# Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

(Difference between revisions)

• Sign below an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
• Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
• Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be ignored, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or the "your signature with timestamp" button on the edit screen.
• You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
• When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
• Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
• Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE.

If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE. Violators of this policy will be SHOT.

Survivors will be given a DIGESTIVE BISCUIT.
Then we shoot them again.

# Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

## Patriotism

Score: +4
• Nom + For-Great collaboration on this rewrite--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 19:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ T. (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Haha I have a few of those awards. Severian 02:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Everybody loves Patriotism. Well, everyone but the Commies.-- 04:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

## Decapitation Disease

Score: +3

Self-nom and for. --Emmzee 14:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. Fine, have your funny article featured. SEE IF I CARE!!!!-- 14:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Aye, tis the awesome...-ness. Demonbob 22:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

## Special:Log/delete

Score: +2
• N+F: seeing that Main Page isn't going to make it... I think it's a hilarious example of comic relief, and I had much rejoincing when reading deletion... er, huffing summaries. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --OsirisX 08:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete!; the whole thing contains nothing but bad memories. --DW III 10:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I WILL go for this one, as the deletion log summaries are often some of the best quality work at the site. :p-- 14:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Actually, your self-deprecating edit summaries when you have difficulty typing an error-free message (like to RC, re: the new Yahoo! design) are quite amusing as well. :) ~ T. (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Glad to contribute ;)-- 17:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

## Obesity Fines

Score: +5
• Self Nomination and For - Pointless Background Info you're probably not interested in: I got the idea for this article when I got pulled over by a morbidly obese cop for doing 122.9km/h. I got a \$170 fine and 37 demerit points.....fags Enjoy. Das Boot 04:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, this is something we desperatly need in our ever increasing fat society. --OsirisX 08:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For--- Jaques Pirat IS NOT FRENCH! TP, F@H 11:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For but I also took the liberty of adding a section on George W. Bush's Obesity Tax program. Dame  12:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. Meh. I laughed at the picture at the top, though. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~14:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Change a lightbulb

Score: +7
• Awesome - I know that I'm only supposed to nominate one article but this one is hella funny, too. --Sparky2002b 01:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, the general populous was in need of an article like this. --OsirisX 08:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Doubleplusfor, made me laugh so hard I cried.--Emmzee 14:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Beautiful. Another winner.-- 14:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Anarchy on a bun. Swordmaster 16:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Oh Hell YES! ---Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes -20:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Dunno what I could have done without it! Demonbob 00:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Now that's what I'm talkin' 'bout! A quality article! --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~14:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Get Banned

Score: +3
• For- Every newbie should read this. --Sparky2002b 01:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Some suggestions cannot be done because the pages are protected. --Sbluen 03:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For ~ But only because it's mine, not because it should be featured. Every newbie should read it, though.  :) ~ T. (talk) 05:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I nommed this the first time, and it's only gotten better since then.-- 14:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Also for. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

## Last Tuesday

Score: +1
• Nominate and For - One of my personal favorites. Plenty of good stuff to find here. -- Sp1r1tofRad1o 22:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry, not doing it for me.-- 14:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. It's sort of funny.--Emmzee 22:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For What else am I supposed to say?(I started it) ;-)-Sgore 02:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Okay concept - needs more humour. Das Boot 08:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

## Handgun

Score: +4
• Nominate and For. A fine article. FreeMorpheme 18:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I was, however, the author. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 18:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against as puns are the lowest form of humour Modusoperandi 20:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I think that I've just been zinged. Colour me...apathetic... Modusoperandi 22:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. FEATURE! - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For its so basic, why hasn't it been done before? Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For!. Spang 22:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I knew what the joke was going to be before I even opened the article. 'Hand Grenade' was funnier and done first. --ENeGMA 20:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Good article Das Boot 05:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just isn't hitting me with the "funnae".-- 14:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good stuff.--Emmzee 22:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

## God 2.0

Score: -2
• Nominate and for a better God experience. --Legion 00:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I laughed a bit, lots of potential but isn't wiki enough. --Severian 01:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not quite there...--Winston 11:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. it won't get featured, the structure.... isn't, and there aren't even any pictures :| but it's still funny tho, wiki format it and add a couple pictures and it'll be fine. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not ready for prime time.-- 14:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against- No more God stuff....Das Boot 08:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I'm with Das Boot. It's just gotten old now. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~14:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

