User talk:THE

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Oye)
Line 416: Line 416:
   
 
::The deed's been done. Good luck--[[User:Leoispotter|Leoispotter]]
 
::The deed's been done. Good luck--[[User:Leoispotter|Leoispotter]]
:::I was planning on nomming it after a little more work. If it doesn't get it this time, I'll make sure it does next time around. :) --{{User:The Thinker/sig}} 21:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 
   
 
==Important information you must know==
 
==Important information you must know==
Line 438: Line 437:
   
 
:Um...K --[[User:THE|THE]] 21:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:Um...K --[[User:THE|THE]] 21:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  +
  +
::Thanks, I needed those essay questions too. Don't forget to vote for your own article, by the way--[[User:Leoispotter|Leoispotter]]

Revision as of 21:44, May 31, 2007

Um....oh yeah welkome to my talk page. This is where you kan diskuss stuff abowt me. Pleeze put new stuf at the botom. and remembr to sine your messages cuz its annoying wen peeple dont. and pleez dont submit incomplete messages because that is. --THE 22:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


'Lo. Good to see you've joined the fold and got an account - you've created some good quality work, I'm looking forward to seeing more of it ;) RabbiTechno 18:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Bout time!! :-D --finker.jpgTHINKER 18:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks y'all. --THE 23:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

A small tip when creating new articles

Actually, two tips. First, you better come out with something that actually looks like an article since the beginning. Or else it can be ICUed or worse, QVFDed, all that shit. If you want to take your time, create it in your user space (instructions here). In case you are sure you're creating a funny thing and proceed to start it in the main space, use the {{Construction}} template to signal other users about the article still being incomplete. All right? -- herr doktor needsApistol Rocket [scream!] 14:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok.--THE 14:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Pennywise

Thank you for your contributions to Pennywise the clown. Your help is greatly appreciated. I thought that article was done for. Jimmy the Hellhound 13:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I'll try and add some more stuff to it when I get the chance. --THE 15:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks THE

u edited my article Unda Construction and made it better and make more sence. FREDD is me and i'm not a comedic genius though (that comment was left by TheNewYarkov sometime in April)

Don't mention it --THE 13:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

GoldenShower Rejoice, THE! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Gracias for the the review of Barbie doll worship. You have no idea how long I've waited for it (or perhaps you do, never can be sure). By the way, the Kool Aid outburst was about the Heaven's Gate suicide (which I bet you already know) and the Paul Newman thing was because Paul Newman donates proceeds to charity, which seems the logical extension of Jesus' teachings, hence the Jesus Says. However, the joke there (admittedly coming after reading Farenheit 451) is that Jesus is commercialized. Whatever. It's a good review anyway. I need to linkify, I agree. Thanks. --(That comment was left by this guy whose username I can't spell properly, but he forgot to sign his comment so I signed it for him)

I'm glad you found my review helpful. I sort of get the Paul Newman thing now. It's just a rather elaborate joke that took a while (roughly twenty-four hours) for me to comprehend. Sorry I mistook it for being meaningless. Anywho, thanks for the Golden Shower Award. --THE 20:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Haaa

THE; a definite brother in arms. A mad genius secretly plotting against Bogdanovich? I damn well hope so. --THINKER 00:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. What a pity that UQG and Boggy never finished their collaborative film. I'm sure it would have been a cinematic masterpeice that none of us mortals would have ever forgotten. --THE 22:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Food for thought: that collab is an article away..
(With a few edits to the tightly intertwining histories, haa) --THINKER 03:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
hmm...now there's an idea! I can see it now. A collaboration of two brilliant, but incredibly deranged, minds...it would certainly require a little tweaking of the intertwining epic of UQG and Bog, but this could definately be a masterpeice of epic proportions in the works. --THE 18:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

UPDATE: I left this message in your talk page, too, but I started an article called Sex Seafood about their collaboration. --THE 18:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh Noez!

Looks like The UQG page got huffed man...might want to talk to an admin about that... --THINKER 22:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I am THE, writing to you from an IP address, because I was banned for writing UQG quotes. I talked to the admin who huffed the article about resurrecting it...now, all we can do is wait....and pray.... --74.75.67.207, aka a depressed and exiled THE. 20:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Exclamation point? Ampersand!

THE... I came to help fight for your cause but it looks like Famine is bipolar changed his mind. I had a whole list of colorful words, too..........................

