*[[UnNews:Tiger quietly plans to devour infant]] was already [[Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Tiger quietly plans to devour infant|nommed]] once, unsuccessfully. If anyone rather wants to try that one, go ahead and renom it. <small>''-[[User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user|Sockpuppet of an unregistered user]] 16:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)''</small>
*[[UnNews:Tiger quietly plans to devour infant]] was already [[Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Tiger quietly plans to devour infant|nommed]] once, unsuccessfully. If anyone rather wants to try that one, go ahead and renom it. <small>''-[[User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user|Sockpuppet of an unregistered user]] 16:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)''</small>
*Additionally, the humour in this article is mainly satirical and not plain jokingly funny. Please take this into account before voting.<small>''-[[User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user|Sockpuppet of an unregistered user]] 16:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)''</small>}}
*Additionally, the humour in this article is mainly satirical and not plain jokingly funny. Please take this into account before voting.<small>''-[[User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user|Sockpuppet of an unregistered user]] 16:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)''</small>}}
+
+
<!--Just press save to close nomination. Comment is optional.-->
SelfNom+For. To honor the conclusion of the Ruffles the Tiger saga, I'd like to nominate this article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:49, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Weak For still has some formatting ugliness, but its funny overall. --Mnbvcxz(Annoy) 14:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
W♥v. Excellent satire. —SirSysRq (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Where was the funny? Devoured by the animals? Because it wasn't in that article. If anything feature the original article this one rode off. --SirDJ~Irreverent 15:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Against. I tried, but couldn't find anything particularly funny. Sorry. --UU - natter10:05, Jan 4
Additionally, the humour in this article is mainly satirical and not plain jokingly funny. Please take this into account before voting.-Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm 25% +3~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 08:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.