Score: 1 Disasters not averted

1. SelfNom and For Senseless airline rules, well, they rule!Pieface 11:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 7 disasters averted

1. Nom And Strong For. A brilliant take on, well, preflight procedures. This article proved to me that e|m|c fully deserves WotM. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes thanks.-- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Ooooohhhyeaaaah Fasten Your Seatbelts!!--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For e|m|c's a jolly good personage and so say 6 of us! So far. Um. You may want to edit this if you're adding later. Or not. I'm good either way, really. --El Zoof 04:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 07:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Dig These mid-air chickens are just begging to be put in the upright-lock position, OH! --THINKER 08:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: -1 member(s) of the species

1. Self-nomination & For I consider this article my first masterpiece. ---Humble Acolyte of Humor, Radioactive afikomen 04:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC

1. No thanks. Unfunny, cliche, image whore. Consult Pee Review before flushing. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against Wow, that's dreadful. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against I'm afraid. Keep at it, though - it has elements. --El Zoof 04:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against Lots of room for improvement. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 05:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
5. blech I could be way funnier about america than this. I choose not to though. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 05:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• I consulted Pee Review long before I even thought of nominating this article. Mong gave it a good review! Radioactive afikomen 04:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 1 men who have come out of The Closet

1. Self nom + for What the hell. I thought this turned out pretty well. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Weak For -It's funny but something is lacking. Still not enough for me to abstain from a positive vote.--Dr. Fenwick 00:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Fror --THE 00:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Dig good show! --THINKER 04:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Smells ever so slightly of gay bashing or at least gay stereotyping. Both can be a funny thing in some cases but, to me, this article is not one of them. --vyvyan 03:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Nah --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 5 makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play

1. Nom and For- Came across this and just had to nominate it.--Gaberou 20:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For heh heh -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For I contributed a lot to it. --General Insineratehymn 20:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For I almost died laughing reading this article the first time. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 20:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Yes please. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 21:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Sure. Love the pics and the different language section. A refreshing take on a tired meme. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For -The math equations did it for me.--Dr. Fenwick 00:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For not an AAAAAAAAAAAAAA ripoff because this is actually a reference to something. --THE 00:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Yes. It's funny, creative, and refers intelligently to a good film.--vyvyan 03:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Dig as a fan of The Shining, I would be remiss if I voted any other way. Long live Sir Kubrick! --THINKER 03:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
11. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes jack a dull boy. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Ach! My eyes! The Humbled Master 04:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
13. Y, it's like the AAAAAAA article, but...goddamnit I was laughing. And many a nomm hasn't made me laugh. So after 4 agonizing hours of contemplation, I'm voting For--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Yaaar.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
15. Weak for. --L 05:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Nope. Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against and I'm not sorry. This stuff is old and boring, guys. —rc (t) 20:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
3. All gimmick and no funny makes MO vote Against. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Dull. --El Zoof 21:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak Against. The pic from "The Shining" ALMOST made me vote for it...but it's just too much like AAAAAAAA!--Mr.Vib 21:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Against Sir Roger 22:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Against because there could be more to it that sets it apart from other Nonsense stuff, like the end of Ekrpat. Maybe it could start off like an article and then descend into madness, or something. I could vote for a take like that, but as 98% of it is just the same ten words I hardly see enough creativity or humor to warrant a feature. (Or, I could say, all nonsense and no satire makes this a dull article.) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Against The fact that people are still making AAAAAAAAA! clones two years on makes me think that this shouldn't go on the front page. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Another one? AAAAAAAAAAAAA! - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 07:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Against - repetitive articles are getting rather boring. I say that in spite of the fact that I am writing one now. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain I don't know...maybe it would have been funnier if I had seen The Shining. It also seems a little too much like AAAAAAAAA! I don't want to say no, but I can't say yes, either. Sorry. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 21:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
• Abstain Blatant ripoff of AAAAAAAAAA!. I would give it against, but that picture at the top is hilarious!P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: -2 Uncyclopedians

