Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 22: Line 22:
   
 
==[[Varg Vikernes]]==
 
==[[Varg Vikernes]]==
{{s|+1}}
+
{{s|+2}}
 
*self-'''nom''' and '''for'''. I don't self-nom lightly, but I'm really curious about this one. I'm specifically wondering if Black Metal will die as rapidly as ''other'' themes I've been known to write about... --[[User:Monika|monika]] 11:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 
*self-'''nom''' and '''for'''. I don't self-nom lightly, but I'm really curious about this one. I'm specifically wondering if Black Metal will die as rapidly as ''other'' themes I've been known to write about... --[[User:Monika|monika]] 11:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  +
*i was toying with the idea of writing a vikernes/burzum article, and then this appeared. i'm glad i never wrote the article myself, wouldn't've been shit on this {{User:Jack_mort/sig}} 00:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
   
 
==[[001]]==
 
==[[001]]==

Revision as of 00:08, November 23, 2006

  • Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (Button sig) above the edit box.
    • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
  • Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
  • Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
  • Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
  • If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION. If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.
Violators of this policy will be painted black.



Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

Epic Poem

Score: +1
  • Self-nom and for. The poem I used (Nibelungenlied) is in the free-use thingy, so it's all good.
  • For. you earned it - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 00:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Varg Vikernes

Score: +2
  • self-nom and for. I don't self-nom lightly, but I'm really curious about this one. I'm specifically wondering if Black Metal will die as rapidly as other themes I've been known to write about... --monika 11:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • i was toying with the idea of writing a vikernes/burzum article, and then this appeared. i'm glad i never wrote the article myself, wouldn't've been shit on this - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 00:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

001

Score: +7 pellets
  • Nom and for. I cackled like a loon. Curse you, Fundlebuggy! - David Gerard 13:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • 004. --L 17:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - after the first sentence. --Nydas 18:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. 15Mickey20 21:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Deeply weird.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Amazing!--Mr. Bob 04:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For daft, and that's a good thing.--no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 13:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • What? It's Fundlebuggy? Fine, give me the stamp -- For. No need to dilly-dally. (I did read it and found it very funny.)--Procopius 13:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Sorry Hardwick, but I just didn't feel the magic on this one. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Henchmen

Score: +7 thugs

Flying Gypsies

Score: +7 magnificent Romanys in their flying machines
Comment. Aw jeez, you voted for the wrong article, didn't you? --L 17:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Fundagelical Christianity

Score: +10 fruitless attempts at intercourse
  • Nom and for. So it's like this. I was clicking on the random page button and I happened to come across this delightful little wonder which, in my opinion, is quite a nice read. I liked it so much that I decided to nominate it. --General Insineratehymn 22:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A favourite of mine (who woulda thought, a fave of the user with the fundie fixation...).--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Man I'm such a whore. Such a sexy, sexy, whore. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Johnleemk 10:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I need to write this sort of thing some time - David Gerard 13:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --L 14:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. 15Mickey20 22:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 19:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 01:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For; the reason this article is so amazing is because it doesn't just satire Fundamental Christianity, but it also skewers the stupidity of the guy narrating it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Shabalov Vs Areshchenko

Score: +3 pawns to K4
  • Self Nom and For. --Winstanley1 00:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - now I want one written up like a Guardian Online cricket commentary - David Gerard 01:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Nope. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For.If just to boost the genre. --Vosnul 07:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Conditional For. On condition that SOTM gives it a thorough editing. --L 14:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against... I did some massive editing for Winstaley1's Politician article, but this stuff needs to be taken care of before an article makes it to VFH — particularly when it's by self-nomination. ~ T. (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 15:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, to prevent drivel like "The Putz" from being featured again. Goshzilla 17:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, "The Putz" was featured ???? BBQ!? --Vosnul 21:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment- What was I gonna say...? Oh yeah...BITE ME. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • for. real good. bits remind me of stare-out championship from Big Train - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 01:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Geocaching