## Banana Skin Joke

Score: +12
• Nomination and For. A universally humorous gag. --Hindleyite Talk 11:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Long, but well done (and well-researched).-- 18:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --L 03:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because the apple skin joke just isn't as funny. --Captain Finding Nemo 04:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Flabius-Danner 17:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I need to vote for something and this article made me laugh.--The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a graffiti. 09:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 10:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I like it, but I feel it needs a little finessing. FreeMorpheme 20:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Don't mention it! In particular, I laughed, I cogitated...--HP talk 00:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Indifferent eh.... Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Really really very very good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - One of the classic scandals of all time. Great Setup. >> Sp1r1tofRad1o 21:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - I wrote it so I promote it. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 22:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

## Main Page

Score: +4
• Nomination and For, because it is a true work of art, that deserves to be seen on the main page. --ZB 04:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For! Marvelous. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is even better than the Featured Articles article.--Sbluen 05:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Always the nominee yet eternally doomed to second place, thus is the tragedy of the main page --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Fo- wait a second... You didn't put the {{VFH}} tag on the page! --L 09:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. This joke was hilarous when I first got here last summer. This joke is probably over a year old.-- 11:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Ultra-Strong-For - I actually nommed this about a month ago. Hopefully things will turn out differently this time. --User:Nintendorulez 15:21, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Too obvious. Let's at least try to make self-reference witty. --ENeGMA 18:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against as always. —rc (t) 20:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against and I'll be against the next time you nom it, just like I was last time. And the time before that. --KATIE!! 16:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against because it will destroy the fabric of space-time if this is featured. — 13:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against because it has been the 'featured article' since the dawn of Uncyc. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 13:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Change to For. Right, I can see how this might work now, and I agree with Spang. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 10:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against technically it's not an article, but a page. --Severian 15:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Technically, it's an article because it's in the main namespace. And technically, UnNews pages aren't articles, but they get featured occasionally. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Well I'll vote For for this, because I voted for Yahoo!, and this is the same bloody thing.It just consumed the main page. --Severian 15:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• I'm always For a good ol' paradox. --TKF 16:25, 15 May (UTC)
• For. We have to do this at least once. Same with VFH--Rataube 20:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Why not? Efitu (TW@) 21:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Don't mention it! In particular, Don't mention it! --HP talk 00:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. It may be obvious, but it's amusing and once it's featured it'll never have to be put back up here again. I imagine this'll keep happening until it is. Spang 04:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Oh, please. :P--Winston 11:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against The mainpage should be the featured article on, and only on, April 1 Modusoperandi 14:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I agree with spang; it's not a bad joke and once it's been featured people will stop nominating it :| - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 19:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

## Spoilers

Score: +4
• Nomination for - A little short, though. --L 07:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --OsirisX 10:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Some funny stuff.--Emmzee 13:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. A joke that's bounced around and been funny for a while, finally codified and presented in an easy-to-read form that'll completely spoil every M. Night Shakalaka movie you'll ever see.-- 14:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• for. --neko 18:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. *scowl*. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 19:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Because people may want to read some of the books whoes endings are spoiled. --ZB 01:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

## Invasion

Score: +6
• Nomination and For.--Emmzee 14:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against --Flabius-Danner 17:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• weak for. it's actualy not all that bad. --neko 17:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• This is cruel, tasteless, and a disgrace to the internet. For.-- 18:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, but I won't admit to it in a court of law --HP talk 18:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I was against this two weeks ago....check the history. --Severian 21:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --KATIE!! 00:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Mixed For. --L 11:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- 02:50, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Forrc (t) 20:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• It's an honour to be nominated! Self-for. -Conniption 09:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Crass but funny and well written; For. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 19:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