Oh well. Glad you're not disunbanned. Keep up the good work. " - K. See ya. Or maybe not. Really depends on when you see this message, I guess. Could be never, depending on what or what doesn't happen. --Nutmegger 01:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

It's a good thing you didn't get to Famine's talk page. I don't know what "colorful words" you had in mind, but they probably would have pissed him off. It's not a good idea to insult an admin. It usually gets you nothing but a ban. --THE 17:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Famine handled the situation like any spot-on mod, managing a large community of personalities. See a potentially problematic trend, squash problem before it gets too out of hand, all standard MO. Please no anti-Famine backlash. He's obviously dealt with some tougher cookies in his time as admin.
Those cookies were, of course, crushed to tiny crumbs.. so yeah, consider yourself considerably blessed. :) --THINKER 18:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree. There were about 700,000 Unrelated Quotes scattered around this website, and he was just doing his job and cleaning up things that could potentially get messy. I hope I don't give the impression of being anti-Famine. I realize that without him and other admins deleting excessive crap, this website would be filled to the bursting point with basic stupidity. --THE 18:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I still want to do the article on Famine's Fan Club, though... --Nutmegger 20:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
You can if you want, but know that I won't be taking part in the proceedings. Actually, I question the wisdom of writing it at all. --THE 20:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm sure it'll be the last article I ever write, but I don't care! 'Twas fun. I'm still waiting for Famine to read it... I thought about adding a quote from UQG, but you said something about leaving you out of it and blah blah blah. --Nutmegger 00:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Holy crap. That article is rather evil. Didn't you see what THINKER wrote about NOT writing any anti-Famine stuff? The article isn't a raging anti-Famine rant, but I'd still say that you're a tad screwed. --THE 00:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Like I said on Famine's talk, I was only vouching for THE, and his lack of action has proven THE to be the type I expected, thankfully. Nutmegger, you're treading thin ice, on your own. Provoking mods unnecessarily will get you exactly what you're expecting.

I wouldn't say anything, but you seem like the vendetta type who'll get banned and come back as an IP blanking pages and/or committing other anti-admin vandalisms. This is frowned upon activity.

Instead of holding a grudge over a resolved situation, why not edit an article or two? Jeeze.. --THINKER 03:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


I don't have anything against Famine. I'm just parodying his handling of the situation. --Nutmegger 20:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, making fun of an admin in any way is generally a no-no here. If you want to make fun of the way someone handled a situation...well...aren't there any other people who would be better to parody? Presidents, perhaps? Perhaps you should put your writing skills to better use, as The Thinker suggested, and stop practicing the evil and despicable crime of Admin-Bashing. --THE 20:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree. It's a good thing Famine isn't our president. --Nutmegger 20:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Um...whatever. Enjoy the ban that is undoubtedly coming your way. --THE 20:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
I'll bring the popcorn :-) Cheese flavored, or just butter? --Nutmegger 20:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Holy Crap. you don't quit do ya? Well, your article appears to be on the Quick Vote for Deletion Page. Perhaps whichever admin deletes it will have mercy on your sinful soul and give you a second chance here...but i don't know. you seem awfully...unremorseful about all this. I'd start praying for mercy if I were you.--THE 21:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

UPDATE:It seems you;ve been given a second chance. Your article is gone, but you are not banned. Well, whatever. Uncyclopedia works in mysterious ways. Maybe you could write something constructive now, huh? --THE 19:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Ugh. I worked hard on that article. Oh well. Heh heh heh... --Nutmegger 01:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
You wrote another article. About the same thing. You never learn do you? --THE 10:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Guess what? An Article About the Deleted Article that was Famine's Fan Club. It's like a spaceship. --Nutmegger 18:23, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
you are a lunatic --THE 23:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

NOTE for intrested readers: the usserdiskussd here has been bannd for three monthts for vanity and genral assholery. wen he comes bak, hopfuly he'll be sober. --THE 20:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Heh...pretty damn funny. Although to be frank, I'm a little upset that someone who I've never banned took the time to work that up. I mean really - with all the bans I've given out, how is it that most of the people who come and mess with my userpage aren't people I've banned?
Anyway, thanks for giving me a laugh. I'd probably have done what Mhaille did, but it's too bad I didn't get to see it all first hand. A fan club...now that's funny....what's next? The "Famine cares" page? :) Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 05/9 23:50
haaa, I figured you would discover this strange little incident sooner or later. I guess Nutmegger was tired of writing articles about your fan club and decided to "parody" you in a more direct way by vandalizing your userpage. You ought to vandalize his userpage while he's banned, just to rub it in his face :)--THE 23:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Naw...that's just abuse of power. Only time I'd do that is if there was something detrimental to the site there. If I was more ambitious, I'd make him a creative new userpage. But I'm not, so thus it stays, until he returns. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 05/10 00:39
I wasnt being serious about vandalizing his userpage...or I wasn't being particularly serious....."until he returns"...now there's a terrifying thought. I'm having nightmarish visions already: "The article about the recently deleted article about the deleted article about the huffed article written by the banned user who wrote the huffed article about the deleted article about famine's fan club" or something along those lines... --THE 00:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

cokie

Newcookie Trar has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

I'm geeving oot cokies. Whope hyou appreshieate id. --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) Mchammer 00:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

wie tank yu. iv nevr got a cokie befoar. --THE 00:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Notes on the Project

Hey bud, don't want you to think I've abandoned over here (even though one drunken evening produced this little beauty). Did some work on the Pre-production today.

