AcidAmmo> ok
<AcidAmmo> when i get his reply i'll say it on IRC
<MoneySign> And let's say it gets the ok from the creator, can AcidAmmo get credited for Featured Image?
<chronarion> no
<chronarion> the creator is credited
<Rataube> Money i wasnt paying attention what were u going to say about the leukemia picture?
<MoneySign> Hmm. ok.
<chronarion> acidammo can get "props"
<MoneySign> Heh... That's ok, Rataube...
<MoneySign> I'll do it some other time.
<AcidAmmo> its just the leet ninjastar
<chronarion> like "negotiated by"
<chronarion> or something

So, it seems you were allowed to put it on VFP, if meeting certain criteria. I'm not sure, but didn't you share with us later on that you did NOT get the specifically CC-licence from the creator? That in fact you couldn't translate what he sent you, but that you did get that he allowed its usage? Tell me... Oh, and yes... The credit-part... QUITE SIMPLY DISPICABLE! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 18:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
That's what I'm saying. The guy just said it would be OK to put the image in the site. And when I got into copyright he said "sim, comuns criativos, que seja. pode por, e se eles quiserem, dá meu e-mail pra eles", which becomes "yes, creative commons, whatever. you can put it, and if they want to, give them my e-mail address". And as the guy who did it doesn't have an Uncyc account, I just creditted who added it to the site. --Witty Guy bitch at me 19:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
I will accept your explination for the CC-thing and putting it on VFP. And I guess my apologies for accusing you of violating rules. But no, I will not accept your explination for the credit-theft. You made NO INDICATION WHAT SO EVER that it was not your image. The only place I could find some indication that it wasn't yours, was on your userpage. But if it wasn't for my prior knowledge of this image, I would have never suspected such. You may be following the "rules" given to you by that Brazilian guy, but making the situation so that nobody would even think about asking for his email address (intentional or not) is just very very very weak. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 19:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Again, agreed. My apologies too, you were in your right to VFP it, maybe. But again, you had no right to claim the credit for it.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok, ok, who should I credit it for? The guy's name, perhaps? --Witty Guy bitch at me 20:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
We don't know if the maluco wishes to publish his name here, I say credit it to Anonymous, to Mr. N/A or to Mr. -----. ---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 21:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

So, Money, I'm not going to re-add it, that would be going over your head. I think you could get all the comments from the previous nomination and paste it and renominate it, right? --Witty Guy bitch at me 00:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I would prefer not to see it renominated. Aren't we supposed to be proud of what we're doing and not proud of what were finding somewhere on the internet, but making sure it's all legal before we use it? If you renominate it, I will add a note explaining the whole thing. But I will also vote against with the reason I just gave you. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 00:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments or suggestions

Since we've had an intelligent and meaningful exchange of ideas, I'd appreciate any thought or suggestion you might have in relation to the corner I've gotten myself painted into. Please see User:Jax-arrgj/001 and leave any thoughts you might have on User_talk:Jax-arrgj/001 --JAX-arrgh!!! Prevaricate at me 17:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


You probably won't see it for a while, so I've decided to say it here as well: Blame my cousin for that. I've banned him from my PC. The guy doesn't understand how the site works. If he causes any more trouble on this ISP, prevent it from editing. I don't want him putting stupid shit on a good site. 07:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

BTW, if you don't know what I'm talking about, remember back to the "nigger" things you mentioned on the My Chemical Romance discussion page.

Quick reply would be that we will ban an ISP if they become uncontrolably annoying. If they just have a very lame sense of humour, a range-block would be a bit of an over-kill... So yeah... We'll see... Take care, happy editing, and have a good one. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 16:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, alright. Thanks. I'll try and keep him off and if he wants to go on that badly, I'll see he doesn't visit here or Wikipedia or any other Wikis at that. 08:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Long and hard

Archive your damn talk page sometime, loser. --Splarka 10:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey, dipshit, I'm planning to! Now ksst! Run along, boy! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 10:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that

Hi -- sorry about that Choose Your Own Adventure format. I didn't know about the game pages. I'll move the pages.--Procopius 00:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

That's ok. And here's another little newbie-mistake: when someone left a message on your talk page, you should reply there. That person is most likely keeping an eye on the page. Replying on the person's own talk page will fragment the conversation, thus rendering it decreased in value. (I'll, of course, have to copy/paste this on your talk page now, because I'm not sure you're watching this space... :D) --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 00:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh, and sorry about the ban... I just find it's the most effective way to get a message to the person before he/she/it does anymore "damage".
Personal tools