## Uncyclopedia is the worst

Score: +20
Comment ~ What about people that hate us even though they've copied our site? :) ~ T. (talk) 04:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
I love those!-- 14:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Uncyclopedia in a coconut. --OsirisX 06:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Sorry, not funny. Das Boot 06:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Said Yuri von Juan in a mighty resounding, God-like voice, having read this article yesterday and said on the talk page that it should be VFH-ed, but didn't do it himself. --The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a graffiti. 08:27 9 May 2006
• For. Junky junky junk, but quality junky junk. Plus I was an author of this. --Hindleyite Talk 10:06, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For yep, thats us -- 12:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR FOR FOR! Perfect. ~ 16:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nothing quite like self-depreciatory humor. Swordmaster 17:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Lenin & McCarthy 20:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hatehatehat. — 23:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Simply mahvolous. --Moogle.EXE 23:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Fory fory for! --EvilZak 00:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. dangerous, dribbling and probably Communist. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 17:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For— 06:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Four! Funny, and just random enough to be a classic. Unsigned vote. ~ T. (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Ya, ya ich liebe der bierworst!! --HP talk 18:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against ~ 20:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:Nintendorulez 22:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• HATE HATE HAT -- 22:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• That sounds like an against, yet your sig suggests for. Which is it? --User:Nintendorulez 15:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• You're an idiot. It's a For. -- 16:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because I hate kittens. Jayrod 06:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I believe it may hold the key to curing cancer. --Captain Finding Nemo 03:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because Uncyclopedia is junky junk junk! --Cctoide 13:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. I suggested its creation, but is it really funny for those who didn't read the original forum post?--Rataube 20:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Noooooo! (runs away screaming)--Winston 11:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against --Lordhed 17:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC) Not really that funny after the first sentence.
• For Uncyclopoedia is about making fun of everything, including Uncyclopedia. And this is one of the funnier ones. --Porsche 07:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For Hilarious.--Emmzee 14:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Cause some people take this kind of thing seriously...all the better for the rest of us -- Sp1r1tofRad1o 02:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• fOR The pinnacle of literary exfcelence. --Sbluen 06:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

## On a stick

Score: +18
• Nomination and For, a profound philosophy. --OsirisX 07:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, and I appreciate the nomination.  :) ~ T. (talk) 12:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• On behalf of all the pole twirlers who can't be here, I vote FOR Dame  14:39, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For my pole could stand a good twirl. --Severian 23:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Concept, content, perspective; Everything is grade A. --So So 03:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Concept, content, perspective; Everything looks better on a stick. ----Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-Great stuff--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 14:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Good concept, decent writing, very funny. --ENeGMA 21:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is indeed funny.-- 04:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good. Sort of the thing I've always thought about but never realized the humor of. Arzikl 06:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 07:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For on a stick. — 23:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. provided you add section 'the moon on a stick'. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 17:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - a cross between real crap and fond memories --HP talk 18:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I liked the "ice cream sliding off a stick" line. --L 06:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Funny, sometimes droll, somewhat disgusting. Excellent front page material. Get saved! 23:02, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For and its not just because Todd wrote it, either. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For because it's downright hilarious. --Rabid Jaguar 19:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

## Colossus of Barbie

Score: +14
• Nomination and For. Great article. 21:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I agree.-- 23:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, as the resident Egyptian Deity, this article pleases me. --OsirisX 00:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For and thanks ;-) Dame  00:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Coolie, Colossus of Ken doesn't even compare. --Severian 02:03, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Good idea, but it's a mess. For - Lenin & McCarthy 06:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-Absolutely Wonderful--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 13:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I didn't really think it was very funny. Amusing concept, but meh. --ENeGMA 21:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Very funny. Someone put a lot of good work into this. --Jester 00:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For but is it anatomically correct? --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Pissing Vinegar Puppy Luff 20:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 09:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. You can't go wrong with 2000 Kens.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 16:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For We need to highlight a feminist piece. Get saved! 03:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For  c • > •  04:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ T. (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Imrealized 17:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• I do --{{User:Suresh/sig}} 21:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against because of the image. (I voted against it on VFP, and I will do it again.) - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yes, the first of the seven uncyc wonders of the world. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Cause the idea of a giant barbie scares me. --ZB 16:47, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Darling love, vote on the merits of the article, not your fear of a twenty-foot Vulva on a Barbie giantess. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Because it could have a twenty-foot vulva if it really existed. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