I don't want to start hacking away at anything, but you'll notice I made pre-production a subheading rather than heading. My concern is that if we go too far into the conflict, we're gunna not have any room to write about the film itself (either that, or it'll be 8 sections down, beyond the reader's attention span). Now, being that Un is so awesomely expansive, there are a number of options here:

1. We condense the history and talk about the film within the article.
2. We leave this article as a "Making of" kinda-almost featurette about the film, and then cowrite the actual film itself as an UnScript (depending on what decisions we make for the film itself, this could be either very funny, very stupid, or very both). This would allow for something I've wanted to do ever since seening UnScripts: A DIRECTOR'S COMMENTARY PAGE!! Like the exact same article as the script, with little blurbs from the directors thrown in where ever! Isn't that a cool idea?

Option 2 would be a pretty massive undertaking, but hell, if I don't have 5 am class this month I'll probably be up for anything. Your call though, partner. :) --THINKER 21:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, here are my thoughts. The article seemed to be drifting more towards having the film be some sort of weird expiremental film (three hours of footage of lobsters crawling around in a little plastic kid's pool, or something). However, with a click of the "delete" button, we could abandon the thing about a "non-human" cast and start over. The reason there is so much stuff in there about the history of the film is that I, similarly to UQG and Bog, have been putting off the idea of thinking of a subject for the movie to the very last second.
My initial idea, though, would be to go with a sort of combination of the two options. Firstly, the film itself. Our first task should be to think of what the movie itself will actually be like. If we decide to make it a full-fledged movie (with a plot and everything!) we could go with your idea and make an unscript and a commentary to go with it. OR, if we decide to make it into a screwed up expiremental movie, we could make a synopsis of it in the article, then maybe make an individual section in the article solely devoted to an excerpt from the director's commentary. Then, there could be a final section of the article devoted to the "critical acclaim" the film recieved, and the ends of the respective tales of our two heroes.
So, basically, what we do comes down to what we decide to make the movie about. Either way, we will still be making a director's commentary, the only difference being whether to make a section out of it, or an entire script. The commentary thing does have the potential to be absolutely hilarious, whether it becomes a full article or not. So whaddya think? What kind of movie did UQG and Bog make? --THE 22:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, this is a good point which I hadn't considered..
Well, my thinking would be that as a collaborative effort, it'd end up being sort of the "best" of both directors. Like, UQG likes to set a camera on something and film it for hours on end, while Bog likes overly dramatized melodrama, so the result could be something like:
UQG and Bog decided upon what they dubbed "Half-Natural Performance Art," in which the camera was trained solely upon the lobster tank at a local Shells seafood restaurant. Par UQG's vision, various aquatic animals were placed within the tank and were filmed interacting with the lobsters. Around 12 hours of footage was taken with several species of crustations and fishes. Bogdanovich handled coordinating efforts between cast, crew, and onlooking restaurant patrons at this time.
After filming wrapped, Bogdanovich set out to add cohesion to the otherwise plotless mass of film. In post production, Bogdanovich and UQG sifted tirelessly through every taken shot, piecing them together one-by-one. As they built the film, so too did Bogdanovich build a story around Alister, the tank's biggest lobster, and the various characters he meets as they enter and exit the tank. This, when added to the psychedelic backgrounds and ambient musical choices of the pair, turned the film into a modern masterpiece.
Ya see what I'm gettin at there? I think that'd work well, because we can do like 8 scenes of an Uncript in which Alister is basically just talking nonsensical melodrama to various crabs, shrimp, plankton, etc. Whatdyathink? --THINKER 22:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I like it! If you don't have any objections, I think I'll stick that section you wrote into the article. It definately works well. I find the idea of writing an UnScript slightly terrifying, as I tend to prefer writing in huge blocks of formal, "textbook-style" prose, but I'm sure I'll figure out what I'm doing once we get going on that project.
Okay, so the way I see it, we've got our priorities set as follows:
ONE-finish Sex Seafood. The simplest of our tasks.
TWO-write an UnScript. You can start this one, and hopefully I'll "catch on" soon as to how to write a script, something I have little experience at doing.
THREE-director's commentary. this one should be hilarious, and a little easier too. Like you said, it would just be copying the original script, and adding "commentary" from both directors.
Well, it sounds good to me. Should be fun. So, are you okay with me copying in that section to the article? We could re-word it and stuff, of course, but does that sound good? --THE 22:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Absolutely dude! I was just flyin by the seat of my pants on that one but if you like it, definitely add it right in there where ever!
Also, don't be intimidated by the script. I too perfer blocky faux-textbook style writing, but as I found with The Creature of Planet Cheese, its really just about getting into the flow with it. Lots of copy-and-paste on the bolded names, lot of formatting, but over all it should be cake...maybe not if it were a real script, but its Un, and thus it can be as nonsensical as we want (lol, and it'll probably evolve as we go along with it). I'll get it going as soon as we hammer out the rest of this article. --THINKER 23:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Excellent. I'll go ahead and add that section to the article, and we can mess around all we want with it after that. Then, I'm afraid I'll have to log off for tonight (my pizza is going to be EXTREMELY cold). But I'll be back to help finish up this article as soon as I possibly can (which might be tomorrow, I'm sad to say). --THE 23:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