Score: +5 Invaded Micronations

The Free World

Score: +11
  • Nomination & For. I love a bit of economic satire, and Fred MacMurray, and Hardwick delivers both with this one. ~ T. (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, of course, considering a large chunk of this was written by me. But Hardwick spruced it up and annahilated the crud. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Sort of reminds me of American Dream, only slighly more funny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For I nearly nominated this at the time. Even better now - David Gerard 00:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --~ Tophatsig 00:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --So So 01:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Breaking the chain! -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Uh oh, do I sense another bitchfight in the making? --Sir Jam 11:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Really enjoyed reading this one. Well-written and not limping on just one joke. --Dutchy 11:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Bingo-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 11:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 07:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. I love this place! --L 13:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Zyrac 20:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. It's good and I like the direction you went with it, but it doesn't feel like VFH-Hardwick stuff. Also, I went off my meds and am not sure what my name is or where I'm at. --66.166.249.66 20:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. That game always was a joke. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 07:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 15:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • for - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 00:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Lemony Snicket

Score: +7 Users who tearfully regret having read this article
  • Recent rewrite by Squiggle, and it's funny even if you haven't read ASoUE. Nom and For, although it would be funnier if it were nommed for VFD. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • A depressing, putrid For. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. (I have not read the series)--Winston 12:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Which here means "I show approval of this article"--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 14:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --~ Tophatsig 21:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Which here means "I am a pompus balloon." --Sir Zombiebaron 23:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Saw this under construction and liked it then. For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 00:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I've not read the books, but I'm familiar with the writing style...and I find it annoying. It's not a bad article, but it's not an article I enjoyed reading. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Still for him for WOTM though. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR Nice! (and he paid me off in IRC~ :b --CchristianTehWazzit 04:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, which in this context means "Not totally opposed to, since it wasn't a bad article at all but left me feeling empty, not unlike a warm apple pie that you want to eat so badly and you find out that it's not for you but for your mother's neighbor." A definite support. ~ PHDrillSergeant...§ 04:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, not a bad article, nice job. RWG 01:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Now that's some good shite. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 01:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong, Strong, Uberstrong For - This article is so sexy, lyke, OMG OMG OMG OMG!! Kthnxbai. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Very Much AGAINST. Ugh! unsigned. ~ T. (talk) 22:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. It starts off good, but the rest just fills me with meh-ity. The picture captions are good though. --Anyone 20:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I like the movie and the parts of the books I read were interesting. --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 23:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • against. I know nothing of the books or films so this probably just went over my head, but i was bemused and didn't laugh - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 00:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For "I am more suave than him as well." Comedic gold. Alksub 08:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Googlewhack

Score: +12 times caught googlewhacking by your parents
  • Nom & for - If you vote for it, I promise you'll never have to look at it again. I promise. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Now remember — you've promised. ~ T. (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For As soon as I hit submit, I'm clicking that link again just to see if you're right emc! --Sir Zombiebaron 01:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, only if EMC keeps his word. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 22:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Great article, but a disturbing image 0_o. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • "Uncyclopedia Admin votes Against another quality article at VFH," but that was predictable in this case.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Nope. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The Ed. notes make it great. Goshzilla 12:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

***Weak for. I read the WP article, and the Dave Gorman references are mildly funny now. Also, Mhaille did some Republican-esque lobbying. Unsigned vote. Please fix this, Goshzilla, and quit changing your mind. ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 23:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

__15px-RedPhone.jpg____15px-SigCommunist.pngсоединяйтесь!15px-SigCommunist.png


Confession (Catholicism)

Score: +11 Hail Marys
  • Nominate and For.--Winstanley1 15:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For-As a catholic I find this to be quite entertaining.--Gaberou 00:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Fucking hilarious.--Emmzee 02:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Surprisingly For. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain Well-written in general, but not terribly funny or particularly original, in my opinion. ---- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Upon further consideration, Weak Against. Sorry. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Got out? Once a Catholic, always a Catholic, brother. --UtarEmpire 10:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
La la la la la I can't hear you -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 10:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh yeah, being Catholic is great. You get the Jewish guilt without the Protestant work ethic.

-- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 10:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey! Maybe we should convert you and call you Sir Armandel Levy Icons-flag-au -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 21:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hmmm... I'll get to upend all those spunky, gun-toting Daughters of Abraham, right? And I get to stay, um, intact? -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 10:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For flour-sacks of cocaine. --Anyone 16:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I liked it so much I helped out with it. And it's all true! -- Hindleyite 18:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
*For HA HA HA HA HA HA --Mrs-Bertram-Keg-water 20:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
*For made me laugh. --BAN:THIS:FILTH! 10:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
*For--GCWINN 14:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Sticks way too close to the facts. Not that Confession isn't an absurd and possibly hilarious topic to write an article about, but this just seems to not really say anything. It's very topical, I guess. I don't know, I just didn't enjoy it much. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Not so much for the article, but for the pictures (for some reason; don't ask). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 04:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against per Squiggle. Well-written, but only the captions amused me.--Procopius 13:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: This has been heavily re-written if anyone wants to reconsider their vote.--Winstanley1 17:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Sir Bungle 18:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Pissed Myself. Ooops.--The velcrow THING 19:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Catch 22 11:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Billybobjoel 13:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Winston 12:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
*For. --The meddling monk 13:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Smell a Bit Like Fish

Score: +15.5 inspirational odors
  • SNom+F Why not. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 20:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For everything about it, even the title, has a charming and hilarious quirk to it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'd say I always wanted to know how to smell like a fish, but I haven't, and furthermore; still don't. All the same, good show chap! And damn you Squiggle for conflicting my edit! --Anyone 21:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Almost makes me want to smell like fish. 15Mickey20 22:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Sheer brilliance. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For InfiniteMonkey 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Leneface 10:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strongest Possible For. Another feature for STM? What else is new? -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 12:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. My ladies like me in haddock. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 08:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 09:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Not that funny or enjoyable, especially compared to the other options.--MrMetalFLower 10:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Pretty funny. Tanktunker30px-Sucrose_b.gif Take heed, this user may or may not be naked and/or insane.
  • For. What? I've mounted myself on a wall already! "Don't worry. Be happy. Woo-hoo-hoo...." -- The Colonel (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Almost -- it's well-written, and I did enjoy the dialogue, but I guess I have a hard time buying into the premise. (Yes, I know how silly that sounds.) Sorry.--Procopius 20:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • weak Against Well written but lacking--Catch 22 11:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For ^_^ SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 18:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against.--Winston 12:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For. The title alone was worth it, but I read the whole thing and loved it. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For aquatic body odour - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 00:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Be a hipster

Score: +11 copies of Joy Division's third album

Just Self-nom for now. I put this sucker on Pee Review a while ago and forgot about it, and I still think the article's funny, but I'm holding off on actually voting until I'm certain that I'm not deluding myself. --Kwakerjak 05:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

  • For - it's a good one. Also entirely comprehensible to a UK audience - like everything in pop music, the UK invented these people - David Gerard 08:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For because, by most standards, I am one, and it's bloody hilarious. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because it is a hilarious satire of the silly culture which I am part of. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) Icons-flag-ie-Icons-flag-us KUN SEXY WH 23:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, so apparently it is good. For. --Kwakerjak 23:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For It's just what Kurt would have wanted. --Sir Zombiebaron 23:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Good, but feels like stuff that's been done before. --Anyone 15:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • As a fan who has purchased Belle & Sebastian, Gil Scott-Heron, and Sigur Rós CDs I am obliged to vote for. Also, it's what Kurt would have wanted. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 08:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Fucking hipsters... man I wish I was that cool. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. There was a time when Everclear was considered a hip band. No, seriously.--Procopius 13:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Nice.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For The skewer of college radio is a nice touch.--The One and Only Czar Yah 00:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • for. funny and accurate, real accurate - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 00:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Total Fucking Asshole Server 2006