1. Self Nomination & For A good sequel to UnNews:Uncyclopedia is better than Wikipedia--Sir Manforman 20:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against The concept's all right, but right now it's not fleshed out enough to be a featured article. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 21:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against--Dr. Fenwick 00:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 1 Musicians can only count to 4

1. Dig could probably use some work, but I can get down with it. --THINKER 21:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For--Dr. Fenwick 00:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For--Bongo O'Starkers 10:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Sorry. Also, you do know that you're allowed to vote for your own article, right? If not, you are.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1. I didn't want to do that - it would be like voting that my mother's breasts are bigger than Doris Day's. --egde 19:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

   Fair enough.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 Gear Sticks Shoved into Overdrive

1. For I still think I'm funny. Your mileage may vary, depending on the number of passengers in your Vulva. --El Zoof 07:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig I say: Funny! --THINKER 07:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Too funny. Sir Roger 07:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For. -- Mitch 16:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For Sadly enough, I've never driven a Vulva, but I've heard that it's a great ride. The Humbled Master 16:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For I've always liked this article. --THE 17:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Strong For Because I'd love one of these...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For I'd like to take one for a spin myself. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For If only for the picture of a Vulva in the swimming pool. --Andreasegde 20:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For --Gaberou 20:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. ForI've never even heard of a Vulva until now lol.--Dr. Fenwick 00:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 17:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. That sounds like a delightful car, I don't see why everyone's laughing.--vyvyan 03:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. --L 05:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against. There's not a lot there, and what's there isn't making me want to get one. Wink wink, nudge nudge. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14 Grannie Terrorists

1. Nom and For'd. -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 00:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. sDig thanks Sonic!! :) --THINKER 03:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Yeah, I really liked this one.--<<>> 04:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For - we must take a stand against these cheek-pinching sweater-knitting maniacs! --El Zoof 06:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For --THE 11:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For. NOT GRANDMA! NOOOOOO!!!--Mr.Vib 13:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Laa Ilia Il'allah wha'Muhammad rasul Allah! ~ 15:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For. -- Mitch 16:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Allahu Uhallalah! The Humbled Master 16:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Wait, do you mean dead Grandma or "I got 20 years left and I'm gonna use 'em" Grandma? Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 17:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Gaberou 20:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
13. I had long suspected it. Thank goodness Uncyclopedia shines the light of truth on us! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Strong For--Dr. Fenwick 00:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For Honestly, how can you deny sweet little old granny a shot at the front page? -RAHB 08:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against, An okay story, just a bit hackneyed. --Brit-guit 13:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11 feral kittens

1. Nom and for Prettiestpretty's best article.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For...this is, indeed, funny--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Sir Roger 06:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Peace, dude This article is far out. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Dig Because I see her at every show I go to. This state is full of em. --THINKER 21:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Of course I am compelled to vote For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
8. like it --THE 11:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For. -- Mitch 16:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Gaberou 20:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Weak For. Text is great, but could use another picture or two. See comment that I'm about to leave on the talk page. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 22:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Full For with new pic. Thanks, PP!  :) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For--Dr. Fenwick 00:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against Thought the lead was funny and the ending but there was a desert of not laughing in the middle. --Andreasegde 14:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• I don't know where to put this, but people will read it here. Anyone who hasn't yet voted for top 10 articles of May, please consider voting for one of the four articles with 10 votes each - they're trying to break a tie, and we'll be into July soon. The link is at the top right of this page. Sir Roger 19:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • What Roger means to say is everyone vote for Folgers Crystals, propelling it higher that 17 votes, thus breaking the tie. Thank you Roger. ;) --THINKER 21:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Folgers Crystals only has 8 votes, not 10 (or 17)... --Andreasegde 10:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
      • I know.. I was dreaming joking.. ;) --THINKER 03:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11 ....later

