Score: 6 Signers of the Declaration of Jesus-pendance

1. Nom AND For. I likes it. And you should, too. If you don't like it, help fix it. It has been said (by whom I will not tell DiZtheGreat) that this article is better that most other articles he sees up here on VFH. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 16:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Pretty goodful.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong Four very funny --THE 17:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. XD--GUN Shandon 18:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Dig hilarious, what a great concept. --THINKER 21:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
6. I wanted to nominate this one myself. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
7. This article is devine.-- 11:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
8. for though I do have One minor Point of Criticism: Due to the Holes someone found necessary to Apply to My Feet, I nowadays Prefer not to Perform the Walking on Water Thingy unless Absolutely Necessary. Original Jesus 15:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against - Just didn't strike me as that funny. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:08

Score: 6 Totally Rad Dudes!

1. Nom & For. Really funny article by The Thinker. Style is really good, humo(u)r is great, and the length is just right for a high school student with the attention span of a gerbil.--Mr.Vib 16:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For because it makes it quite obvious that it's just past the normal "awesome" teacher Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 16:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For One of the thinker's most inspired ("inspir'd"?) articles. Thumbs up --THE 18:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. sDig Thanks Vib. He really did bring in a real live whale, man.. :-D --THINKER 21:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For--Gaberou 22:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
6. But of Course!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 6

1. Nom & For. Give this one a very good read before voting here. The more carefully you read it, the more you should realise how awesome it is. Oh, and see if you can guess who the author is without looking. :) Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Very humorous.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig I love it! hilarity!!! --THINKER 21:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For -- Has more theme than a lot of this guy's stuff, IMHO. ----OEJ 23:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For. Very good. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:10
6. For, I plan my vacations around Dirk Snyddering mad ramblings. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 7

1. If someone wants to nom Hermaphrodite, that had the next-best percentage on the list. I didn't particularly care for that one, though, so I'm nomming one I liked.--<<>> 15:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For. OMG! Brad's got a list! Run! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig a great take on one of our nation's funniest debacles. Gotta check those error margins, Chicago! hehe.. oh and "Dewey Cheatem & Howe" got a real live lol. :) --THINKER 22:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For--Gaberou 22:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Kwakerjak, you are much missed. Brad, thanks for the list. Strong For, and blast it all if this one doesn't make it! We are going to feature a US presidential election article eventually, darnit! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:11

No against votes

Score: 8 fiery banquets

1. I could not stop giggling when I read this article. --General Insineratehymn 22:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
2. I think dining in hell might be a better name, but it's still funny, and that's what counts. --~

   Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

   22:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For The title leaves a little to be desired, but the article as a whole is genius.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
4. THIS IS SPARTAAAAAAAAAA --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. I do like this one very much. --Pcgamermofo 03:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Very Nice!'  Weasel 3689 06:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Not quite my impression of what dining in hell would be like. Thanks for clearing it up for me, I plan to be dining there a lot in the future. -- RAHB 10:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For--Shandon 18:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For - Hooray for hell! No, wait... {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 02:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:14, 03 June 2007

1. AGAINST Sparta is overdone. Tonight we dine in SUCK. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 16:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against - Slifer put it perfectly. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:13

• Conditional for. The title has got to go for this to be acceptable on the front page. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

• Move to traditional titling with title hack on the page for the all caps? --THINKER 05:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 16 dictating dictators

1. For. This is the first of a series of articles I will renomming under the new use of {{QFA}} as a second-chance for VFH. This one was um, kinda deserving (it had gotten 94% of the votes of the featured article at the time it was taken down). --<<>> 14:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For I really liked this. Funny and never gets boring. The Oblong Lobster 14:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Weak For - As clever as it was nothing made me laugh out loud not even the images, however it's very well written.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gaberou (talk • contribs) [1]
4. For A funny article that never keeps you bored.• • • Necropaxx (T) {~}
5. For I contributed to this a while ago, i'm glad to see it given another chance.--Winstanley1 17:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For I voted for last time, now I'm voting for this time.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
7. "This grape isn't entirely peeled, Sally!" -- 19:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Still for. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Jolly Good.--Dr. Fenwick 20:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Brilliance. I don't know what evil forces stopped this from getting featured the first time. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
11. Dig --THINKER 21:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Take a message. "For." --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For Excellent. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 05:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 02:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For - Brilliant. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:15

No against votes

fixed Gaberou's vote--<<>> 16:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 5 dwarves tossed

