It's quiet in here, isn't it?
Pup 07:46 19 Mar '11
You beat me to it! Spıke ¬ 07:46 19-Mar-11
Took you guys long enough. ~
07:47, 19 March 2011
I have a real life too, you know. Pup 07:53 19 Mar '11
You must be the only one. Seriously, what is this 'real' of which you speak? ~
07:56, 19 March 2011
It's that feeling of desolation and emptiness you get when your internet connection stops working. And have we all gone anti indent recently? Pup 08:38 19 Mar '11
Sounds lovely. And apparently. Have you something against not indenting? ~
19:04, 19 March 2011
Make it a redirect
I was going to make User talk:Maniac mcpee redirect to User talk:Lollipop and then request full-protection. Could you please? -
LOL vandalz 10:48, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- But there be history in the talkpages. The userpage proper already redirects. ~
19:04, 19 March 2011
Headache
Ouch. 17:43, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, man. And why did you feel the need to put this in my talkheader? o_O ~
19:04, 19 March 2011
Image lost
Hey Lyrithya, I just had a chance to check all the articles that I have written or contributed to. On the page: This is not an article there is now missing the File:Notexit.jpg Is is astill too late to bring it back!?!?! --ShabiDOO 19:22, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Of course it's not too late... but I take it you have the sitenotice turned off. Anyhow, done, although it'd have been a little easier if you'd have linked said article and/or said file. *shifty eyes* ~
19:24, 19 March 2011
- Thank you so much. Your kindness is bringing me, one good act at a time, slowly out of my depression. did you hear that, life is whizzing by. Sigh....... --ShabiDOO 19:31, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- My... kindness? I'm sorry, you must have me confused with somebody else... *backs away slowly* ~
21:03, 19 March 2011
- No really, come over, I have a roast in the oven, and its all just for me. I can play you my Benny Goodman records ;) --ShabiDOO 23:05, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- What... exactly are you roasting? ~
23:09, 19 March 2011
- Lets just say, Im roasting two of them, served with two bay leaves and eaten with chopsticks. ;) --ShabiDOO 23:11, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- p.s. lyrithya when you have a chance, would you be able to put the "old" version of stupid cats on my user space (id like to see what its like and if anything can be incorporated...whenever you have a chance :) --ShabiDOO 23:17, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- And where... did you get them?
- You mean 'Stupid cat'? Mon, I told you. It's just 'hello kitty' repeated several hundred times. ~
23:32, 19 March 2011
- What... exactly are you roasting? ~
- No really, come over, I have a roast in the oven, and its all just for me. I can play you my Benny Goodman records ;) --ShabiDOO 23:05, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- My... kindness? I'm sorry, you must have me confused with somebody else... *backs away slowly* ~
- Thank you so much. Your kindness is bringing me, one good act at a time, slowly out of my depression. did you hear that, life is whizzing by. Sigh....... --ShabiDOO 19:31, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
OMG! DUKE NUKEM FOREVER IS COMING SOON!!
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's officially release date is 6th may, 2011!! I Feel so happy! In fact, Cookies for all!
| Another n00b has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
| Another n00b has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
Your all the best!!!! -
LOL vandalz 19:30, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Nearly forgot to give you this
| Mega Deletion Award! This Admin has successfully beaten the crap out of many, |
For helping me finally reduce the thousands of unused images down to just three pictures of sexy asian chicks. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:44, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
A Stupid Question
Why?:Are you huffing pee reviews? Aleister 3:33 20-3-'11
- Because I said I'd do a review the other day and still haven't gotten around to it, so I decided to take out my uselessness on other people's reviews.
- ...okay, not really. I was deleting malformed ones - most of them weren't even review requests, usually just a link, or a bunch of stuff spewed over a page by some IP, or... well... that kind of thing. I blame a DPL idea I got. ~
03:37, 20 March 2011
- Maybe we can create a bot that quickly spins-out pics, articles and other odds and ends at a dizzying pace, attach it to Uncy's sandbox, and you can chase it around deleting its production for the next 11 days. That should keep you busy, and give the site time to heal after getting a lot of bed rest and ingesting lots of liquids. Both of which sound like a good idea right now. Enjoy, and see you during the one-hour writing thingy later on, if I happen to drop in for that. Bannion de Turin! Aleister 3:54 20-3-'11
- I'm sorry. You're right. I make a horrendous admin. It is fortunate that after those 11 days are up, I will go back to being the same powerless user I always was, save for one slight change... the populace will now be aware. They will be aware of what I am apt to do, and they will avoid ever allowing me to do such things again.
- Wait, what writing thingy? ~
04:29, 20 March 2011
- Mmm...in a few more days you'll start writing again no? And reviewing? Creating? I have no clue if you are a good admin (except your moment of tension easing diplomacy) wait (and your ability to admit something and apologise) wait (hours and hours of stuff that someones gotta do). But I think those hours you dedicate to the site are better served (in my humble opinion) with your writing, which I know you are good at ;) ;) ;)
- The writing thingy is the 1 hour write-a-thon tomorrow. Im horrified with the prospect of something I wrote in one hour being sent to that (place we will not name) to be trash talked by other members of the com., but competitions are swell arent they? You should do it if you can :) --ShabiDOO 05:17, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Whatever put the strange notion that I normally write stuff into you people's heads? I've already written more this month than I have last month... but that's not saying much, because I didn't write anything last month. I plead laziness. Writing takes effort, not like doing silly bot-things, and I can do plenty of those with hardly any rights at all. Normally do, in fact... perhaps I should stop. Sort the deathlist. Poor deathlist... it needs it mummy, doesn't it...