PS - Vote or Die! :) --THINKER 23:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Voted! It looks like your article is doing rather well so far. --THE 23:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks man! I just don't want it to stall out; my other 2 nom'd articles were only Quasi-featured mainly due to inactivity. My schedule is much better now, so once I can get back in a positive sleeping cycle I'll jump back on the project. We should be finished with the history page pretty soon! :) --THINKER 06:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah, that page is definitely getting near completion. I've been working on it quite a bit. Just finished an extensive rework of the "making the movie" section. It still needs a little tweaking, and definately one last section about how the film was recieved, but we are definitely almost done! I can feel it!!!! --THE 20:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay, updated the Inspiration section (very funny btw, love the part about the haircut: such a perfect reference note :-D). By the way, we MUST get a good photochopper to do a poster for this thing. --THINKER 03:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

A poster sounds good. We could use a poster for the script too, once we make that. The thing about UQG using pie-charts to explain his idea was hilarious! I added a TON of stuff to the article today, in a fit of pre-finishing-the-article excitement. The history of our two heroes seems to have taken a rather melodramatic and tragic turn in the "unfinished sequel" section. The section about the critical response to the movie could really use some more work (and could also use an oscar acceptance speech by Bogdanovich...I wrote one for UQG, but I'm not too good at writing Bogdanovich quotes). I've also tweaked the two articles about the individual directors to correspond with these new developments. --THE 19:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Alright, everything on the page has been Thinkeriz'd. This article, as is, seems like a "Making Of" featurette rather than a complete entry about the film, mostly because we don't go into the movie itself at all (I guess, due in part to the fact that we haven't written it yet). It'd be branching the concept out a bit, but we might be able to have it linked to an umbrella DVD page, featuring links to the film script, director's commentary, this page, and the page that discusses the movie's specs in an encyclopedic manner. Just thinking out loud; we can discuss this all. Right now though if there is nothing more for that article, it is complete on the writing side. We need some pics and a few little touches (factoid template maybe, things like that), and it'll be set to go. Now, step 2 is the script then? yeeee!
Oh, and PS - Vote or Die...AGAIN! (probably gunna be another Quasi, *sighh*) lol :) --THINKER 18:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey, just wanted to let you know I put up 2 new sections, getting towards the meat of the screenplay. I'm kinda formulating a story as we go along, so it can still go any direction, but I think it has a pretty firm set of material so far. Lemme know whatcha think! :) --THINKER 12:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

It looks pretty good to me so far, though I have so much stuff I have to do that I don't think I'll be able to really look through it or edit it until tomorrow. --THE 20:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Awesome, I'll leave it alone for a bit so you can check it out at your leisure and we can both think up some new ideas. I'm working off a basic plot in my head, and of that, the script is about half complete (like the dream sequence is gunna imply about 45 minutes of footage, and serves as the half-way point, at which time I think the "ant song" would be playing). The second half also has a concept, but that can evolve also if we get inspired. :) --THINKER 02:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I added some more to the bizarre dream sequence and had him wake up. The fixation with the salad bar is still there (I have an idea for an ending of the "salad bar" storyline). As for the second half of the story, whaddya have in mind? I seem to have developed a small idea for a story...something along the lines of Alister falling in love with Daphne and proposing with hopes of soothing his "melancholy soul," but their marriage getting interfered with by some sort of religious zealot character (perhaps a snail) who doesn't believe in "inter-species marriage" or something like that. Could provide for lots of melodrama. But what's your idea? Let's brainstorm a bit before we start the second half. --THE 19:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
That all sounds pretty cool, I think it'd all work with my ideas: I was thinking that the dream sequence can end with Alister being visited by some mystical creature (I was thinking something like Ra, the Almighty Blowfish). The creature tells Alister of the grandness of the salad bar (making it out to be a sort of crustacean heaven). When Alister wakes up, he becomes enlightened, preaching about the afterlife at the salad bar (at this time, he could begin courting Daphne...I think it'd be funny if he continues his sort of disdainful attitude towards her though, even while trying to woo her). He gains a following with his preaching (a congregation of shrimp or something). Everything is going great, when Alister is taken out of the tank by human hands. I envision a lengthy goodbye speech as he's being taken out (like, way longer than it would take for a person to pull a lobster out of the tank). He'd tell them how grand it is that he's transcending to the next plane of existence, etc etc. For the dramatic, ironic melancholy ending, Alister is dead, ready to be served to a customer, being garnished on a platter at the salad bar.
Lemme know what you think. Also, do you like the character box I added? --THINKER 23:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