Score: +17 staplers ruthlessly stolen
  • Nom and strong for. Totally fucking hilarious.--Procopius 00:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For This "ENeMA" is a very funny and strange character. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Very funny Prolix 02:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 03:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 04:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Aye ---no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 10:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. One cool thing about this article is that it looks heaps like the joke I made on IRC when I was banned as a misconfigured human proxy. The first two paragraphs are excellent, but the rest just doesn't cut it. -- The Colonel (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I got the idea off of an IRC discussion. I may have stolen it from you. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:55, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - anyone who's used Windows will understand this is just the next logical step - David Gerard 11:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I actually think the first 2 paragraphs arn't that great, but the rest is awesome, especially the dialogues. --Anyone 21:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I think one of these handles my email. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I give this Fucking Asshole System a For (oh for). --UtarEmpire 11:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I like expletives and the featured articles page is sorely lacking in them. Fuck, fuck, fuck.-- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For.InfiniteMonkey 09:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I made a grave mistake - I read it during a business meeting and nearly collapsed laughing. For. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 14:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Super stuff. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 07:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, the talk between the servers is hilarious. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 09:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Winston 12:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I like. Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 23:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For "Your paper is significantly lacking in ethnic slurs. I'll go right on ahead and add some for you, kike." What more can one man say? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Loved it; ruthlessly demeaning crap like this is funny. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Hell Yeah Its come far from a spur-off-the-moment IRC discussion--The One and Only Czar Yah 00:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • for - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 23:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Life's Unanswerable Questions

Score: +15 unanswerable questions
  • Nom and For. Accessible, clever and LOL - David Gerard 14:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • One must first contemplate the options. If pushed, I would say yes, but then I was the author. -- Hindleyite 14:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • for, still room for expansion though - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 15:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Mild against. It feels like it's missing something somewhere.--Winston 15:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
    Well, one thing it's missing is the "Overly British" template. Either that, or section for the unanswerable question "What the fuck is so great about EastEnders that the Brits won't shut up about it?" --Kwakerjak 22:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
    Just answered for you - David Gerard 08:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Well done. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Wow that's hilarious! Lt. Wyoming 08:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For A towering work of the human intellect. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Looks like it's been edited by like 10 people, none of whom are sure what they want to write about. This subject could be done a lot better if it were more coherent. --So So 01:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, either this is too British, or it just isn't for me. Either way, I didn't really laugh.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. Hard to understand at times due to it's overly Britishness. Then again, any British at all is overly British. You guys put the UK in Fcuk! Still good though even though I don't get all of it, because I was born in the US and A like God intended. --Anyone 21:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Hilariously enough, this external link is actually funnier than the article itself. Also, Abstain. --L 06:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against as per Bradphraser, mostly.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. And a general request: please, for the love of god, stop writing LOL!!! I'm feeling like we're becoming ED. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 15:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. LOL. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yah!   Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN  Eh?  Oh!  UnTunes! CannabagreenI Card-spades-up my cat! 13:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's British, but I have PBS. And the Guardian on my web browser. As for Eastenders, the appeal is lost on me, but I'm sure the English find Americans' love of Seinfeld baffling.--Procopius 20:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. lawl. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Death and God! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Even if it is overly British (which would be immaterial to me anyway), the "Did you threaten to overrule him?" reference makes it completely worthwile alone. --Sir Jam 11:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For the whore I adore greatly admire. ~ T. (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Hani 18:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Philosophy=good. British humour=good. Hindleyite's wiriting=good.--The One and Only Czar Yah 22:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

U.S. Presidential Election, 1960

Score: +12 jowly Republicans
  • Nom & for - I really liked this one. American politics are always funny. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. gets my vote! *suicide* - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --L 03:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Kwakerjak has found his medium. The real challenge will be the U.S. Presidential Election of 1904, the dullest of all time.--Procopius 03:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Do I intend to write/rewrite articles for all the presidential campaigns? I don't know. Maybe. --Kwakerjak 04:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I'm looking forward to having these on the front page during Kwanzaa.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 20:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For that damned dead Dick Nixon. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Belatedly. Been meaning to read this for ages. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 01:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For; I hadn't voted? Bleeaargh! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Argos