## Segregation

Score: +12
• Nominate and For because PLS should dominate the clearly inferior non-PLS articles on the front page. (also it's a great article) --EvilZak 18:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Heh, this was going to be my next nomination but you beat me to it. —rc (t) 19:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For It's a good, funny idea, but it's a bit short. - Lenin & McCarthy 19:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Short but sweet, and PLS to beat Modusoperandi 19:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh, absolutely. I loved this one.-- 19:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For- I wish it was longer, but it's still great!--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for Its a great base, but it needs to explore what happens to the Pure white when something hot and red gets thrown in with them - the stain of miscoloration. FOR!Dame  00:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Okay, seeing the support for this article, I must now expand it to win over those wary of its shortness. Strong Rad 15:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Wow - very witty! --Jester 02:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Great - very me. --Witt E, 21:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Spin 23:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Not yet. Needs more work. Good start though.--Anon32 00:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For now that it's been improved.--Anon32 00:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against since it's hasn't actually been improved.--Anon32 00:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A good article, but I think a lot more could be written on this topic. Bloopy 08:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. A nice, meaty follow-up piece to Folding@home, but a little short. ~ T. (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Well written and clever in spots, but to me the overall concept is kind of cheesy. --So So 03:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. yé! - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

*For, funniest article i've read in a while. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Jack, I love you as much as the next guy, but only one for vote per article, please. :)-- 00:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• Strong, yet supple for. Some damned fine rightin', fer them's want to reed a funy artikel. LMSO, silently of course. Get saved! 04:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Sbluen 20:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

## Wolf

Score: +7
• Just crying wolf! here for I am the boy who cried wolf! --Carlb 00:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Ehhh... sure. But next time make the nomination a bit smoother, eh? --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 02:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. I LOVE EVERYTHING NOW!-- 03:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Warren Zevon is awesome.--Severian 04:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Greatness of a kind that gives paws for thought. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 15:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Yes. -Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes 30 April 2006
• Against. Fairy tale references in there too... Ugh. --So So 11:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Hilarious. The picture of the coyote alone is worth a VFH vote. --ENeGMA 21:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's just not really very funny to me.--Spin 22:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 08:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• ++For. well proper proper. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• weak Against meh... it's OK, but not funny enought for VFH IMHO Get saved! 15:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Sbluen 20:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --KATIE!! 01:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

## Oscar Mayer

Score: +14
• Nom and For more inuendo. -- 13:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• For (and thank you for nominating it). ~ T. (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Splendid. --Hobelhouse 18:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For this fine addition to the local meat market. --Carlb 00:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For all its meat-by-product wholesomeness(!). --DWIII OUN CUN 01:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Reminds me of sexual inuendo. No, not the article, I mean the thingy.-- 03:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For who would've ever thought mechanically separated chicken and assorted beef would be so sexy. --Severian 04:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. That first quote is a great prelude to an awesome article.--Witt E, 05:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 08:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Almost as good as Bouncy Castle. Dame  14:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Almost as good as Bouncy Castle. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 22:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny. --So So 10:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Is this a record for most unanimous votes so far? --User:Nintendorulez 19:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against No.-- 21:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gibberish but also good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Laughed my love handles off! Get saved! 15:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Yes, I am a scheme breaking asshole. -- 02:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For but I do wish it would have unlocked the mysteries of olive loaf for me. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

## Homeless Nerds

Score: +12.5

Nom and For. I found this to be quite funny. What do you people think?-- 18:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