1. SN + F Braydie said I should. It got a 46 in the Pee (by Braydie) and, well, I like it..Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Rfo Yay, 1st vote! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
3. like it --THE 11:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
4. I would say For, but I just can't be bothered. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Fur, yaw me like. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For I would have voted for this earlier, but I'm a procrastinator myself. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Yeah. —Braydie 22:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
8. '"," -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
9. I'll vote for this tomorrow. Next Tuesday, at the latest. --El Zoof 02:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Because I meant to do it late.r Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
11. For Can't think of anything witty, sorry. --Hrodulf 21:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For Cute. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Could be a great article, but needs a lot more (or less, depending on your level of procrastination) --Andreasegde 14:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Not enough there to be featured, content or length-wise. --So So 05:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Abs Yaknow how people have those things they just don't find hilarious (like pedophilia or religious humor)? Procrastination is mine; just never thought it was all that funny a topic. Its a good little piece, but the subject just doesn't make me chucklez. --THINKER 21:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I see.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry buddy. I'd buy you an ice cream cone but someone might misinterpret it, and I'm not going back to the clink, man.. :( --THINKER 21:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Eh, the Mr. Softee truck already passed anyway. Perhaps another day.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain - It has its good points, but I wasn't laughing through most of it, so I'll abstain for this one. -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 16:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14 silly dogs

1. Self Nom & For. She's the sweetest crazy person you'll ever meet!--Mr.Vib 00:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig poor uncle Morty... --THINKER 01:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For.--vyvyan 03:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For That silly lady was out of her mind, but this article was hella fine!Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For Don alun 22:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 19:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For Supermoose
9. For Disturbing... The Humbled Master 03:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For. -- Mitch 15:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Ja Though what's possibly even more bizarre is apparently a friend of mine has relatives who've named their dogs Lenin and Stalin...seriously. I don't think they'd get along with Goering very well. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 20:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

    At least they didn't name one Molotov. Burnt dog flesh...not good.--Mr.Vib 21:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

13. For. Not enough pages reference Sir Oswald Mosley, I think. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Best article of the month. --L 05:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 11 hands needed to play a single chord! WTF?!

1. Self nom and For. I guarantee that this article isn't short. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Strong For As a pianist, I get this article even more. Good Great stuff TKF.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig Sorry I couldn't help out with the audio. Still very good regardless. :) --THINKER 20:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 22:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For. Oh, come on! Would you rather play Liszt instead?--Mr.Vib 00:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

   Vib has a point. Kill 'em all! Oh, wait, they're already dead. Carry on, then.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

7. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For as the reviewer, Id like to say I had an intricate part in the formation of this article. at least, id like to say that. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 05:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Avg. For -- Feature-worthy, I'd say, but there are a lot of great pages up here. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For Ach! Not the RACHMANINOFF!!! *Psycho music plays* The Humbled Master 21:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For. -- Mitch 13:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1. OK. I find it OK, but not... excellent. Sorry! Social Studiously 12:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

• Isn't it Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2, not No. 3? -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 00:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Nitpicker -_- -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

For this error, you must listen to a bad recording of "Vocalise" for twenty-four straight hours! BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!--Mr.Vib 11:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 15 Moist Floridians

1. I'm a grumpy gus, but this is good stuff. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
2. self for - I've never had someone nom an article for me before.... *wipes a tear from his eye*....this may be the greatest day of my life! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Yep. Well done, my Led man.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Big For. I laughed out loud at the pic, I must admit. I don't know what I was expecting, but there it was. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For. Froggy found it funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For It's funny and featured article worthy. The Oblong Lobster 15:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For'd It's a good article, and I like it. -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭16:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Dig! Good to know that I'll be safe when this god forsaken state goes under! :) --THINKER 21:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For--Gaberou 04:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For. -- Mitch 07:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For -- Miles Edgeworth 20:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  21:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For. It's funny, I've got to admit. Social Studiously 12:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For. ~ 19:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
16. Para. Si, me gusta el articulo! FumbDucker 15:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

