User talk:Sycamore

While I don't exactly understand this adopting business,

Can i be adopted?Djdorama 01:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I left a note on your talkpage, I'll bve around if you need anything:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks a lot! And thanks for editing my page. it's not really beefed up. do u have any ideas to make it more....big? Djdorama 21:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

That can be tricky, the way I started out was reading other peoples articles, and over time I started to work out ways to beef them up and get ideas for them. Check out Our featured stuff - there's a few good ones in there and it might get you kick started (don't worry, your first ones will always be a little fledgling, but they get better over time):)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Pants

Again. MrN  Fork you! 13:24, Mar 8

Better be no skidmarks on them--Sycamore (Talk) 13:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Socks

To go with those pants. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

If I had started out with no clothes I think I would look like a chicken at this point:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, one can never have enough socks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Relax Syc

Rage is not good for your ulcer. ~ 09:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

/me goes for the frozen peas:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Purim

Mad Mike "Moishe" Tyson does it, so you should too!

Yes - it's Purim already, so be like
Mike and eat some ears today!

It's the only time of year when being a Jew is fun!
Chag Purim Sameach from Rabbi Techno

OK, so you Jewish identity is in some doubt, but Yad earns you Purim greetings anyway. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Whirling Star of Vigilance!

The Whirling Star of Vigilance I award this user a whirling star of vigilance because he/she has contributed so much to Uncyclopedia nad for being a very good adopter :). – » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow »

Thanks there, I don't know if I'm a very good adopter, you're doing very well:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

De Categorizing Images

Ok, I can see de-categorizing the that images you uploaded, espeically, when I placed them in porn categories. However, the consensus has been to categorize images, and you've been de-cating some perfectly good categorization. Your the only person who has been de-cating or has been objecting to my categorization, and several people have been supporting my categorization work. --Mnb'z 18:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the lecture...:/ Do a 'good' job of this project of yours, I have lost count of how many times I come in an theres a load of page with these uncreated cats you've spammed. Create them first, then add them.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Chaps. This looks to me like one of those cases where someone is not using an edit summary where they should. Could we have a bit more of that please? MrN  Fork you! 18:20, Mar 9

Were you also confused about the edit summary "claim consensus"? It sounded like something one would pick up at a D.C. dry cleaner. pillow talk 18:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Jesus - 2 thirds of the images on here are probably unused, I fail to see what the whinefest is about (My ignorance I'm sure). The way this works is simple = sporks/ICU dodgers have lot of unused cats, so its easy to find them, you keep adding ones that don't exist - it takes up my time to sift though this pretty redundent pastime, I've a good few summeries now about this now. Simple problem, simple solotion - add these things right. No bad feelings here:)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, nevermind, it looks like was category typos. Sorry about that. I probably should start checking Special:WantedCategories after my categorization blitzes.

On a related note, are we allowed to de-cat user pages with nonexistent categories --Mnb'z 18:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

This flamewar sux ballz. It's best not to edit other people user pages unless there is a good reason. What would be the reason of removing a nonexistent category for a user page? The user might actually like it like that. MrN  Fork you! 18:35, Mar 9

MadMax does it, but I do it sneakily when Mordillo isn't looking - probably best not;)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Who asked you? Anyone would think this was your talk page or something... MrN  Fork you! 18:39, Mar 9

The reason would be to keep the false positives down in the wanted category list to a minimum. --Mnb'z 18:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

MrN9000, no this is the Scottish complaints department, Mnb, yes its all about creating a climate of terror for vandals.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

~ 19:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome oh great and spinning Star of David. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Pee Reviews

Hi again! I've decided that maybe I would want to do pee reviews :). But the thing is, how should I review articles? I read UN:PEE and the Guidelines already, but what is considered a good pee review? » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 08:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, cool. I'd dive in there, remember the goal is to provide some help and give some guide as to how it might fare on VFH. Here's one I made earlier for the Zionist entitiy: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Mordillo/Why?Watching a marathon of House, M.D. while you're sick is not a good idea. Obviously its a lot harder to do one if the article isn't very good - just be honest though. A good way to start is with a membership request on here: PEEING - and UU will sort that all out - and you'll just have to go agead and write some reviews!:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmm.. Thanks. I just reviewed an article, but I think I'm too lenient. How's this? » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 13:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah top notch first review:) I would say that more in the humour section is a good idea - as thats a major factor in assesing whether its any good and in the concept you refer that the writer should get someone else to do stuff on it - which is probably a bit of a no go - its important to stress what the writer should do to improve it. The scores are probably a bit easy going, but they're not really a good gauge of an article. Good luck, hope you keep up with the reviews.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Ban Patrol Smiffery

Great minds think alike, eh? :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, ya fanny:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Quote Police?