• For and Comment: Could do with being expanded a little, but it's pretty good right now. — 18:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. 19:13, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Indeedy. --The Rt. Hon. 07:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• For ~ 17:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 14:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against Good initial concept, but needs work... --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Pissing Vinegar Puppy Luff 14:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Good compact stuff --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 19:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For I'm a bit biased 'cos I added a few lines. I think it's definitely featured article material but I agree it can also be improved substantially. For instance "thick-rimed" glasses? Pocket protectors is an outdated stereotype- I don't know if I've even seen anyone wear one(and I know plenty of nerds), or if you can even buy them anymore. --InfiniteMonkey 22:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• (For) It's funny because it's true. --KATIE!! 04:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• For --epynephrin 18:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. This one made me laugh a lot.--Witt E, 05:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's an ok article, doesn't have that thingy that takes it into hallowed VFH territory. I didn't get some references, probably because I'm an aging hippie <>s>old</s>. It could use something extra... Vienna Sausages, perhaps? -- Get saved! 15:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR because it is MINE ...01:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Spin 23:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For It's at least something original. Unlike that other one. I'm not even going to mention it. Don't make eye contact. Damn it, stop that.--24.183.61.204 03:55, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is funny, end of story. Did I mention it's funny?--Anon32 00:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• On second thought, the article needs more work. Weak Against.--Anon32 12:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Funny it is indeed. Arzikl 03:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Really very good, well written and funny. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

## Robot uprising

Score: +10
+ This one has a story behind it. It started out as Howto:Survive a Robot Uprising, but after consultation between Fasmine, Nytrospawn, and myself, it was merged here with my own material. Go and vote for, guys! --Hobelhouse 00:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Eh, whatever.  c • > •  00:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 06:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• For--Rataube 22:11, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 22:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 08:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For --Claudius Prime 18:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. Eh, not having Famine voting for all over this one makes this JUST good enough for a vote from me.-- 19:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Even if it is sadly lacking a Dalek contingency. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against Unoriginal and uninspired. 15:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I presume this vote is superseded by your later one... —rc (t) 04:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment They were intended to cancel out. 01:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Agin'. Not very funny, relies on the word "fuck" to save it's sorry ass. IMHO as a n00b. -- Get saved! 23:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. --— 21:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. sry :( -- 23:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For --The Rt. Hon. 10:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- 12:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Some very bright moments, but too uneven. A promising start to the end of humanity. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 14:22, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Splendid --Maggot infested testicles 13:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Google™ --TimeStopper 23:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against
1) Too much of a list
2) Contains the word "shit" in the firskt paragraph
3) A historical event that never took place is more like an UnNews -- Swami A. Suresh 06:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. It makes me laugh. Spang 23:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I have to say, I liked the original more. 21:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• For The most sterling piece of work I've seen in ages. And please not that Tompkins posted on opposites day. 03:20, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against Booo Das Boot 09:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• For - thedukeofnuke - 11:25, 19 April 2006 (GMT)
• Weak For. Before I change my mind. ~ 15:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against I think I already read this one, but it was a different article... wait... that would mean that this is unoriginal repetition of something that wasn't that funny in the first place... kinda like euroipods... --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Pissing Vinegar Puppy Luff 15:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Could a bit less list-oriented, but it's good enough to get some laughs from me. -Conniption 17:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against The book was better. Modusoperandi 04:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for Too long and awkward now for a strong vote. 01:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. yee - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. Yeah, I'm seeing some repetition and its a list, but it's still funny enough.--Witt E, 00:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against The how to guide is more concise --Nytrospawn 00:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

## John Cage

Score: +13

Nominate and Strong For - This is hysterical brilliance. It helps to know a little about Cage, but I think it'd be funny without that knowledge. Very well-written comedy. --Imrealized 07:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Silence... (Cough, cough.) ... ... ...For. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 07:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• 2+2 --Hubert Cumberdale 15:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIRM-A-TIVE --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• For, seeing as I wrote most of it. The only thing I know about John Cage is that he wrote 4'33", and that was enough to make it funny for me. --Spang 17:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Oh, and if you vote for, a keep in its VFD entry wouldn't go amiss. It won VFD. --Spang 23:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - nice addition to the composer pages :) --Lurgy 15:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Man, this guy WAS high on kittens...-- 18:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Amusing, and 4' 33" is my favorite song so I must vote yes! -- Get saved! 23:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I like to say 'exuberant' often, not just for effect, but as a real descriptor. This writing is clever and exuberant, and made me chuckle. Well done, I say, well done. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 15:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I actually own a copy of Piano Falling Down Five Flights of Stairs in A Minor and it is some of his best work! Triddle 00:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For - I've definietly heard 4'33" before. I haven't heard some of the others, but I was especially entertained by that section. --epynephrin 16:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Some good jokes (eg the extended dance remix of 4'33"), but it's quite badly written. Heaps of grammatical errors and sentences that don't make sense - including the first one of the article! -Conniption 10:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• 2 squared This really is brilliant... --Johnfn 20:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Amusing. — 00:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Couldn't you work in a Mortal Kombat Johnny Cage reference?--SLACK...ah ah...he'll save everyone of us! 02:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Because I'm awkward. ~ 15:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because it zings with harmonious counterpoint.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against This article had a LOT of natural potential, which was completely quashed by stupid kitten huffing references that had no relevance to the complete insanity of this already bfi person --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Pissing Vinegar Puppy Luff 15:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very good, affectionate, i didn't know who the fuck he was but it still made sense and ammused - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• FORE! Hilarious. I especially liked the part where the trumpets don't come in. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~ 16:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