1. It's funny, but not featured article worthy. Perhaps being listed in the UnNews column? --Ekashp 03:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 18 indignant North-West Evening Mail editorials

1. F☭R, It made the news so it has to be true. 08:26, 13 June 2007
2. Yes. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 20:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
3. DIG the article is only slightly amusing, but the fact that it apparently pisses off the city officials makes me support it strongly. --THINKER 21:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
4. YES I like the idea that the people objecting to the article and alerting the newspaper could indirectly cause this article to be featured. The Oblong Lobster 21:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For I laughed. And then some more Don alun 22:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Yes, please --General Insineratehymn 22:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Strong for. The background with the newspaper is great, and the article is great too. Reads like a good STM piece. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Whoever added that image and sorted out the content is a genius. Oh, wait...FOR. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 00:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For increasing awareness of The Lake District.--Procopius 23:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Thumbs up --THE 01:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For I was set on voting against from its whole town-y motiff. But the article convinced me otherwise.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For - This has suddenly become one of the most significant articles on our website. I wonder if anyone will try to edit it... Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
13. FEATURE IT --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
14. for --Ekashp 03:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For, not just because it was mentioned outside. It's the blatant exaggeration ("the only permanent resident is Farmer Giles," and "sheep, sheep, and more sheep") that makes it stand out. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
16. I saw this in the papers! Nathalalias 00:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For Obscure, yet hilarious! The Humbled Master 05:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 07:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
19. For Hilarious! --Miles Edgeworth 20:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
20. Yup. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
21. For Supermoose A great quote from the news:

'Angela Knowles ... said... "You just never now how widely these things are noted. If there are means of monitoring and editing these sites, I would be all in favour of that."'

If only, Angela... If only...

1. Apparently --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 10:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Better than most towncruft, but still towncruft. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
2. No. “Most local people can be much, much funnier about the Lake District than this.” I'm sure it's true. We would make ourselves look very mediocre if we put this forward as the kind of thing we feature. Sir Roger 18:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against. It needs a lot more work and needs to be more subtle about the town's features. Right now, it reads as somewhat of a cheap knockoff of Blandford.--Mr.Vib 12:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Sorry Not bad, but just not quite Front Page material. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

This article has been cleaned up and improved since the paper's "Most local people can be much, much funnier about the Lake District than this" comments. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• Someone more intelligent than me please put the "referenced in the media" template on this. It's found here, but I can't seem to get it working right and I don't know what I'm doing wrong.--<<>> 15:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

• I put it in manually – you know, copied the code straight out of the template. I don't think that the template and the equals signs in the URL get along. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 15 severely crazed teddy bears

1. Self-nom + For Sir Roger 23:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig I liked it so much I was upset I didn't get to review it. :) --THINKER 02:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For This is such an awesome idea. Pulled it off too. -Epical Zamora
4. Strong For! This is the epitome of the perfect Uncyclopedia article. Can you say "top article of June?" — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For Worthy of the front page --WesternLotus 15:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Tackles mental ilness in grislys with immense sensitivety. The Oblong Lobster 18:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For - I'm so impressed by this article I want to buy Bipolar Bear merchandise.--Dr. Fenwick 02:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
10. For. Terrific! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For. -- Mitch 04:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Strong For--Gaberou 01:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
14. I never want to hear another polar pun again as long as I live, no matter how subtle. That being said, For. You can just hear some National Geographic narrator softly talking about these poor, magnificent, messed-up creatures.--Mr.Vib 17:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For --THE 15:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For The bits about Nunavut and the toonie really drove it home for me. Save the bipolar bears! -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Somehow this just doesn't work at all for me. --So So 06:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 18 happy Pontiffs