Sycamore, why did you remove the quotes from the UnFilm category? I started that category, did work on it and the quotes stay. Don't like um, don't read them. Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Ah, bung em back (cranky in mornings) - but leave the subcat bits;)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

N00bie need help

If you could, do you think you could adopt me in the adopt a noob program thingie? I could use some help with making articles funny and maybe also with unknown parts of the site. Thank you!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Johnrofl123 (talk • contribs)

Sure, I left a note on your talkpage:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Woosh!!

Pantsless Ninjastar Just something to show my thanks with :D. –Johnrofl123

Thanks there, I hope I make a good adopter for you:)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost 12th March 09

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper That Openly Admits Its Liberal And Conservative Biases!

March 10th, 2009 • Issue 38 • Mucking up your talk page, one issue at a time

CONSPIRACY!!! By Gerrycheevers WE ARE DOOMED! Head for the hills, Uncyclopedia users, there's nothing that can save us now! As of this morning, we NO LONGER EXIST!!! Now, if you are reading this, you may be thinking to yourself, "why, that Gerry fellow is quite mad. Since I am reading the UnSignpost now, then both I and Uncyclopedia must still exist." To this i say to you: THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK. Furthermore, it is also WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK THEY THINK YOU THINK. Reactions were mixed today at the wiki. Some theorized that uncyclopedia.wikia.com was, in fact, sinking. In response to this, the women (all 3 of them) and children were loaded onto lifeboats and fired out of the lifeboat-cannon, in hopes that they would land far away enough from the landlocked Uncyc as to find a body of water. Other preparations included the Cajek string quartet playing rousing versions of traditional ship-sinking music. While it might seem rash for an official non-cabal-run periodical to endorse panic, the UnSignpost urges all Uncyclopedia users to abandon all reason and logic in an attempt to save themselves. The best course of action is most likely the one that involves the maximum amount of screaming, arm-flailing, and general insanity. The Uncyclopedia Store is likely to be looted quickly, so be sure to stop by early to maximize you chances at getting the best stuff. Count to a Million: Update By Gerrycheevers Uncyclopedians have continued their brave foray into the dangerous world of numbers, today reaching the long-awaited benchmark of 3,239. The constitutes nearly 1/300th of the total goal, meaning we are 0.32% of the way there! Users were overjoyed, confused, and generally apathetic about the achievement. Since its inception on February 20th, 2008, many different counters, or 'c-ters' as they refer to themselves, have contributed to the project. The content of the countup has varied greatly, from battleships to cartoon characters to road signs, and yet never deviating very far away from pornography. At any rate, it seems Uncyclopedia admin and Chair of the Committee to Investigate and Eliminate Needless Committees Spang's experiment to destroy the internet has not succeeded...yet. The project has advanced at a rate of 8.39 numbers per day, a respectable clip considering the enormous effort involved in adding the next number in the sequence. At this brisk clip, the project will reach completion at 18:45 UT on June 24, 2334. Until that day, Uncyclopedians can only hope, dream, and continue in the increasingly difficult task of adding one to a moderately large number.

Check out these pages! Silliness Pointlessness Eyerapeness From our logs: 23:47, 9 March 2009 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked 72.23.110.230 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (Blanking 'please don't delete this page'--my favorite part about that idea was how original it was.) 04:39, 10 March 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked CS SHITTY (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (HOLY SHIT WHERE ARE YOU MONGOLOIDS COMING FROM?!?!?!?!?!!?!) 16:08, 10 March 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 168.170.199.120 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ ("He who shall be an idiot shall be striked down with furious anger". Book of Mordillo, chapter one verse 3) 10:52, 11 March 2009 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked 24.89.227.16 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 month ‎ (we apologise for taking so long to ban you, but we get there in the end. also, I think you'll find it is you who loves the cock.) Biopic of the Week Guildensternenstein ~ With one of the hardest usernames to spell correctly (and not one that's hard but fun, like some users), Guildie has splashed upon the Uncyc scene with a gusto. Displaying a knack for writing humor (the main prerequisite to be considered "ballin'" by fellow Uncyclopedians), he also takes part in the current trends of Pee Review and Imperial Colonization, making him popular and, thus, cooler than you. Old-School Featured Article of the Week This is it. The big one. The greatest article in Uncyclopedia history...Bears. Yes, these foraging lunatics are masters of cryogenics, and will stop at nothing in their quests for honey, human flesh, and pic-a-nic baskets. Cajek ban of the week 15:14, 6 March 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 24 seconds ‎ (I am very troubled by the fact you were not banned in a while. Has the community given up on you???)

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

9001(bot)  21:43, Mar 13

I'm too lazy to make a template...

But thanks for the vote on Driving in Bucharest, it's really appreciated. –—Hv (talk) 17/03 17:56

No probs:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Monopoly

You only let a few users edit. Your justification was not to only write whoops or similar things. Now what's your point? --Dadadudi 16:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't have to justify myself to you hypocrites and plebs, I regret nothing! /UN guards take Sycamore away--Sycamore (Talk) 16:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I am totally unable to determine the source of this complaint. Is Dadadudi confusing Sycamore with MrN9000? pillow talk 17:31, 19 March 2009 (UTC)