Score: +18
  • Self-nom and for. I'm not a big self-nommer, but I really enjoyed writing this and it seems, on the evidence of Pee Review, a few others also quite liked it. -- Hindleyite 14:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For ~ I've been to an Argos, but it had a different name for some reason. ~ T. (talk) 14:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For A fine example of an article where having no fucking clue about the subject matter still left it with some jokes. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For So good, so good, and so true - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. And how about doing one on Iceland (supermarket)? -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 02:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Winston 15:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against... too obscure...or am I just stupid? -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
It's probably more British than obscure. Scores of millions of Brits, millions of norteamericanos and hundreds of thousands of Aussies know it. Think of it as a really bizarre kind of Pommy Wal-Mart if you will. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 01:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
What, they don't have Argos in other countries? Just pretend it reads 'some cruddy American catalogue company' instead of 'Argos'. :) -- Hindleyite 11:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Some damned kookey article about some Brit shithole. I'll vote for it out of pity, but write about something all American next time, you goddam commie rat bastard... --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 19:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't know what the hell this article is about, or what an Argos is, or if it even exists. I'm even questioning whether Hindleyite was cognescent when he wrote this. Funny stuff though. For. --Anyone 20:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, although, frankly, it's just not British enough. Oh, you could see my tongue in my cheek? Dang. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I felt more detail was needed on the mysterious beings that lurk behind the scenes at Argos, so I added some and now I can vote for in good conscience. 15Mickey20 21:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, maybe my changes weren't that great, but having been to Argos, I still think it needs something about the mysterious backroom happenings (or maybe I just have an old Jasper Carrott stand-up bit stuck in my head). 15Mickey20 18:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For because Americans need to know these things. --Zyrac 19:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • This bloody pen isn't working properly......bugger. For -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 20:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For America's overseas friends allies acquaintances.--Procopius 20:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For; read this a while ago, lolled, forgot to vote. Alas. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A fine catalogue of humour. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, this article is dealing with UK "culture"--—Braydie 19:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Hani 18:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For How did I miss voting for this? I loved it the first time I read it. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 21:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

UnBooks:The Complete Idiot's Guide To Talking To Women

Score: +17.5 stupid thoughts

Nom & For - A lot of work went into this; one of the best UnBooks out there by far. Absolutely terrific. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Todd Lyons will never get laid. For--monika 05:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 09:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - The Blaque
  • For (?) ~ This just goes to show that after a over year here, I still have no idea which of my articles are funny, and which ones suck. Thanks for pointing this one out. ~ T. (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Agree with Monika. Todd Lyons is the only one who'll never get laid. -- mowgli 12:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. XD --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For. The Todd Lyons hit parade continues.--Procopius 13:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - --Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Funny, definitely. But you can find this kind of humor all over the place.
    "Speaking of all over the place, my wife/girlfriend/whatever is so fat that her ass..." ..Ah, forget it...
    --So So 15:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Hindleyite 15:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • against, don't hit me. it is funny, but it's an unbook not an article, it should be here UnBooks:Vote for Featured UnBook - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 19:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Llama-Llover 21:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Nintendorulez 22:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against unbooks are mediocre jokes in themed giftwrapping. + article much to close to the truth. Be off with you --Vosnul 23:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I must admit, the lack of any "Now really, what kind of question is that?" responses was odd. Although if one formed it that way, it may be out of the question already... --Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 03:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Seems good enough SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Winston 15:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- I helped it a little bit, and I think it's funny, so why not. LadySway1985 00:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Funny and useful. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. You saved my love life AND my marriage--I'll never get kicked in the balls again! Thanks T.! --Anyone 20:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Mrthejazz 23:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Definitely Against I didn't laugh at all, pretty weak. 24.94.19.107 00:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I think that it could make for a good satire on the stupidity of male attitudes to women, but it just seems to use those attitudes as props - and that stuff has been done before, sadly. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, as per SoSo & HF.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I would prefer there to be some more general advice mixed in, rather than just an endless procession of questions and answers. Well, not endless, but a procession nonetheless. 15Mickey20 21:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. It is funny, but mostly a collection of good jokes and not really "a great piece of writing".---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Viking 12:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak AgainstFunny but more of a list than an article.--Winstanley1 11:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For the love of a good woman. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 14:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because I could actually use this. I can't get past hooking up at parties. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For- Nice! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For- Amazing article props - Noradseven
  • For, it's funny enough as it is. Johnleemk 15:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Just against. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 09:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)



Gaydar

Score: +18 centipoofs on the Gaydar
  • nom and for. I thought this was pretty funny and the graphic is genius, and it's got the potential to be even better. For instance, there must be some kind of gaydar jamming system, right?InfiniteMonkey 23:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for -- I'll change my vote to For after I make a few touch-ups. Note to all: halt voting on this submission until I've fixed it up a bit (nothing serious; just some minor tunings). Or not. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm done, and for. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against. Short and no laughs. The pic is good though. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 23:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thanks :) --Huffers 02:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for. This is a funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Very Strong For. Not that it makes any difference, adding strength. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • A For so strong, its almost butch. I gave this one a good going over too. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for, nice and edgy, good content balance, great puns.. yeah funny !.--Vosnul 10:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Reluctant For. Ok, fine, I'll vote for this gay-themed article, but this is the last one I'm voting for for a while.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For in a ruggedly heterosexual manner - David Gerard 12:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I don't care for the article, but the Gaydiation image made me laugh... You should VFP that one! --Mindsunwound: (NS) Suppository Sickness Cher Hunt Here 2cents.PNG 20:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Sure. References to Buckyballs and that mysterious siren in Vanilla Sky secured my vote. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Indeed yes. After I had snorted out big laughter-chunks at the image, the rest of the article fell into place. Freemorpheme.gif 09:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The humor is obvious and deserves to be noticed.--SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 15:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For: funny, and made me pull out my old Palm to see if http://www.freewarepalm.com/mature/gaydardeluxe_v22a.shtml still worked. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 01:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Yesses.' Mostly for the Gaydiation picture. Dumitru 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • No thank you -Heh heh funny, but not enough for VFH. The picture is gold, though. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against IMO, it just doesn't have that classic burning sarcasm that some of my favorites have. --Atomsk.gif Kaizer the Bjorn takkun Takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 03:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For because it was started by a friend of mine --Huffers 20:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For but I'm not for Gay marriage for straight people. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 00:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Gaydiation. LOL --Savant13 21:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • sorta For takes a concept and runs with it but maybe wants trimming a bit. A little tumescent for my tastes. Pewpewpew 02:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Thetanmancan 03:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Gay. --So So 06:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agaynst. Not that funny. --Anyone 18:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Thuper For it'th tho, tho funny, and the imageth are jutht Fab-ulouth! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, mostly because of the "Jamming and Stealth" section. --Kwakerjak 00:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Fabulous. Simply Fabulous. --Legolasegb 18:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

*Close, but no cigar. I might change my mind, though. --Goshzilla 22:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    • Weak for. --Goshzilla 10:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Pick one or the other; you can't vote both ways.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

Inanimate Sponge

Score: +18.5

Featuredrc (t) 07:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Not really. I want to see how much I can get out of the ones in the past before I try the ones that haven't happened yet. --Kwakerjak 18:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Sponge-a-larious. Goshzilla 20:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yay. Because I feel like we don't use that word enough around here. --Anyone 20:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. We have much to learn from sponge(s). -- Imrealized ...hmm? 07:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Why do you yanks always vote for stupid individuals like George W. and this sponge? For. -- The Colonel (talk) 01:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 15:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This guy might have a fair chance of winning. Swordmaster 02:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Poo 69.221.72.72 06:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I had already voted for this, but a glitch in my voting machine made me vote for I maed a yuky doody instead.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 23:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Yay, it has my picture on it! Of course for. It's gneomI 08:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • for - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 00:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