--Hobelhouse 17:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)==Goa Tse==

Score: +12
• Nominate. Nice riff on what you may have thought was an exhausted meme - David Gerard 17:29, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Nein. The very word "goatse" causes me to vomit. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 17:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Did you read the actual article, Sikon, or are you just subscribing to the Do NOT click any links! philosophy?-- 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. This article is very, very well done. I just can't bring myself to vote for anything goatse-related for the front page. Especially after Yesterday...-- 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Also strong against. Rocky Mountain Oysters was bad enough, then sexual innuendo, can't we keep the front page SFW? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 20:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
"SFW?" "So Fucking What?" (yes, I know.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• For.— 23:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. --OsirisX 01:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. -- 01:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I'm too lazy to click on the article link and want to read it on the front page. Guinness2702 02:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It could use some more content. -- – Mahroww a.k.a.  08:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. So disgusting, so wrong. But I couldn't care less. 17:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Biased but For -- 17:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Enhanced by Mhaille - me too steps out of the closet. -- Swami A. Suresh 03:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For with a smirking grin. --KATIE!! 13:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For want pie now --Willy on wheels! 12:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• For the quotes alone are hilarious :) --Huffers 03:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Too deep for me. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• For YES! good. an original take on goatse that won't make you gag. --JackMort 12:45, 10 March 2006 (GMT)
• For. A Goatse on every computer in every school by 2007. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against - In what appears to be a sadly predictable trend for me. Even though the subject manner is handled cleverly, it's still one big anal sex joke at the end of the day. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 17:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak NEG-A-TIVE. I like this. I really do. It's smart, and I laughed. But I have to agree that the front page is starting to get too predictable in its display of crassness. I'm all for smutting it up, but too much of a good thing, and all that... maybe later. Yeah, definitely later. And no, not like that, you filthy bastards. I'm a trashcan. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. No Goatse!!!--Anon32 22:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• OH my fucking god, that is so disturbing! FOR! -- 04:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Subtle and funny: I like it. -- Get saved! 13:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Jump on the bandwagon. --The Rt. Hon. 19:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. This would require an NSFWArticle for it to be featured, and it would mean some workplaces could block Uncyclopedia from their servers. --Sir Velair Wight 04:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Very well written. Ethereal 08:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. I didn't want to like the page, but the quotes won me over. -Conniption 17:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• I haven't voted on this yet? What the hell? For. — 04:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's goatse. Period. Full stop. Whatever. ~ 15:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for I don't believe that this hasn't been featured -- Norwegian Kanaaääaäaalääaaaäaaää Attack! 10:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Although I support Yeah - votes - this one is double. -- Swami A. Suresh 23:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Indeed it is... —rc (t) 04:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For ancient chineese secret? I just wish that the title wasn't so offensive --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Pissing Vinegar Puppy Luff 15:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Wholistic combination of the sacred and the profane --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice,Nice --Severian 19:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Rataube 21:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. I don't know what a goatse is, I know it isn't very funny outside this site, and this article is funny enuogh that I don't need to know.--Witt E, 05:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. how long has this thing been on this list? Ant to Nintendorulez, calm it or i'll have the feature Euroipods again. --Anidn Needs Ignorant Dumbasses to Not Meaninglessly Exile him from InterNet MeetingrOoms MUN FC4 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 03:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against  c • > •  04:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 05:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Lenin & McCarthy 06:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• NO ~ 01:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. C'mon folks, it's not what you think. By the time I reached the "Great Works" section, I was laughing my ass off. Get over the title and read it. :) ~ T. (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I admit I was scared at first but this is frickin' hilarious.