- Er, I mean... um... oh. Right. That. Um. Crap. ~
08:39, 20 March 2011
- Maybe we can create a bot that quickly spins-out pics, articles and other odds and ends at a dizzying pace, attach it to Uncy's sandbox, and you can chase it around deleting its production for the next 11 days. That should keep you busy, and give the site time to heal after getting a lot of bed rest and ingesting lots of liquids. Both of which sound like a good idea right now. Enjoy, and see you during the one-hour writing thingy later on, if I happen to drop in for that. Bannion de Turin! Aleister 3:54 20-3-'11
Last time I did an article in an hour it got renamed and then to compound the embarrassment got put up for everyone to point at and laugh. Pup 05:39 20 Mar '11
- The first article I got featured was written in about an hour. That was weird. ~
08:39, 20 March 2011
Image huffed
Hello, you huffed the image File:Nailingirlfriend.jpg, used on my userpage? Any chance of it back, please? --Matfen 14:36, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
LOL
Am I the only one to notice that you voted no on all the pages in the contest in one minute? If my page gets huffed because of you, please bring it back to my user space. Probably the funniest thing in the contest, the thing you just did. Aleister I'm done with the timestamps. No more timestamps.
- Not the only one. Chief said something menacing in response, and then Socky apparently decided to negate it. Alas. Meh, don't worry. The usual VFDers are staying out of this one, it would seem. ~
20:05, 20 March 2011
- After a one-hour awful-writing contest, what could be more fitting than a one-minute awful-voting demo? Spıke ¬ 20:07 20-Mar-11
- Don't you agree, though? Pretty much all but one or two of the articles are terrible! ~
20:10, 20 March 2011
- Thanks! I will lump mine within that one or two window. Mine is about the best thing since sliced tofu. Al
- No, I dont agree that they are all bad, but I have no problem with you voting against all of them (you didnt verbally trash them and spit acid on them, so whats the big deal). I voted for all of them (well minus one) so would be hypocrytical to cry about it. But a awful voting demo? Thats a realy intense idea of awful and cynical way to see it. --ShabiDOO 20:14, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. It's a joke. Spıke ¬ 20:17 20-Mar-11
- To be fair, there wasn't even time to read all of them properly, let alone get in a wider opinion on the things... although I could blame the voting against all of them on the fact that everyone kept edit conflicting me when I tried to put in actual votes. But that's not the point. There's a yak on the loose. ~
20:19, 20 March 2011
- No, I dont agree that they are all bad, but I have no problem with you voting against all of them (you didnt verbally trash them and spit acid on them, so whats the big deal). I voted for all of them (well minus one) so would be hypocrytical to cry about it. But a awful voting demo? Thats a realy intense idea of awful and cynical way to see it. --ShabiDOO 20:14, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! I will lump mine within that one or two window. Mine is about the best thing since sliced tofu. Al
- Don't you agree, though? Pretty much all but one or two of the articles are terrible! ~
- Haven't been following, but it's what I expect with a one-hour deadline. Separately, yes, Ammo was much worse, and you need not check. The sporked lists were longer, and the playful segues in Terminology are all new. And the background in the Kudlow UnNews was originally twice as long before it got around to the business at hand (Kudlow). By the way, on Kudlow's podcast off WABC Radio this week, Kudlow with guest Arthur Laffer was really wearing his heart on his sleeve--must have heard how crass he had come off (more likely from the Huffington Post than UnNews). Spıke ¬ 20:15 20-Mar-11
- Most of that went completely over my head. O_o ~
20:19, 20 March 2011
- My page was huffed! A masterpiece, a Picasso on the trashheap, a lost Bach concerto found and used for waste paper. And the Kulow page, I lol when I first saw the headline on the site, thought it was about the best idea I've seen in weeks, that Lisa Kudrow would tell people that everything was all right. Then it was ruined when I saw it was about Kudlow. A true story. Both of them, actually. Aleister 20:19 maybe
- Well, in any case, it was no joke for me nor probably most who participated in it and created something. I hope it continues and that people vote honestly and that it produces the beginnings of new and good articles in the making. --ShabiDOO 21:52, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- I never said I voted dishonestly, and Spike didn't even vote. But... er... meh, they do all kind of suck in their current states, but indeed, they should get better. When Aleister moves his back into mainspace, the masterpieciness should be much less questionable.
- And UnNews is a mystery to me. ~
21:55, 20 March 2011
- Well, in any case, it was no joke for me nor probably most who participated in it and created something. I hope it continues and that people vote honestly and that it produces the beginnings of new and good articles in the making. --ShabiDOO 21:52, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- My page was huffed! A masterpiece, a Picasso on the trashheap, a lost Bach concerto found and used for waste paper. And the Kulow page, I lol when I first saw the headline on the site, thought it was about the best idea I've seen in weeks, that Lisa Kudrow would tell people that everything was all right. Then it was ruined when I saw it was about Kudlow. A true story. Both of them, actually. Aleister 20:19 maybe
- Most of that went completely over my head. O_o ~
- After a one-hour awful-writing contest, what could be more fitting than a one-minute awful-voting demo? Spıke ¬ 20:07 20-Mar-11
You huffed VFD
Now how will I express my inner turmoil by getting article deleted?!? 22:24, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- It's its.... mAttlobster. (hello) 22:26, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- The dozens of joke bans didn't affect me. This is a major fuck-up. The experiment has failed. Spıke ¬ 00:49 21-Mar-11
- Spiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiike. -- 00:51, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- There is a brand new VFD system currently running on IRC. Yes it's a little rough around the edges - but so was DI Burnside. What I'm saying is, the job is getting done. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:53, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Spiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiike. -- 00:51, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- The dozens of joke bans didn't affect me. This is a major fuck-up. The experiment has failed. Spıke ¬ 00:49 21-Mar-11
Sorry, guys. Yes, I am an idiot, and messing things up does seem to be what I do, but what can be done? I have tried, but restoring the pile seems to be out of my or any admin's scope, so for now I've restored one of the most recent revisions. Please do not make things worse; there has been enough of that already, and do not let what I have done reflect on the other three; they had nothing to do with any of it. I'm the hopeless idiot who should never have been made an admin, even temporarily. Who knows about the others. ~
01:00, 21 March 2011
- That Socky fella is also kinda douchey. -- 01:01, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- It was sort-of my idea - and a good one - VFD doesn't work anymore as a wiki-page. We should do it by postal vote. mAttlobster. (hello) 01:03, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
I have no idea...