1. Nom & For A present from 1998 for everybody who voted against my "In God We Trust" article --Hrodulf 15:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Well-written, and funny too. RabbiTechno 17:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For the body of christ, that tasty jew. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
4. For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For Funny, comprehensive, well formatted with good pictures, and of course there's the Pope jokes. OOPS I FORGOT TO SIGN/VOTED IN THE WRONG PLACE LAST TIME. My bad. Feebas factor 17:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Against. No, wait, For. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 19:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Judaism. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Change of mind The Oblong Lobster 20:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Very for -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Dig much funnier than the other one --THINKER 20:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For. To be honest, I can't quite tell why I liked it all so much, but liked I did. --The Dit 07:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For - Quite funny. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 12:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
13. Strong For - How can anyone vote against an article as funny as this one --Uncle J 15:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For Voting against would be offensive to Christians. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 20:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For the fancy goyim thing. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For --THE 21:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For. All the articles on here seem to be pro-christianity! Nice to see a bit of variety! --PirateFaafy 10:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
19. Hrodulf is vastly underrated. He needs the recognition he deserves. --General Insineratehymn 17:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
20. Indeed. The Humbled Master 05:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
21. It could happen... Wish you'd take out the last Jew reference though; anti-semitism really isn't funny. --Kelpan 21:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
22. For. Hardly laugh-a-minute, but its satire is both subtle and precise. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. No Too long for the one joke. No Pee review for this self-nom. The Oblong Lobster 15:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC))
2. No Agrees with the oblong lobster, too long for the joke. -- You have been Censored by Jew Boy, You'd better Complain 17:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against. Kip the Dip
4. Against It was well written but the joke takes way too long to get to.--Dr. Fenwick 02:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Against See above. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1. It was pee reviewed, see this --Hrodulf 16:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I should have checked more carefully before opening my big mouth.. The Oblong Lobster 18:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

1. No I believe that the person who wrote this has no idea about the Catholic church and had little knowledge or gave the effort to add the realism to the article to make is credible as unnews. There is no such thing as St. Peter's it's St. Peter's Basilica. And i changed car to Popemobile. Most likely the guy who wrote it just saw the picture and did little reasearch -Sith Penguin Lord 19:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes. First, if you want to vote against, do it in the right section. Second, this is Uncyclopedia. Do we look like sticklers for accuracy? Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 20:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

(Moved from above) —Braydie 08:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I was parodying the hypocricy of anti-semitism with that passage. --Hrodulf 03:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm not accusing you of anti-semitism. Don't worry, it's just a personal gripe. --Kelpan 12:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 16.5 shameful tears

1. Nom + for A quasi-featured and a runner up in the last PLS competition. It was robbed last time it was nominated; I thought it deserved another chance. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 14:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Sweet merciful tiddlywinks, YES! --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 19:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For, it's the Mr. Grumpikins of its generation. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
4. F☭R 08:50, 07 June 2007
5. For If you don't for this, I think we should end our relationship before anyone gets hurt. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig fun read --THINKER 23:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For, although I can see how it missed out before, as it takes a little while to get going. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For I can see that damn smudge. That jerk kid...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Again For — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 16:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Mr. Beluncle shamed me into voting for this article. But, aside from that, it's very well written, and gets better and better toward the end. Great work. -- Big Brother (a.k.a. #1_ALF_FAN) Miniluv•Minitrue 17:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For - It could also be an UnBook, from the way I read it. Just a thought. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
12. For. -- Mitch 18:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
13. love. I doubt most people find this hysterical though, its just enjoyable, until that last part. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 04:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For --THE 21:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For - This is actually more disturbing than hilarious, but... IT'S SO WELL WRITTEN. I can't help myself. 206.248.135.200 23:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
16. Holy Mind! That's a good piece -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
17. Weak for It's good until that horrible anti-climax. The Humbled Master 00:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Severian: A number of users (including myself) brought that up last time. Unless somebody objects soon, I'll move it to UnBooks myself. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• DOOOOO it. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)