I like the idea of Alister becoming some sort of religious prophet, and it wouldn't be too hard to weave in a romantic storyline between him and Daphne. Your idea for an ending, with Alister getting cooked, then seasoned at the salad bar, would maximize the bizarre irony of this whole tale. My original idea for an ending to the "salad" storyline was more centered around making fun of excessively sappy, corny, hallmark-channel style feel good movies. Alister would have some sort of crisis of faith, and get all depressed, thinking he would "never, ever ever" taste salad in his life. He would become convinced that his life was worthless, and in the typical "feel-good movie" fashion, some sort of absurd plot twist would happen (along the lines of a passing waiter spilling a monstrous bowl of salad into the tank for Alister to feast on). Either way, I like the idea of Alister becoming a prophet for his fellow creatures. I think either ending could work all right, because they're both odd and ironic in their own way, but let me know what you think.

The character box was a good idea, by the way. That way we can add as many characters as we want without worrying about the list taking up more space than the actual script:) --THE 23:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC) M'kay. I added a part to the dream where Alister meets the blowfish (I called the mighty blowfish "A", but you can change it if you want). I still left our options open as far as the rest of the story is concerned, but I'm starting to think your idea for an ending (Alister getting cooked rather than some waiter spilling salad into the tank) would work better. lemme know watcha think, though. --THE 00:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Aw, damn I'm actually really torn, because your ending makes perfect sense (I see where you were going with the build-up of Ali's existential frustration), and reminds me on a HILARIOUS Upright Citizens Brigade sketch that could totally be work into the story!! My only concern, if we went that route, is what happens after the salad gets dropped in? Alister eats, and becomes happy? Actually come to think of it, a waiter dropping in some salad could be worked into my ending as well as the Daphne angle: perhaps, after the dream sequence, the waiter drops in the salad. Alister wakes up covered in a couple of lettuce leaves, which give him credibility among his new followers. It covers all of our ideas into a cohesive package, unless I missed a point somewhere in this massive discussion we've amassed here (hehe)
And A is fine by me for the mighty blowfish: I have some great, great dialogue ready for him which we can play around with. He's one of those enigmatic "one with the universe" types, which are sooo funny in parody. I think, if the story is somewhat hammered out, we'll be able to truck through the rest pretty easily (and funnily)!!
Oh, and PS - I had to give a little nod to the boys. :-D --THINKER 03:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, that sounds like a good plan. Maybe at first nobody believes what Alister says about salad until after the waiter spills some in, or something like that. That way, we could still have that ultimate irony at the end. great idea, by the way. I have a good idea of some closing dialogue between some of the remaining animals in the tank, something along the lines of "I will never forget...um...what was that guy's name again?" Something along those lines, that will really drive home the empty-headedness of the rest of the creatures in the tank. We still have a few details to work out, but I'd say we're ready to dive back in and start writing part two. Think so? --THE 19:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Absolutely; sail on, silver bird! I'd get on it right now if I didn't have to go out drinking (normally that'd be a good thing, but tonight it's with shit company; I'd rather drink at home and do some writing). If I'm functioning when I get home, I'll do some addingz. :) --THINKER 20:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I started the next act. It's much smoother sailing now that we have a definite story that we're setting up. Also, I messed around with the history article a little for continuity with the emerging script.
BTW, do scripts need to have links to other articles, or are they exempt from that whole "linking" thing? --THE 00:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I like it!!! Just finished some edits on the current material; leads perfectly into the waiter dropping in the salad/sign from god. As for the linking, I wouldn't say its exempt, but I try to limit my linking in the script world since, unlike an encyclopedia entry, the material isn't meant to be referential. I mostly try to keep it to proper names and stuff like that (which is why James Bond and Orson Welles are linked therein). I wouldn't be against it though, but with the conversational nature of the bulk of the work, I'd keep it sparse. --THINKER 20:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I started a new section where the waiter spills in the salad. It's a bit weak now, could use some messing around with. I couldn't figure out what to make Daphne say after she tasted salad; what would a creature as simple minded as her say when exposed to the vegetably (YEEE! I invented a word!) goodness of salad?
I was thinking act seven could be the one where Alister becomes the preist that he is destined to be, and will also be where the romance blossoms...it'll probably be a fairly long act, but 'twill be good anyway. From there, it will just be the final act left, which will be really fun to write. --THE 22:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, I've now added a villainous character, another lobster who is a sort of worm flakes purist. He's the only one who doesn't taste the salad. I was thinking that he would be the source of conflict in act seven when he tries to turn the other animals against Alister, and possibly interfere with Alister and Daphne's romance (dialogue along the lines of "First he tried to corrupt us against the mighty fish flakes, now he's encouraging inter-species marriages! Next, he'll be telling us to try and escape!"). Then, the moment of victory for Alister (before tragedy strikes) can be when he finally convinces Dennis to taste the last remaining piece of salad in the tank, and Dennis can finally be converted to the glories of saladism, and it can be right after that that Alister gets taken out, and the empty-headed animals in the tank forget about him in five seconds. Sound good? --THE 23:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Definitely sounds good! I looked over the new stuff but haven't sat down line-by-line with it yet, but I like the direction 100%. I'll hit it up tomorrow for the indepth read.
I fear we might be the only two with the willpower to read the whole thing once its over, but thats everyone else's problem. :-D --THINKER 04:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Let's continue the discussion down under "thank you," shall we? This section of the talk page is getting tough to work with cuz it's so LONG. --THE 16:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

