Uncyclopedia:VFP

Sign below a picture you find excellent - new nominations go on top. Unsigned votes will be thrown out, and IP votes carry less weight than votes cast by a registered user, because anonymous IPs are pathetic peons in our eyes. Feel free to add an thumb + description + article. You may nominate and vote for your own images: such is the freedom of Uncyclopedia. Make sure your vote is clear, by using 'For' and 'Against' in bold type. Neutral votes are absolutely unnecessary. If you're only making a comment and not voting, be sure to note that.

Please submit only original pictures to VFP! Images cribbed from elsewhere on the internet will not be featured on the front page, though you are welcome to use them in articles.

For discussion about VFP see Uncyclopedia:Community_Portal/archive2#Here_we_go_again_with_Rainbow_Brite.

When nominating an image, the template Template:VFP should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFP}}. A featured article should have the template Template:ImageFP, using {{ImageFP}}.

Removal/archival of failed/expired candidates, as well as the decision on which have reached failure, must only be performed by the sysops who have nothing better to do than look at pictures all day, so leave it to them.

You can see all the featured images listed here, or on the archived voting page.

MS Paint screenshot

• For - Nonymous 19:38, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• 4 - Nice screenshot 19:41, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I must repeat. For me it takes more then a poor MS Paint job Acid Ammo 09:27, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• And I vote 'FÜR. I like this one. --⇔ 20:22, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For It looks exactly like the real thing... I can't differentiate between a screenshot and the actual program. --Code.azul 1:02 PM, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. I bet this is what Katie made Hitlerbear in. [ducks]. -- 06:43, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. i love this program. Check out what i made here--Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM ::: 08:24, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Roy Octopus

Nominated and For. Classy piece of work. 15:45, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against. I don't like it. Acid Ammo 09:32, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Weak For. Charming if not completely insane. --IMBJR 13:15, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Darwin Is Knocking

Mhaille did a great job of making the former image from this article into a far funnier and more applicable image. Vote for this image! » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 14:52, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Am-zing. KATIE!! 15:03, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, stored in my big bag of kudos. And For. :) -- 15:45, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Falcon Fab! 17:37, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Very much for! --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 17:45, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Fork. officer designate Lugiatm 17:47, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For CoyoteJoe 18:12, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against. The pic is poor, and the good caption is not enough to save it. Also, stolen Jesus pic from YTMND. Acid Ammo 19:56, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Flat Earth

Think it's both well-made and works out of context. Caption will need work, though. -JBob 10:10, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against, until caption is changed and image is made less tall. Think of the children. officer designate Lugiatm 17:49, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. Good idea, nicely executed. Acid Ammo 19:59, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. Nice.. always love a good catholic bashing!. AlexC 20.56, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For Really good and yes good execution, needs a change in the caption me thinketh. 21:19, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For but change caption. -- 22:17, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For Excellent work. eander315 05:33, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. Change the caption, though--it's not offensive (to me anyway), but not very funny either. SlySi42

I'm not sure of what kind of caption would work. If anyone thinks of anything funnier, post it here or change the caption itself. -JBob 09:28, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Earth, before Xzibit pimped it.
• Due to constant falls to the infinite, the Earth Legislation stated that the Earth should be round in 1927.
• Earth, after one month on Atkins.

Acid Ammo 13:16, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Christopher Columbus falls off the edge of the earth.

I like the picture. Although it could use some cropping. I changed the caption; is it any better? KATIE!! 18:07, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Katie didn't learn to share. Or perhaps she did not like any of my suggestions. Eighter way, it saddens me. Acid Ammo 18:11, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

More Caption Suggestions:

• On that fateful Wednesday, God accidentally flipped the Earth vertical and everyone fell off.
• The Earth gets an upgraded stand, leaving its prior position on top of a turtle.
• The Christian Right reveals its new cause: Intelligent Cartography.
-- 18:58, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Harvard