...How to restore that, but I've just grabbed VFD/new from the mirror site, so we can recreate it, and the pertinent parts of the history will be in the archives. Pup 11:00 20 Mar '11
- All in your hands now. Pup 12:05 21 Mar '11
Panic over, it's all better now. info in the VD -- Prof. Olipro
KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:06, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Hye!
Care for a cookie? Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)
12:53, March 21, 2011
- Nah, that was`nt the main reason I came here. I came to ask; What is going on with the april reskin? I mean, what the idea of the reskin really is about? Is it about those melons? Or those drugs that Lollipop said? Or is it really about mooses?!!
Cat the Colourful
13:15, March 21, 2011
- Corea! You spell it Corea! Oh, good; perhaps I wasn't losing my mind, after all... anyhow, the reskin, it's... tradition, I suppose. Pranks in general on April 1st, for that matter. I take it they don't do that where you're from? Or am I misunderstanding? I dunno what we'll actually do, mind. ~
22:43, 21 March 2011
- Okay... But... Are you sure you did`nt want a cookie? I dont see your name on the list... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)
13:07, March 22, 2011
- Okay... But... Are you sure you did`nt want a cookie? I dont see your name on the list... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)
- Corea! You spell it Corea! Oh, good; perhaps I wasn't losing my mind, after all... anyhow, the reskin, it's... tradition, I suppose. Pranks in general on April 1st, for that matter. I take it they don't do that where you're from? Or am I misunderstanding? I dunno what we'll actually do, mind. ~
Seeing as no one will respond to me
I've decided to take this into my own hands, I'm going to move Dinosaur into mainspace at ten fourty-five EST tomorrow. Anyone who wants to make their final edits can do so within that time frame. Thanks. --
15:10, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Huh?
Is there a reason for Call of Duty: Black Ops to be redirected? Is it because the ICU tag went out? The last time I checked (when it was an article), the tag said that the article would be re-checked on March 25. --Gamma
- I don't see that it is redirected. It was nominated for deletion (Archive 232, Sec. 9) and I said the nomination was invalid because of the ICU. It is still tagged with ICU, expiring in a week. Spıke ¬ 22:38 21-Mar-11
- Another n00b redirected it. He seems to think the deletion policy, since that's basically what he's doing, deleting articles, doesn't apply to him. Doesn't he know the only one exempt is Zombiebaron? ~
22:42, 21 March 2011
- Another n00b redirected it. He seems to think the deletion policy, since that's basically what he's doing, deleting articles, doesn't apply to him. Doesn't he know the only one exempt is Zombiebaron? ~
Image Huffing
Hello, may I present you with yet another opportunity to prove your complete and utter incompetence as an admin. Word got around that you were recently involved in a project regarding a mass execution of useless images on this site. Well, this image has several old versions which are completely identical to the current version, making them absolutely, entirely, totally, completely and utterly redundant. I had put them up for QVFD twice in the past, but they were ignored, and I didn't care, but now I thought that if you're so into image huffing, you might enjoy this. So for the sake of server space, would you please delete the old versions? Or don't, what do I care. Schamschi, 00:59, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Honestly, there's really not much point in deleting the old versions as they are indeed the same, and technically admins don't have the power to actually delete anything from the database, just remove it from view. Stuff's still on the server after being delete, and that is why it can be hacked up later. That was probably why folks did ignore it on qvfd. If you don't care, however, why did you enquire then and why are you inquiring now? ~
01:55, 22 March 2011
- Ah, ok, I didn't know that the stuff isn't technically deleted. I mean, I guessed that it is not immediately deleted (seeing as it can be recreated), but I thought it is put into a trash or something from where it can be recovered for a certain period of time before being ultimately deleted. That's why I requested it for deletion, I thought it would clean up server space. But, seeing as it doesn't make any essential difference — to quote the bot-template on userpages of bots and *cough* some non-bots –, tough fucking shit. Schamschi, 02:16, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
- I up loaded another completely identical revison just to piss you off, Schamschi. You're welcome. --
03:22, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
- I up loaded another completely identical revison just to piss you off, Schamschi. You're welcome. --
- Ah, ok, I didn't know that the stuff isn't technically deleted. I mean, I guessed that it is not immediately deleted (seeing as it can be recreated), but I thought it is put into a trash or something from where it can be recovered for a certain period of time before being ultimately deleted. That's why I requested it for deletion, I thought it would clean up server space. But, seeing as it doesn't make any essential difference — to quote the bot-template on userpages of bots and *cough* some non-bots –, tough fucking shit. Schamschi, 02:16, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Call of Duty: Black Ops
I'm just saying, but that article contains plagiarized content from external sources. What the heck, Uncyclopedia isn't EBaum's World! (;*´Д`) -
LOL vandalz 08:02, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I removed most of the content in general; dunno what may or may not have been plagiarised. But even so, when you find things like that, as with any other questionable content, take them to an admin or to VFD. If it is indeed plagiarism, mention that, and link to where it came from. Don't just redirect pages; that's not your call. ~
08:52, 22 March 2011
The plagiarised content came from Comedy 23/6. including This, which I remember was taken from a website called VGBoxart, or something. -
LOL vandalz 15:19, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
- If you have proof of plagiarised content you speak to an administrator about it and they will take action. You are racking up a depressing number of bans for doing things that, while well intentioned, you should not be doing. It needs to stop. In terms of this article provide me with a link to the content along with verification that they have not plagiarised it from here (dates of creation) and I will remove it. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:06, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Help
Can't you help beginners like us on developing articles instead of putting it in ICU maybe?
