Make sure you sign your votes with --~~~~ or the "your signature with timestamp" button on the edit screen.
You may nominate up to two of your own images per week. No more. You can nominate as many images by other people as you want.
Voting: use "For" or "Against" (or some clear iteration) in bold type to specify your vote. Comments are allowed, but excessive discussion/argument is not. Use the image's talk page for that.
Please submit only ORIGINAL IMAGES to VFP. Images from elsewhere on the Internet can be used on articles, but will not be featured.
Unmanipulated as well as photoshopped images are allowed as long as they are original.
When nominating an image, you may place {{VFP}} on the image page.
Things to be aware of
Do not remove or archive nominations. Loser admins will see to that.
You can see all previously featured images here, or on the archived voting pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. To vote on previously featured images, use Uncyclopedia:PFP.
Please read HowTo:Get Your Image Featured before nominating your own image. You are also encouraged to submit your image to Image Review for peer opinions before you list it on VFP.
If you are changing your vote, either remove the original vote OR strike it through with the appropriate HTML tag and change the # to ## so your comment won't mess up the vote numbering. Finally, update the votecounts.
The Yaltabear Conference reminds you to focus on starting a Cold War.
For zombie will murder this with a rusty steak knife for being 100% text but I read it and it was hilarious. I sorta think it should be an actual ARTICLE though. --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 02:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong Against No. Really. I can't tell you how much I love it when you mention my name. BUT THE B IS LOWER CASE. I mean really. Other then that...well...you know how much I love those text based jokes. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 02:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. True (I'm third from the top), but way too much of an in-joke. It would work as a part of the intro for Reefer Desk, however.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. Would not work at all on the front page. •Spang•☃•talk• 02:46, 14 Feb 2007
Strong for Holy shit this is good --GAMESPOT=666 03:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
A☭AINST, my name isn't in it. 03:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
comment, You need to stand out more... VFP needs a troll; do something rash w/ your scoring... Wait, you voted For on every VFP nom except this one... WTF? --AmericanBastard 04:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment, That is not true. I voted against the Angry God image. As for bein' a troll, no thank you, you're doin' a fine job all by yourself. 10:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. I read the whole damn thing and really wish I hadn't. You owe me 5 minutes!--The Jeff Killer 03:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
comment It took you 5 minutes to read that? A blind, retarded 3rd grader could read that in faster than 5 minutes. --AmericanBastard 04:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. No... it took me 30 seconds to read, and 4.5 minutes to read it over, and over, and over until I got the joke, and, guess what? I don't get it.--The Jeff Killer 12:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Its a reference to both the film of the same name, AND the nickname of the US Marine's (due either to their distinctive hairstyle, or emptyheadedness, depending on whom you speak to). -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For. Sikon's comment seems to typify responses to Jarhead -- some think it's funny, perhaps because it is so obvious; other's think it is not funny, perhaps because it is so obvious. ----OEJ 15:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
ForJarhead was one of my first articles, and recently I saw that someone had replaced my crap image with this one, and I though "This is bloody amazing, I should thank them". Well, consider this both a thank you, as a support. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 16:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
For-The Jar fits nicely where it should be, and it looks great. Love the pun.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 16:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Against Same humor as the madonna picture below, almost... A one angle joke. The "jarhead" pun actually derives from the helmet if you wan't to get testically about it. Good picture-crafting on the plus side. Trying to think how this could make me laugh... Pickled Infantry? --AmericanBastard 17:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Unlike many of today's New Age religions Artificial Pseudoscientology maintains a strong focus on iconography as seen is this 14th Century piece entitled "Madonna and Child".
Against I don't get it --GAMESPOT=666 04:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment - check out the accompanying article. 'Tis a reference to celebrity cults like Church of Kaballah and Scientology, with two notable practioners. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Thank you for explaining it to me, but that doesn't change my vote --GAMESPOT=666 03:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
For - Madonna, before the artist came around, referred to the Virgin Mary. Also, the newer Madonna is a religious wacko. R 16:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Against Agree with above --Mulehunter 10:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
For This is good work, and it should be judged on its merits, not whether or not people think that a trend is no longer trendy. If all the people who voted against images tried to create images of this calibre they'd have more apprciation for the time and effort that goes into creating them. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 18:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Against Same reason I took a piss on the Jarhead pic. Clever allusion, single angle/objective (madonna=mary), great picture crafting. Just didn't crack me up. Maybe if her eyes were bleeding makeup or something... something like that... might churn my ecclesiastic sense of offensive humor. --AmericanBastard 00:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment:That would be, like, awful. BTW you're missing the Child/Britney angle that is also referenced in the accompanying article. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
...the Hundred Acre Wood-wide police crackdown netted Piglet, shown here in his mugshot after being charged with vagrancy, operating a wheelbarrow while intoxicated, hunting woozles without a licence, smuggling of unpasteurized honey across state lines...
SN+F. I saw how much fun Zombiebaron had nominating his poo picture, so I'm nom'ing my Pooh picture. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Conditional For, the comment has to be changed to Modus's vote summary. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 22:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Conditional comment. I tried. I really did. But, if anything, it made it too funny. I can't be responsible for that. I'm just one man!--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment Hm, now I'm thinking the numbers could be arranged in a slightly more aesthetically pleasing way. And it could use some plaid. Somewhere. —rc(t) 06:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
In an effort to extend its presence to areas that were previously only covered by UnNews, Fox News has founded a subsidiary in Middle Earth to stay competitive on the misinformation provider market.