sorry, me again

just out of interest, how old are you?--TheNewYarkov 06:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes. --THE 19:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC),


Fair enuff ok- me from a different computer

From a different computer? You can still sign in even if you are on a different computer. It's amazing.--THE 19:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Not fr0m my mum's. she would bite off my dick--The New Yarkov 06:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

ah. well, that would be a problem. --THE 18:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Beat the Odds

GoldenShower Rejoice, THE! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

As per your advice, I tweaked the beginning and added a new section. If you could, please review it again. Gracias--Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Whew, tough set of edits there. Just kidding. Yeah, I wasn't too keen on my European section either. It frankly sucked. And I changed the first part of "What are the odds." Review it one more time, if you wish.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Article re-reviewed. Nice job. --THE 22:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Peace. And nice! 46.5! That's the best I've ever getted.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

It's a good article, and was enjoyable to review. Quite a contrast to the last article I reviewed. --THE 22:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

PINK FLOYD!

You like them too? AWESOME! Just because they're not a lot peoples' favorite. Nice. Another cultured Wikipedian.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Aw yeah. They're awesome. my first article was almost completely about them. --THE 22:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey THE

Thanks for helping me with my debut article. And yes, its funnier if both Stephen Hawking and Yoko Ono go on their sexcapades together. -Leoispotter

Yep. No problem. And you do know that you're logged out right now, right? Check out the history page of the article. It shows you as an IP for some of your most recent edits. --THE 23:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Oh whoops-Leoispotter

Careful you two.. this guy might come to gitcha.. hah! --THINKER 01:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Haaaa...yeah plus there's the "Sex Tape" section I added to this article.--THE 19:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Self Promotion

Thank you for looking at me, I thought no-one cared. The changes you made were great... Please award yourself a shitty template of your choice... and if you are bored all the other articles on my user page are in desperate need of comedy. --dantoller

No problem. I'll take a look at some of the others, though I probably won't get to ALL of them --THE 19:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Halfcookie User:Ljlego has awarded you half of a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.


For voting for Hodgepodge. Maybe, if we try hard enough, next time we'll get it up and you'll get a full cookie.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. Sorry it didn't make it. --THE 15:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

VERY IMPORTANT, MORTAL!!!

FREDD has extended an invitation for you to join the mighty Unda Construction

in doing so, you ensure your survival, on the day of reckoning,

when Unda Construction finishes their master plan.

To accept this invitation go to the User page of our mouthpeice,

FREDD, go to the discussion page,

and type i accept. sign your comment

to decline, hide in a box and die. that is all. --Unda Construction


Kablammo
This page has been

touched by Unda Construction

I repsnoded in your talk page. --THE 12:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank You!/NotPII:Redux2.0

Muchos gracias, mi amigo. :) --THINKER 04:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey no problem. You got a featured article at last, after all those QFH's! congratulations!!
I'll wait to add anything more to the script until after you've gotten a look at the stuff that's there now. --THE 16:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

M'kay. I started up the next act, where everything falls into place for our hero. Looks like we're getting pretty close to finishing this script! /*rubs hands together excitedly in preparation for THE COMMENTARY PAGE* :} --THE 21:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Yep everything is truckin right along pretty damn nicely. Its gunna be the Uncyclopedia film release of the year! --THINKER 21:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it should be quite an epic upon completion. I was going to apologise for getting sidetracked earlier today, but I saw that you did too. Nice article by the way, an excellent parody of the IP users who haven't yet realised that nobody cares about how awesome their algebra teacher is.
I might be able to get a few more punches into the script tonight, maybe. We're almost done! Yeeeeyyyaaaya!! --74.75.54.87 21:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC) THE (who accidentally logged out) 21:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

OKAY! I've finished up my initial "draft" of the seventh act, which still awaits your usual round of edits. I gave the last act a title, and I figure Alister should get seized at some point during the wedding procedure (preferably sooner rather than later, since the script is getting pretty massive now). --THE 19:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

