Vote Vote Vote Vote
Heerenveen (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +11
- Nom and for. Per my reasoning last month; "Recent changes slut, QVFD whore, and UOTM for April." </lazy> A great asset to Uncyclopedia, this tank needs bigger guns. — Sir Manticore
12:25, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- For He's done more for the site than I ever have or will. • <17:53, 13 Jul 2008>
- For Per Manticore. MrN
Fork you! 18:20, Jul 13
- For - Also per Mantiwhore Jul 13, 18:22
- For. Tireless and awesome. --UU - natter
21:51, Jul 13
- For - I think he sometimes is about here, possibly doing things or something like that--Sycamore (Talk) 11:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- For. ~
11:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
SysRq (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 2
- Nom I think he said he'd quite like it, I think he'd make quite a friendly admin and also I'm just nomming a load of people, here... - [12:31 11 July] Sir FSt Don
Yettie
- For. Per YTTE. 21:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Pointless self for. Probably not my month, considering I'm not that active right now (busy with the music stuff) but I still think that I would be a decent op. Whatever. MrN deserves it more than anyone. sir
sysrq @ 23:09 Jul 13
Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom When I first came to Uncyclopedia I thought UU was an admin. I think he deserves this, but he may have turned it down last month. Unfortunately I'm too lazy yo check that. - [12:31 11 July] Sir FSt Don
Yettie
- Indeed I did, and I'm rejecting the nom again this month. Nice of you to say, thanks YTTE, but my contribs are likely to tail off dramatically in the next couple of months, then I'll miss pretty much all of September. So not a great time to be opped, really! Besides, there are more deserving candidates, and Sycamore's just edit conflicted me and nommed one of the very best in MrN!. --UU - natter
12:40, Jul 11
- Indeed I did, and I'm rejecting the nom again this month. Nice of you to say, thanks YTTE, but my contribs are likely to tail off dramatically in the next couple of months, then I'll miss pretty much all of September. So not a great time to be opped, really! Besides, there are more deserving candidates, and Sycamore's just edit conflicted me and nommed one of the very best in MrN!. --UU - natter
MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +16
- Nom - He's good--Sycamore (Talk) 12:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it would definitely make a lot of sense to promote one of our more dedicated poopsmiths, since that seems to be one of the more common admin duties... 19:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Most indubitably. ~~Heeren ["Meh"] [tecħ] [kurk] [13/07 17:53]
- For • <17:54, 13 Jul 2008>
- For - He makes a great job of VFD, and he'd make an even better one as an admin Jul 13, 18:23
- For He's one of those people you think is an admin anyway if you don't know any better and you're stupid. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Do it. Doooo it. Doooooooooo itttt... sir
sysrq @ 20:00 Jul 13
- For - not promoting MrN9000 would be a mistake of apocalyptic proportions. 21:24, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For. Because he's so definitely not pants. --UU - natter
21:42, Jul 13
- For Duh -RAHB 21:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For This old man deserves the honour. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Trousers! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 03:17 Jul 14, 2008
- Self-against. Hea, with all the self-4s which are going on, I'm just trying to be different. MrN
Fork you! 16:51, Jul 14
- Feed my...Frankenstein! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:11, Jul 15
- For - He does stuff--Sycamore (Talk) 11:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- For. ~
11:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- I very much vote For this good man being an admin. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 16:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- For A great help around the site, and pretty damn awesome to good n00bs. Pretty damn hard on the assholes too. I see nothing wrong with this. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 03:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
over 9000 huffs --CharitwoTalk 03:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Roman Dog Bird (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +14
- Nomination and For as per him being active and awesome and a fantastic user who has big balls, no nonsense, and a miraculously intact sense of humor. RDB is the man, and if he doesn't win UotM this month, he could at least get opped too. -- 13:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- For, again again again. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For. His contribs tell the tale: QVFD, VFD, FD, D. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Give me liberty, or give me an admin that is actually active! (looking at you, Lj!) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:08, Jul 13
- For because this guy has my Space Ghost article on his watchlist for some reason. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For - UnIdiot |
| Talk | Contribs - 01:00, Jul 14
- Self-for. --
Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER
16:42, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For -RAHB 18:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Absolutely~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 02:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Dr. Skullthumper (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +16
- Nomination and For as per him being Dr. Skullthumper. That is just a reason you simply cannot top. -- 14:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- for! • <16:16, 11 Jul 2008>
- Patience. -- 17:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'd just like to point out that I fully agree with the nomination reason. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 20:42 Jul 11, 2008
- I dunno. TKF didn't cite his sources. Also,
For. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno. TKF didn't cite his sources. Also,
For. - Jul 13, 18:25
- For. Shit man, plenty of outstanding candidates again. Skull gets my vote, but whoever emerges from this opped, the site can only benefit. --UU - natter
21:56, Jul 13
- Five The One and Only... NecroBlade [STFU] Live And Learn...