1. For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For It's different, but it's definately very good. The Oblong Lobster 14:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For- His coming of age bit really sold me on it.--Dr. Fenwick 20:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For - Only hardcore LOTR fans will really get most of this. Especially the bit where it mirrors the meter of one of Tolkien's longest sagas. God, whoever wrote this either is a major dork, or had way too much time on his hands. Or both. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/1 22:57
5. For Not a hardcore LOTR fan but, I can appreciate good humor when I see it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:17

1. Against. This is partially because of the subject matter. These types of stories (fiction or real) become really boring really fast to me. It seems like it could be a parody of how drawn-out and complicated these stories can become. If it is, it needs more humor to pull it off (as well as possible elminiation of the Rivendell reference).--Mr.Vib 14:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 pervy old codgers

1. NomandFor - A great piece of work from TKF...has FRONT PAGE written all over it (not literally though) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 22:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For! Thanks for the nom Mhaille :) I was going to wait until the weekend to self-nom when Sannse finishes the final image, but this is good too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
4. DIG!!!! Very very funny, I hope this one shoots on through. Great work TKF! --THINKER 21:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
5. F☭R 09:44, 31 May 2007
6. For --THE 23:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For B a n g The Oblong Lobster 23:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Bigass For Love it. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Queezy For It's really funny but gosh just feels so wrong reading it.--Dr. Fenwick 20:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Weakish For. Wasn't too sure, but good in the end. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:19

1. No thx. I have long since tired of ageist jokes, especially the type of "they're old, so they want your sex". Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 21:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
2. TKF was vote whoring again on IRC... that was bad enough, this article was worse --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

So much for constructive criticism, eh UF? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I dunno what's going on with the score, but it's messed up.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fix'd --THINKER 22:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Thar she blows!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 6 injured skiers

1. Nom + For THE's best work--Leoispotter
2. Dig this is an article I was planning on helping to birth into glory. Its still a bit rough, so if it doesn't make it this time, I'll put those edits into effect. Still hilarious, and still a fine example of why THE is, to me, one of the funniest and most promising writers here at Un. --THINKER 21:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Wow! Thanks! self for --THE 22:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Strong For The humor far outweighs any crudeness. Quality quality right here.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For--Gaberou 15:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For- Was there really a need for an article like this? The answer is yes! Difficulty level 7!--Dr. Fenwick 20:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

1. I read and reread it and still am not finding the funny. Oh, there it is. It was in my pants. Maybe you should ignore that last bit. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Abstain This article has a lot of humor in it. However, the violence in it seems unnecessary and crude, and detracts from the article as a whole. In my opinion, of course. Didn't we have this not too long ago, too?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think we did.Leoispotter

I could be wrong, I don't know. I will contemplate my decision for now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I've reread it many times, and my abstinence is now lifted...-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 5 MAGGOTS!

1. nom & for. excellent example of self-reference. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Weak for on account of the fact that all caps fits. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can}
3. --~

   Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

   20:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For and comment to the againsters: are you crazy? THIS ARTICLE IS SUPPOSED TO BE YELLING AT YOUR FACE, SCUMMAGGOTS! -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 20:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For--Dr. Fenwick 02:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Funny. --Hrodulf 02:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
8. weak for it isn't hilarious, but I liked it enough to give it my vote --THE
9. For I liked this one --Leoispotter 23:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
10. FOR VOTE FOR IT, MAGGOT. IT'S FUNNY. --Ekashp 16:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For. One of my favorites as of right...now. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 06:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Yep. There's the self-reference, and the fact that he seems to be referring to Uncyc itself, and the fact that you can just hear him screaming it... It's short. I'm really picky about short. But it's also really, really funny. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Naaah. --L 16:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against The whole thing is CAPS, how can I see? Vincent Pun 16:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Don't get me wrong but it being in all caps makes it harder to read, and thereby, takes away from its humour. But if the article isn't in all caps, it doesn't make sense and not funny at all. It is quite the paradox. --Dexter111344 17:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
4. No. Having this on the front page is a long shot away from having even Ct. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Against. I was thinking about voting for it, but You TEH GEY gave me a rash. Sorry. ~ 21:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Against - I love the idea (like most of So So's articles), but the execution isn't great. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Against. Not hard to read, but not particularly funny. Maybe with audio? I dunno. --El Zoof 07:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

• Abs. Funny, but wears thin early. I think it could be 20x funnier if a different approach was taken. --THINKER 20:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Abstain. I REALLY want to vote for this since the execution is the right way to do it. However, it's just too full-force the entire time.--Mr.Vib 13:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Tweaked as of 1230. --So So 15:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 10 scientifically jaded Uncyclopedians