• Done. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Ooo! Now make it an UnTune! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Darn it, Modus, I'm a doctor, not a songwriter. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14

1. SNF Thought I'd give this another chance as last time I nominated it before it was ready. --Winstanley1 09:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Super FOR! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For --THE 19:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For I like this more than plastic. The Oblong Lobster 20:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
6. F☭R 08:51, 07 June 2007
7. For Beautiful, freewheeling in its cynicism. --Phantom Grammar 21:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Dig its back, and still funny --THINKER 23:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For--Dr. Fenwick 03:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For Sure, why not. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For. -- Mitch 18:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For As promised.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For. I was fixing it up for CPS (didn't see that you had already done that, Mitch!) and laughed all the way through. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Needs cleaning up nice ideas, but the writing's a bit iffy and the text has too many punctuation and grammar mistakes. I've cleaned up the first few paragraphs but hey, I have work to do. I'll change this to a For if the text gets tidied up. Phantom Grammar 12:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

• I've sorted out the typos now. Most of them spring from the fact that this was originally written as a magazine feature in the first person, then re-wrtitten into an encyclopedic format. I handn't noticed that it messed up the grammar in some places.--Winstanley1 13:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks - vote duly switched to for

Conditional For Submit to Ceridwyn's Proofreading Service and have someone take care of it and I'll vote for.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

• I've added it to the proofreading service. --Winstanley1 11:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• It's been fixed twice now. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14.5 soiled pairs of pants

1. Nom + For Very funny work courtesy of DiZ.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For I said it was funny when it was in the piss, and I say it's funny now (and the captions are better!)P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For - A sheer work of genius, if I do say so myself. 'Cough-cough' --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 23:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For--Gaberou 04:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak for. --L 06:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
6. FOR. Thought it was hilarious. --Polyamorousx 16:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Gave me a whole new philosophy. I used to consider it a mild annoyance, but I'll value every crap from now on. Sir Roger 19:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For funny. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
9. For Push! Push! Kip the Dip 17:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
10. XD Brilliant! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
11. Yes. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For I like the Hello Kitty picture --24.215.168.140 16:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
14. F☭R 09:14, 07 June 2007
15. For. -- Mitch 12:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For a brown stain. --Ekashp 01:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For 172.143.185.85 17:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For 86.152.82.149 17:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
19. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 18:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against scatological just-okay-edness. Sry. --THINKER 16:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against as per the Thinker -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Constipation is no laughing matter. I had constipation once, and I had great discomfort for the next three days. --General Insineratehymn 22:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

ROTFLOL at the last sentence of the article. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

Same w/ me, but I think it's really that the article sets up for the joke through the entire thing to make it funny. Standing alone, it's alright, but after the article, brilliant!P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

True dat. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

Score: 15

1. If someone wants to nom Hermaphrodite, that had the next-best percentage on the list. I didn't particularly care for that one, though, so I'm nomming one I liked.--<<>> 15:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For. OMG! Brad's got a list! Run! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig a great take on one of our nation's funniest debacles. Gotta check those error margins, Chicago! hehe.. oh and "Dewey Cheatem & Howe" got a real live lol. :) --THINKER 22:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For--Gaberou 22:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Kwakerjak, you are much missed. Brad, thanks for the list. Strong For, and blast it all if this one doesn't make it! We are going to feature a US presidential election article eventually, darnit! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:11
8. For just like before. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For. Once again, Uncyclopedia teaches me about American history. I didn't even know there was ever a President Dewey before this! -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Give 'em Hell, Mister President-HST...yeah, he'd vote Fortoo--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 17:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For Kwakerjak! YAARRRRR! (And my Strom Thurmond photoshop).--Procopius 13:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
14. FOR! Kwakerjak was so great. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For Poor Kwakerjak... The Humbled Master 00:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 16.5 painted-on Powerpoint slides

1. Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. This generation's Waiting for Godot? Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Could've sworn Mandaliet wrote this one from the corporate drone's parts... Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 15:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
4. DIG I thought the same thing as ENeGMA. Brilliant! :) --THINKER 18:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
5. YEs I really like this kind of thing. The Oblong Lobster 23:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
6. -- 20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Brilliant -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
9. ForInfiniteMonkey
10. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For Suicide looms... lol 134.226.1.229 19:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. Nothing like corporate asses dying inside...or something like that. --Mr.Vib 18:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Heeheehee... I am laughing... --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 07:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For Loved it! <3 ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:08, 02 June 2007
15. For Terriffic - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For nice. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
17. Thoroughly fun to read. For!--vyvyan 00:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
19. So morbid... yet so funny. For — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
20. For I love this article. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Not bad, I chuckled at parts but definitely not featured article material. ennui2778 dif
2. Naaah--Sir Shandon 06:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Sucks Ass --Steve Johnsenson 04:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 35 uses other than tea!

Featured —rc (t) 06:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Nom+sDig - I haven't self nommed in a while, but I think this is worth it :) --THINKER 05:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
2. I liked it. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 06:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Well done. Sir Roger 06:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Funny! Good. Social Studiously 12:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For. I'm going to try it. --vyvyan 16:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 18:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Very informative --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 19:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For You had me at Why? But for good measure, I read it. Very helpful. /me attempts a smile amid the hot steam from his pants.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For The arising steam can also really clear up the sinuses. Don alun 22:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For --THE 11:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For It's quite funny. --Andreasegde 14:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
13. Strong For because the images are funny.Manforman 12:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Very Strong For Probably one of the best new articles on this site! The Humbled Master 18:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
15. I should try that some time. (translation: For) --General Insineratehymn 20:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
16. Clear and compelling. -- 21:34, 20 June 2007
17. Hot to trot! For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)(UTC)
18. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
19. Why ask why? Pour boiling hot water down your pants. --So So 02:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
20. Strong For I lawled - RAHB 02:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
21. You sick bastard. --El Zoof 03:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
22. Sure. This vote doesn't mean anything, as this is already well on its way to being featured, but I just want a thank you template. That and it's also a good article. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
23. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
24. For -Just one question, why?--Gaberou 14:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
25. "For" - Ahhhh. Refreshing. --SirIsaac 14:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
26. For. -- Mitch 15:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
27. For'd, funny! -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 16:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
28. For I want to see this get 30 votes -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
29. Classic - Beats the record of pwnage. --Eiyuu Kou 22:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
30. Best Why Ever — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 22:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
31. For. The Schluttz comment put it over the top.--Mr.Vib 23:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
32. Ohhhhhhhhhh....that felt good. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
33. Woot! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
34. No real reason to for it, it's gonna win anyways...P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
35. Aaaagh, it burns Kevin Costner to his kneees!--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Trust me, I sincerely appreciate it, but I do believe it's one vote per person. Thanks though THM! :) --THINKER 22:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oh, dear. I'd forgotten I voted! Sorry, Thinker. :( The Humbled Master 23:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• Hey, man, if it were my choice you could vote 8 million times (on my articles)! hehe.. honest mistake, stricken. :) --THINKER 23:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• All right, thanks! :) The Humbled Master 23:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• I believe this is a new voting record - beating Horton Hires a Ho and The Anarchist Cookbook, which both had 28. Sir Roger 22:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

• Let's see this go all the way to 42! The Humbled Master 22:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

• It's already at 31. Love to see it, but it's going to get featured before it happens.--Mr.Vib 23:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Holy hell, THANK YOU EVERYONE!!! Damn, I wish I could make a White Russian for each and every one of you! I'm quite honored by this. :) --THINKER 23:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

What can I say, the article really ties the room together. Now make me my White Russian. Dude. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