The Bureaucracy Channel

Score: +18 TVs at work

Featuredrc (t) 05:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

*Against. Way too listy.--Kevin Bell 02:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment, um, yeah. It's a programming schedule. They're like that.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment - And unlike most lists, it gives some humorous explanations. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Ok, ok, its good now.--Kevin Bell 00:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 12:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. "While you were outsourced"...genius. --Anyone 14:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For I could see myself watching this.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 16:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against all lists. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    Sigh see my comment above. Again, sigh.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I love lists, me. Great lists. Very listy. Remarkably list-like. An almost erotic sense of listability. Where would we be without lists ... Listless!! arf arf. (One of my many list-related jokes- for others, refer to the list.). I HATE commas though. You just got away with those. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Great content, despite the messy format. (Tip: If you need an extra level of subheadings, try "==== ====". Don't use the main title markup "= =" in the article body - it's butt ugly.) -- The Colonel (talk) 17:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    MO fix. MO make funny words and pictures. MO not like formatting. MO king of jungle!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For.Put that on Skynet.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 03:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Where can I find form 12323XCHFOR/b? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 13:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 02:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Brilliant. Deliciously cruel sledge at the BBC, though Otis Redding deserves better -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 09:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Maybe you could parody more shows to fill in the "Tonight" schedule. Swordmaster 17:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Shades of Brazil in an article-sized dose that is remarkably non-listy. Yay! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 14:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Winston 13:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Johnleemk 10:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Pontius Pilot

Score: +22 crucified voters

Featuredrc (t) 07:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment. Mr Mayfair, was there a reason you deleted my vote? --Anyone 16:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It was probably just a mistake since Tom voted for several articles in one big edit. Yours got lost. I've restored it below. —rc (t) 16:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Ah, here here. All's well that ends as well as it started out, no weller or less well than before. Thanks. --Anyone 12:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It is too short, but what's there is so damn well thought out and put together I can't say no. --Anyone 14:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. If it's expanded etc etc... Freemorpheme.gif 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 10:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Humorous.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and Against people who vote down articles based solely on their length. —rc (t) 20:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and Against Anyone who votes down articles based solely on their length.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 05:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Boooo. That is all. --Anyone 12:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For short, funny, to the point. A proper joke. Pewpewpew 01:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because I'd rather see an article that is short and funny than one which gets padded out with unfunny extras for the sake of length. 15Mickey20 19:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and a nod of agreement to Mickey. --SolarEquinox Icons-flag-us Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 02:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. paradox's, I love that picture.--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 05:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against Although this article is very clever and quite funny, I can't vote for it because it's much too short to be featured. Great picture though. --Thetanmancan 03:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For--it's short and sweet, like most jokes should be. KappaDelta 01:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For an article with 80% less fat and 30% more sacrilege than other leading FA's!
    Research: USDA
    --So So 07:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I enjoyed this article very thoroughly--- Truly Yours, The Exalted One. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.30.42.178 (talk • contribs)
  • Unsigned, I need the diff for it to count. —rc (t) 07:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Good laughs --69.152.37.215 04:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Not that this needed someone else to vote for it. --Nakedman 00:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Gaberou 00:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It was far too short, and I dunno.. I didn't find it EXTRA-ORDINARILY funny. -- Lacey clicky 20:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It made me laugh. All I need.--Procopius 14:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For It's about time this article gets nominated.--65.27.212.74 01:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For I get it. --Sir Zombiebaron 03:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Biblical reference for the win. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 00:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

*For good article--Bagoballs 13:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC) told him on his talk page not to vote for articles that have been already been FA...-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 14:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Archives

Awards, Decorations and Honours
Awards2 Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
Ranks &
Honours
Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment
Potatochopper of the Month

Foolitzer Prize
Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year
RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners


Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · Uncyclopedia:Top 10 Articles of 2013 · Hall of Shame
Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer
Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions
Personal tools
projects