1. Nom+Dig I found this article hilarious before doing a minor touch-up and adding the right pic and caption. I found it even funnier with the shaking space shuttle, and after rereading, yes. Its hilarious and even funnier. Simultaneously. --THINKER 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. Also, part of my soul just died. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 23:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For. -- Mitch 12:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Definately This is very good.. The Oblong Lobster 16:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Up, up, and awaaaaay! ... Okay that was lame. For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 21:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
6. for --THE 00:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For –—Hv (talk) 30/05 13:20
8. Beautiful-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. Space, the first budget cut. These are the sitting around and rustings of the space shuttle fleet... --El Zoof 07:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For. Nice parody.--Mr.Vib 14:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 13.5 Flying Japanese Sand Tigers

1. Self-Nom and For. Pee Reviewed and reviewed again after a complete rewrite. I know that it's difficult to read, but that's the only way I found to make it work. --Mr.Vib 11:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. I really like the tone and flow. The plot devices are terrific and I really dig the multilayered, multidimensional themes and story lines thought out the article. Greetings from a fellow Pathological liar.-- Vosnul 14:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against ForThis is complete and utter tripe It's funny. I liked it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Dig there are some improvements that could be made to help readability, but its pretty damn funny regardless. --THINKER 18:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
5. 4 Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Even if I end up Darwining my own article, For Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 19:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For --THE 21:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For I also have an idea for a reskin based around this. --General Insineratehymn 21:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For - Damn funny (I'm a pathological liar...) ;) Spawn Man 05:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. -- Mitch 12:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. --User:TheHop 1 2/sig 9:50, 29 May, 2007 (UTC)
13. For I can feel the sun! The Oblong Lobster 16:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Why Not?  Weasel 3689 23:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For Karma-AH 07:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
16. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

1. The humour is unsubtle at best and all the crossing out is annoying. --Kelpan 15:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against. I've read it three times now and...I like the idea, but the execution makes blood come out of my ears (which is a nice change, admittedly, but still). Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against, slightly. A strange problem, but I just don't find it funny as it is, with the lies crossed out. It would be far funnier the other way round, with the truth being deleted, or even not there at all leaving just the lies. As it is it is just not funny. --Imber 11:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Just created a reskin related to this article, located here. Add or improve to it if needed. --General Insineratehymn 23:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Who left the unsigned "against" vote in the #3 slot?--Mr.Vib 13:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 13 Norse sports newscasters

1. Well, Kalir nommed one of mine, so now I've found one of his that I liked that I thought was worth a for.--<<>> 04:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
2. That good, eh? Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 04:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For: As someone who liked the original game, the sportsdesk picture really sells it, and the article itself delivers it. I, for one, welcome our Norse overlords. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 08:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For, dudes. -- Hindleyite Converse 10:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. --Emmzee 15:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
6. yes Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 19:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Kind of random but very funny nonetheless--Dr. Fenwick 00:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For the vikings. -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 17:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Weak for The picture put me over the edge.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
10. By Thor! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Strong For, those pictures are awesome. We should totally feature them or something. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. -- Mitch 16:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For! I deserve extra credit for fixing ZB's spelling errors. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For I liek much. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 16:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

1. against Great Video Game: Shitty Article --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against I like the concept, but there are changes that need to be made. With such a random connection (video games Vikings turned newscasters), a better segue is needed. I'd help, as Kalir suggested, but I don't know anything about the game. Sorry bro. --THINKER 18:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Keep in mind, I've yet to get an article to featured status, so if you could provide good advice, you can get a hippie when you bring the article back down to earth. Also, I'll be thankful. And everyone loves a happy Kalir. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 05:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

The Steve Johnsenson against wave (and its numerous references to feces) leads me to believe that little constructive input will be offered. --THINKER 05:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah. Well, the request still stands, but thanks. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I have concluded that the conclusion needs to be more effectively concluded, otherwise voters will conclude that an Against vote is needed to conclude this VFH section. So, yeah, I beefed up the end. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 19:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

My issue is more with the leap from being vikings, to being vikings at the super bowl, to being viking behind a newscasters desk. The intro is like 4 sentences; for people who don't know whats up, well... they wont know whats up now will they? --THINKER 20:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah. I do that sometimes... If you want, you can take a crack at fixing it. It is a wiki after all. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 22:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I'd help, as Kalir suggested, but I don't know anything about the game. Sorry bro. I'm not equipped for such a task. --THINKER 01:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 Times being gently tapped on the shoulder by the universe