## War on Humor

Score: +10.5
• Self-nomination and for. I may have waited too long to put this up for voting, but I still find the idea hilarious.-- 01:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I especially like the part starting with the Jains and ending with the Teletubbies.  c • > •  01:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Heh, yes, and I thank you for your help, Some User.-- 01:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Of Course. 01:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Not good enough for the front page.--Rataube 02:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. I added the Scientologists. - David Gerard 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• $\sum_{k=0}^1 \left(2k+1\right)$ 00:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - Because the above 4(For) is so damn hilarious to me (yes, I worked it out) --Olipro 21:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Two PG Tips thumbs up. --The Rt. Hon. 22:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against, it could be improved. Make it Unews, and make it like "A way on humor has been instated by the UN." -- 23:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good writing, funny, makes fun of religion... these are the reasons it smells good to me. -- Get saved! 13:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• For --71.213.200.43 23:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -Conniption 13:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Fore! I was amused, I do see potential for expansion, but I am inspired myself.--epynephrin 16:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For, as per the UnNews Heaven Jehovahs Wittness nomination. ~ 15:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I'm amused and the idea is there, and i especially like the pro-islam picture ^^ but could be expanded perhaps User:Sqsz/sig 13:42, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• AgainstFor Got a nifty template out of this one... --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Pissing Vinegar Puppy Luff 15:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For, even if it is biased of me. I added to it. --epynephrin 18:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against It had a documentary feel that wasn't funny to me per se --Severian 19:52, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very good. Proper uncyc topical satire, A+ - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I got bored in the first paragraph. Even if it's funny elsewhere in the article, a VFH article should make you laugh in the first paragraph. It's a good idea, though. Just needs a little work to be rewritten with a different approach. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~ 16:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

## Le Corbusier

Score: +11
• God I hate this guy. Nominate - David Gerard 14:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• Machine For Yes-Vote - -- c • > •  14:51, 21 January 2006 (UTC) (and I like the custom VFH tag, too - thanks David!)
• For I don't get most of it, but I can still see the humor here.--Bradaphraser 18:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• For. Never heard of him, but funny nonetheless. -- 23:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• Ask the so-called experts. The man responsible for modern architecture resembling dystopian sci-fi movies - David Gerard 21:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• I'm way too lazy to click that link... could you put it on the page for us uneducated losres?--Bradaphraser 01:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC) [Done - --Some user 02:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)]
• For -- Droopy 03:40, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Machines for voting. --Hobelhouse 00:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very funny. For those who don't know who he is, I think this line in Wikipedia sums it up: "Le Corbusier's theories were adopted by the builders of public housing in the United States. For the design of the buildings themselves, Le Corbusier said "by law, all buildings should be white" and criticized any effort at ornamentation." -- Rei 16:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. The end is a little too repetitive, a machine of repetition.--Rataube 21:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry but this isn't front page material.--Unissakävelijä 15:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. As rataube said the end's repetitive, and the rest of it is just too normal, not very twisted. 17:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For Had Corbu lived to read this, he would have dubbed it bourgeois, and thats good enough for me! Prettiestpretty 02:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Purrrrrr Had he lived to see this, it certainly would have killed him. Me like. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Nah. Been thinking about this one for some time now. ~ T. (talk) 02:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• There's no question, I'm For it. Wait, I do have a question... what the farth took me so long to read this bleak brilliance? Loved "openable windows". --Imrealized 09:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against -- Bloopy 07:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. -Conniption 12:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. ~ 16:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Right on the button --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 20:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. well written, quality, clever, but many of the jokes and touches will be lost on someone who doesn't already know about Corbusier - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• For --Severian 13:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• OK FFS - highlight this one now. Good subject, smart picture, a bit ranting but whatever. And the guy made Chandigarh. Think about that! --{{User:Suresh/sig}} 09:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Spencer (yiff) Cheer up! Hitler's still dead. 16:19, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For LMSO Get saved! 03:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I couldn't find it funny --Jester 15:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I take it this is US-centric "humor"? Not really front page stuff for me.... -- 12:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Actually, no... he was European. --207.64.85.1 18:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Eh, same thing, really.-- 02:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment So he is......still not for me though....sorry... -- 08:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