If you can't can you suggest anybody who can?!Wacko! 09:44, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
- P.S. I need practice. Give me a chance.
- P.S.P.S. If you can't, at least help me.
- P.S.P.S.P.S. Why does contruction tag expire in a week? Because, as of now, I won't be able to re-check the article every week...
- P.S.P.S.P.S.P.S. I'm not God to write an amazingly hilarious and divinely funny article in one go. Perhaps you admins should..umm... give us training or something??
- P.S.P.S.P.S. Why does contruction tag expire in a week? Because, as of now, I won't be able to re-check the article every week...
- P.S.P.S. If you can't, at least help me.
Well, to be fair, most beginners utterly suck and chasing them away is a good thing... but that's not the point. You're here, you've passed the first test, and now the lessons really begin.
- Firstly, don't expect too much, and don't be discouraged. Most people here are lazy and never do anything useful, just sit around complaining about all the new users or about all the old users or about all the articles or about all the... well, it varies. I think I had some point, but I forgot what it was.
- Secondly, we all need practice, mon. It'll get better with time, though. If you want helps or ideas, you can do what Chief said, for lack of anyone specific willing to help... chat, er... IRC's sometimes an option, too.
- Construction tags may expire after a week, but if you need longer, you can also move the page into your userspace and work on it when you get a chance; it's safe there. Put it back in mainspace when it's done. If your account won't let you move it yourself at this point, one of us'll probably be willing to.
- Another thing - if you're doing a bunch of PSs or whatnot, it helps to indent them with a :. Also helps to use the preview button to see what you're churning out.
- Anyhow, I forgot what I was saying, so... um. ~
11:03, 22 March 2011
Ban
Yeah, I got a little carried away there. Also, I need to quite rushing April Fools' Day. -- 11:37, Mar. 22, 2011
Are you seriously
considering deleting my article? with the amount of junk/vandalised articles on this site? I guess it has limited appeal for Americans, are you suggesting I turn it into an American newspaper for some deprived ghetto instead? What the hell.
18:50, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
- As there was no indication on the page itself that you had intention to do anything more with it, I was going off what was there already, which simply wasn't much. Stubs in general have limited appeal, and things specific to any relatively small region are likewise apt to not have much appeal to those outside, regardless of where specifically, especially if smaller. If you don't build off the fact that this is supposedly an encyclopedia, and use that to develop your concept and jokes more, chances are it'll be lost on most folks, and lose potential effect even on those who do know the subject.
- As for the junk on the rest of the site, that's what VFD is for. Vandalised can be tagged various ways as well.
- And Jack's got a point about the pee tag; usually you want to put a {{construction}} on these things if you're not done, but that'd work too. ~
21:44, 22 March 2011
- How dare you. Good day, sir. I SAID GOOD DAY. Mister Victim (talk) 07:36, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
I'm sneaky
Sneaks in quickly but quietly and HUGS Lyrithya! Seventh Demigod of Sneaky Hugs, Jnr. 22:05, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Another image to restore
File:Unfortunatekidsinalaundrybasket.jpg needs restoring. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:05, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
User:Hammerlock the Cock
I found him chatting you up on your Wikipedia talkpage. Next thing I knew, he was a sockpuppet, and a vandal, and an indefinitely blocked user. Who the fuck is this guy? --Scofield 10:36, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Wait a minute, he isn't Lollipop, is he? Oh God! --Scofield 15:24, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Some people tend not to do so well on wikipedia. ~
16:56, 23 March 2011
- I was kind of furious when it happened. Nhlrules was actually not my account. And for some reason, my account got dragged into some other user's mess. I'm telling the truth. I had to change an IP range in order to reuse Wikipedia. I checked the other accounts and it apparently was some NHL bullshit. I'm not really a sports guy. --
Lollipop 23:35, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. ~
23:37, 23 March 2011
- But I did a horrible job on Wikipedia. I got banned for a different reason because I created vanity. I created Penispenispenis. --
Lollipop 23:44, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Smart. (?). As I said once before, I can do stuff here because my ego is rubbed and dusted on wikipedia, as pages I either wrote or did major things on and squat get upwards of 70,000 hits a day. So even as I stumble and slobber here I know that "information" I share on a daily basis is doing some good somewhere. This means I can write That time I nearly drowned during my sojourn on the Titanic and still feel like a real live boy. Aleister 22:51 23-3-'11
- You're too good for us. ~
23:55, 23 March 2011
- No, the opposite, almost everyone who works on wikipedia doesn't realize how much fun it is here, they are the stupido ones. We all are the lucky bunnies who are good enough to play here! Aleister 00:00 24-3-'11
- You're too good for them, too. ~
00:06, 24 March 2011
- Hmmmmm. I'll be moving on from these insults and go edit "Evil Jesus". I wish Evil Jesus could be made into a movie. Aleister 00:10 24-3-'11
- Perhaps it could. ~
00:11, 24 March 2011
- Wikipedia sucks. Who wants to create a rival to Wikipedia? Called FACTOPEDIA? --
Lollipop 00:34, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Hey lolipop. Totally unrelated. I had a "canadian" experience today. I had a doughnut called a "vanilla dip" and was aparantly the Canadian doughnut featured in a pastry stop. The American one was "boston cream". There was no Australian one. It was so sweet I could barely finish it but it had rainbow sprinkles on it and about 30,000,000 calories. I ate it in your honour. I looked for "tim bits" but couldnt find them. Tim bits are nice. EVIL JESUS! --ShabiDOO 00:46, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
- We have Boston Cream Donuts at Tim Horton's too! By the way, I lost again at the ROLL UP THE RIM TO RIM. Oh, and hope you enjoyed the donut. --
Lollipop 00:53, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
- We have Boston Cream Donuts at Tim Horton's too! By the way, I lost again at the ROLL UP THE RIM TO RIM. Oh, and hope you enjoyed the donut. --