• New, submitted for consideration by the artist. Herostratus 03:43, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC) um, could I get a vote? I mean even an "Against" vote would be fine. Don't just ignore me here. (P.S. Turk 182... 1985 Timothy Hutton movie...) Herostratus
• For - "DAGREE - \$12" Ha. Pretty funny. It's not laugh-out-loud hilarious, but it made me chuckle. --DrAwesome 18:10, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Doesn't do it for me. Acid Ammo 20:00, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Close Encounters

• It made me laugh. Nominated and For. -- 23:11, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• I quite like it. For. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 06:52, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Does Hitler ever cease being funny? For! » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 14:55, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• I can't tell it's Hitler on the screenshot. Also, Hitler is overused. Against. Acid Ammo 19:46, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• No, Hitler never ceases to be funny. For. KATIE!! 23:47, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. Gave me a chuckle when I looked at the large version. FireballX301 08:25, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Hitlerbear

OMG lol i made this myslf adn i think it shuld be feturd 4 lol KATIE!! 00:45, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

omg da bears r nazis now?omg for cuz da troof mst b nown officer designate Lugiatm 00:49, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Katie, you forgot your perspective. FOR ---Kakun 01:12, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Um, isn't the bear traditionally supposed to be Russia? Rather opposite on the political spectrum... --Carlb 03:18, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

In Soviet Russia, bears comment on you. I stand by my for. officer designate Lugiatm 10:21, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

GREATEST IMAGE EVER TO GRACE THIS PAGE! uh, I mean, For. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 09:15, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Christ on a stick, that's just about the scariest collection of pixels I've ever seen!

$f \bigodot \mathbb(R)$ --⇔ 10:31, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Paw it cos I love self forfilling prophecies. --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM ::: 14:09, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

FOR A well thought out and creative piece of realistic yet comical art. Bravo! -- Dear Lord YES!!! Omigawd that pic is the best thing to happen to this place since i burning your dog! --InfernalAsparagus 15:36, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Okay, this gets nine "for" votes in one day, and the (funnier, IMO) Bears vs. Unicorns image takes a whole month to get eleven? I don't have a problem with the fact that this probably took two minutes and that probably took two hours, but I should still vote against it just for that reason. Nevertheless, I'm voting for this, purely in the doubtlessly vain hope that it will make someone out there feel ashamed for helping to perpetuate such an obvious, massive injustice. --Johnny C. Raven 02:26, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I pity the fool who takes 2 hours to make something of Bears-vs.-Unicorns-quality. --S P I N N I E 07:14, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

OMG LOL! I get it -- da bear is a nazi! OMG!
Against. It's not linked to any any article (by which I'm not suggesting...). How can it be a featured image if its not an image, at least not in any article? Its just sitting on the server... Herostratus 03:59, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For I am humbled by the sheer mastery put to work in this image. I may never use photoshop again....I'm not worthy!! Strong RadX 04:04, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I didn't realize it was an orphaned image until I read Herostratus's and RadX's (original) comment a second ago (which he changed ten seconds later for some reason). So I just added it to Bears vs. Unicorns Conflict. If anyone objects to it they can bite me. --Johnny C. Raven 04:17, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Lol i swear everything Keitei touches turns to gold. For. 04:21, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. This postmodern reflectionization upon the meta-conceptual identification of art succeeds not only in challenging our preconceptions of artisanship but also in the decontextualized profligation of ironic deconstruction of the very idea of humor. -- 04:29, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

But aren't you concerned about the debasement of modern quasi-cultural iconography as expressed within a sterile and dystopian perceptual framework? Oh shit, I just spilled Pinot Noir all over my thesaurus. --Johnny "The Wikinator" Raven 05:02, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Not at all. The modern fragmentation between narratives of reality has served to relativize cultural signifiers to such a degree that "debasement" only effects an additional contruction. By reappropriating meta-iconographic elements, the piece productively reconstrues the creative roots of society, shattering the artificial dualisms of good and not good and mockery and sincerity. Glad to hear about your thesaurus: by liberating yourself from the pre-existing vocalizations of hegemonic discourse you can truly embrace the psuedo-arolect of the postmodern zeitgeist. -- 10:46, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sieg Heil *Zombiebaron raises his arm in the Nazi salute* -- 11:00, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC) (This is a vote for, if you were to dense to figure that out)