DENNIS: HEY! Just because I'm dismissing you without even considering what you have to say doesn't mean I'm closed-minded! -- made me lol! I really hope my edits are helping your humor rather than chopping away at it; if there are any parts you feel are being poorly altered pleeeease change them! I just think that you have the right idea on most of this stuff as far as I can tell, and I just tweak and fine tune it. I don't wanna be like the looming.. chopper-awayer(?) I don't know. Anyway as usual, I really love where its going, and will do some edits first thing after class tomorrow.
PS - Were you channeling the kindred spirit of Lil Jon in that scream up there?!?!!?! :-D heheheh --THINKER 03:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Dennis' line is actually based on numerous political debates I've had with THE. THE based Dennis' character on me.--Leoispotter
Keep out of this, Leospotter! And you just interrupted one of the thinker's old messages, completely throwing off this entire discussion! oops, I did too...anyway, get outta here! And I'm not an asshole! Just because I beat you mercilessly in ALL of our political arguments doesn't make me an asshole, it just makes me RIGHT!
Don't make me start ranting about your political ignorance again! We'll take this up in class tomorrow (unless I forget. in that case, have a nice day)!!!!!!! --THE 19:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
UPDATE: Ah. you took the "THE's an asshole" part out of your message. I suppose I'll look like a lunatic now, especially after giving you that bowl of shit pudding in your user talk...oh well. And yes, I did borrow some of the more objectionable aspects of your political opinions for Dennis, especially the part about Dennis never even considering the fact that he might be wrong about ANYTHING, no matter how reasonable the argument against him is. Wow. Look at me. I'm ranting, after I promised I wouldn't! AAAAAAAAAAAA! --THE 19:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Whoops, didn't mean to interrupt that message. Yeah, I should probably stop talking now.(PS. I win all our political debates, not you)(PPS: I fixed the talk page. Now this entire discussion is irrelevant)--Leoispotter


No no, your edits are always helpful. I almost never proofread anything, so it helps to have all my "peices" turned to "pieces," my "rediculous's" changed back to "ridiculous's," and my other generally embarassing spelling mistakes fixed. And your contributions and alterations add well to the humor, too. No worries. And yes, that was an attempt at a Lil Jon scream up there. I'll wait to start in on the last act 'till you've gone through act sebben. "sebben"? "yeeeeyaaaya"? what is WRONG with me? :} --THE 19:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Act Phil Ken Sebben?? Finish'd! :-D
For 8, I guess the wedding gets set and all is well til Alister is taken out of the tank? --THINKER 19:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, that's what I had in mind. I can start on it as soon as I finish screwing around with one of my subpages. --THE 19:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


WELL, I've written the rest of the script. It could use a once-over, and Alister's farewell speech is rather sub-par. I wasn't quite sure what the nature of the speech was going to be; does Alister think he's being taken to the salad bar? Or does he not know what's happening to him? You can go ahead and rewrite the speech if you want, as in its present stage it's not very good.

I really laid on the melancholy irony quite a bit in there at the end...I'm telling ya, it was tough writing that last scene... Sometimes satire can be suprisingly...tragic. --THE 20:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

D'oh! I was going to foreshadow the "hands from above" in Ali's meeting with A and totally forgot. I'll add a few lines on that when I do my read-through and edits. How crazy is it that the movie is like 98% done?!?!?!? :) --THINKER 21:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I know! It's almost ready to be unleashed!
Incidentally, there are a few pictures on the Wikipedia article about lobsters that could be extremely useful if "borrowed." I was actually extremely suprised by the potential usefulness of one image [1], which seems to show EXACTLY what the final act describes! Just food for thought. Seafood for thought. --THE 23:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

RIP

looks like unda construction is fucked--FREDD 06:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

got killed on VFD huh? poopy. --THE 16:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I need a hug--FREDD 06:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

/*pats you on the back reassuringly*/ I have repsnotted rebsponded resplotted ressponted responded in your talk page. --THE 21:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Newcookie User:Mr.Vib has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

For the Pee Review. --Mr.Vib 13:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

no problem. was i right in assuming that it was referring to the REM song, or the fact that there was some correlation just some wild coincidence? --THE 21:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

not so bad

Nah, my uncles american and hes about the coolest guy ever. exept hew kinda moved to costa rica. and he smokes cuban cigars. Hey do you know what country Uncyclopedia started in? i couldn't find out anywhere, so i just assume Haung is american--ETLCh X4Ch ChTLG GTLCh 06:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I think the site's servers are here in America anyway. not sure though. and for all I know about Haung, he could be a gerbil from Sweden. --THE 19:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Cookie=

Newcookie TheNewYarkov has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

for trying to help Unda construction--ETLCh X4Ch ChTLG GTLCh 07:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

no problem. --THE 19:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Kidlet research

iv asked you before but

how old are you. im trying to find out how many users are kidletts or there about.

  • I am
  • Z is

are you??

I am three and a half years old. My parents occasionally let me out of my crib, and whenever they do I crawl over to my computer and write uncyclopedia articles. --THE 19:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


Thanks!!

One mo' 'gain, thanks buddy!! SS gets edited after I finish handing these out!! :) --THINKER 18:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem dude --THE 19:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank You!

And also: Seamus was your article? Awesome! I found the Seamus article to be hilarious, and I can't wait to check out your edits to "Wish you Had Beer". Thanks for fixing it!--Glowla 18:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome, though I didn't really "fix" it so much as just extending it.
And yeah, seamus was my article. my very first one. I wrote it when I was still a lonely, friendless IP user. I'm glad you like the "Seamus" article, and am also glad that you don't mind that I made references to it in your article (i was afraid you'd get pissed). --THE 19:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to UnNews

Nice work with UnNews:Donald Rumsfeld opens pizza parlor Cheers! Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 21:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


Che Ape

Reverend Zim_ulator says: "There are coffee cup stains on this copy, damnit! Now that's good UnJournalism."

Welcome to UnNews, THE, and thank you for contributing some crap, or otherwise attracting my attention. For a quick introduction about how you can write a decent or better UnNews article, please take a minute read our spiffy new Style Guide.

I am your humble servant (in your dreams), and if I may be of help to you, please leave me a note on my talk page.

Good things that can happen to you

You can win awards and prizes! You can become a better writer by subjecting your articles to the scrutiny of UnNews critique machine or UnCanninator shit article detection system. You can become a thorn in the side of Journalism as a whole. You can get promotions, ribbons, and free crockery! You can write stuff your mom would be ashamed to show her friends.

What happened to my article?

If you've submitted an article, and it's disappeared, I may have mercy-moved it to your user space. This means I've probably left a message on your talk page, likely in close proximity to this very message, explaining why.

Your article may have been tagged for ICU if it has significant problems meeting our criteria, or I may have deleted it because you did not register as a user.

Finally, maybe you just pissed me off. I mean, I know I'm a Roshi, and I'm supposed to be all "Zen" about everything, but I have bad days too, you know?

UnNews Audio

If you are interested in doing an UnNews audio, check this out.

UnNews UnFunnies

At present, I create UnCartoons for UnNews all by my onesies, for better or worse. Now, I will never claim that I am a good cartoonist. Fortunately, the internet provides us a way to do all sorts of things simply and easily. I found Stripgenerator.com, a great site to create cartoons with a minimum of talent.

This document is an ongoing effort by me to enhance the obfuscation coefficient of Uncyclopedia; productive changes, and criticism are welcome. Cheers! The Right and Left Reverend Major Sir Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 17:38, March 28, 2010 (UTC) Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 21:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Actually...

you said a while ago to let you know if i needed help with anything, well there is one thing, can you ad an UQG quote onto my user page? or is that just for articles?--TheNewYarkov 06:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I added an unrelated quote to your userpage. Feel free to change it if you don't find it amusing. --THE 19:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Oye

I'm gonna nominate your Drunk Olympics article for VFH. Hope you don't mind--Leoispotter

Wow. This is rather terrifying. I've no idea how good it'll do...AAAAAA! I'm scared!
By the way, I'm sorry I didn't see this message sooner. I was peeing. I hope it hasn't been sitting here...unread...for too long.
Anywho, go ahead and nom it if you want...don't know if it'll make it...AAAAAAAAAA! --THE 20:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The deed's been done. Good luck--Leoispotter

Important information you must know

To unlock the secret, you must answer this question: What are the essay questions due tomorrow? Please answer soon... I must get started...

J

Oh, you can answer in Nutmegger's talk page and delete this little bit of nonsense if you want. But it is related to Uncyclopedia. --64.185.129.238 20:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

HOW DARE YOU ask me to help you in your FOUL PROCRASTINATION by asking me such a completely UNRELATED, not to mention STRANGELY WORDED question?!?! Do you REALLY expect me to tell you that question one was something along the lines of "Discuss political reforms sought by the progressive movement. What were the reformers supposed to accomplish, and how succesful were they?" Do you REALLY think I would tell you that question two was "Discuss the philosophies of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and Louis Brandeis. How did their philosophies reflect the progressive frame of mind? Citing examples form court cases, explain the response of the Supreme Court to new legal thought."??? Would you REALLY expect me to tell you something so completely irrelevent to this website? No, my friend, I should say not! --THE 21:06, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Well then MAYBE you should go stick your head in a PICKLE JAR and EAT all of the GOLDFISH you SLOB...

[T]omorrow[H]ank's[A]pple[N]eeds[K]indness... [Y]ell[O]ut[U]rn

Try to lick the ICE CREAM OFF YOUR TOENAIL

--64.185.129.238 21:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Um...K --THE 21:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I needed those essay questions too. Don't forget to vote for your own article, by the way--Leoispotter
Personal tools
projects