- Six and Yeah. Skully might be an
obnoxious douchebaginteresting character, but he has my vote! Love,
Self-for. Because I can, apparently, and I feel ready for the job if I get stuck with itit is bestowed upon me. If not, I'll be around. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 03:17 Jul 14, 2008- For Despite him being Dr. Skullthumper. MrN
Fork you! 11:18, Jul 14
- For. --
Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER
16:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For Pinkytalk 21:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For: a fabulously medical man of heretofore unimagined medicines. Mostly bad medicines. But, bad medicine is what I need. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
For. Still not a real doctor though, watch your genitals kids. --CharitwoTalk 03:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
RAHB (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +21
- Nom, as per what you all expected. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:18, Jul 11
- For, as I pointed out last month, he is the very model of a modern major general. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For. It's been brought to my attention that, with respect to binomial theorem, he's teeming with a lot 'o news. 21:26, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Self For I hate to self for on this, but I just think I'd do a pretty good job at this point. -RAHB 21:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)For. His self-for indicates a giant ego that would, I hope, go mad with power. Mad! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC) I've thought about it, and his self-for terrifies me. I woke up in a cold sweat and everything. Especially everything. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)For. His unself-for'ing indicates a heretofore unrecognized level of unselfishness. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah! this way he gets two votes instead of just one! (Not that he doesn't deserve it. Go Rahb!) • <2:11, 19 Jul 2008>
- For Nice guy who likes Freakazoid. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For going mad with power, per Modus. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:02, Jul 13
- For~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 00:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For - UnIdiot |
| Talk | Contribs - 01:01, Jul 14
- YAY! RAHB would make a perfect admin -
annoying, a hardass, mean, pretentioushelpful, informative, nice. Love,
FUCKING DUH – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 03:17 Jul 14, 2008
- For MrN
Fork you! 11:17, Jul 14
- For -- 16:07, Jul. 14, 2008
- For. --
Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER
16:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- 4 --Skizzerz 00:58, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- 4444444444444444444444444444444 -- 01:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Strategic Cabal For. — Sir Manticore
04:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
One-eyed Jack (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +9
- This nomination has nothing to do with OEJ's nomination last month. Instead, this nom has everything to do the fact that I feel that if Mr. Jack keeps doing what he does - but with a flaming-vorpal-admin-sword +2 - stuff would be gooder. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
For.. I was his personal advocate for several months, before Modus' non-oppage became so blatantly unfair that I picked up his torch. Now I'm back on OEJ's horse. One of the original Pee-review peeps, and I'd venture he has more pees than anyone else here.--<<
>> 22:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For. OEJ is one of the good guys. I'm not going to hold that against him. Hopefully his contribs will pick up when he can do whateveritis that admins do. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For, and not just because the guy who nommed him used the term "flaming-vorpal-admin-sword +2". -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For per those guys. 'Specially ZB. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 15/07 18:56
- For. He can holster his ban hammer in his empty socket. ~
07:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Orion Blastar (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 0