- Hey lolipop. Totally unrelated. I had a "canadian" experience today. I had a doughnut called a "vanilla dip" and was aparantly the Canadian doughnut featured in a pastry stop. The American one was "boston cream". There was no Australian one. It was so sweet I could barely finish it but it had rainbow sprinkles on it and about 30,000,000 calories. I ate it in your honour. I looked for "tim bits" but couldnt find them. Tim bits are nice. EVIL JESUS! --ShabiDOO 00:46, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia sucks. Who wants to create a rival to Wikipedia? Called FACTOPEDIA? --
- Perhaps it could. ~
- Hmmmmm. I'll be moving on from these insults and go edit "Evil Jesus". I wish Evil Jesus could be made into a movie. Aleister 00:10 24-3-'11
- You're too good for us. ~
- Smart. (?). As I said once before, I can do stuff here because my ego is rubbed and dusted on wikipedia, as pages I either wrote or did major things on and squat get upwards of 70,000 hits a day. So even as I stumble and slobber here I know that "information" I share on a daily basis is doing some good somewhere. This means I can write That time I nearly drowned during my sojourn on the Titanic and still feel like a real live boy. Aleister 22:51 23-3-'11
- But I did a horrible job on Wikipedia. I got banned for a different reason because I created vanity. I created Penispenispenis. --
- Okay. ~
- I was kind of furious when it happened. Nhlrules was actually not my account. And for some reason, my account got dragged into some other user's mess. I'm telling the truth. I had to change an IP range in order to reuse Wikipedia. I checked the other accounts and it apparently was some NHL bullshit. I'm not really a sports guy. --
- Some people tend not to do so well on wikipedia. ~
Now this may sound stupid,
But I want a copy of another user's userspace in my userspace. Basically, I want to have a copy of a Userspace by Gert5, called User:Gert5/Game/readme.txt. I want a copy of this in my Userspace as this is one of my personal favourite Articles. I would ask him, but he is no longer an active User. I just wanted to ask an administrator if it would be legit to do copy it into my Userspace, even though it is another person's Userspace. -
LOL vandalz 18:23, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Yay! (‐^▽^‐) -
LOL vandalz 08:09, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Lyrithya...
Can I make you a sig? I'm good at that. I made Another n00b's. --
Lollipop 01:02, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Are you implying there is something wrong with my current signature? ~
01:04, 24 March 2011
Protecting the HS
I guess eventually we've got to get into this - does the fact that you protected it when you did mean you agree with Dexter's POV over Aleister's, there? Because, personally, I don't. 04:34, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
- They kept reverting each other, so I protected it. With any luck it'll remain protected forever... but that's not the point. Actually, might as well unprotect it for now. Even if Skully's right about my notion being completely idiotic, we'll probably have some new setup soonish, but in the meantime... ~
04:36, 24 March 2011
Cookies! Get cookies!
I`ll give you a free cookie. I`m so cool.
| Cat the Colourful has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
Cool like a muffin. Thankee. ~
06:33, 24 March 2011
ICU
Is proving to be really useful when it comes to getting help with an article, shame about the threat of deletion though.. Is there a place where I can put an article and let it be known that others can have their way with it and expand it at will?
19:45, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, the threat of deletion is always there, at least until they get featured. But even then sometimes they get deleted. Not permanently, but... administrators can be rather silly at times. Anyway, the nice thing here is that even if something is deleted, it is not lost forever. Just ask an admin and they'll usually gladly hack things up for you, I've found. Damned helpful bunch, most of them. ~
20:20, 24 March 2011
- Oh, as for the other bit, no idea. Can ask around, but... I know on Illogicopedia there be an entire, mostly ignored, system for specifically that, but this place is a little different. ~
21:02, 24 March 2011
Shame on the Hall of Shame
Since you are now huffing categories without VFD'ing them (Category:Hall of Shame), and putting in new pages concerning the hall of shame, may I ask what is your final plan? Are you planning on getting rid of the hall of shame in favor of some kind of individual page? Aleister 00:29 25-3-'11
- I made that category in the first place as a container for the HoS subpages, but the name was misleading, so I deleted it and recreated the same thing with a more descriptive name. Because yes, that is... basically the intent at this stage - each user has a subpage that they can edit without messing with the overall table. With any luck, this will actually work and it will sort itself automatically, as with the current notion, the main thing will still be there, but it won't be edited directly. This should at least ease the concerns of those with trouble editing it, but as for what to do about it itself, hell if I know. I'm just the tech guy. ~
00:44, 25 March 2011
- I thought you were a woman... --
00:51, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, right. Forgot about that. ~
00:54, 25 March 2011
- Sounds good! Have you tested it on one of the pages you created, to see if it shows up in the hall of shame page? And hopefully it won't require an edit button on all the hall of shame listings, Puppy tried that and it didn't look good at all, at all. And it's really not much bother to edit the hall of shame, just have to wait a few seconds of loading time which gives people time to contemplate the shame as they wait. Aleister 00:54 25-3-'11
- Eh, have to figure out the DPL for that, first. It's definitely doable; should be rather like the VFH summary, but... less insanely complicated. As for where the edit button would be, I'm not there yet, either. Could be like the VFH things with (links), or maybe make the number into a link to the page itself? I dunno. And yeah, I've never had any trouble with it, either, but some people use stupider web browsers, so... ~
01:06, 25 March 2011
- Eh, have to figure out the DPL for that, first. It's definitely doable; should be rather like the VFH summary, but... less insanely complicated. As for where the edit button would be, I'm not there yet, either. Could be like the VFH things with (links), or maybe make the number into a link to the page itself? I dunno. And yeah, I've never had any trouble with it, either, but some people use stupider web browsers, so... ~
- Sounds good! Have you tested it on one of the pages you created, to see if it shows up in the hall of shame page? And hopefully it won't require an edit button on all the hall of shame listings, Puppy tried that and it didn't look good at all, at all. And it's really not much bother to edit the hall of shame, just have to wait a few seconds of loading time which gives people time to contemplate the shame as they wait. Aleister 00:54 25-3-'11
- Oh, right. Forgot about that. ~
- I thought you were a woman... --
Happy Sasquatch Appreciation Day
| Happy Sasquatch Appreciation Day!
| ||
| March 24 is Sasquatch Appreciation Day, as decreed by Reverend zim_ulator. Please join me in celebration of the noble Sasquatch and his innumerable contributions to Uncyclopedia. |
...still blocked... blimey. As for the day itself, awesome. ~
03:39, 25 March 2011
- The dud should create an account. --
Lollipop 03:47, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
- ... 03:49, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
- ...? --
Lollipop 03:50, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
- ...He's a dud? That's a shame. ~
03:51, 25 March 2011
- You mean the IP that is obviously just Zim ban dodging should get an account when he has a account creation block? 03:52, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Ban dodging? Why in tarnation would an administrator dodge bans? I mean, sure, he banned himself in the first place, but come on... ~
03:54, 25 March 2011
- I thought Zim wanted to be banned. He benned himself, didn't he? --
Lollipop 04:00, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I thought Zim wanted to be banned. He benned himself, didn't he? --
- Ban dodging? Why in tarnation would an administrator dodge bans? I mean, sure, he banned himself in the first place, but come on... ~
- You mean the IP that is obviously just Zim ban dodging should get an account when he has a account creation block? 03:52, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
- ...He's a dud? That's a shame. ~
- ...? --
- ... 03:49, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Happy Sasquatch Appreciation Day
| Happy Sasquatch Appreciation Day!
| ||
| March 24 is Sasquatch Appreciation Day, as decreed by Reverend zim_ulator. Please join me in celebration of the noble Sasquatch and his innumerable contributions to Uncyclopedia. |
The Chatroom..
Is annoying this dumb noob...how come I was able to log in 3 times over the past week but now I need to register my username? Also...I don't know how to register because it doesn't seem to accept hotmail addresses as a valid ones.
18:50, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Please see Forum:I'm banned...on IRC?. -
LOL vandalz 18:58, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
User:Frosty/100 reasons to ban Lyrithya
Wondering why you are actually contributing, when I'm refering to getting you banned...
Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB
21:42, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Some of it's pretty funny, man. Also, plenty of folks think I should be banned, for all sorts of reasons, so I'm not terribly fussed, if that's the bit you're wondering about. But that could even help you with yours; I'd suggest asking around, but people might take that the wrong way... hmm. ~
22:02, 25 March 2011
User:Egalitarian Aspie/UnNews:Charlie Sheen discovers new element
How is it? Ready for moving? - User:Egalitarian Aspie
- Better, but the formatting still needs work - look how other UnNews are formatted and mimic that, mon. Needs a headline-thing, sources, etc, and the {{q}} really sticks out. And say things like it really is a news report - don't just link what you mean, say it. "His show, Two and a Half Men,..." That kind of thing. ~
00:29, 26 March 2011
- My eyes hurt. Vomit indeed. This article is the joy of putting random words on paper, not relentlessly pursuing a comedy concept. Zim, is it you? Spıke ¬ 00:31 26-Mar-11
- IS IT FUNNY AT LEAST? Oh sorry, caps lock. I was just yelling on an Asperger's forum. -- User:Egalitarian Aspie
- It is ODD. (That was Shift.) Again, it has no comedy concept. Spıke ¬ 00:38 26-Mar-11
- My eyes hurt. Vomit indeed. This article is the joy of putting random words on paper, not relentlessly pursuing a comedy concept. Zim, is it you? Spıke ¬ 00:31 26-Mar-11
King of the Hill on VFD
Lyrithya, I am now in doubt: is nominator gaming the process to get a free review of an awful article that he didn't want deleted in the first place? Spıke ¬ 00:38 26-Mar-11
- Hell if I know. But it may well not even be that - he could have genuinely thought his version was significantly better and figured this would have been the way about replacing it... I forgot what I was saying. ~
00:46, 26 March 2011
Sorry to bug you again, but...
I changed some things about HowTo:Become a Master of Disguise, hopefully for the better. Anyway, maybe you could give it a look through? I know I'm being really annoying right now, and should shut up. Anyway, I leave you with a gif of MC Hammer dancing.
Enjoy. --
01:26, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the surprise non-birthday gift
Whoa, I didn't expect to see Tombstone on VFH. Thank you! I'll keep track of it this time, promise, and will jump on the vandals with both feet and at least one elbow, leaving the other one free for a sucker punch. Vandals! Thanks, very appreciated. Happy Monkey! Aleister 1:35 26-3-'11
Aliens
Don't like wearing pants. 05:14, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Of course you would notice that... but what's your point, eh? Are you calling my humanity into question? Because I'm normal. Of course I'm normal. ~
05:18, 26 March 2011
Annual writing contest: Sign up now!
Are you interested in signing up for the contest? Please do.