Against. For me, it takes more then poor MS Paint job. Acid Ammo 19:48, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Again, I resent the assumption that I have a PC. KATIE!! 19:50, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For!!!!!!!!!!! -- 20:12, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Courtney Love Killed Kurt Cobain

Putting up my own image for public scrutiny as I am a masochist. --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 17:02, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm a facist,so i'm afraid it's a no --80.227.58.13 03:46, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For - Made me laugh, reminds of some fan rants --Joewithajay 08:36, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oooooooh yesh. I heartily endorse this product. --officer designate Lugiatm 15:15, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Abstain until captionis changed. Acid Ammo 18:04, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

To what? Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 17:53, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sure, why not? For. -- 20:14, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• For Kakun 21:44, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I like it. Needs a better caption, but the image is pretty cool! Strong RadX 04:16, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I'd tap that -- 11:03, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC) for

That's the good shit -- 20:13, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. Deserves to be on the front page for sure--USER:Saguaro 13:03, 03 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Dog Hazard Labels

 New label issued by the National Pet Association in light of recent tragedies. New label issued by the National Pet Association in light of recent tragedies. New label issued by the National Pet Association in light of recent tragedies. New label issued by the National Pet Association in light of recent tragedies. New label issued by the National Pet Association in light of recent tragedies. New label issued by the National Pet Association in light of recent tragedies.

For: These labels are so perfect. I can't decided which one I like most so I'm nominating them all and people can either vote on the best one, or maybe we can vfp them all with a reduced weight to mimic a random selection between them. --Sir gwax (talk) 20:32, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination and the 1337 ninja star. I'd vote for if it wasn't so blasé to vote for oneself... So instead I just reorganised this nomination so it wouldn't look so n00bish. ;)--MoneySign 23:36, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For: Just so fucking awesome. 203.54.40.223 23:43, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Weak for (As if me being anon doesn't make it anymore weaker): Very good quality, but i don't really see the humor. --80.227.58.13 01:46, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. Particularly for the explosive one. Captions could stand to be a little more creative, though... -JBob 05:11, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

How about those? --MoneySign 06:39, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Weak for. The main problem with these, I think, is that individually, they might not work. If put together, they might be too small on the main page. I'm still not sold on the caption, but thanks anyways. I trid to think of some sort of replacement, but I'm just drawing a blank right now. -JBob 08:44, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
One last try: uniform captions. --MoneySign 10:38, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I like those. And since they're uniform, there could be a possibility of putting them all onto a larger image for featuring on the main page. Just a thought. -JBob 19:52, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Against - Together they're very good, but they won't stand up when separated. --Algorithm (talk) 07:10, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For, just need the captions enhancing away from their original intent. The corrosive/dribbling dog is good as is the assploder. --IMBJR 20:22, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure what to do with this one. They're funny in a row, but even with captions they don't seem to work for featured images. AGAINST » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 10:59, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Against Funny, but doesn't work as a highlighted picture.--Bradaphraser 18:28, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I can go for the tiled picture.--Bradaphraser 20:00, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For --Nytrospawn 22:48, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Against per Algorithm. I do like the corrosive dog but I don't think it's strong enough on its own. --—rc (t) 19:05, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oh lordy yes. --officer designate Lugiatm 15:20, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I love explosive dog. I think if they are featured, the probability that they be seen should be split between each of them. But the odds should definately be in favour of explosive dog.