1. The Hittites made OEJ write that one. Aye. ~ 21:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For Rogpyvbc 23:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig Keep your tusks away from the goods, mastodon.. --THINKER 03:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For Finally I know what's happening when I wake up with a giant dead mackeral on my head. I guess I should apologize to my brother . . . -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
5. -L 05:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For--Dr. Fenwick 22:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. -- Mitch 12:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For This is really good. The Oblong Lobster 14:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Sorry, maybe this is due lack of Ritalin but it made me lose attention after I bumped into the first anachronism (Windows). -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 20:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11.5 painted-on Powerpoint slides

1. Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. This generation's Waiting for Godot? Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Could've sworn Mandaliet wrote this one from the corporate drone's parts... Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 15:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
4. DIG I thought the same thing as ENeGMA. Brilliant! :) --THINKER 18:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
5. YEs I really like this kind of thing. The Oblong Lobster 23:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
6. -- 20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Brilliant -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
9. ForInfiniteMonkey
10. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For Suicide looms... lol 134.226.1.229 19:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. Nothing like corporate asses dying inside...or something like that. --Mr.Vib 18:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Heeheehee... I am laughing... --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 07:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For Loved it! <3 ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:08, 02 June 2007

1. Not bad, I chuckled at parts but definitely not featured article material. ennui2778 dif
2. Naaah--Sir Shandon 06:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Sucks Ass --Steve Johnsenson 04:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 9 Dragon Dung masters

1. Brad made me do it. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 02:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. I did not. Also, for.--<<>> 02:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. You did too. Probably. Maybe. I wasn't there. Also, for. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Hi YA! I vote for articre now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Dig --THINKER 01:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Hai. --Emmzee 13:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For...All right, Brad: after a day or two of letting this percolate in voting, I've concluded this is better than most.--Sir Shandon 10:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For- Not sure why I like this show but I do so yeah....--Dr. Fenwick 22:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- Mitch 12:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

1. no, no, no! where is the humor? --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11 reimagined John Hughes movies

1. nom and for : This is one of the funniest articles I've ever read --Uncle J 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. Maybe one day I'll watch the movie. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For, because I like dead baby jokes. Or really anything involving baby jokes. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. --Emmzee 22:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
6. --L 03:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Dig in the words of the wise Rafiki; "change, is good." Much better updated. --THINKER 11:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Change of heart (again). Change at the end makes it more complete. I like it. --Mr.Vib 12:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Mmmmm...okay--THE 13:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Sure Me likely. --Dexter111344 02:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Dr. Fenwick 02:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For--Will Tomlinson —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HamishTheSecond (talk • contribs) dif
13. For /titter ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:24, 02 June 2007

1. strong against Fine if you enjoy feces consumption --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Iffy Against While it's funny, it's mainly a quote and lacks any sort of mock tone that would put it over the top for me. Call me crazy. Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against per Mr. Vib --THINKER 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against. Who gives a crap? -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Okay, okay, I fleshed out the text and dropped the "this reporter" bit. I didn't wanna, but I am bowing to peer pressure for the greater good of Uncyclopedia. Jeez, the things I do for this website... Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14 animo acids

1. Nom+for. Oh comon, even you have to admit this take on anime led to some great chemsisty.--<<>> 22:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For Very nice <insert obligatory Borat joke here>-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong For, even though it's just begging to be IP raped. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Self-for. I've been working on this on and off for almost two months now, and I'm flattered to see that it was nominated so quickly! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. All praises to anime, although I got the feeling the idea was somehow stolen from me... --The Dit 07:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
6. -- 20:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. Very clever. --Andorin Kato 20:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For I've seen the article before, and trust me, this is a vast improvement. I think it should get a full protect after (if) is gets to the front page though. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 15:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Dr. Fenwick 20:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For cool. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Very for, especially with the choice of chemical formula. --Imber 18:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Very Strong For. This is an amazing improvement over the original article. Finally, one that doesn't say anime fans are [insert insult here]. That in itself deserves a feature, if even just to keep it that way. I really do like the chemistry, though, very original! -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For. Nice work chaps. His Grace, the Duke 11:37, May 24 2007 (BST)
16. every time this article has come back from being nuked it has sucked. this is an exception, in fact, it is very good, so for --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
17. Yes sir, thank you sir. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
18. Very For: Funny, irreverent, goes in a direction you don't expect it to, and isn't either "omg anime r00lz u all" or "omg anime sux0rz u suk". The sort of thing you could confuse with a "real" article for a few minutes. Excellent indeed. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
19. For Brilliant idea! Ethereal 10:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
20. Strong For - Nice!--Gaberou 15:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
21. For Love the concept, and I especially love the thought of all the little anime fanboys clicking this link from the front page and getting all het up about it. >:D ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:15, 02 June 2007
22. For Cripes! An anime article that a) Is actually really funny, b) Is actually clever and not just a parody of the anime, and c) Isn't necessarily hated by everyone who hates anime. This is truly quite a monumental event! Although this page does still need protection.