08:14, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Mon, you really can't just start a contest so suddenly, especially when there are so many other ones currently in the works. If you want to run a contest, plan it out. See if people are interested in the notion, first. Then get to the specifics and set it all up, and stagger it with the others going on. The way you've tried to do it, you've wound up with a forum page that is more confusing than explanatory and no support at all with about a day to the thing itself; it's not exactly appealing, nor the sort of thing with which folks would want to be involved, myself included. ~
08:34, 26 March 2011
Could you please pull/cancel/fail THIS Nom on VFH
Hi Lyrithya, please fail this now at request of author. Thanks much. Hope you are well! Cheers!--Funnybony
09:24, Mar 26
- Aye, 'sa done. ~
09:35, 26 March 2011
- Ur-a-saint!--Funnybony
10:34, Mar 26
- Since you are pulling things, can you get rid of Skunk on VFH. It's stinkin' up the place. Aleister 10:36 26-3-'11
- Er... okay... ~
10:50, 26 March 2011
- Ur-a-demon! Aleister 11:16 26-3-'11
- Sorry, couldn't resist. Go ahead and revert that if you want, mon. XD ~
11:19, 26 March 2011
- But I was serious! The handwriting was on the wall (in crayon no less), you hadn't voted for it, so the page was doomed. Like a Picasso thrown upon a trash bin, like a .... Aleister 12:39 26-3-'11
- Sorry, couldn't resist. Go ahead and revert that if you want, mon. XD ~
- Ur-a-demon! Aleister 11:16 26-3-'11
- Er... okay... ~
- Since you are pulling things, can you get rid of Skunk on VFH. It's stinkin' up the place. Aleister 10:36 26-3-'11
- Ur-a-saint!--Funnybony
Would it be acceptable to move this to mainspace?
I made an article on This, called User:Another n00b/Zombiebaron. Would it be a good choice to move this out of Userspace? -
LOL vandalz 12:07, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Those aren't even sentences. No links or subsections or paragraphs or anything, either. Now, really... ~
12:09, 26 March 2011
So I'd take that as a no, LOL. -
LOL vandalz 12:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
funny?
Is this template funny? Well, a better question is: Can I use it for holyright, then have an article become a success and then the template can be used for actual images? -Egalitarian Aspie
| and/or damn this document under the terms of the GOD Public Documentation License 1.0. Holyright is better, but if it's God's property, whatever! |
I really don't see how it would have much use outside said article. It definitely fits that, mind, but other than that... eh. It may prove cleaner to just subst it in, but we'll see, eh? ~
20:07, 26 March 2011
Give me your bank acount details
The page is actually a very clever joke on todays archipelagic restrictions concerning government fluctuation details.
please restore! Lock'd And Loaded (Shoot!) 19:58, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah! What he said! Or not. I don't know. -Egalitarian Aspie20:00, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- That's... er, lovely, except I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, to the point where I suspect you made it up.
- Anyhow, I can restore it to userspace if you want. Which of you wants it more? ~
20:13, 26 March 2011
- I DO!!! It's called Give me your bank account details. -Egalitarian Aspie--Egalitarian Aspie 20:22, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, it's here. Have fun with your pudding, you two. ~
20:52, 26 March 2011
- Alright, it's here. Have fun with your pudding, you two. ~
- I DO!!! It's called Give me your bank account details. -Egalitarian Aspie--Egalitarian Aspie 20:22, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
I like these two. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 04:13 Mar 27, 2011
Sure
Sure, I'll get right on it. Thanks for giving me the heads up. Also, hi. ---
[talk] 20:06, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Done and dusted. ---
[talk] 20:19, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Done and dusted. ---
I was just looking
at what Zana Dark is doing, and saw her adoptee list. She adopted Paizuri. That means she's your grandmother! I bet she'd be proud to know that, or its opposite, if she doesn't already. Aleister 21:08 26-3-'11
- Ayup, indeed she is. And she knows. Or knew. I went over and asked and learned some fabulous family history, I did. Such a glorious grandmum... ~
21:27, 26 March 2011
King of the Hill
Having just stuck this VFD debate into the archives, did you notice the comments? Author and nominator Gamma287 informs us that there is a better version on the mirror site (as, come to think of it, he did in his nomination); I read it and tell him it is better taken care of but substantially the same; he states his intention to roll it in as a replacement after the vote; and I tell him that that is very close to gaming the vote and indeed using VFD to flog his writing. Keep an eye open for this, please. Spıke ¬ 22:27 26-Mar-11
- Yeah, I saw. Shame you can't just go threaten to ban him if he tries it. That'd solve everything. ~
22:30, 26 March 2011
No, I can't. But.... Spıke ¬ 22:36 26-Mar-11
- What? ~
22:43, 26 March 2011
- Biggest laugh of the week, these last two posts. Aleister 22:47 26-3
A request on joke ban
Block me with an expiry time of 6 minutes, But the block summary should be the most offensive, profane block summary ever. Be imaginative, Go on click that little Ban button and think of the most distasteful thing to say you can think of. Go on, you know you want to. -
LOL vandalz 23:50, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
All you could say is "You are a <- Insulting word -><- Insulting follow-up word -><- Insulting follow-up word -><- Insulting word -><- insulting racist profanity -> <- Insulting follow-up to insulting racist profanity -> who fucks <- Randomly selected hate figure -> <- Insulting word -><- insulting racist profanity -> <- Insulting follow-up to insulting racist profanity -> because you <- Insulting word -><- Insulting follow-up word ->". Fill in the blanks! -
LOL vandalz 23:58, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Why are you unfunnily requesting an admin to do something unfunny? 00:00, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting question. More interesting to me is why he is requesting a joke ban when I am in fact inclined to give him a real ban for apparently never using the 'preview' button, and when Skully keeps also giving him real bans for constantly doing a very similar and entirely related thing... ~
00:06, 27 March 2011
- Well, just combine these two things. "Use the Preview-button, you motherf*cking son of a b*tch.". Schamschi, 00:12, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting question. More interesting to me is why he is requesting a joke ban when I am in fact inclined to give him a real ban for apparently never using the 'preview' button, and when Skully keeps also giving him real bans for constantly doing a very similar and entirely related thing... ~
Yes, like that, only uncensored. -
LOL vandalz 00:14, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
So are you going to do that? I know it's not funny but I don't care (゚∀゚). 6 Minutes. -
LOL vandalz 00:42, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
hey u huff my userpaeg =
<nowiki>Insert non formatted text here</nowiki>
what teh fuckk dood' its MY userpaeg not UR userpaeg and if i wanted that 'PAEG huffed id have do it myselflink text
stupid stpuid dumb ADMNIS GIVE ME MY PAEG
BAC
Insert non formatted text here
- NOU
how much of a FAG do you even have to BE to DO something like that – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 04:10 Mar 27, 2011
Good question. If I ever find out, well... you'll be the first to know. Maybe. ~
04:14, 27 March 2011
What idiot is not only unable to insert properly formatted text, they forgot to sign! -
LOL vandalz 08:59, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Stupid Question of the Day
Can I submit an article for Pee Review moar more than once? --Gamma
- After it's been reviewed you can submit it again. Make sure you submit it to pee as something like "Your article (revised)" 04:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Gamma 05:17, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Animals
with feet. Thanks, the pic does look better on top. I'd say the quotes paragraph should stay as one paragraph, simply because listing all the quotes one after another takes away from the impact of the quick escalation of the arguments between the animals with feet versus the animals with no feet. The drama is in the fast pace of the insults. As scholars study the page they will surmise that each twist in this paragraph adds a particular direction and velocity of the conflict. I don't know why, but that sounds good. With feet 11:39 27-3-'11
- Makes sense, except if you shove all the quotes into the same paragraphs, it also makes it a lot harder to differentiate who is speaking. People like me get confused. And frankly, that's just not proper grammar. *hmphs loudly* ~
11:42, 27 March 2011
- I know, but it seems the pace is thrown off with the quotes separated. The pace is quick within the battle there. The first quote actually is separated. I wrote the thing last night as I went past a computer and logged in, did it ?logic style free-flow without thought, which I like to do but haven't done enough here. Just edited it a bit now, a couple of commas were needed. Thanks for drawing my attention back to it actually, I'd forgotten about it. With no feet 11:48 27-3-'11
Huffing your Userpage
Ah, I see you're getting desperate to indulge in your temporary admin powers and use them to their full extent now that the end of your days as a temporary admin is getting closer and closer. Well, it's now or never, isn't it? Schamschi, 00:08, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Permanent Adminship is a given, but I will be advocating a one-month hiatus first, so we slower mortals can track down everything she's huffed or pranked. Spıke ¬ 00:26 28-Mar-11
- Recall that, in Impeachment, the question was not whether the guy got his dick sucked in the White House then tried to game a federal judge; it was: "Would you prefer Al Gore?!" Likewise, the question for our betters here will not be whether Lyrithya has made a travesty of Uncyclopedia, but whether those old guys who ceded the banstick were preferable. What were their names? Spıke ¬ 02:15 28-Mar-11
UnNews talk:Voldemort appears in London
Is there a second? Spıke ¬ 02:08 28-Mar-11
- Never mind. There was--by JackOfSpades and TheHumbucker--and I mercy-moved it, with a note to the author. Spıke ¬ 12:35 28-Mar-11
You turn around and get back here right now missy
And bring your things with you. Aleister 12:10 28-3-'11
- Aw, she's just sleeping. I've checked her Contributions, and she does doze off from time to time. (Can't be dates; none of us are able to make conversation in the world outside Uncyclopedia any more.) Spıke ¬ 12:36 28-Mar-11
Oxenford Authorship Answer
[1] Thanks for the speedy deletion. I wasn't finished. I just posted the article a couple of hours ago. Give me a chance please to continue editing. Thank you in advance for your consideration of my feelings. 74.234.112.6 14:57, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, IP! It's really not in the best interest of the tidiness of the wiki to have an IP copy a Wikipedia article into mainspace and then work on it there. If you register an account, we'd be more than happy to put a copy of the article in your userspace, at User:YourNewUsername/Oxenford authorship answer, and then you can work on it there and move it over to Oxenford authorship answer when it's done. Does that sound reasonable? 15:03, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- O' much joy!! Yes, thank you very much! I am a registered user called User:Knitwitted but am currently banned for sucking too much dick until later today. 74.234.112.6 15:07, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- You're ban evading a ban for ban evasion and telling us about it? Gods... I need another drink. ~
15:09, 28 March 2011
- Yes, My Right Honourable Sock-Puppet-in-chief User:Samuel Clemens got me banned. He's a big dick. Can you tell me how to get on Wikipedia? They're really nice to me over there. They don't hurt my feelings. They've never banned me either. Although they have threatened to sanction my ass if I dare open my mouth again. 74.234.112.6 15:12, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Knitwitted, I left a note for you on your talk page. 15:31, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, My Right Honourable Sock-Puppet-in-chief User:Samuel Clemens got me banned. He's a big dick. Can you tell me how to get on Wikipedia? They're really nice to me over there. They don't hurt my feelings. They've never banned me either. Although they have threatened to sanction my ass if I dare open my mouth again. 74.234.112.6 15:12, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- You're ban evading a ban for ban evasion and telling us about it? Gods... I need another drink. ~
- O' much joy!! Yes, thank you very much! I am a registered user called User:Knitwitted but am currently banned for sucking too much dick until later today. 74.234.112.6 15:07, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Please ban me
Just please ban me. Not a joke ban, A real ban. Please please just ban me. Please? ban me. Preferably temporary. Thanks. -
LOL vandalz 16:41, March 28, 2011 (UTC)