Oh, and in my puny opinion, I think they would work excellently as individual images, I just think certain individuals have difficulty imagining their reactions to having seen one on it's own now that they've seen them presented as a set. Also, this way anybody who goes on the Main Page quite a lot will be rewarded by seeing a few of the Dog Hazard images and forming them into a set in their mind. ALSO also, it'll generally be cool, and quite Uncyclopedic, to have a set of images featured on the main page which most people don't get chance to realise are a set, so each person has a different experiance of very similar images. Yes. Stuff like that. --Sir Carlos the Mean CUN VFP CS CM CUNT (talk) 04:52, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I agree. I think that the new captions work very well, especially for the exploding one. I think that both the set and just the exploding one would work well as a feature. For! KATIE!! 14:20, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Take nos. 2, 3, 5, and 6, put them in a four-square, and feature that. Otherwise, against. --Johnny C. Raven 02:40, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. Awesome! If you have to pick one, I'd go with the corrosive saliva. Herostratus 03:13, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I think that a new tiled image with all of them or maybe 4 ou of 5 would be good. so for now im Neutral 04:16, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment Tiled, JPEG artifacts removed. - Nonymous 17:07, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For the all-together one. Acid Ammo 20:02, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but rename as bewareofdog.gif :) --Carlb 00:22, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

O RLY?

YA RLY! --KATIE!! 23:52, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comment: I think we should try to keep the YTMND jokes and the Uncyclopedia jokes apart. Two different kinds of audience. Acid Ammo 02:01, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It's Tim O'Reilly of O'Reilly and Associates, who publish books for sysadmins. See O RLY? - David Gerard 10:24, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Which, coincidentally, makes it very funny to the geekier set here. Actually, his company not only publishes "sysadmin" books, but books on all the deeper aspects of most programming languages, operating systems, and various other aspects of technology. They are the books that always have a sketch-style monochrome animal mascot on the front. For » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 10:47, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For! - I'm one of those geeks. --The Hedgehog 18:03, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. --Algorithm (talk) 22:51, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC) (heeheehee)

Fuck no. Shittiest internet phrase ever. 172.213.117.126 14:14, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The Truman Torch

Shameless self-promotion. --Isra1337 08:18, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It's well-made, intelligent, and funny. What's not to like? --Peder 17:30, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

What's to dislike? I like it. Truman will always be known for being the Truman Torch. --Mosquitopsu 20:40, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

WTF? For! --Overlordzoloft 03:41, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Strange enough for me. --Dalar 03:54, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Great play on words. --MuncherOfSpleens 01:03, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

In Favor This is awesome. --Code.azul 03:18, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I do like it. --KATIE!! 16:08, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)

FEATURE THIS! I have decided to throw my support behind this image. It's also one of the only images on this page, outside of RadX's latest, to have absolutely no votes against. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 18:43, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For One of the only funny ones I've seen nominated. Neegore 12:35, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

V to the izzO, T to the izzE --Savethemooses 20:31, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Flame on! Harry's on fire! Feature him! Strong RadX 18:45, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Feature! I feel like the article this is linked to (New American Justice Coalition) should be featured too. Jlove1982 01:48, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Who is Harry S Truman? Acid Ammo 16:52, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Harry S. Truman was the American President who ordered that the atomic bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II. "Truman Torch" is a play on the Human Torch, a member of the famed comicbook team "The Fantastic Four." I proudly stand by my America-centric humor. -- 17:54, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For, then. Acid Ammo 18:02, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Connectthedots

I think it's awesome. So I'm nominating it. And voting. --Keitei 07:42, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Excellent image and pun. The spirit of Uncyclopedia is held inside its frame. --Mosquitopsu 14:06, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For This one was a lot of work! It's always been one of my favorite creations, if under-rated. --Strong Rad 22:13, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Hadn't ever seen this one, heh. --Splaka 22:20, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Aye I'd love to see their state flower also --Staxeon 05:17, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pretty darn funny  ;) For Rei 19:59, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For I like it. --Silius 06:13, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against -- Not very clever enouogh for me... --Leo 17:59, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against Sorry, there are more worthy Strong Rad images... --—rc (t) 23:19, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Man, someone's been drinking their Haterade! hehe --Strong RadX 03:22, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. Ah-ha, I get it, the state.

