User talk:Codeine

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens)
m (I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens)
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 213: Line 213:
 
I don't get why you deleted the article. It fits in nicely with all the other nonsense articles. That'd be like huffing [[rolling your head on the keyboard]]. --[[User:Emmzee|Emmzee]] 20:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
I don't get why you deleted the article. It fits in nicely with all the other nonsense articles. That'd be like huffing [[rolling your head on the keyboard]]. --[[User:Emmzee|Emmzee]] 20:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:You just answered your own question, dude. Why do we need two articles of keyboard-hammering gibbberish? The nonsense articles are all ever-so-slightly different from each other, that's why they work; but really, there's nothing to discern between the two articles you mention above. Prove me wrong and I'll cheerfully restore it. -- {{User:Codeine/sig}} 22:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
:You just answered your own question, dude. Why do we need two articles of keyboard-hammering gibbberish? The nonsense articles are all ever-so-slightly different from each other, that's why they work; but really, there's nothing to discern between the two articles you mention above. Prove me wrong and I'll cheerfully restore it. -- {{User:Codeine/sig}} 22:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  +
Okay, I will. [[Rolling your head on the keyboard]] and [[I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens]] are ''completely'' different. My article referenced a saying popular on the Internet that goes like this: When someone is asked how they wrote such a great article/forum post, they reply, "I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens." My article was making fun of this saying by stating that literally slamming on the keyboard does not, in fact, make you write well. It's irony. [[Rolling your head on the keyboard]] is just Bat Fuck Insane. --[[User:Emmzee|Emmzee]] 00:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:25, May 25, 2007

Codeine
A molecule of Codeine.

Previous complaints: Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6, Archive 7

Leave new messages at the bottom of the page, please

Serial blanker

I have apologised on Braydie's talk page User talk:Braydie/archive7 for my serial-blanking, including repeated blanking of articles regarding God, Jesus, Evolution, Evilution etc. If you unprotect them (or return them to semi-protection) I promise to leave them alone. You can test me on this. I have quitted blanking. To quote your words, I admit to having been a "deranged twat".

Serial blanker.217.42.248.106 23:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I read the above disussion. Pleased to see that you've seen the error of your ways (although you'll forgive me if I still retain a modicum of scepticism about your sincerity, given your past behaviour). Also pleased to see that you've learned the lesson about turning the other cheek when you perceive your beliefs as being mocked (I believe there may be something in the Bible about that somewhere... ;-) Wiki vandalism is ultimately futile, as edits are so easily reverted, so if you want to contribute properly, well, that'd be a much better waste use of your time and ours. Like I said, I'm a bit sceptical for now, but if time proves you sincere, well then, apology accepted and no hard feelings. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Warning, this editor is both not to be f***ed with and has a thoroughly runaway superiority complex.

I'm new and thus haven't really been proven in the community, however there is an article on whose discussion page I made a *significant* (I am God, say it is significant and ipso facto it is... it's also rather long...) comment before realizing that editing rights to the article had been apparently restricted by someone (I don't know who, which is why I'm leaving a message on a random admin's message board). If I do say so myself, the article sucks a**, and I think just about anyone out there should be able to agree with me on that fact. The article is entitled "Black People" [[1]] and is obviously a response article to "White People" [[2]] which is far more developed and retains editing privileges. I argued my reasoning for why the article should be rewritten, and how it should so as to be appropriate, on the discussion board.

I already started to rework the article on my own before I discovered it's restricted status, and I would be willing to rework the entire thing to be sweet...

I can't believe that the admins would think that this article could not get any better. Unfortunately, I can also imagine that vandals might be likely to disrupt any advances made in the article. Not that I have very much time on my hands or experience with the website, I still would and believe that I could make it my baby for the next few months. If you have any suggestions, though I'm sure my interface provides my contact information as well, I'll tell you that I'm reachable at realitybug2@yahoo.com . However, don't bother to tell me if you come up with a suggestion as, if you look carefully, you'll notice that I have already given you my contact information and so you will find yourself already able to reach me and I recommend progressing to the next step which would be to tell me your suggestion.

--Outskut 19:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Outskut. According to the page history, the page was semi-protected to prevent repeated IP vandalism. This means that you should be able to edit it now that you've been registered for a short amount of time. If you find yourself still unable to edit this page, please let me know, and I'll unprotect it so you can make your edits; alternatively, you can create your own version as a subpage of your userspace (e.g. User:Outskut/Black People, and then have the benefit of being able to submit it to Pee Review to gain the community's opinion and input regarding the rewrite. Hope this helps. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Main Page

I fixed it. I think, if you reload browser (cache and all that) you should be able to see the reskin in all its glory. —Braydie 09:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Neat-o. Not bad for a youngster ;P -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 09:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
So, you see it properly? fullscreen? Because when I'm logged out I can see it properly, but when I log in I can't. Hmm. So maybe I didn't fix it. —Braydie 09:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
All seems fine to me. What does it look like to you when it's "wrong"? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 09:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Well. I assume you see it going across the whole screen, I see it like any other page. Showing the navigation part etc. But only when I'm logged in. —Braydie 09:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Nice humour

Thanks for blocking me...

