*{{delete}} That's just stupid. --[[User:Count of Monkey Crisco|Count of Monkey Crisco]] 22:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
*{{delete}} That's just stupid. --[[User:Count of Monkey Crisco|Count of Monkey Crisco]] 22:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
*{{delete}} {{User:MrN9000/sig}} <small><small>16:45, Aug 15</small></small>
*{{delete}} {{User:MrN9000/sig}} <small><small>16:45, Aug 15</small></small>
+
*{{delete}} I went ahead and went all italic on your asses. I stuck it in userspace, left him a message, and blanked the page. For this, I will undoubtedly be blocked indefinitely. {{User:Hyperbole/sig}} 17:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
Thank you.
No really, thank you.
Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
# - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
--~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.
To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.
Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.
If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions.This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty.Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept.You have been warned.
Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.
Delete - I hate to admit it, but I want this gone more because of the author's treatment of the ICU tag than the article's content itself. But the content is none too great either. pillow talk 15:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Exterminate- That is a pretty fantastic edit, though. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 16:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - Sheesh, Woody, I haven't really been here any longer than you, but even I know that there are zero (0) funny articles on Uncyclopedia that mention Link, and that even the faintest of allusions to Link correlates tightly with the necessity of deletion. pillow talk 15:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep. Maybe it's the lack of sleep, but the idea of hand waving being an ancient insult struck me as cute. Also kind of liked the picture. pillow talk 15:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm... the concept is OK, it's just that the execution is terrible. Rewrite tag? --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 16:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
delete. not positive on this one, but it seems worthless. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep Looks like it was written by someone who new what they were doing. I don't understand the joke, but it's a real Theorem, so maybe it's funny to maths types. MrNFork you! 16:49, Aug 15
Weak delete but this one is actually kind of close to being worth keeping. So close... and yet, so about to be deleted. pillow talk 15:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I went ahead and went all italic on your asses. I stuck it in userspace, left him a message, and blanked the page. For this, I will undoubtedly be blocked indefinitely. pillow talk 17:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Well, fuck. There's nothing I hate more than this situation on VFD. A new user shows up - one with the ability to write coherent sentences, format articles well, and work diligently on something - and he spends hours slaving away at an article, and we delete it two weeks later. No, Amby is not good enough to keep, and because it's broken in concept, ICU won't help. I don't know. Maybe we should just move it into his userspace, leave a message on his talk page, and move on. pillow talk 23:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. This is coherent but it's just that nobody cares/knows what this is. Move it and someone leave them a nice, long, friendly praising message that encourages them to at least begin by writing about real things until they establish a reputation. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 00:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Maybe so but here's another, more vicious angle to look at it: It's vanity about the author's stuffed toy. Although I have to admit that it is pretty freakin' cute, it should be deleted per the vanity policies. See, that wasn't so hard, was it? Now we can delete it without any guilt. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 06:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Guys! If you want this moved to userspace, you have to vote delete, and leave a comment to that effect in your voting reason. Just saying put it in userspace in the comments section will not make that happen... MrNFork you! 16:45, Aug 15
keep I laughed the whole way through, and I usually hate short articles. I'd imagine this would be a lot worse if it were longer. --monika 15:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
keep Maybe obvious, but still kinda OK concept. MrNFork you! 20:47, Aug 14
delete. An obvious joke to those in the know, a noninteresting one to those who aren't. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 00:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
D1337 While I obviously know what this article pertains to...I think that it is incoherent to everyone else. Chocolate Rain 01:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Move to Undictionary I took a class on complex variables. Unpleasant memories. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 06:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain - this is a joke that every first-year physics student immediately makes when they learn the formal definition of "work" and realize that nearly everything we know as work constitutes no work under that definition. It's kind of a funny concept, but, I don't know, to me it got stale like a decade ago. pillow talk 16:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
I must be in the very narrow band between physics majors and people who don't understand calculus. --monika 00:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep - the concept of applying AD&D 2nd Edition alignment tables to political philosophy is funny. The execution leaves something to be desired, but I don't care. pillow talk 20:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep I reverted back to a version I read a while back. It's really short (obvously) but I actually kinda like it. Feels great :) MrNFork you! 01:14, Aug 13
D1337 Per Frankie's short but true and insightful comment. Chocolate Rain 18:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - even after MrN's trimming, it's mostly about sex with falafels. Articles about sex with inanimate objects are always abject failures. pillow talk 21:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.
Delete. Randomcruft. 
Keep. - Theres potential— 