Unsigned. --—rc (t) 18:29, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Ohhhh, I get it! Ahahaha! Now we need an article for Connectthedots. Swordmaster 20:37, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

There is. It's called Connectthedots.Strong RadX 05:30, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Gotta love der puns.--Bradaphraser 20:52, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. The fact it has exactally 69 dots makes it even funnier. Acid Ammo 02:06, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Finally, someone noticed that...hehehe Strong RadX 00:20, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Put a good comment on it and I'll be for it. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 13:27, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Now I am For this image, since it has a suitable caption. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 21:30, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Previously Featured Pictures

These images have already been featured. Do not vote for them anymore. kthx.

Stained Glass Mr. T

Featured --—rc (t) 07:12, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I pity the foo' that don't vote for this image. Strong RadX 19:35, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Has to be For --

For. --Isra1337 19:38, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Now, this is actually funny and feature-worthy. Is this that hard, people? » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 19:44, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. --Kakun 22:19, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

RadX again?! Awesome :p FOR --Caiman 22:37, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For --Spintherism 23:36, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

FOR Pray his holiness, Saint-Mr. T --Tunel 00:19, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm all for beacons of hope. KATIE!! 00:22, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I think I speak for everyone when I say "for." That looks really cool. --Mosquitopsu 05:59, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I think you're right. --MoneySign 10:41, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For St. T should be highlighted everywhere!--Bradaphraser 18:24, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. Awesome picture and an awesome caption. -JBob 19:50, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Despite my well-known antipathy for Raddy, I must vote for this image. --—rc (t) 20:13, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

FOR-GASMIC --Savethemooses 20:35, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. Ain't nothin like the T. FireballX301 22:14, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. --John Shutt 22:39, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Now stop yo jibba-jabba and feature it...sucka!--Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 00:49, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Yes. Please. As if being very well-made and having Mr. T wasn't enough. Code.azul 12:51, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Fort Might aswell, I AINT GETTING ON NO PLANE 13:49, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

FOR This is a HOOT! Prettiestpretty 00:54, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. Now quit yo' jibba jabba. --officer designate Lugiatm 15:18, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Front page material. Acid Ammo 17:39, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rumble In Euroipods

FEATURED Yee-haw --—rc (t) 04:18, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I just made this picture, to be added to talk:euroipods. I think it's pretty funny (but I would say that), and it'd be great as a featured image. --Carlos the Mean 04:54, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oh, and I'm for. --Carlos the Mean 04:55, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Me too, but why the hell am I fighting you, CTM?--Sir Flammable KUN 05:27, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Here --Carlos the Mean 05:25, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it's self-referencing; yes, few people will get it; but it's hilarious, and I'm voting for it anyway. --—rc (t) 05:57, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Heh, I just noticed it says "VERUS" instead of "VERSUS" (on the original too). --—rc (t) 07:50, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

YES! Definetly an inside joke, for sure; but seeing as I'm inside of it... --Putz 07:43, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yeah. Maybe it will prompt a few people to read the Talk page (which probably should have been nominated VFH itself). -- T. (talk) 09:33, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Clorox/Bleach should feel awfully proud for getting mentioned twice. ;) -- T. (talk) 09:35, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Quiet, you! --Carlos the Mean 02:50, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Give me a Hell Yeah! Should be a featured image......coz...RC...sez so!!! -- 12:32, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. --Katie loves you! 19:57, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Funny picture, even if I don't get the in-joke. For. --Hinoa4 01:30, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. I just looked at the talk page for the first time since the day of, and Good God! Someone needs to write an article on Meta-Humor. --Isra1337 01:42, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Neutral until I'm added to the picture, then For - Out of pure vanity. That is a very funny picture from an in-joke standpoint. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 07:27, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

You weren't involved in the conflict. And you should thank your lucky stars. I still get flashbacks when I see an mp3 player and a European flag in the same place *shudder*.--Carlos the Mean 08:33, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I was involved in the conflict before there was a conflict. I just wasn't involved in the Talk page portion. I was there when "feature!" was declared and I was the first (I think) WTF'er on IRC. Not involved... Pffft. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 05:47, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I was merely documenting what I saw, I'm not a reliable source as such - which makes my output perfect for the front page of Uncyclopedia! --Sir Carlos the Mean CUN VFP CS CM CUNT (talk) 05:59, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rcmurphy for teh win. I mean, For. --officer designate Lugiatm 16:32, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sonnet the Hedgehog

Featured --—rc (t) 05:41, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Nomination and vote. This made me smile instantly, and I didn't enjoy Shakespeare. -- T. (talk) 16:06, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Do you never sleep? Fore and thanks... -- 16:16, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
To be against or not to be against: that is the vote. I love clever things like this image so I give it an Aye. --Mosquitopsu 16:51, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For: fantastic. --Sir gwax (talk) 22:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For (log-rolling) --Johnny C. Raven 05:41, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For It took me a minute to "get it," but once I got it, I thought it was very clever. Yeah, I need to brush up on my Shakespeare. --Silius 02:55, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For, because my article-writing ego demands it. --Andrusi 23:07, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. I knew him, Horatio. Swordmaster 18:30, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Against. Not my bag Neegore 12:38, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For I like this picture, it's subtle and funny. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 01:24, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For - cute - David Gerard 10:36, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Verily, I say. --KATIE!! 10:57, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Featured, hurrah --—rc (t) 04:46, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

No article for this one, sorry. ::The "articles" for this image are: 1 and 2 Vote for this great image. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:53, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

HAHAHAHA, now THAT's comedy! For --Peder 23:52, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Change the PMS symptoms text, increase size and then you'll have a good picture. But until then, I'm against it being featured. --Peder 21:01, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Good idea....I'll do that tonight! Strong RadX 22:06, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I personally like the part about breast tenderness. But the part that says "Pre-Menstrual Syndrome" should probably be changed. I agree with the bigger too. But I give this a For whether it's changed or not! --Katie loves you! 22:56, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Vote for this great image. --Nerd42 04:55, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Its funny, bcoz its true. For - 16:19, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For. I actually saw it in the delete log before I saw it here, and I laughed. -- T. (talk) 17:05, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
sure why not --Nerd42 17:23, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For. Great stuff. Acid Ammo 19:42, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For. Can I get this in packs of 200? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 02:28, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
We should pool our money together and get a case of a few thousand imported from Canada. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 15:57, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

By the way, have a looksy at Wiki Administrators --Nerd42 03:02, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For - David Gerard 01:07, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comment perhaps someone could smooth out the edges of the box? just a comment 204.38.191.99 19:15, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For, and how much does this go for on the black market? --Hinoa4 01:22, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Not Original

Sandwich

• For. It's beautiful! Staxringold 04:33, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Against. Neither original or all that funny by itself. FireballX301 05:41, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Nay. Unless this is the submitter's own photo/photomanip, this is not original to UN. --IMBJR 14:20, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. Hahaha! Acid Ammo 16:30, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Not original. I've seen this elsewhere. --Algorithm (talk) 22:24, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• OLD, VERY OLD ... Against » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:33, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Lookee here. At that location, the upload date says Monday, January 24, 2005 8:12 PM. Definitely not original. -- T. (talk) 11:05, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Pikachu

For Better than You, Cuteness and Oscar Wilde Himself P.S This is a Syrian Hamster for all you Wickedpedians--Oscar Wilde The 2nd

Is this original? Anyone want to check? It's great! » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 12:24, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Unless this is submitter's, no, it is not original to UN. --IMBJR 12:27, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I generally hate anything having to do with the whole pokemon thing, but this image is extremely funny. Even though it's probably not original, I would support it becoming a featured image. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 18:31, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For one condition though: must be original. --Savethemooses 20:36, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For I agree with STM. We need to verify that it's original, and if it is, then it needs to be featured! Strong RadX 20:49, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Comment That pic's been on the internet for a couple of years now--Nytrospawn 22:45, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)