- Another member of the "3 years at Uncyclopedia Club", and I'm not even sure if Orion has ever been nommed for VFS - or, if he has, I don't remember it. In anycase, Orion's three years, so far, have been marked by a diligent adherence to quality and humour. He'd make a fine sysop. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see the evidence for this nom to be honest. Yes, he's a fine writer, one of our finest. But just scrolling through his past 500 contribs, I see very little in the way of reverting or maintenance. That's also absolutely fine, no-one's obliged to do that stuff apart from us. But I could swear that I had a rant before about adminship not being simply a reward for longevity - ignorable by all means, and I don't expect my rant to be doctrine, but I do still feel the same way. I think Orion's great, but I don't really see anything that suggests to me that his adminship would be particularly beneficial to himself or to the site; in fact, my concern stems from the fact that we could reduce the comedic output of a very talented writer by obliging him to perform mundane tasks. This is not an oppose. I'd like to hear OB's opinion on this. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 15:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- I only mentioned Orion's "longevity" as an indicator of his dedication to the wiki. He's been around for three years, so I doubt he'll bugger off after doing nonstop admin-stuff for two months. Also, as I walked through his contribs, I did notice enough VFD edits, and enough reverts to satisfy me. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Charitwo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +7
- Yea, you know? That one IRC guy? The one that keeps reverting crap and helping out during vandal sprees? Who we all decided to give rollback to waaaaay back when? And patrols for vandalism throughout the day? And then reverts that vandalism? Yea, him. Nom & For. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 06:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Fo-Reverted edit(s) of Heerenveen to last version by Jocke Pirat. Amazingly quick. ~~Heeren ["Meh"] [tecħ] [kurk] [13/07 20:04]
- Machine -- 03:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For This is like my 4th or 5th nom, I could probably use some extra firepower for vandals. --CharitwoTalk 06:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For - Sure, he blacked out my talk page, but hey, he's a nice guy....or she's a nice girl? -
Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate
20:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Not a girl. --CharitwoTalk 20:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- So, what's with the ballerina outfit? Are you trying to tell us that you're a ballerino? Is that even a word? Question of some kind? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what you're talking about. --CharitwoTalk 01:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't say "Stop dancing"! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what you're talking about. --CharitwoTalk 01:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- So, what's with the ballerina outfit? Are you trying to tell us that you're a ballerino? Is that even a word? Question of some kind? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Not a girl. --CharitwoTalk 20:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- For A reverting beast, and a good guy. Right now when he reverts vandals, he's gotta wait for someone else to block them. Might as well cut out the middleman, and help out everyone. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
THEDUDEMAN (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +3
- Nomination. Insert obvious reasons here. -- 14:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- For - He has been doing plenty of good stuff lately.
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
THEDUDEOP --CharitwoTalk 04:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Bonner (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +5
- Self Nom and For Oh wait... I like this yooser. He looks like cheese. And there are many other reasons. --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 14:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Self for I suppose - Jul 13, 18:19Actually this would be better used elsewhere Jul 13, 18:21
Strong For. He's making a comeback baby. — Sir Manticore
22:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For the longest time, I thought he already was an op. sir
sysrq @ 23:13 Jul 13
- NOW I'm giving him the For. I also did a bit of score cleanup. I wouldn't of thought he would get 3 entire points! --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 09:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Five (points now) --Pinkytalk 21:42, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +6
- Nom and For I think this is the third time I've nommed him, and I think I'm not the only one who's ever nommed him. Starnes needs some admin tools, I'm confident it'll help the wiki greatly. -RAHB 23:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- For --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- For ~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
13/07/2008 @ 20:03 - For - UnIdiot |
| Talk | Contribs - 01:05, Jul 14
- YES! Ah, Starnes. The most
mean, nasty, boring, dull, smelly, perverted....interesting....person by far. Yeah, hesucksrocks. Love, - Self For -- 16:04, Jul. 14, 2008
Orian57 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 1
NOM AND FOR-HE DESERVES IT. Founding Member Baseball16
12:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