For. I thought this was already voted in. Strange...--<<>> 13:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For - I bet $500 Zombiebaron won't vote FOR. It's gneomI 14:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
ForThe last time this was nommed I didn't like it so much. Now I guess its alright. At least the text takes away more then it adds. Also, Gneomi ows me 500 American Dollars. None of those Canadian Dollars, eh? --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 15:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hahahahaha. Damn you! Nah by the way I bet with Jimbo Wales. How come I bet with you if you're the main subject of the betting. Hehe - It's gneomI 23:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For but I would really like it much better if the US flag weren't in the corner. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 01:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. True, flag with the white tree would be a lot of funnier.--<<>> 19:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment Last time this was nommed did we confirm that it was original? I can't recall. —rc(t) 01:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
A Google search for "foxspoof.jpg" only yields a link to this Uncyc image and forums that link to the Uncyc image, except for this. This is the last revision of the previous nomination just before you removed it (I totally forgot it was nominated once). Originality was never questioned then. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 06:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
SNF - Take this road instead. It's gneomI 00:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For - Make the arrow in the center bigger (like a regular road sign) and consider this a for. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Considerate Done sir! A bit too big? It's gneomI 03:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Uhh, I meant pointing the other way (to the right). --AAA! (AAAA) 03:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
LOL, ZB and Rad want it to the left while AAA wants it to the right. What should I do now??? It's gneomI 03:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh wait, now I get it... --AAA! (AAAA) 04:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Against WOT THE HELL! There are two ways! Why does it say "One way"! Plus, the joke doesn't work without the text and a whole bunch of other stuff about the decline of VFP. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
No need to scream, Sir. Also, thankfully we use caption on Uncyclopedia, and every featured picture has a caption. It's gneomI 03:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
First off, the caption is not why it is featured. Also, that doesn't explain a thing... --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For With the new "One Way" sign this acctaully made me chuckle. Good old Canadian poetry... --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For I know you've worked hard on this one. You have my vote, sir. R 04:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For literary references (even if it is Frost, blech. The Pulitzer prize is totally a popularity contest).--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For. ~ 13:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For. i wanna go there - jack mort |cunt| talk - 13:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For.I think I'll take that road today... Swordmaster 20:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For I hadn't voted for this yet? --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 01:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Self nom and For It's an actual screenshot, but it is original. I made the Javascript code to produce the popup, and then took a screenshot of it. Blah Blah Blah 14:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Against, despite making me giggle a little. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 15:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Against, despite making Squiggle giggle a little. (Squiggle giggle, Squiggle giggle, Squiggle giggle. Say it with me).--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 20:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
For - two people here laughed out loud the moment they saw it - David Gerard 22:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Conditional For - Make it more clearer (I suggest PNG) and this will be a for. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
For - Now that quality is better. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For Just increase the resolution and I think you have a winner. --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
For, though I'm with the two dudes ahead of me.--<<>> 23:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment Updated it to a PNG (I actually had to redo the entire process and make a new screenshot, because I couldn't find the old file). Blah Blah Blah 23:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Nom & For - NOTE: Tripod2282 is the original creator of this image. It may say someone else created it on the image page because the above image is a PNG version of the original, due to a Reefer desk discussion. --AAA! (AAAA) 11:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Against Thanks for explaining the joke AAA, however if a joke needs to be explained then it isn't funny. Also, its not an original image (as per your nomination), and I prefer the original. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 16:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
For - You don't need to explain the joke to get it. Also, I don't see the difference between this and my original image. Thankies for teh nom. --Sir Tripod2282cunvfptalkActive~19:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Against "God mocks earth by making a shadow rabbit with His fingers" is terrible but funnier than "God is pissed;" i don't think this picture will work in the funny department without some good context. --AmericanBastard 07:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Against Not very funny. Al-Pita 08:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Self-Pimpin' and For I don't know what it is about this one, but I like it. So often, I'm disappointed by my own work. I hope you feel the same. Well, that you like this one, not that you're disappointed by my work...=/ R 19:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Against No, I am not the next "Grinch of VFP", I acctaully find it not that funny and with sub-Rad's-normal-high-quality head swap. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination and For I really like this image. While the text does add to it, it works well on its own, esspecially the Sophia shaped cereal already in the bowl! --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 19:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Must admit I was quite impressed by the image the first time I saw it, and more importantly, it made me laugh. Also, its great to see different types of images in here, particularly cartoons. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 19:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Although I'd rather see the actual box less cartoony, it's still really good. --Sir Tripod2282cunvfptalkActive~19:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
For. That thing's got a lot of Star Trek communicators in its ingredients! There's only one thing worse than having Uncyclopedios for breakfast and that is "not" having Uncyclopedios for breakfast. --AmericanBastard 20:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
For Its nice to see something different, and its fortified with "Adminicine" for strong teeth and bones. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 21:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
For.~ 21:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
For. "...and either this bowl goes, or I do."--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)