Unblocking2

and unblocking me XD

sori if i editted too much of the article.

keep up the humour.

help please!!!

I can do better, I promise. But I SUCK at this article (Pennywise the clown). Is there anyone I can ask to help add funniness and humoressness to this article? Of course, if you want to help yourelf, just clikc the link above. Thanks. Jimmy the Hellhound 13:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

You'll be wanting Pee Review for reviewing, advice and contributions. Best of luck. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Off I go. Jimmy the Hellhound 13:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

The Right Brothers

Hi Codine,

I noticed you huffed my article The Right Brothers.

I'd be really grateful if you could put it back - and I promise to work hard on it to make it funnier :-)

OK I guess that I shouldn't have invented stupid dates for things - but I did try to do something witty with the quotes (Paul McCartney, Cole Porter etc) and I thought the basic idea of making the Right Brothers out to be revolutionary marxists with Nashville Tennessee being the center of international socialism had at least a sniff of smile about it - if not an outright belly laugh.

Anyway I'd love to have another go as I suspect the band is ripe for a bit of a ribbing.....

Cheers

Done. You might also want to consider registering, as you'll then have your own userspace where you can work safely on ideas without fear of them being huffed before completion, in addition to having a handy name that will quickly become like an albatross around your neck for people to recognise you by. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Multiple deletion complaints

Not funny? This is...

SPARTA!!

Taxonomy delivered a Chest-kick to Codeine.

Taxonomy 19:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Errors and such

Okay, I appreciate that Windows errors which don't exist but should was sort-of duplicated elsewhere, hence notionally deserving of a huff but I was hoping that it might encourage other people to play - hence the reason I gave the relevant link in the history page. Plus, it might have been nice to be told before you killed it dead! Guybles 15:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

My Article?

You huffed The Sand Hermit for no apparent reason. It's not a vanity page any more than The Enigmatic Mr. Grumpikins is, and that won the Poo-Lit Surprise Award a while ago. I just don't understand why you felt the need to huff it--did you even read it? Under the vanity guidelines, if it's funny, then you should take it into consideration. I worked a long time on that article before posting it to this site. Basically, I want my article back. --The Llama Llover!!! 16:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


Fine fine fine. I don't care, they've all been restored. Anything for a quiet life. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 16:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Anticyclopedia

Sorry about the "Uncyclopedia is unfunny" comment. It was written during a time of frustration, and more me lashing out at not having my wiki approved than actual opinion. I hope it won't permanently change your opinion of me.

As a stubborn person, I would like to present my reasons for a seperate wiki. A. Uncyclopedia is for disinformation: "The goal of this project is to provide the world's misinformation in the least redeeming and most searingly sarcastic and humourous way possible.", whereas Anticyclopedia would be about satire, focusing on history, current events, and science. B. The internet has not yet found a wiki that is home to historical and political satire, and I hope we can finally create that place.

Thanks for your time, if you have any response please talk to me on this page, on my talk page on the Wikia forums or here. --Madmonkey24 21:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

why cant you insert/redirect using the special:username?

Why cant you redirect to the special: namespace? i tried to take advantage of those tags, i know how to insert a userpage. (not a regular, only user) but why wouldnt it let me do that? oh, oops. lol. i didnt log in or sign. ONX 13:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea. Splarka or someone more gifted in the art of scripting may be able to answer that query. I think your experiment didn't work because you were nesting template tags (curly brackets), and the javascript needs to be a little tweaked to allow templates to do that. Possibly. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 14:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for nomination

Thank you for nominating me to become a new administrator. I really wasn't expecting it! It didn't pan out, but thanks. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

God

Can you unlock God? Not in a spiritualy sense...more of a literal one. It's been over a month now and I hope the vandal has moved on to greener pastures. Also, there's a request on its talkpage to add an interwiki link. I'd add it but: it's locked, I've no idea what the Arabic wiki's link abbreviation is (he's got a web address, but that's different than an interwiki thingy), and I'm pretty sure that the NSA been watching me ever since I did research into extremist Muslim sects (oddly, it was for a page or two here...). --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Done. Let the vandalism commence afresh! -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 08:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Hurrah! Now that vandals can blank the page again I can go back to thinking "Geez, of all the religion pages on Uncyc, you find this one offensive enough to vandalize?". --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Joey Deacon

Nice work on locking Asian male handicap without a VFD tag when it's currently up for VFD. Intentional? Rogerborg 10:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

It was locked due to vandalism beforeit was nominated for VFD; therefore, the onus is on the nominator to contact me regarding tag placement. Go and bother them instead. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi Codeine

Just came across Portsmouth which got huffed a week or so ago. Not that I actually saw the article, but your huff-summary looks vaguely like you meant to revert an edit instead, so I just thought I'd check! --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Well spotted! I must have hit the wrong button in my drug-addled frenzy. All sorted now. Thanks again. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


Long time no see

I chuckled a bit when I saw some of your recent contributions. Award Placed on User Page  –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 10:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


Power Hungry

Hay Codeine, how do i go about getting sysopped? I see that many articles that shoulda been huffed are around, they slipped thru the cracks. let me huff away! ONX 14:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

See the Forums for a whole list of topics on how to and not to get sysopped. Essentially, asking for it doesn't help; working hard and being a good community member does. Keep up the good work and remember that all things come to those who wait. In the meanwhile, there's always QVFD, your one-stop bottomless crap repository. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 15:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

i've been here for like, 2 years. i think i've waited. i work hard whenever i'm actually here...

