From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (Button sig) above the edit box.
    • You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
    • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
  • Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

American Dream

Score: +1

Nom and For. The wit, the humor, the real melancholy at the heart of this piece would be more than enough to make this VFH. And it's got a really funny Coca-Cola commercial in the middle.--Procopius 12:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


Score: +6 bestubbled transsexuals
  • Self-Nom and For. Well, it didnt win the PLS, but I still think its feature-quality, and hope you all do too. I thank RadX and Modusoperandi for the lovely pics. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For my favourite article of the PLS.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • ARRRGH! self-nommer beat me to it!!! For--I thought this was gonna be the winner--Shandon 06:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • TransFor! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 09:47, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Wow.--Procopius 11:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I love it.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 12:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The Incredible Hulk

Score: 0
  • Must... restrain... keyboard... Nom+For. ...Crap.--NotANinja 01:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. It's pretty funny, but I don't think it's feature-worthy. See Talk:The Incredible Hulk. --Falcotron 02:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Nah. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The hobbies section killed me.--Procopius 11:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Crazy foreigner down the street

Score: 0
  • FOR. -- mowgli 16:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. It hasn't really changed since it was nommed in June, and I wasn't too enamored with it then, either.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL (request by nominator) Oh! I didn't realize it had already been nommed once (and hasn't changed since). -- mowgli 22:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


Score: +1
  • Nom and For. Love this thing. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against for feature. It could make an interesting mainpage reskin though...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:15, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, but I agree with Modusoperandi; someone should try it. --Falcotron 02:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No. But I also agree with MO. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Not the greatest work but I like it.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 04:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Haven't read the article, don't plan to, but those jerks in Pod 6 above this nomination don't want to seem to put the best goddamn movie ever made on the front page, so I'm voting for this one just to smite them. Did I mention Pod six is full of jerks? --Captain Finding Nemo 05:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Nah.Amusing maybe but not funny enough to fill our daily humour-bellies.--Gubby 05:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'm hardly going to vote against my own article, am I? -- Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 10:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 10:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No way. What a contentless piece of junk. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Withholding a vote. I seriously like this, but I think it needs to be longer to get VFH (the reskin is not a bad idea). More screens or scheduled days, maybe? It made me laugh, regardless.--Procopius 16:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment. The original idea was to have a whole system of Teletext pages, but Silent Penguin beat me to it. He preferred his idea of an animated GIF on UnTeletext and I just forgot about the whole thing. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 16:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
We haven't had a skin in a long time. We're overdue. The BENSON is a popular skin, but Rc doesn't like it. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. That was my idea and it sucked.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 19:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AGAINST (echo) What a contentless piece of junk. (see dump for more) -- mowgli 19:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No this isn't screaming feature me. --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 20:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Nomination Withdrawn in favor of a skin. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Votes to make an UnTV skin

Score: +14

HowTo:Get Laid

Score: +3 failed virgins
  • Self-Nom and for. A rewrite of mine, I like it for my own reasons, but I wanted to see how it'd do here.--Gubby 01:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For this is funny, the pic is great!kinda shoddy, but still funny. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 02:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • 'gainst --L 16:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, however I would like to see one written in a woman's POV...
    • Whyy?... Unless you mean FOR women. That would make sense. --Gubby 01:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

--HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 20:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

...yeah, the quote is a little sucky... anyone want it to stay very badly? Otherwise I'll delete it.--Gubby 18:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. Only because I think one more rewrite could take this into the stratosphere. But I liked it. Losing the quote would help.--Procopius 11:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

War of 1812

Score: 13 foiled invasions of Canada
  • Nomination and For -- An absolutely hilarious article, although it could use some minor tunings. A large portion of this is the work of DWIII and Procopius. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 02:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Conditional For. The only problem I see is the massive amount of red links. Change that, and sure. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 02:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
    Comment. Agreed. Redlinks are cleaned up now -- but pace Falcotron, I challenge someone to come up with articles for Francis Scott Key, Willard Scott, Rock 'N Roll Hall of Fame, Ralph Lauren and so on.--Procopius 01:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
    Francis Scott Key or Ralph Lauren would be hard work, but could be very funny; Willard Scott and Rock 'N Roll Hall of Fame should be easy (but probably not that funny). --Falcotron 03:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. H.M.S. Custom, Common Law and Royal and Parliamentary Decisions? You don't need a press gang to get me on board. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 03:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For!—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 06:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll vote For for just about anyone who defeats the French. Oh, and it was extremly funny as well. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 06:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Modusoperandi 06:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I glanced at four bits and all made me laugh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For The impressment jokes alone... um... impressed me. Even funnier if you know the Great Lakes area. By the way, most of the red links are things that really should exist, but sadly they don't. --Falcotron 08:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For: A great article on a great war. H.M.S. Custom, Common Law and Royal and Parliamentary Decisions is pure genius. --Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) Icons-flag-ie-Icons-flag-us KUN SEXY WH22:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Self vote for. This is why I love Uncyclopedia: My joke about the English Constitution would be met with blank stares anywhere else.  :)--Procopius 01:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
    Oh come on; not even ED would give you blank stares. They'd just say, "Dude, that's like a long, boring-ass name, lulz" and edit it to "H.M.S. Fag." --Falcotron 01:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For One of those few truly funny articles. --Iambusyeating 16:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • 1814. I love the note. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 01:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


Score: +5
  • Self Nom and For: At the moment the only letters I've got after my name are BA. Which stand for "bullshit artist". So I thought I'd give this ferret a run. Cheers -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 12:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Digdig Kah Boom (which is Cambodian for AYE!) -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 16:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Hmmm . . . how should I vote? More than 60 per cent of Cambodia's sex tourists are creepy old British pop stars. Oh, right. For. Rock and Roll, hey.--Procopius 22:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Sorry, but I didnt find it all that funny. It also kinda feels unfinished, ends too abruptly. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 22:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Moved hilarious commentary to here.
That's fair enough. Looks like it's sunk like a treacle-pudding turd, but I'll be back... -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 01:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Featured Article Candidates

Score: +3
  • N+F. Especially liked the Romania part. - User:Guest/sig 16:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. etc etc ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh God, which page am I looking at? My eyes are crossed. And I laughed. Support, in the alternate universe lingo--Shandon 18:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NotM|+S 19:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 19:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Self-Interested Forgive me. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Why on earth wouldn't you vote for this? Support with every ounce of voting power I can muster. Wehpudicabok 00:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I would rather feature VFH itself, but it was alredy voted down too many times. Once featured it'll be a great link for Featured Articles.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong support --Sbluen 08:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Another formatting challenge for Moneysign (if this makes it).--Procopius 22:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 07:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Nice one. And love the tatt pic. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 11:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I think it's funny, and what i think is fact! To me at least! --ZniLe 11:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For The oldest trick in the book is vote rigging. --12.34.567.8 20:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For! --Thetoastman 04:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong against. Most inside jokes are signified by their blatantly low quality, and this one is definitly no exception. I don't know how long I still have to put up with VFH articles that no one in the world understands (except a few people), but I think it's about time to put an end to this kind of nonsense. -- The Colonel (talk) 04:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. As per Col.Swordman, except the bit about nonsense. I like nonsense, just not on the mainpage. Modusoperandi 04:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. It's funny but I don't think it's good for the front page. Plus it's lacking in continuity: some nominations have scores, some have nomination reasons, some don't. There were also some other things. Oh yes, there were other things. La la la. I'm going to stop typing now.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 06:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Hopefully it isn't catching...do i need to see a doctor? --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 20:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Denied--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 21:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against-This is just stupid.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 13:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support.-With undisclosed reason.--Wit (tawk) 16:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • STRONG NEG-A-TIVE. If the Block Log can't get featured, this doesn't stand a chance. Besides, the operative word in the compound term "Featured Article" is "article." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
    "Article"? Are you pushing for the to get featured again? --Falcotron 09:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • WTF? what kind of horseshit trash gets into VFH is beyond me. I mean come on people these are supposed to be featured, you know the best that uncyclopedia can spew out...not Grue-vomit. A joke VFH page as a candidate, come on quit wasting my time...you effing posers...other than that it's funny as hell...so For. --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 20:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I was about to lambast you and use your small intestine as a jump rope, but now I think I want to have your children instead. --UtarEmpire 15:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


Score: +9.5
  • Nom and for. Entertaining and all the assorted links make me happy. A great body of work --Cycliclythium 19:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, very creative. Logixoul 21:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. A good parody of a Wikipedia entry on foreign countries. This will be a stonger endorsement if the redlinks are cleaned up.--Procopius 12:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Sure. --L 12:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Nice job. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 01:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Very for: Classic! Why did it take this long to be nominated, and why aren't many people voting for this? Vote, you bastards!!—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 04:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Because it's good ~McDestroyertron (talk) 04:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I guess. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Excellent. 23:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Damn good... --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 04:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's funny, more exposure will help fill out some red links. -- 17:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because this has fewer calories and goes down smoother than the regular brands. Wait, what were we talking about? Oh yea. Article r0x0rz, which in haX0r sp33k means "Dude!" --Captain Finding Nemo 06:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

UnBooks:My First Necronomicon

Score: +17.5 souls consumed by the Elder God
  • Nom and For, something of a self-nom since I did a fair chunk of it. InfiniteMonkey 08:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The pictures really sell this one.--Procopius 12:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I added a link.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I made the orignal page but InfinteMonkey made it, in my opinion, so much more. --Ginchael 16:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I wish it were longer, but it's great anyway.--NotANinja 16:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Otherwise Cthulhu will eat my soul ... sooner. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 18:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Be honest, Cthulhu helped draw those pics, right? They're excellent. Good writing, too. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 02:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Cthulhu Fortaghn!User:Tooltroll/sig 05:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • ƒø®. -L 12:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Especially considering that I already have Baby's First Mythos (the actual book.) Pray I never breed, people. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For...I agree about the pictures.--Shandon 19:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Cthulhu werde unsere Seele essen! -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 01:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Because its a clever twist to what I've been reading forever. 12:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • För Almost as good as the Pudgic Bible...But I don't think enough children have heard the word of Cthulhu. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 20:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm so for this that I'm taking a nite course in conversational Cthulhulian. Modusoperandi 04:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Not funny, and I understand it about as much as why we're fighting a war in Iraq. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, good treatment of an otherwise overused genre.--Nydas 21:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for the title alone, I case one vote. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 19:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very clever stuff. I doff my cap and drop my trousers -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 04:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Made me laugh. 18:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because 20:1 isn't a good enough ratio for this book. --Falcotron 13:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia

Score: +16 IP addresses blocked under WP:VAIN
  • Nom and for. Pretty funny, and I think the author actually did all this stuff.--Procopius 13:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For! - User:Guest/sig 13:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For beyond reasonable doubt. It's true. And funny. It's funny and not just stupid. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 15:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes. Go Gubby! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 17:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Hilarious. Very "in" (as in "in-joke") but most readers will understand. good job! -- mowgli 20:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh yeah! --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 20:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Finally a 'HowTo' you can actually use....... --Some Fool 00:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Awesome! I wish I had thought of it. Wehpudicabok 00:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Anything that makes Wikipaedophile admins cry gets a for from me. --UtarEmpire 12:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, if I can vote for my own article I will, because I'm worth it. *grin* Gubby 16:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Good fieldwork. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. An aside: Gubby posted the same article on Uncyc, and I couldn't figure out if it was vanity or not until he posted the other one. My only concern is that this stuff will promote vanity on WP and here. But, to be honest, nobody cares since I can just ban them. ^_^ Major insignia Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 20:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. John1728 21:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against: clever but too image-heavy. I don't think that would translate to the front page very well. Also, did you find your Rosa Blanco novel?—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 21:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Bloke did 'is 'omework. And I laughed. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Whoever fucking wrote this deserves a medal. {Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 19:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Religious Wikism is getting to be a problem..thanks for exposing this ever pervasive trend-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 01:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
    • For Bravo. I loved that article.The Spith 08:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • YES. I love anything involving the vandalism of wikipedia. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. [1] --Han 09:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Hilarious, I know from personal experience on the Charles Edward Cheese article of Wikipedia. 1028 18:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Step 6 is wrong. --HPSigHP talk 02:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Against I get the strange feeling that somebody is maintaining a vanity page here, seeing as how the two other people to edit this article have had it reverted.User:Jsonitsac/sig21:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Unsigned, really. And no timestamp. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NotM|+S 19:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

    • Comment. Possibly their edits were unfunny? --Gubby 20:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment Oh, so you're the judge of that? I guess that would make sense on your article. I guess I should just give up than. Good idea for a humor wiki, but make only the person who writes the articles determines what's in it.User:Jsonitsac/sig21:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Though somewhat amusing, it's a bit of a bad example, but also too image-heavy and thus unfit for the front page. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NotM|+S 19:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Really funny article. Deserves recognition. --Admiral06 04:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. A page on How To: Waste Admins' Time is not comedy. Modusoperandi 04:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • comment. I just bet that you're an admin XD--Gubby 14:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. You heard it - this thing is butt ugly! -- The Colonel (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I found it funny.--Mister Nosey 16:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against- Funny, but not feature worthy--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Howtos and UnNEws articles should not be featured. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 03:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: You just said that 'cause it rhymes. Go on - admit it. --Some Fool 03:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Grue's Clues

Score: +9.5
  • Nomination. This needs work, but it's a freakin' awesome use of a running gag, with some great lines, so I'm nomming it. InfiniteMonkey 10:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ok. But you forgot to vote "for" it as well. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 10:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
    • I'm nomming it in hopes of seeing it fixed up a bit: it starts out strong but really drags in the second half (most of which could be deleted to the benefit of the article) and could use some inspired pictures. If that happens, then I'll vote for it. InfiniteMonkey 07:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes yes yes. Dammit, Infinite Monkey, I was gonna nominate this. :)Procopius 11:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, the Grue meme lives! Modusoperandi 14:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • WEAK AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Although I'm getting pretty damned tired of Grues myself, I won't deny that this article has laughs in it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For A clue, a clue! Some dead loser 17:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For because I enjoy this article. It made me happy. --em|c|! Icons-flag-us 19:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Its a decent article, but we dont wanna be like ED. No memes! The only grue-related article that deserves to be featured is Grue, and it already has. Sorry. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 19:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey thanks, Sir Cornbread. :-[ --em|c|! Icons-flag-us 19:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Don't take it personally, I just don't like memes. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 19:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
You wanna' take this outside? --em|c|! Icons-flag-us 19:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
which is my thinking. Repeating other people's ideas is derivative; variations on your own jokes is called a running gag, like the coconuts in Monty Python, the endless plays on Alfred E. Neuman on the cover of Mad Magazine, or Homer Simpson's "D'oh!". Used creatively and in moderation, Kitten Huffing, Grues, and Oscar Wilde give Uncyclopedia a distinctive character.
  • For. While I don't have excessively strong feelings about this, I think that "memes" should have equal opportunities here (so long as they're funny and unpredictable). Y'know, if you call it a "running joke" it doesn't sound all that bad, huh?--Gubby 22:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For My brainchild, though i'm not good at execution. It's done fairly well, could use some refinement here and there before it gets featured.--ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 04:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Sweet.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 18:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • NO MORE DAMNED GRUES! Major insignia Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 05:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Erm, you're voting No but you want "more damned grues"? -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 05:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against-I must agree with Hinoa, the Grues have run their course--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 14:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Oh Bosh, it's a funny parody and should be featured.--Wit (tawk) 05:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


Score: +14.5
  • Self nom and For. Out of the closet, into the fire - one last one before I retire --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. We're here, we sneer, welcome to our site.--Procopius 14:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. That almost exactly describes me.--Emmzee 14:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Fur because I feel bad for Procopius. --emc! 03:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Sweet pity helps me escape. :)--Procopius 20:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Rob will do a lot for a pizza, but he drew the line at being mentioned in this. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Fro cool. --Parodius 22:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Edvard Munch

Score: +10.5
  • Quasi self nom and for a big rewrite on the lonely shore of existential fumbling --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For...yeah this was a really hard descission there is so many of them...umm....GO VOYNICH ONE ALSO....alright...here's another one for you Hardwick The HRH MuCal. Tayor Lz4MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
  • For...careful, I think only truly cultured people are gonna get this one... --HPSigHP talk 16:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Hilarious! --L 17:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Yes, quite well done indeed.  c • > • cunwapquc? 18:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Wait -- I want to be cultured, too! (Also, the "Very Miserable Years" section is great.)--Procopius 20:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A great rewrite. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 16:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Missed this one too.....still think you should have the Munch Bunch! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 17:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I quote: "Edvard spent his later years looking forward to death with sheer terror while curled up in a corner of his room, under a sheet." --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 21:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I'm cultured! I'm cultured! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A21:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. If anyone wants to buy a Munch, I know a guy who knows a guy. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 03:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against i dont get it--Parodius 22:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


Score: +7 mutilated mad scientists
  • N+F Igor gets nommed out of his skull --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Sorry Hardwick, too short, not funny enough to overcompensate. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 08:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment No need to apologise - I'm not the writer - just the nominator. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Amusing, but the third person goes a little too far. It's also too short.--Procopius 14:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • 4 Gonzo!, Gonzo!, Gonzo!, Gonzo! --HPSigHP talk 16:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Four gonzos, get it?? For! --HPSigHP talk 02:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For C'mon, making weird biographies is what Uncyclopedia is all about! Besides, the Filbert part made me lol. --KUK nerd
  • For A very unbiased vote in favor of this. I understand if people think it might be too short... so add more! I'm the only one to edit it so far (besides its nominator for the nomination template). So if you think you can improve it, please go ahead.--NotANinja 02:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For  c • > • cunwapquc? 18:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I thought when I started reading this that it would be one of those articles you love but couldn't bear to see on the front page, but I was pleasantly surprised. Wehpudicabok 04:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Clever idea, and I like how Igor kills the scientists accidentally instead of maliciously. Real character depth too. Arnie the Scrib 14:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. After reading the too short disclaimers above, I was surprised to discover that this article is exactly the size it wants to be. And damn funny, too. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 06:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. Terry Pratchett has already made Igor as funny as he's going to be, but you have to give credit to anyone who makes Igor funny again at all without using a single one of the same jokes. --Falcotron 14:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Sausage Butty Batter Nugget

Score: +8 well chewed gobbets
  • Nomination and cholesterol-rich For. Heck, you can't argue with Russell Crowe. I know I don't fancy a phone in my mush. Anyway, I'm sure they sell these at my local chippy. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Napoleon Boneparte died alone and childless on the windswept island of St. Helena after a harpsichord fell through the ceiling and hit him on the head. I'm a sucker for rich imagery.--Procopius 11:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. dung has not just fallen out of cows, it has also fallen out of fashion. Pure genious, well done that man!--McBumlo 19:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. This is my kind of random. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Quatro I mean (Four), considering I helped inspire its creation (yes, I am God), and seeing as Snakes on a Plane isn't faring so well anyways.--Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 19:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I blew chunks, it was so funny. --HPSigHP talk 16:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm Lovin' It --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I mean, it was okay, but then I read the other articles voted up at the moment, and it's not as good. If the competition was dreck then it would be a good vote: but then if there were no other guys in the world, I'd be up to here in pussy chicks female company, know what I mean? FreeMorpheme 21:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Hi-larious. I prefer this to Humosexual. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Jesus Christ this is amazing. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • What, you expect me to say "for" or something?? --User:Anidnmeno/sig 03:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

HowTo: Be a Tramp

Score: 17 dumpsters raided
  • Nom + For. One of the wittier HowTos out there.--User:Czar Yah/sig 01:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For LMAO. Yugoslavian F 03:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against Pretty funny, but not main page stuff. --Gunny 09:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Albeit biased, as the author. Just re-read it and think it's great, so there. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very clever, with funny text and amusing pictures. This vote cast in loving memory of HowTo: Criticize the Media's failed VFH nomination.--Procopius 16:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For because it was funny, and i laughed at the bit about "you Scally." --Palsworth 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, rather useful. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 01:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Down four stubbies in one go. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I shall give it a whopping 209 out of 210 for originality. - Stejinz 15:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For traveling on wind power through the night. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. What can I say? Schadenfreude strikes again. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For because that's exactly the right way to use a shopping cart.--Shandon 16:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I can't wait to get my Doctorate in Trampology --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 21:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, how did you guys find a picture of me? --HPSigHP talk 05:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against - could be so much better. --Nydas 18:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Will vote for cash. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 12:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Nice. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A01:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Very witty. Evil Mark 12:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Tramps are robots? The Bumfights thing has been done in real life, and Viz had a funnier page of job ads for tramps. Hate to be a prick. Sorry -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 12:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For "Will code HTML for food".....priceless. No really, Hindleyite bribed me. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 14:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, now stop bitching about it on IRC. ;) --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR At last, a serious article on tramping that doesn't just assume that we tramps are all nothing more than drunken dossers. As a member of the community of 'sunshine dribblers' as we prefer to call ourselves, I found the section on "useful phrases" particularly helpful in the fight against terrorism. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 16:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • PHOR. Hindleyite bribed me with pie. Also, is good HowTo. --Sign2SarinZero (blabber )Sign2 18:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Pentium 4

Score: +9
  • Self Nomination - I have worked on it for some days and it's time for it now to face the final test. (I'll try and respond to every comment/vote posted here - just like this guy)-- The Colonel (talk) 11:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - Thanks for the vote first of all, but it would be even nicer if you make a comment or two on the article. See my talk page. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • What the hell is wrong with u ppl? Saw this when it was under development and liked it then. For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 15:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - Thanks for that, Uncle Mhaille! :) -- The Colonel (talk) 15:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I liked it. It's not very often that an article up for nomination mentions a recently featured article (Idiocrates). Plus it was funny. --emc! 20:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • I'm glad that you like it! :) -- The Colonel (talk) 05:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Took me a while to decide, because it was kinda confusing the first time I read it, but after re-reading, its funny and the images are good. -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 05:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
    • It's good that you re-read it, and thanks for your support! -- The Colonel (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because I'm one of the poor bastards that bought a Pentium Pro and I'm still holding a grudge. Modusoperandi 00:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Then I hope you are not still mad at the fact that Pentium Pro is weak in 16-bit processing. -- The Colonel (talk) 08:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, you know why... --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Cleverly done. This is why I own a Compaq. Wait a minute . . .--Procopius 12:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
    • I have a desktop with an AMD chip running at 1.8GHz, and a laptop with an Intel P4-M chip running at 1.7GHz. Notwithstanding the fact that there is only a difference of 100MHz, the desktop runs almost 3 times as fast as the laptop. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This is a sympathy vote for a nice try. Seriously, WTF is this (see [1])? Go to Hades? That's some funny shit there Swordman. So is this article. I've no sympathy at all, actually. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Thanks for your "antipathy" vote. :) -- The Colonel (talk) 13:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For...I never owned a dog named Patches, thusly go Smackintosh! --HPSigHP talk 05:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Do not click the link "See here" in the above line, you may regret it!!!!!!!!!! --HPSigHP talk 03:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:Diogenes searches world for honest mechanic

Score: +12 vroom vrooms
  • Nom and for. Well written and funny. InfiniteMonkey 01:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Nor should UnNews articles. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 01:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This is a perfectly brilliant cynical slab of comedy mothballs. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 01:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Unless it is terrific, UnNews shouldnt be featured. It needs its own VFH kinda thing, though. -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 01:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For It is terrific. I mean, I agree, but this is fucking great. Diogenes makes anything better. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Voting For my own work, so take this with a grain of salt. Thanks for the nod, Infinite Monkey.--Procopius 02:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Yep. Now, back in the tub I go. -- Imrealized 02:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Greek philosopher + UnNews = win —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 05:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Damn it Hinoa, don't vote while I'm voting ;) --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me| 05:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

*Against Not a big fan of featuring UnNews either. --emc! 00:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

  • FOR! -- I changed my vote because I now support the featuring of UnNews. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I liked it when I read it in the UnNews before seeing it here. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For one good idea cheerfully executed. -- The Colonel (talk) 06:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. I don't think saying that it's UnNews justifies voting against this article, and it's possibly the best one so far. Wehpudicabok 05:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Gubby 22:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for Hilarious! Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 10:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Martin Van Buren

Score: +12 Presidential dicks
  • Nom and for. I laughed pretty hard at this. Yes, I'm a history dork.--Procopius 14:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. InfiniteMonkey 17:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Too American-centric. For - David Gerard 18:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For; I shouldn't like it but I do.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. XD --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 20:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against- I think it was funny, and I'm probably nitpicking, but most of reads like it could be about anyone, little of it has anything to do with Martin Van Buren.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (speak up) 20:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Well, it does mention the Independent Treasury Act. You can't go into your local independent treasury without seeing a statue of Martin Van Buren.--Procopius 17:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Random and hilarious. -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 21:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's true, it could be written about anyone, but I think that's what makes it so funny--that an insulting article like this is written about an obscure president, of all people. Wehpudicabok 03:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Retracting earlier vote. It's been changed and I don't like it anymore. Wehpudicabok 22:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Enthusiastically for. This reminded me of IFHTBT. - Nonymous 03:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For! I voted for this last time, and I'll be damned if I don't do it again.--Emmzee 21:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A rare example of something being both stupid AND funny? --So So 02:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against This isn't even close to being clever, its just a silly rant. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for fdssafkf --emc! 03:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. All f- and s- words and no humour. -- The Colonel (talk) 08:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩųTalk%C2%A7.gifMini%C2%A7.gif 05:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. And §ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ, you might want to make a /sig. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I've always had a soft spot in my heart for this one.  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - Too stupid and hateful to actually be funny. Rxfort 00:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For --MrMonkeyMan 20:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their Uncyclopedia. Also, the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. --Captain Finding Nemo 08:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- The fact that you kept the joke running the entire article is commendable in and of itself, but the whole thing is extremely funny too.--Dark llama 18:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Holy Cow! What is it going to take for this thing to be featured? If this page can't be featured, there is no hope for pages created by a n00b like me.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 20:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment [sniff][sniff] I smell a sock puppet. Maybe three. Maybe more. 12:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Why all the hate on Van Buren? He was a totally average president.

Paradise Lost

Score: +19 Apples Eaten
  • N and F. Vote for this instead of the other one! --L 13:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For it's worth it just for the Chris Walken pic. Plus I dig choosing sides when VFH has a voting war between a page, and itself. Freaky. Modusoperandi 14:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, I still don't get it. --Joe!/TALK/CONTRIBS/F@H 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise_Lost - it's famous among those who can read - David Gerard 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Too bad I can't, eh? Abstain, it's obviously well known. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 22:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For: John Milton wrote Paradise Lost. Then his wife died and he wrote Paradise Regained. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 17:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 19:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --emc! 22:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because writing this got me to finally read Paradise Lost. -- Imrealized 00:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Fine, fine... I'll also abstain, because its a little confusing to me too. -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] 02:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For-Very clever.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (speak up) 20:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR Finally, something clever and funny. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because I actually learned about the real thing, making it funny now. -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 07:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Although the original is pretty good, too.--Procopius 16:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For making us laugh instead of driving us blind...--Shandon 20:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, definately! --HPSigHP talk 16:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloody funny, not sure how I missed it earlier.--NotANinja 16:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • STRONG AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Man, I love reading Milton trashing! "Winnie's corn cider, how my loot was spent!" --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No idea how I'd missed this before....but FOR. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 19:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for. Consistently funny from beginning to end. Just skim over it and you'll definitely miss something. --So So 05:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AGAINST. 'cos too many for's against it already. frankly "episodes" has funnier pictures. the main article is too long and tooo american, soap/tv oriented -- it's almost an "in-joke" for the rest of humanity (well, the rest-of-humanity understands gi joe, george bush, paris hilton and thank-jew-very-much much better). -- mowgli 20:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

::hmm, leave me a msg in my talk page if you're missing "featuring" by a vote. that was never my intention and i can still change (edit!) my vote. -- mowgli 20:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

FOR - was being frivolous earlier which i now regret. voting sections should be taken seriously. i never actually meant to vote against (nor abstain -- which means i neant to vote for, duh!) -- mowgli 06:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For man's first disobedience, and the fruit of that forbidden tree whose mortal taste brought death into the world, and all our woe, with the loss of Eden, till one greater man restore us, and regain the blissful seat, with earthly parody. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hissss eat the apples already -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 01:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. We don't even have this in Oz yet. They'll probably put it on at 11.30pm Tuesdays in 2008, run a few episodes out of order, drop it while the Olympics are on and then forget to bring it back. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 00:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


Score: +15.5


Score: +12
  • Self-nomination - Just for Déjà vu sake... plus it now has a Talk Page. -- Imrealized 18:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Though this is a tardy crediting it is worth noting that Some user contributed the true genius to the talk page (replacing all the dates with the proper Attic calendar dates and the superior second half). That may slip unnoticed if one were not to check the history, so I'm telling it here. -- Imrealized 20:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I can't believe I'm doing this, but I'm a sucker for lampooned Greek drama, and this had me hyperventilating. Aristophanes pwns indeed! ("Lost his oilcan!") STRON-GEST AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • No. This scares me. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --19:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Boo. -- Imrealized 19:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. All injokes are going to Hell. -- Colonel Swordman 20:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - Here I thought it was a Greek joke. Guess I oughtta brush up on my mythology. [2] -- Imrealized 20:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment on the above comment by Imrealized - Υποκριτής -- Colonel Swordman 21:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Tired joke gets new lease of life. For -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I voted "for" for this before--TKF 21:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • for, but only if talk:euroipods is featured. otherwise, it would confuse any young nooblets who haven't lurked here as long as i have. --Testicles 00:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Great parody. Weird, because I hated Euroipods.--Emmzee 01:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For evreything you could possibly want in an article: clever humor, intellectual references, and euroipods. The Talk page only adds to the glory that is.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, amazing how the obvious injoke was made into a funny intelligent article ---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For a) money b) referring your friends to read Homer --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, same as last time. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 03:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, not significantly improved since the last nom. It appears to have barely changed at all...needs both more & better Modusoperandi 05:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
    • For Hey, it's a parody of Euroipods! Having read both, I'm changing my vote. I may be slow, but my dead eyes more than make up for it. Modusoperandi 21:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Major insignia Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 06:27, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Most definite for ever. - User:Guest/sig 11:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - Too reliant on an injoke, and all of the actual Greek references suffer from it. --Jamtrousers 17:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. EURIPIDES!!! --User:Anidnmeno/sig 23:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Malista ge!! Phor. -unsigned vote Unsigned vote and unsigned crossing out. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NotM|+S 13:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. In-jokes sucks! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NotM|+S 13:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The perfect combination of high culture, low culture and injoke - David Gerard 16:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against anything related to Euroipods except Talk:Euroipods and Euroipods Crusade. Crazyswordsman 00:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Wheel Of Fortune! Alright, that was lame. But the article's not. Brilliant. --Joachim22 10:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 13:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Atomsk.gif Kaizer the Bjorn takkun Takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 15:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Wehpudicabok 05:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuck No. InfiniteMonkey 06:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured


Score: +21

Featuredrc (t) 05:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

  • For and Nom. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 18:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, though I feel biased for some reason. <checks tattoos> Ah... Modusoperandi 19:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Suprised me. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 19:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

(UTC) 2006 August 12, 20:00 Mordillo IsraeliconHands off the virgin!Time till next rocket hits:Countdown - For *

  • roF --Kakun_Sig.JPG VFP Eincyc (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I liked the movie. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Did I tell you the one about Sammy Jankis? I did? Multiple times? Oh. For. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 00:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • What the...? I mean, for, since I wrote the text. Credit goes to Modus for the second image and some anon for the re-ordering. --Nydas 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. That movie was cool. Rxfort 13:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • --TKF 13:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)For.
  • For. Didn't see the movie but liked the article.--Procopius 22:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • roF gnortS. I mean Strong For. --Falcotron 10:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Love the tatt pic too. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 11:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Wehpudicabok 19:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC) But it's funny once you do get it. Took me a while to get it since I hadn't seen the movie. Weak For
  • For Good...--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 04:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For-Brevity is indeed the soul of wit--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For.My soul, art thou Brevity.--Wit (tawk) 16:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For Funny only if you know the movie --Iambusyeating 16:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For What the hell is wrong with this article? I have no idea, I just know that when I read it I get a squishy feeling inside. Maybe it's gas, maybe it's my appendix bursting. All I know is I like it. --Captain Finding Nemo 05:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, nice. --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 20:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I remember saying at VFD ages ago that something a whole lot better could be done with this. I was so right. Spang talk 16:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Fisher Price: A Retrospective

Score: +22

Featured I decided to put the Fisher Price text itself on the front page and link to the Retrospective. Seems to make the most sense for people who aren't already "in the know." —rc (t) 05:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Nomination And For Shizzle. Yes, I already know this has been "Quasi-featured", but this just might make me laugh more than any other article in the damned universe. PURE BRILLIANCE. --Sir Cornbread 04:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment...Anyone have any idea what in the hell the guy above me is talking about?? He cant possibly think that this is a REAL BOOK, unless hes completely retarded. Also, his only contribution to the site was that vote...A little suspicious... Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN--06:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • He bolded the F and O, so I guess he's voting for and is kidding. --User:Nintendorulez 18:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Well I guess that makes sense, I'll add it as a for until he says otherwise... Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --20:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Apparently I copy-edited this recently, so I have to vote for it.  c • > • cunwapquc? 22:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh hell yes! Brilliance at its core!--Emmzee 23:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • against Meh... it didn't tickle me at all. Maybe I should change my medications again. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 13:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The only problem I have is the name, which seems so unrelated. Arzikl 07:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

*For. Definitely: it's the analysis that sells it.

Oops, already voted ... --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 04:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 13:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I have to agree with Wehpudicabok. --Teh fish 10:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Meh, wasn't really all that funny. --Rabid Jaguar 04:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Forgainst. Lovely. --Splaka 07:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It may be about an injoke, but it explains it as well. Crazyswordsman 03:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against--Nytrospawn 21:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Neutral, I don't want this held against me in a court of law either way --HPSigHP talk 16:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, voting for my own article. --Sir Volte CUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH F@H) 06:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Geez, I can think of 5 unfeatured/nominated articles that are way funnier than this one. --KUK nerd - no timestamp
  • FOR please. get this on the front page already.--Bladetip 22:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloody brilliant! --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) SpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-usSpacerSpacerSpacer 03:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Hey, why not front page "Fisher Price"? This article, though hilarious, is a lot funnier when you've read the original. And, on the original article, there's a little "see also" which leads you to the retrospective which no-one is going to miss.--Gubby 23:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, this fighting is <James Dean moment> tearing me apart! </James Dean moment>. Modusoperandi 00:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It sucks and it's not worth featuring...no, it's a load of bull shite. Momochii Zabuza 01:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I love satirical humour in any form or fashion.--Mister Nosey 04:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against--TKF 00:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Alright, fine, I'll put a for on this page, but to those who don't find it far funnier to put the 'Fisher Price' thing on the front page, well, I shakes my head --Some Fool 01:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • forsimple-- 02:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I'll try again ..., and if this doesn't work, well then, "Fisher Price to you!" --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 01:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


Awards, Decorations and Honours
Awards2 Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
Ranks &
Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment
Potatochopper of the Month

Foolitzer Prize
Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year
RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners

Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · Hall of Shame
Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer
Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions
Personal tools