The Dude abides, man. ;) --THINKER 23:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Y'know, this agression, will not stand, man... The Humbled Master 00:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Well, guys, I dunno. Maybe with a little luck this'll get quasi, but I just don't see 35 as a high enough score for feature these days.  ;-) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Do you know how crazy this is?! Well.. its freakin crazy, man!! :-D --THINKER 05:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 22 votes here, there and everywhere

Featured —rc (t) 05:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Self-nom and for. I feel like giving this a go. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For McDonald must be stopped. I'm the only serial killer around here. Don alun 15:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong for. I was actually going to put this up a while ago, but I forgot. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Dig NOT QUACKY!!! NOOOO!!!!! --THINKER 21:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Yep. Also makes me want to reexamine my stories from childhood...what did they mean by the wolf "eating" grandma?--Mr.Vib 21:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For Brilliant! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Fors Nathalalias 00:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For--Gaberou 04:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- Mitch 07:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Like it --THE 21:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
11. Mummm Good! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 22:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 00:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Woah...disturbingly For--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 01:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
16. Strong For--Dr. Fenwick 03:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For And on that farm, he had some... ax-murderers?! The Humbled Master 03:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For Sir Roger 05:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
19. For -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
20. Excellent, but was it just me who was expecting the more literal interpretation of "had a <insert innocent young farmyard animal>"? --Kelpan 19:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
21. Strong For One of those rare articles that made me burst out laughing. Could do with a reference to Animal Farm somewhere in my opinion, though. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 14:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
22. Eat --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 16:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

1. I took the liberty of added Old McDonald to the first paragraph. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 22 compulsive uses of poetry leading to insanity

Featured —rc (t) 05:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Self-nom and For It's been Pee Reviewed twice, and added to significantly after each review, including the incorporation of material written by One-eyed Jack. After my latest round of edits, the second reviewer (Sir Roger) said that he couldn't think of anything else to add, and that I should put it up for VFH. I've decided to take his advice. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 19:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
2. I guess I'll vote for, and say I hope this gets more. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For I like this more than oranges. Birds.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For to up the score to four. Soon we'll croon "no more rhymes" a thousand times! Sir Roger 21:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For has improved quite a bit since its first pee review. I can't think of a rhyme for "first pee review". --THE 21:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC) --
6. For Because it'd look real nice on the front page, not one thing in it caused me rage. I think I may even read it again, it's one of my favorites, just between us men. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For - Not my fancy on the humor side but very well written and creative.--Gaberou 01:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Cute.--vyvyan 02:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
9. There shall be no end to the rhymes, I say, as cessation of poetry results in dismay. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Wow. -- 04:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
11. Weak for. --L 04:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
12. With this for, I open the door, to a brighter, new future than ever before! Have faith, take a care; there's no need to beware, for, with all these good votes, you're already there! The Humbled Master
13. For. -- Mitch 08:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For, but don't expect any rhymes from me. I have to say it gets old quite quickly. --The Dit 10:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For...and glad to see my Rudolph Hess pic found a new home--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 15:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
16. VERY well-written. For.--Mr.Vib 21:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
17. FOR Although it may upset some who have been stuck down with the debilitating condition. But it is great The Oblong Lobster 13:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For -- Claire'05 01:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
19. For I've actually been talking like this the past week. Damn, I guess I just wasn't that unique. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 06:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
20. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
21. For. Clever and well-written. --Andorin Kato 02:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
22. AAAAAAAAA! For --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 13:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
23. For. ~ 19:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
24. For Don alun 22:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 22:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
2. No thanks. Seems a bit forced, and not much actual rhyming in the main bit of the article. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 14:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Personally, I wish that there was more rhyming in the actual body. The caption "Finding just one pup is enough trouble, but the problem is twofold when one needs a double." Was hysterical. I just don't know how to vote on this one. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 21:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• I was really really hoping it had something to do with Cockney Rhyming Slang. You broke my obsessive compulsive heart. --monika 23:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)