I Know you want It,

Goobf RapeShielded
Olipro has awarded you his Get out of Bumrape Free card
Consider yourself lucky

Congratulations for earning it.

There you go... call it in when necessary or pawn it for cash --Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 19:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh man... talk about closing the stable door after the horse has bolted -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

One Piece

Hello, while I have a question for One Piece, why did you delete it? It was so funny and people over in APforums likes it but you delete it. Why?

(Edwardadrian 10:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC))

Think you might have answered your own question. I for one have no idea what APforums is... :) -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Ditto Mhaille; also, the content that I deleted was "This article was not worthy of being deleted, yes?", which can hardly be called an article. Pages about yourself, your mates, or the uberk3wl forums you hang out in are called vanity pages here on Uncyclopedia, and are subject to the rules at UN:VAIN, as well as HTBFANJS. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I don't understand what your saying. One Piece is not a personal articles and it's not about hanging around with buddies. Ok, generally, why is the One Piece article deleted? Why is it funny just because it's funny? Is'nt Unencyclopedia suppose to be a parody site where everything is oppisite?

(Edwardadrian 20:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC))

Thanks!

Haywain For voting for her article, The British Class System,
Sanns-sig has awarded you:
A print of Constable's Haywain. Now your true class will be seen by all.

Hey....

Just heard they are going to be playing the Champions League 3rd and 4th place runners up match at Wembley this year. They are going to call it the FA Cup. :) -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Ha ha! But surely this means that following a certain 2-1 win last weekend, Pompey are actually the 3rd best team in Europe? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 16:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Also heard that from next year we are going to be sponsored by Viagra, as we're hard to beat and never lose a semi. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Thanks for the vote

Beerpint Olipro has bought you a beer!
Remember though, you're getting the next round.


Yeah... thanks again... although maybe I should curse you for turning me into a mindless deletion zombie, I can't tell :P -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Spell 'I Cup.' ICUP hehe, but really, about the ICU

Yeah, you put an ICU on Worst 100 Diseases Your Wife Could Have. You wanna check it over now, and see if it's improved? If not, hey I'll fix it back up. Right after I convince 3 different people to stop adding random and unfunny stuff to four different articles. I'll check back on this... Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)

Well, it's better, but it's still just a list at the moment. It could be good, but I think the items need expanding; compare it, for example to Worst 100 Ways to Deliver Bad News; each entry on the list has a short synopsis or explanation beneath it that contributes to its humour, and sets it apart from being just a list. For example:
78. Your wife is Oprah.


OK, this raises a faint smile (or maybe even strikes terror into your heart), but we can expand it:


78. Your wife is Oprah.
A particularly debilitating disease, but more so for the husband than the wife, as he finds all his money being rapaciously devoured and replaced with gelatinous blobs of fat.


...or something like that. The idea is good as I said, but a bit of careful nurturing could make it really good. Hope this helps.

Oh yeah, you might also want to take note of the standard formatting for "Worst 100" articles - numbered items should be prefixed with a semicolon, descriptions underneath indendented with a colon, like so:

;78. Your wife is [[Oprah]].
 :expanded text goes here

-- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes Sir, get right on it after I stop procrastinating. Thanks for the tip! (by the way, Worst 100 Ways to Deliver Bad News ironically inspired me to make this article) {{User:Serq_fet/sig

Worst 100 Diseases Your Wife Could Have is finshed; Please romove the ICU

I followed your advice exactly, and here it is! Thanks Please ewmove the ICU, thanks Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)

Done. Good job! -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 08:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Steve Irwin

Define "couple of days". oTHErONE (Contribs) 11:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

"However long it is until someone points out to me that I forgot all about it". No charge. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

ONX

That guy's been going round asking everyone for rollback rights it seems... looks like he's taking the "throw enough shit and hope some sticks" approach. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 01:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

S'Ok. I've got New ShitAway 9000™! Just one spray and you're as fresh as a pair of newly laundered underpants, lovingly ironed by Braydie's mum. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 01:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens

I don't get why you deleted the article. It fits in nicely with all the other nonsense articles. That'd be like huffing rolling your head on the keyboard. --Emmzee 20:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

You just answered your own question, dude. Why do we need two articles of keyboard-hammering gibbberish? The nonsense articles are all ever-so-slightly different from each other, that's why they work; but really, there's nothing to discern between the two articles you mention above. Prove me wrong and I'll cheerfully restore it. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I will. Rolling your head on the keyboard and I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens are completely different. My article referenced a saying popular on the Internet that goes like this: When someone is asked how they wrote such a great article/forum post, they reply, "I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens." My article was making fun of this saying by stating that literally slamming on the keyboard does not, in fact, make you write well. It's irony. Rolling your head on the keyboard is just Bat Fuck Insane. --Emmzee 00:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects