*'''Nom and For''' I'm so glad I'm not olde enought to be incontinent, as I would certainly soiled myself. {{User:Zim_ulator/sig}} 01:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Nom and For''' I'm so glad I'm not olde enought to be incontinent, as I would certainly soiled myself. {{User:Zim_ulator/sig}} 01:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
−
==[[Contents]]==
+
−
{{s|-3 contents}}
−
*'''Nom and For''' Greatest and funniest article since [[Euroipods]]. --{{User:Insineratehymn/sig}} 00:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
−
*'''For for for for''' {{User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig}} 00:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
−
*'''Against'''. I'll tell you the same thing I said last nite, [http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:VFH&diff=prev&oldid=1512100 "no"]. I've had it up to ''here'' with gimmicky, one note articles! /me tears off shirt, runs outside, pushes over a car.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 01:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
−
*'''Against''' Agree with Modus, except I'd just go for some kid on a bike. {{user:Rcmurphy/sig}} 01:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
−
*'''Agains-t''' We should institute some rule to not allow articles that have just been removed from here to be put back on. Especially if they've been removed with a -3. Especially the day after they've been removed. --[[User:Composure1|Composure1]] 01:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
−
*'''Out of my sight!!!''' -- {{User:NeedABrain/sig}} 01:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
−
*'''Fuck [[Contents]]''' Yeah, I said it. What'cha gonna do about it? --{{User:ENeGMA/sig}} 01:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION.
If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.
Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )
SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).
VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.
VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Self-nom and for I think that it's a good article. 159.148.202.14 15:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Against Your article has to spend a week in Pee Review before being self-nommed. I think it definitely has potential if it's expanded and that list in there is shortened. --Composure1 19:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment is that cubical image better or do I need something more? Time Cube only has one image and I want to keep it as a somewhat pure parody of the article. --~
For and Comment: Change the text color more frequently. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 01:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
For. You had me at "YOU DESERVE TO DIE BECAUSE YOU DO NOT REALIZE THAT YOU MUST GIVE ME A DOLLAR!" --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 01:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Against. The text is too big, I had to turn down text size to actually read it without going insane. Then the article was really boring, so I just stopped reading. --Efitu (TW@) 02:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
weak for. call me a length nazi. it's not the size it's what you do with it. is i lie wimin tell. it's funny, but there is a lot more funny that could be squeezed out, i want potential reached! - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
For Good job on sprucing up this article (which apparently is one of the most visited ones on Uncyc for those that haven't seen that thread in the dump). --Composure1 04:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Against. Based too much on the actual movie. Good article, though. --TheSlyFox 09:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Against. Ditto. --Redmond 19:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I really like this, and i'm gonna vote For on the proviso that the author promises to expand it, cos you could fit loads more in. - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Dildo, err...I mean Ditto. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 22:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Against What about the pedophile school principle that hunted Ferris down in the movie??? Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 22:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment I believe he's the narrator of this piece. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 22:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
when the god damn was he a paedophile? - jack mort |cunt| talk - 10:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Against, doesn't do the film justice, or at least the memory of the film that rests in the "Bueller" lobe of my brain. (Prettiestpretty is just mad 'cause Rooney threw away her gummy bear during the closing credits)--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
SN+F It's spent a week sulking in piss, and it got a really good review. It almost made it through last time, but hell, it's worth another shot, and I think this is my best work yet. VOTE! --SeñorDiZtheGreatCUNAOTM( Worship me!)(Praise me!)(Join me!)AMEN! 16:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
For, like last time--Shandon 18:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Self-nom and For This is the first time I have ever nommed one of my own articles on VFH. I chose carefully which article I nommed for VFH, and I chose this one, as I feel it is funny, but not in-jokey or cliche. --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
will an article about vote-whoring make people laugh at vote-whoring and cause its decline, or will it just give people ideas? For - jack mort |cunt| talk - 14:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Against, *shrug*, I did a much better job of illustrating proper page whoring technique on this page.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Nom & For Still funny after all this years. The Humbled Master 06:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Against I don't think it's appropriate to put this back on here so soon after it was QFHed, and without any changes to the article. --Composure1 17:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment: Technically, it is allowed.--<<>> 21:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment: Techincally perhaps so, but not in my personal opinion :). --Composure1 14:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Against As I said the last time this article came up, the timing is bad. In December I'll vote for it, but not now. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 21:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment: Actually, I have made some changes to it. Look at the history page and you'll see. The Humbled Master 02:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
For a masterstroke of literature, en par with Milton, Swift or some other drunken author of ages past. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 15:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
N+F - a simple joke, but worked out very thoroughly and nicely - David Gerard 08:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Up For. (and a quarter). BerogenVFH 12:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Soon to be a TV movie starring Omar Sharif as Prisoner #426 and Ernest Borgnine as Dick Cheney. True story.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 15:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment."In the decades since the discovery of DNA and the subsequent mapping of the human genome questions have arisen as to whether traits of personality, including narcissism, are partially or fully determined by one’s own genes." Hilarious. t o m p k i n s blah.ﺞوﻦוףהՃՄண்ஸފއހวอฏม+տtrade websites 23:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Self Nom and For I really enjoyed writing this article, and a great picture by Mhaille improves it even futher. —Braydie at 15:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Against. Missing...something. It either needs to be more paranoid, or more straightlaced. Or something else entirely.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Against as per discussions of third picture's entry on VFP. BerogenVFH 13:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
It all hinges on the definition of murder, so you can vote against and I can vote for with no inconsistency if we disagree as to whether it is murder or not. Not that it really is a huge issue as it is just 1 image. --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 23:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Weak Against Brilliant idea, but tone of article needs to sound more expository. Ethereal 05:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Wow, sometimes the truth is funnier than fiction... My solicitor has advised me to state that in this article, this is not the case. -- HindleyiteConverse 19:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
For and submit I feel that this is a very well laid out article filled with clever and ironic jokes from the start and throughout. Plus, I believe it shows beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt, that Intelligent Designerists are correct in everything they say. Weri long wang 19:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
That's ok, I twy not to mwake fwun of pweeple wiff nick impediments...— H. Peebles- D - HS 07:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I critized his signature, which is a bit too long. That has nothing to do with his against votes for all articles without reasonable explanations - it’s like he has OCD or something.Weri long wang 13:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Score: +10.5 games missed due to Mastercard/Verizon/HH Gregg/ESPN commercial shoot
Self-Nom and For. If we can't get this featured in time for his next playoff loss, maybe we can get this featured in time for the Super Bowl. That is, of course, assuming this article is worthy.--<<>> 02:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
For He got tripped by one of his own linemen and still beat the Patriots. I hate him. The Humbled Master 23:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
For Although I know nothing about football.. I somehow found this funny. It's probably the narration/rant style that I love. —Braydie at 00:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
For Let's see if Peyton can win the superbowl and get featured on Uncyclopedia all int he smae day we should save this for after the superbowl win or lose it'll be timely.--71.72.210.124 03:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Oppose I can't find the humor for this to be an FA article. --Endgame 07:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Not because it's good, but because we want to overhype him so he'll lose the Superbowl. I hate, hate, hate, Peyton Manning. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
for. huzzah, actually clever and funny writing about bush - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
For So good that it's almost a shame to highlight it, since that will inevitably mean people messing with it. --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 01:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment According the the VFH archives (check the oldest ones), this article was already featured (on March 14th, 2005). --Composure1 04:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
For an original way of mocking him. The previous version that was featured was what is know known as George Dubya Bush, before it was moved to the new location to make way for this page. •Spang•☃•talk• 06:57, 9 Jan 2007
For, it's the article I would have written if I had any idea what I was doing.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
For - this is actually really nicely done - David Gerard 08:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
For Hosanna to the Son of George Bush! The Humbled Master 23:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Subtle and funny. --So So 01:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Against...this is a snub of the previously featured and hilarious George Dubya Bush. Sorry, its not funny, its just a bio. --HPFPtalk 18:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Our Great Leader deserves to be honored as such. -- Rei 19:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For proof that community projects CAN work (never thought I'd ever see this many people vote for Bush, though...).--<<>> 03:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
For. A good satire of Fox News more thann Georgie.--Emmzee 16:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment ~ Collaboration if I ever saw it. If I vote yes, who wins? Ketei, Mhaille, The Bard or Tompkins? Or do they split the winnings? :) --SirToddGUNWotMMIUotMNotMMDAVFHAotMBur.AlBur.CMNSPC(talk) 14:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Oppose How is this supposed to be funny? "Witch-Hunting For Fun and Profit has seen many editions with numerous authors adding to it, keeping it forever relevant and up-to-date. The original manuscript is said to have been based on the journals of Tomás de Torquemada. Since then, it has been passed down generation to generation, notable contributions made by Samuel Parris, Betty Parris, Abigail Williams, William Griggs, and Joseph McCarthy." It has a section just for this. --Endgame 22:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Nom & For: I came across it while working on my PLS entry rewrite of rainforest, and I liked it. So I did some clean-up on it, and now I think it's ready. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 22:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
For Funniest article ever. Funnier than the entire uncyclopedia on end. -- 23:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
weak against. Sorry dude it's real funny and has great potential it's just a little too unorganzied clean it up a bit and I'll be happy to vote For it.--Gaberou 23:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
For: One of the few articles that made me laugh out loud.--85.224.80.23 23:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Against I've read this article several times trying to find what makes it so great - I don't see it. Sorry. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 01:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Strong for. I think I meant to nominate this one myself before. Just fucking makes me laugh. Agree that it could use some trimming though. --So So 02:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
For...I don't know why, I don't know how, but it sort of grows on you--Shandon 18:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
For There MUST be like 13,167 squirrels in that tree.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 23:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
For I rarely vote, but this has been one of my favorite surrealist articles for a long time now. Glad to see the light dusting this has given it. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition»01/29 23:33
For And I think I'll record my voice for this one. --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
For (I Approve) Should be a mention about what it would be like to fall out of the Big Tree. Maybe mentioning the Antigravity Cat's or something but I like --Naimrod 21:06, 29 January 2007 (EST)
For "Nice Mullet Asshole!" [[user:Weasel3689}} 23:05 30 January 2007 (PST)