1. Excrement-I tasted bile in the back of my throat --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. -~ 12:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against per UF in the Pee Review: Excellent concept, could be funnier (still). --THINKER 18:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Halfhearted Against. Not good, but not terrible. Just boring. --Emmzee 01:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Against Sorry, this is well written but I just don't get the overall point. The Oblong Lobster 14:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Against. Overall quite bland. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}
7. Sorry--Leoispotter

• @Jedravent: Is that supposed to be ironic, or is it a mistake? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Mistake. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• I agree with the person above that this article definitely needs a full protect. -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Needs a full protect. Maybe even if it doesn't make it to the front page. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 17.5 blobs of Sponk

1. Nom & For - Made me laugh, definitely a quality article... not to mention the highly unique writing style -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 02:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For - Blah blah blah - It's gneomI 02:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
4. --L 07:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Definitely worth it! Very funny. --JewBoy 14:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For. -- Mitch 15:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For- Ihave to admit I was afraid I wans't going to like it, but who can dislike quality sperm jokes?--Gaberou 20:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Very nice -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Yes - Made me spunk! The Oblong Lobster 17:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Why didn't i vote for on this before? I mean i read it, then forgot to vote. --Emmzee 23:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Fro --THE 20:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For -- 131.170.90.2 01:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For. Remembers me of the last chapter of "Everything you blahblah about sex blahblah afraid to ask". -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 20:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
14. A spunky attempt at a subject matter that could be a real handful. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 22:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For —Braydie 21:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
16. Yep. Funny stuff. Slightly disturbing with the pictures, but funny.--Mr.Vib 13:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
17. Change o' Heart What was I thinking?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For Well, I proofread it, I should know ;P ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:00, 02 June 2007

1. Snore--Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Sorry But this one doesn't do it for me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

• I decided to be italic, and transformed the Sperm article into this. --L 07:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 15 humorous brain-shaped hats

1. Self nom & For A brilliant idea by El Zoof, expanded and rewritten by yrs. truly --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Approved. -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For. Well, what the hell did you expect? I merely laid the corpse out on the slab, it was Cap'n Ben who attached the electrodes and sent it lumbering towards the Village People. --El Zoof 05:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For It should be featured without a doubt. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Oh my god, this is brilliant. For. --Emmzee 13:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig very good stuff --THINKER 18:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
7. EAT THAT! - I would say yes. The Oblong Lobster 22:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For. Devilishly brilliant. Near-perfect comedy. YouFang 01:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- Mitch 13:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For The White House Brain Roll sealed the deal. Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. ~ 13:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Feb 14. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 18:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Don alun 11:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For Took me too long to get to this baby.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For Two thumbs up...well ok one used to be a toe, but you get the idea ;) ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:58, 02 June 2007
16. For. I liked this when it was on Pee, and I still like it a lot. ----OEJ 00:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

1. not --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. I was going to nominate it myself around Valentine's Day, but if y'all think it's ready now, okay. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Would be perfect for Valentine's Day. But that's a while off.The Oblong Lobster 22:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I had originally intended it to be released before Valentine's Day in the hope that it got picked up as front-page material for that day... but then I got stuck and ran away and hid from the article. Thanks once again to Cap'n Ben for rescuing it. --El Zoof 21:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe the admins should put this article on hold after the vote and then feature it on Valentine's Frankenstein's Day? Kip the Dip 02:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11 Cro-Magnon poets

1. For. Quasi that made me laugh. --He's a radical rat! ^{(Talk page!/Contribs)}
2. Onka-Bonka! -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 16:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Article good for brain. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Still for, although most of it is over my head. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak for. It's hilarious, I laughed out loud at "Ug no able record CSI: Miami," but it's a little too short... but funny enough to compensate. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
6. --L 10:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Self-for. --Emmzee 00:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Dig but Ug digress --THINKER 20:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Fug, even though I voted Agug last time -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Featured article good. --General Insineratehymn 02:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Abstinence Lifted Good luck.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 20:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For. goshzillacorrespondence 02:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

1. crap--Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Lovely article, but I think MO's article did the caveman thing better. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:23, 14 May 2007
2. nope, nope, nope. not funny, semi-duplicate article and vote-whoring on irc is a great way to seal your fate. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
3. *sigh* I'm sorry. Against. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain because I think that two caveman themed articles so near each other is uncool. Really good though. Will renom at an unspecified date.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment... So? We had two communist articles in a row, and all that happened was that it got added to Worst 100 Reflections on 2007. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Hey, it's just my rationale for abstinence. Not attempting to convince anyone one way or the other. And plus, why knowingly get added to something with worst in the title.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Just vote already. Gol-dang kids with your highfalootin' words like "rationale" and "or". Pah! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Peh, you curmudgeonly old fogies with your incomprehension of words such as or. I like the article, but my will remains firm. You know what else is firm? Ironing boards.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright, my will is less firm than I originally made it out to be. Sue me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11.5 Ancient Chinese Secrets

1. Self Nom + For because I like this article of mine. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 04:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig ..and to think it was on VFD not to long ago.. Great overhaul! --THINKER 04:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For It's better to vote for now than for later, in bed.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For I've been watching this article since way before the vfd, it's completely different now and I think it's finally pretty good.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For Splendid.--Dr. Fenwick 19:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For. Revenge vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 16:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For, since the damn pic has been fixed --Sir Shandon 15:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
9. a-FOR-ism. The pic is fantastic. Oh, and the writing's good too. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For, a charming article. A LOL, indeed. --63.24.61.167 22:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. --Emmzee 13:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For --User:Pwner Ganondorf 17:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Confucious say:This article will be featured. Lucky letters are:S, T, F, U. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines

1. shit sandwich --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against...if that image is fixed I might change my vote.--Sir Shandon 17:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Note: I fixed the odd edges of the fortune cookie  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

The image is strangely assembled from four parts, however, when you press refresh theres a new fortune! its the only good part of the old article. cept maybe "how to be hysterical." Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 22:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Not funny. --So So 06:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against. Unsuccessfully straddles the line between quasi-historical and somethingelse. It might work better to pick one and run with it. Run! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

• I'm gonna think on my vote for a while. I've been pretty ruthless tonight thus far, and the turn around in this article from its stint on VFD (which can't have been much more than a week ago) is enormous, but sadly it still fails to hit that secret spot for me. The funny spot, not the other one...pervert! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:30, 13 May 2007

• Thinker...Ummm VFD? So was this up for deletion lolz?--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  09:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Not this version of it no. Extensive work has been done to it since it was on VFD. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:32, 14 May 2007

• Aw is it like that? Didn't do too bad, and the comparison is pretty steep.. The cookie is cool? Who can say...
  But, Leatherbound hasn't answered my call for Ups or downs, so whatev... :) --THINKER 09:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Good luck Leatherboundbooks. It's pretty darn near impossible to get Ceridwyn's vote, apparently.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Not at all. I've voted for plenty of good quality articles. Just the recent batch don't quite hit the mark for me. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:17, 13 May 2007

• Well, considering I put it up for VFD because it was under the wrong name and was a completely different and terrible article, think of them as seperate entities. (Do it for the random fortune fortune cookie, if only the random fortune fortune cookie) Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 13:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 18 drunk hosts

Featured —rc (t) 04:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Self-nom + For Got a 48.26758 on Pee Review.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Spiteful For. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig Stayin' aliiii-iiii-iiiIIiiii-iiiive!! --THINKER 21:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
4. F☭R 09:42, 31 May 2007
5. For --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For --Leoispotter
8. For I panicked and rushed to put this up in time.--Gaberou 00:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Jfhvb 13:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Very funny. --Hell0ihateyou 14:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}
12. For -- 20:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For--Dr. Fenwick 20:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Four!!!. Spatz  [Speak.]. 21:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For --Hrodulf 02:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For - I generally don't like HowTo's, but this is one of the best I've read. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For Eh, sure. What the hell so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 16:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
19. Rar. --Jack Phoenix _(Contact) 17:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
20. For — H. Peebles - D - HS 20:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

1. i like the concept, it's a good article, but going about vote-whoring is a good way for people to not like you. that and it didn't really make me laugh --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Meh, some good lines, but doesn't do it for me. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)