User talk:Keitei

VOTE FOR HIGHLIGHT NOW!! I know you liked it, but with a singular further step you can be part of a bigger purpose (i.e., earning your friend Simmy bigger balls). So please, VOTE NOW on Uncyclopedia:VFP!! This propaganda brought to you by His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great08:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank You Keitie!

Thank you so much for restoring our highschool page... you hav brought joy to the hearts of many who thought that it was lost forever. You are a great admin! - user:Sujacal

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! jk   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Hahahaha

Your wicked laugh picture really suits the article. Thanks!--Rataube 10:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

THIS USER VOTES WISELY They voted for me. And I didn't even have to bribe them. A featured picture is a nice birthday present for me :) --

Thanks (he stole my title)

...for your kind words on the front page box. Those can be tough to write.  :) Hugs, etc. ~ T. (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Cthulhu

You have pleased Cthulhu with your support of his column. I have been instructed to give this to you.

This user has pleased CthulhuBy aiding Cthulhu in his quest to obtain souls online. So now: Surrender your soul!!!

--<<>> 23:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

mmmm... I was instrcted to do the same, how confusing. But keep this one, the caption is better I think.--Rataube 10:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Abu Ghraib

Hi! Could you explain why you removed the NRV template I placed on this article? I think in this case merely expressing a contrary opinion doesn't cut it. While the premise is good and few institutions deserve satire as much as Abu Ghraib and the peculiar goings-on there, the article itself is of very poor quality, containing numerous errors in spelling and grammar, and it is not particularly funny, given its cut and paste origins. It would be far better to be rewritten from scratch IMHO, this time making humour rather than convenience the object. --Skyring 10:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

NRV is for articles which have No Redeeming Value. Not liking an article does not mean it doesn't have any redeeming value. {{vfd}} would be more suitable in this case. If you object to the spelling and grammar so much, fix it yourself. --KATIE!! 12:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Could you take another swing at a response, please? --Skyring 12:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

In all fairness, and no offense is intended Keitei, I'm going to have to side with Skyring on this one. Just because you happen to think the article has quality doesn't mean that Skyring was able to find anything he considered redeeming about it. If you weren't an admin and an action like this had taken place, I would not hesitate to block you for a day or few. The burden of using {{vfd}} is on the NRV-remover and while I agree with your view on the article, you still should have followed the standard procedure. --Sir gwax (talk) 14:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

It wasn't some "unilateral" thing. Whywhy asked the IRC channel if we thought it was fairly placed, and nobody thought it was. I happened to be the one to remove it, but I wasn't the only one who thought it should be. It seemed unfair to NRV such a well establish article. It seems inappropriate, and we are in the process of trying to refine NRVing. We've been having problems with people NRVing things they simply don't like, which have a long history and plenty of humor. So, yes. --KATIE!! 09:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

A well established article? Fair suck, it's been in existence for all of four days, and I whacked an NRV on it less than 25 hours after it was created. I like the premise; I don't like the way it has been developed. Although I think it's fatally flawed, I haven't made a fuss over the unilateral NRV removal. However, I don't see anybody racing to improve on it. Does that mean that those reading this think it's fine as it is? --Skyring 10:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't think that it's fine, I just think that there's humor that has some redeeming value to it. It most definitely still needs work. --Sir gwax (talk) 17:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your vote, KT!

THIS USER VOTES WISELY They voted for me. And I didn't even have to bribe them. Do NOT click any links! -- Bradaphraser

With your blessing, I'm sure to get featured now! The cult of KT will prevail!  :)--<<>> 17:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Old Man Grumpus

Hey, K, according to the deletion log you killed Good Old Days. Although there may have been a WIP or Construction template on there, the article, such as it was, had reached a completed stage. Ummmm...can I have my article back? It wasn't that bad. Not that bad at all. It had words, and some formatting, and even a picture. Words+formatting+picture = not bad at all. Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 12:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I was very undecided on that one. What made me decide to just delete it was a picture I think, or a template or something. I forget, actually. I'll restore it. --KATIE!! 13:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh right, it was the three templates. I hate templates. A lot. So that offended me. =] Just finish it or something, and removed the frigging templates. --KATIE!! 13:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks; I admit I just forgot about the templates. In any case, here, have the inaugural Weasel's Award of Superior Achievement Barring Indictment. Put it on your fridge and impress your pets! — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 14:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Wild Weasel has awarded you the highly non-coveted Weasel's Award of Superior Achievement Barring Indictment Go forth and do great things! (just don't get indicted)

'Marlborough'

Hi, I've come to request that my page 'Marlborough' be replaced. I know it was marked as a WIP and the tag was not subsequently removed, but the principle reason I did this was because I feared unless it was marked incomplete it would be destroyed for being too short. As it is, I do still like the page and want to expand on it. Thanks.

Restored. Please do expand. Cheers! --KATIE!! 09:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Obido

I was purging my Watchlist, and saw that Obido was swimming with the kittens. While it looks like a random crap, Obido was one of the first Words of the Day (Word of the Days? [Word of the Day]s? Like sands through the hourglass, these are the Days of the Word?). Whaddya say about bringing it back? (Note: an answer of "no" will not make me respect you any less. I would have been looking at your chest over your shoulder while talking anyway, 'cause I'm a guy and I'm easily distracted by boobies.) -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 02:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks and shut up

Oops. Forget the shut up part, I thought I was talking to someone else. Anyway, just want to say thanks for helping me and others out. -- Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 15:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

the Magic of Bears

Keitei, although I can't be entirely sure you voted "for" on bear, have this:

The Magical Eight-Days Gestating Bear Award The Magical Eight-Days Gestating Bear wishes to thank you for voting "si" on bear in VFH. Hooray for you! Hooray for magical bears!

— Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 17:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you very much for the links to the helpful pages here on Uncyclopedia. I'd seen them before, but it's good to see the management/administration here is very helpful to new users. I hope to contribute to this very hilarious site very much. Thanks for noticing me and giving me some helpful suggestions. --ObliVioNT 21:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

?

If you wonder what I'm doing recently, I have 8 tabs open in Firefox, and a surprisingly neat system. But many tabs, too many... anyway, erm, I'm making new invention templates. They're, well, you can see the explanation. Should I stop, or what? If I should, then what ho, I will, but anyway... Flameviper12 21:54, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

HELP!

Right, I wrote an article about my friend AGGI or kitty as I call him, but now there is a banner saying "no redeeming value" what does that mean I have to change? how does on complete an article?

[[1]]