# Previously Featured

## HowTo:Avoid speeding tickets/fines

Score: +19

Featuredrc (t) 02:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• Self-nom and For. Can a HowTo be featured? --Hindleyite Talk 11:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Kind of long, but it has some good jokes. Excellent pictures. --ENeGMA 14:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Old joke, and a little long, but it made me laugh.-- 18:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Jocke Pirat 21:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For! --L 03:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --ZB 16:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Flabius-Danner 17:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Laugh joke, and a long little, but it made me old. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 20:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Spin 03:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For because it is fricken hilarious in an exteremely random way. --The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a graffiti. 11:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Bloopy 10:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I wish I had known about your techniques last year. --70.160.123.211 21:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For And that article contains too many facts! --Jester 23:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --HP talk 23:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For THIS ARTICLE KICKS MUCHO BUTTO Japanese Lenin 05:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• grudgingly FOR but what about just showing the officer your tits? Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hysterical. Swordmaster 19:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Usually i don't read really long articles cos i don't have the attention span but i finished this and it made me laugh, and was pleasingly english, so kudos. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-One of my favorite hobbies--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

## Yahoo!

Score: +18

Featured!, and Reskinned-- 04:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

• Self-nomination and for because I'm feeling too good lately, and I need my ego to be taken down a notch.-- 04:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, great! It's a hell of a lot better than what was there before. Shouldn't Yahoo redirect to Yahoo!? Bloopy 07:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I think it does. There's no redirection notice (I guess Brad's formatting preempted it) but if you click Yahoo and check the history, it displays the history for Yahoo! with the exclamation. —rc (t) 15:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Spang made the redirect some time after my comment. =) Bloopy 01:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Clever, subtle satire of Brobdingnagian proportions. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 08:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. No ego depreciation for you. Spang 11:43, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Self reference is getting rather old. Sorry. Not this thyme, friend.--Anon32 12:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Because that's just fucking funny. --ENeGMA 14:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Hmmm... --The Rt. Hon. 15:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Agaisnt It needs some work. I think this'll be my next project --PiOfFive 19:51, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
*Comment You have my blessing. I think it could use some pictures of 6 of the 7 deadly sins across the top, myself, but it's pretty good as-is. (Since Lust is pretty well-represented in the article as it is now, and there are 6 icons across the top of Yahoo!, it'd be perfect!) Man, I need to learn how to gimp...-- 20:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Zombie gave me EXACTLY what I wanted. Thank you, Zombie.-- 01:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Your welcome for both that and the For vote old chum. -- 00:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• for i havent figured out what the difference betwwen that and yahoo.com is yet--Alia kenobi 03:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• $\sum_{k=0}^1 \left(2k+1\right)$ 05:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I'll bite, and it bit back and it was good stuff.--Severian 23:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Cause I helped make it. -- 00:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For because it links Cancer porn - David Gerard 08:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Because it is so much better than the original! --Mordillo 20:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For even though it links to Cancer porn.  :) ~ T. (talk) 04:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - superb Das Boot 06:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For that guy who always votes against my stuff..... -- 13:15, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - I enjoy epileptic siezures now and again --HP talk 18:19, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, although it'll be tough to put it on the front page... meh, that's RC's problem, not mine.— 03:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gulliver's Travels references = my vote. --L 06:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Vive la differance, eh? Get saved! 20:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, but how are we going to put this on the main page? Oh, and I'm not surprised at where the Wrath link leads. At all. — 13:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For! I laugh.--Witt E, 01:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For!!!! Wooooo! It's funny - and offensive! The two best things about Uncyclopedia - except for the randomness. Gazco 17th May 20:04 (UTC)

# Archives

 Awards, Decorations and Honours Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars Ranks &Honours Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · Hall of Shame Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions