• Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
  • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
  • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
  • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
  • You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
  • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
• Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
• Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.

Contents 1 Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * ) 1.1 Hermaphrodite 1.2 Solid Gold 1.3 But Seriously... 1.4 Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal 1.5 French Revolution 1.6 Pontius Pilot 1.7 Boss Fight 1.8 I am not kidding 1.9 Martin Van Buren 1.10 Boston, Massachusetts 1.11 Hammer 1.12 The Wicker Man 1.13 Washington and Lafayette 1.14 Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid 1.15 Philosophy 1.16 Gaydar 1.17 Erraticus 1.18 HowTo:Learn Hebrew 1.19 Rorschach Inkblot Acid Test 1.20 Pentium 4 2 Previously Featured 2.1 Fire hydrant 3 Archives

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

Hermaphrodite

• SN+F. Just Quasi'd due to stagnation with a +16. Hopefully it still gets the votes, but doesnt get buried on the VFH page this time... -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 04:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Actually, it was +14, but who's counting? ;)--<<>> 14:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• I'm still for it, though it bugs me a bit that you renom'd it a mere two days after it was pulled and Quasi'd.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• I said it beFORe, I'll say it again. For. I love it. 05:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - again -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. John1728 10:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Not For. Against was too strong a word. --Anyone 13:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Still for.--<<>> 14:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Again, I didn't find it all that funny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For...gee I wish I could do this with The Life and Times of Kraft Dinner--Shandon 22:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

  Hug? --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• *Sigh* Fine, weak for. Based primarily on the strength of the images. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Not against. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Solid Gold

• SN+F. A well deserved satirical poke in the eye for Shari'a Law.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's alright, but not what I'd call feature quality. And isn't this like the fifth self-nom you've done recently? The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a button. 06:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

  Um, no. It's the third, ever. Unless you mean VFP, then yes, I am a nom whore.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• For on effort, at the least - David Gerard 09:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I enjoyed it. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For You voted against me because of self nom's once...you're slowly degenerated into a common vote whore.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 15:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

  Comment/apology on your talkpage.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Strong For Modus = Very funny. And I certainly don't mind self noms - I does them meself, in facts I does. Look at French Revolution or HowTo:Skip School. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Great idea. For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 05:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Another article from the brilliant mind of Modusoperandi. --Hhamdy283 00:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

But Seriously...

• LOL after subtlety. Nom and For - David Gerard 10:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Heh. --L 10:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• A very dry For.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Very for. We need more articles of such high quality. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh dear Lord this is funny...--<<>> 14:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! But seriously though, it's one of the best articles currently up for featuring. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For because life is futile.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 15:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Definitely for. Funny stuff. ----SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 16:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Not front-page funny, but what it lacks in hilarity (which it does) it makes up for in creativity and well-thought-out-ness (which it has a lot of). And also I've been giving out a lot of "Against" lately so it's time to mix it up. --Anyone 20:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Random and pointless. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. But seriously... 06:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For John1728 10:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Hardwick Fundlebuggy does it again! And this time is once too much. I've called the proper authorities on you, sir, and with any luck you'll be in the slammer by midnight. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For This article is unique to me in the fact that it is the first article by someone else that I like so much that I wish that I had written it. OK, maybe Fisher Price: A Retrospective. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal

• Nom and for. I've never added anything here before, but this is deserving. And not just because it mentions me (needs moving into the main namespace though of course) -- sannse (talk) 19:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for: move it into the main namespace. — Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (19:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
  • Condition met; For. — Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (19:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
• For. Brilliance. -- Hindleyite 19:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I feel kind of bad now. When I get banned, all I say is, "F*uck!".--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For I felt Hardwick's pain. I haven't actually, as I haven't been banned. But I pretended like I felt his pain. It hurt. I think. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For but this one crosses the line of "In jokes", "Vanity", and "Sigining Articles". However it's damn funny! --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. That is hilarious. I love it. --Flyingfeline 21:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, but how did he keep this log while banned? {It was then that I started to search for possible holes in the inpenetrable banwall...}-<<>> 22:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For My favorite Fundlebuggy article yet! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For I can empathize. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 01:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For a crime he almost certainly did commit. Abstain. I maintain my point of view that inside jokes are not for the front page, but, yeah, this is definitely on of the best written ever. "Go on a blanking spree..." they whisper to me. "You'll feel better. It's revenge. They hate blanking sprees.... -- The Colonel (talk) 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For because this could lead to his breakout new prison album.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 04:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For I've done my time. I've paid my debt to society. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Well, it's two parts brilliant with three parts Hardwick, what more do you want? Except possibly twelve parts pie. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a button. 06:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Self-reference, inside joke, signed article, subtle encouragement to the stupid ... and LOL funny. What's not to like? - David Gerard 10:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For great justice. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 16:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against A bit too short, and way too inside joke-y for the front page --Jordanus 17:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Injokey, but more importantly it's vanity. It'd set a bad precedent to feature this. (Yeah yeah, I know we already featured HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia or whatever.) —rc (t) 20:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Vanity? Like... Euroi - *is shot* --User:Nintendorulez 20:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment What do we do with this b/c its InJoke-ness is way over the heads of people. It's like choosing which of your children is slated for ritual execution.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 05:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• For. Many of us can relate. The article should mention what he was banned for though. --User:Nintendorulez 20:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For And turn it into an UnBook if you can. 05:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Sorry Hardwick, I do like the article, but don't think its suitable for the front page for reasons previously stated. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 07:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. It is vanity, but you don't have to know anything about Uncyclopedia to find it funny. Except, of course, that it's a parody site. I suppose if someone wandered onto Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal, mistaking it for Wikipedia, they might find it very unprofessional, but whatever. John1728 10:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I spent 24 hours banned once, man. I know how it hurts. But now I'm reformed, brutha! Swordmaster 21:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For For those people arguing that it shouldn't be featured because it's an inside joke,

I think that even if it's someone's first time here, they'll pick it up fairly quickly, furthermore the entire premise is simply like nothing thats ever been thought of before. Hardwick's best work, I'd say. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 21:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Such a good way to spend one's time when banned from Uncyclopedia. I'll appreciate the irony when this gets featured. --Thetanmancan 05:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

French Revolution

• Self Nom + For Maybe because Pee Review failed me, or because of the euphoric, drunken feeling of power that comes with having written a featured article, but I wanna see how this article does. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• It was a vote for, it was a vote against. Oh wait, it was a vote For. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 04:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Content isnt that funny...-- Sir C  Holla | CUN 05:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I giggled. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Aww, someone already made a Tale of Two Cities joke...--Ginchael 14:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good show. 14:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I loved it. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a button. 15:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 01:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• What's French for For? 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Pour. Contre is Against, but you really wouldn't want to use that, now would you? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• For Erastus Brigham Bigelow. --So So 10:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 10:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Nay. I just don't feel like it had It, know what I'm saying? Of course you don't, I'm being too vague. --Anyone 20:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Pontius Pilot

• Nom and for. This article is hilarious and the picture has been featured. --Onion 01:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, it's cute, but too short.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For? Cool. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. I just re-read it. Not to brag or anything, but I'm a frickin' genius! I forgot how good that article was. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very short, but the entire thing is hilarious. Should be expanded, but until such a time, still has my support. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Regretfully Against. Its a great joke and I love the pic, but sorry STM its just too short. It is hilarious though. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 05:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Short, but hilarious. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very good. 14:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Mr Mayfair, was there a reason you deleted my vote? --Anyone 16:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment It was probably just a mistake since Tom voted for several articles in one big edit. Yours got lost. I've restored it below. —rc (t) 16:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Ah, here here. All's well that ends as well as it started out, no weller or less well than before. Thanks. --Anyone 12:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• For. It is too short, but what's there is so damn well thought out and put together I can't say no. --Anyone 14:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. If it's expanded etc etc... 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 10:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Humorous.--<<>> 14:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For and Against people who vote down articles based solely on their length. —rc (t) 20:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For and Against Anyone who votes down articles based solely on their length.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 05:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Boooo. That is all. --Anyone 12:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• For short, funny, to the point. A proper joke. Pewpewpew 01:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Boss Fight

• Numination and For This looked like an ugly hasty mess...then I started laughing at it.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 01:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Needs pictures first but still kind of funny. Has great potential just needs some pics for more entertainment value.--Lt. Wyoming 03:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, but only after it gets pics and corrected spelling. The DOOM references made me laugh. Especially the wall. --Onion 04:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, it might work better as a "How to:".--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. I don't know how to rename an article, How to: Survive a Boss Fight may be appropriate, but it's not my article, I just nommed it because it's funny.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 22:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Weak For - with cleanup. It works because it's close to the truth, rather than 'Boss fights were invented by Abe Lincoln in 3000BC' or something.--Nydas 21:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Definite For, tho again it is in serious needs of a few images. InfiniteMonkey 04:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. --L 05:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. (for) But only because you forgot the greatest boss of all time--Tony Danza.--Anyone 14:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

CommentDid you read this at all? Tony Danza IS in there. Read it again carefully, anyway, since that was your only reason, your vote is a for I suppose--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 21:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. No, that link doesn't count; I want specifics, confoundit! Until then I remain steadfast in my thoughtless decision. --Anyone 12:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• For. I hate them God-like Badasses. 14:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, as I am a gamer myself and have come across some form of all these bosses. Swordmaster 19:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against - where's the Marxist polemic? I mean, COME ON. - David Gerard 10:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

I am not kidding

• Self nom and for. I've gotten comments from people saying it's feature worthy, but no one actually put it up on VFH. Anyway, I worked pretty hard on it.--Bladetip 21:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 23:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Nah It's Ok. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I love paranoia.--<<>> 23:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Well done, Bladetip. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Haha! Funny! --User:Lolster884
• For. I was one of the aforementioned people, I think... Sorry, I was just being lazy!  c • > • cunwapquc? 01:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Made me laugh --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 02:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For That was some funny stuff!--Lt. Wyoming 04:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not bad, but would be funnier if it didn't try to go so over the top. Plus, will the parts on spinach and the Pope still be funny when the news becomes old? --So So 04:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: People will remember it. There are articles with references to Elian Gonzalez and foot and mouth disease, and they're still funny. Oh, and For.-- cdr. thetoastman tlk ctr cun f@h 05:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Some funny shit, plus now that I'm off my meds, I can say whatever I want and I'm not responsible. So, for. Yeah, just for. Uh... shit, where's my meds? Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 05:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 07:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strongass for. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strongass against. It's a one trick pony and the pony has been flogged to death. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For - and no kidding on my part this time! - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 09:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I like it. 14:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Meh. It sounds like my neighbour's neighbour.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry. It's funny... just not funny enough. --Jamtrousers 18:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I am not kidding. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 18:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. We're dead.. --Hhamdy283 20:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's a good idea, but it's stretched out too far for the one joke to support it. 15Mickey20 20:25, 30 September
• For, but it does need more work. Savant13 21:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

2006 (UTC)

• For.Oh God, I didn't give my dog my pizza crust and now a pack of wolves are after me!.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 00:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strongass against funny but not long enough —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Serminigo (talk • contribs)

Comment Here folks is a paradox, a user has just stated that he is a "Strongass against" this of being on the front page, yet he immediately states that the article is, in his opinion, funny. Unfortunately for his standards it's not "long enough" but still "funny". What he doesn't realize is that things don't need to be long to be funny. May God have mercy on your brain.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Against. Somewhat kind of a good idea I guess...maybe, in a way. Too much on the fence to vote for though. --Anyone 14:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm not kidding about this vote. Really. Swordmaster 19:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against I'm sorry, I'm not fond of this style of article. —rc (t) 20:50, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Martin Van Buren

• Nomination and For. Funny, article, plenty of people working on it, and the pictures add to the effect quite nicely. I don't know. You either hate this page, or you think it's a riot. --The Llama Llover
• Against. It's not good enough for a front-page article. Like, this one time, we were out at this roller rink. He went up to this girl and was like, "Hey, do you wanna go get a burger or something?" And she said yes, but then she totally blew him off. Later, I asked her why she did it and she said it was because he looked like shit. It's true. That's what Martin Van Buren looks like. That is frikkin' colloquial. --thematrixeætsyou, the master (talk) (flames) 05:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For - wasn't this nominated before? This is really good - David Gerard 09:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Yeah, and I liked it better when it didn't have the parts on Star Trek, squirrels and phone calls, but still for. --So So 09:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I nominated this before; it was on VFH for over a month but never got any traction. Let it remain Quasi-Featured.--Procopius 11:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's good, not great, but that screen watching part is fuckin awesome. Fuckin screen watchers. --Anyone 12:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. I chuckled. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against Brad removed this a while ago, because of stagnation. It's a Quasi... -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 22:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I need the diff for an unsigned vote to count. —rc (t) 22:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

• For - I don't recall if I voted for or against this article the first time around. Actually, I don't even recall if I voted on it the first time around. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 20:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I love it.--Bladetip 21:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment- This article has been changed a lot since the last nomination. Please take a chance to look at it before you automatically vote against it. --The Llama Llover
• For... yeah, it's ok, maybe a little work is needed, but it's still good --User:Lolster884
• For the second time. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 07:05, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I tweaked it a bit, but only a little. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Quasi, Quasi, Quasi!!! 14:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Hmmmmmmm.... no. 15:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I love it. --Hhamdy283 20:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• I was going to vote against, but the tweaks have put it over the edge into for territory. 15Mickey20 20:25, 30 September
• For And as for the guy above me, if tweaks would change your mind one way or the other, you shouldn't vote at all. Savant13 21:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Before the changes, it was a good idea, but had little to do with Martin Van Buren. The added references to his political career nullified my objections (as well as making it funnier) and made it forworthy. 15Mickey20 12:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Strong For I liked it before, but the changes made it hilarious. --Onion 00:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, but dude, Llama Llover? You made so many edits! You should just rough-draft everything into a document and then post it instead of changing it every single time you see some little thing wrong... --Just Joshin' Ya!
• For Good work. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain. Changed my mind because of changes in article. The changes would have been good if it were any other page, but to me the charm to this particular article was in how it gave next to no reference to the actual person's life. --So So 01:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and Comment. Actually, I have kind of come up with something crazy with The Llama Llover and I don't know if you like it or not. Well, we are all silly people, right? :) But, yeah, I think the changes are a bit over the top and have kind of adulterated the original flavour of the humor. Shame on Hardwick FundleBuggy. -- The Colonel (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For lol, i couldnt stop laughing. star trek? puh-lease --Running with scissors
• For. Much better with refences to the actual person.--<<>> 15:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For As if the original article wasn't enough, a hate template created on the side is like another cake made of icing. Love:M.D
• OH MY GOD HARDWICK MADE IT FUNNY! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against It failed already, yes? --Jordanus 17:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For good show --User:Stoopid - no timestamp
• for this was almost featured last time, but i didnt vote for it. so now i am. --Hooplah!!!
• Against. HTBSANJF in its finest. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Boston, Massachusetts

• Nominated and for Absolutely hilarious. The dialect is exactly like how people speak in Boston. I'd know. I live there. It made me laugh so hard I cried. --Thetanmancan 02:36, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Obligatory for. --KATIE!! 03:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Likewise. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 06:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Fah. More than a dialect joke, which is a good thing.--Procopius 12:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Fah. Dis heah is some funny shit. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Holy shit thats hilarious. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 22:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Stahng Fah. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Lahve da ahticle. -- cdr. thetoastman tlk ctr cun f@h 05:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Lahvedit. Wickid fah. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 23:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I don't think it's very funny, but the time it must of taken to write all that in a Boston accent is commendable. --Anyone 19:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Fah - David Gerard 11:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For-Wonderful!-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 16:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I remember when this was written. It also gives me flashbacks of some train driver at the station in Boston near the airport asking me something in an accent so thick that I didn't comprehend I was being talked to until he tried again more slowly after I realized it was something sort of like English, but not really. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against for yet a second time (presumably for the same reasons). --DW ^III 18:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• No --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 20:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against I'm not too impressed with Boston. Sam Adams is one of my favorite beers however.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For 15:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Hammer

• Nomination and for. One of my favorites. --So So 09:17, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is delightful. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 15:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. You don't want to mess with me. I've got a hammer. --Jordanus 16:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Laughed out loud at it while I was meant to be working earlier this week. Not sure about the biology bit though.15Mickey20 19:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. C'mon! It's a hammer.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I like how it refuses to consider any constructive use for the tool.--Procopius 12:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• "The hammer's scientific name is Hammerius hitticus, which is obviously a bland and misguided attempt to write something hammer-related in a vaguely Latinate manner." How could you not vote for? --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 19:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• No. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 22:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very funny. I loled. --Kinst 02:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned...? -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I checked the history, and apparently David Gerard made a change that screwed up this person's sig and timestamp everywhere it occurred on this page. Since it was signed originally, I went ahead and fixed this person's sig for all the votes they made here. --Jordanus 04:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• ForThough I prefer the mallet.--Wit (tawk) 01:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For a sack of hammers - David Gerard 10:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• SMASHY! ...er, wait, wrong voting page. I meant obligitory for. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 14:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

*""For"" Its Hammertime Bitches Unsigned don't feel like looking for who did it.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

• How about this?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Weasel3689 signed below. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• for really random and funny. --JimmyB 06:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For It's as dumb as a bag of hammers. "Hammer of the Gods!We are your overlooooorrrds!"-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Quite funny. --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 18:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Excellent use of pictures and the word 'ululate'. Savant13 21:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For "Swing hammer manically Don'task questions" Thi§ arti¢le pwns --Weasel3689 06:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Measure once. Whack twice. What kind of troll am I, after all? For  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 05:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

The Wicker Man

• Nom and For Yet another masterpiece by the master of British film, Sir Mhaille. It got everything needed for a smash hit - sex, violence, scots, Christopher Lee and killer bees. In fact, I wish to god I'd seen this version and not the actual one...-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 09:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm voting for this now before he has a chance to hassle me on IRC. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment - You must be mistaking me for some kind of vote whore. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Don't you think it's about time you vote for your own piece? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 14:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• FOR!!! Groundbreaking, stunning, a work of art. He made me vote for it.-- 12:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• comment am I to undestand the He is not the polite gentleman he pretends to be but rather a sort of a....Wicker Man? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 13:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. You know too much.......-- 13:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• For, actually pretty good. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Britt Ekland yummy-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Its funny, and I hate voting against Mhaille, but its just too short. Havent seen the movie either... -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 04:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Mhaille does it again!! One of his articles has once again gained my approval. Kudos. ~~The Freed Mind Sutoth Indar the Black Mage [MUN] [YvJP] 12:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, because Mhaille makes me giggle. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 11:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, but only because he talked me into it. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 14:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain. Having been asked to look at this thingy, and being totally illiterate in British movies, my final decision on my vote is, "Argh! I give up!" -- The Colonel (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Nicolas Cage's wig... it's so lifelike. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I've been meaning to vote... and now I've been guilt-tripped into doing so, amongst other favours. --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 20:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Funny, short (in a good way) good pics and lots of good refs to triple wood and the equaliser. Pewpewpew 02:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Washington and Lafayette

• Self-nom and for. Coming to a theater near you.--Procopius 12:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 12:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. I like it, but I don't know why. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For YES.--Ginchael 00:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I have no idea what the joke is, but it is beautifully laid out which gives me the Pot Noodle horn. I could look at it all day. 20:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, Procopius makes history come alive.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• For maintaining the morale of the young republic, I vote yes.--Rljenk 01:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• For ...better than most...though the pic of 'em both togethah could use an upgrade--Shandon 04:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I enjoyed the echoes of all the different classic comedy teams. ----SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! 20:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's like a fine tooled Queen Ann. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid

• Nom and for. Not only is this the best-written article on the site, but it's also quite funny. Also, maybe if we feature this, some people will read it.--<<>> 21:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• For because people need to read it and they don't. --~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  22:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, as long as featuring something in the Uncyclopedia namespace is allowed. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• For it'll theoretically propagate other good articles --Roger The Bum Full sig!
  <a href="http://rdoger6424.jaywebdesigns.com/recipient.php">psychotomimetic</a>
  CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 23:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, "Single Text Page seeks nice User for pictures. No fatties."--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC) For --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Noperoo. 10-4, over and out big daddy. ~ T. (talk) 23:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Because of brilliant lines like "Erik Estrada is an interstellar Cherzgon warrior who was aborted by his mother during the third week of pregnancy." Man, we really need more humor like that on Uncyc. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's actually quite funny and well-written, but does a policy count as an article?--Procopius 02:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Probably not. But it doesn't matter. Euroipods wasn't an article either, but we know how that turned out. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

True. Incidentally, How to be stupid and not just funny is also pretty funny.--Procopius 14:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

• For 'cause I added that Wilde quote (which is acctaully based of a real quote by Mr. Wilde). --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against, why? one word - Rodney Dangerfield - --HP talk 03:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. No way. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Of course. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 09:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• "If someone types in "Harry Potter"...they want to read a humorous slant on Harry Potter, not an article on a Dutch mink farmer with laser-beam eyes." Hear, hear. --L 14:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, because it's brilliant. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, as per everyone else who voted "for". ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against Just put a link next to the Beginners Guide, Style Guide, Big Five, Questions, Donations button.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, because it starts with an Oscar quote, has a Chuck roundhouse pic, uses the word "gay" three times in one sentence, and escalates weasels down Australia's pants. --  !!! ??? 00:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, all the IP articles that weren't started because of reading HTBANJS. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 00:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. It may not be as funny/witty/crap as the other articles we feature, but this is certainly one of our best pieces of work, and as I recall VFH is for our best work, not funniest. The Freed Mind Sutoth Indar the Black Mage [MUN] [YvJP] 07:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• "Weak For'. It honestly should be in the HowTo namespace. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, this policy deserves to be featured. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 22:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very, very funny. And it'll get people to read it. --User:Nintendorulez 17:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against Brilliant and helpful, while still being hilarious, but in the end, it's still an ignorable policy, and no policies on the main page, i say! --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 14:26, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Not just a great article on how to write on Uncyclopedia, but also a great article in of itself, even if it isn't helpful. ---Stevo the Human, now with an article!!
• Positive Reinforcement. In smaller words, yes.--Wit (tawk) 07:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, I love this article and fully support it being featured, especially since it helped (and amused) me so much as a lowly noob. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:48, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I had only skim-read it before, because I know I'm funny (my mother tells me so). I didn't realise how hilarious it is. It's one of the best things on the site. 15Mickey20 20:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Maybe someone will actually read it if it's featured. Swordmaster 16:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• That's a *NEGATORY* good buddy...policy ought not to be VFH--Shandon 04:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against; much too fact-laden for featurability. --DW ^III 11:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• 85% for, 15% undecided. Why isn't this featured? It is one of the most important pages on the site. --Cs1987 15:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Think of this as the article that launched 1000 features. --Onion 19:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• For because featuring weird stuff is fun. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against As hilarious and useful as this article is, it is more intructional than comedic. There are other articles on Uncylcopedia that are much better suited to be featured. --Thetanmancan 20:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against What will newcomers think when they see policy as the featured article? They'll think we have nothing better to feature than our own rules. --Jordanus 22:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Philosophy

• Nom and For InfiniteMonkey 19:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• If a user votes for in a VFH section, and no one's around to see the edit made, was it actually there the whole time? -- cdr. thetoastman tlk ctr cun f@h 20:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• I think, therefore I vote no. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Ok, but not quite. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 21:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Is the glass half For or half Against? I changed my philosophy-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 04:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, because it reminds me of a philosophy teacher (boo!), and it was funny (unlike that philosophy teacher. Again, boo!)--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Winnah! For - David Gerard 12:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Why not, Kate Winslet? Love the Heraclitus section. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• It's attractive, well put together, thought-out. But not funny. Needs trimming, like Diogenes' nosehair. So, no. 09:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. It fully actualizes its potential as my senses act upon it and create the image of Philosophy in my mind. But then, what do we really know?--Procopius 15:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I agree with Procopius.-- 15:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• To vote For, or not to vote For? That is the question. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Still, I'd love to see mention Plato's treatise on pederasty from The Disgorgias, entitled "Fuck You, Socrates." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I actually had a funny philosophy teacher. --  !!! ??? 01:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 08:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Yes. Funneh. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Phor. The intro was the best description of philosophy I've seen so far. -- MaximvsDecimvs 18:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I liked the intriduction though.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against--Shandon 05:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Someone nominate the first picture for Featuring, I don't know how. --Savant13 21:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Gaydar

• nom and for. I thought this was pretty funny and the graphic is genius, and it's got the potential to be even better. For instance, there must be some kind of gaydar jamming system, right?InfiniteMonkey 23:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for -- I'll change my vote to For after I make a few touch-ups. Note to all: halt voting on this submission until I've fixed it up a bit (nothing serious; just some minor tunings). Or not. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm done, and for. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Against. Short and no laughs. The pic is good though. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 23:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks :) --Huffers 02:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong for. This is a funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Very Strong For. Not that it makes any difference, adding strength. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• A For so strong, its almost butch. I gave this one a good going over too. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for, nice and edgy, good content balance, great puns.. yeah funny !.--Vosnul 10:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Reluctant For. Ok, fine, I'll vote for this gay-themed article, but this is the last one I'm voting for for a while.--<<>> 14:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• For in a ruggedly heterosexual manner - David Gerard 12:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I don't care for the article, but the Gaydiation image made me laugh... You should VFP that one! --Mindsunwound: (NS) Cream Of Meat Dog Fart Trombone 20:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Sure. References to Buckyballs and that mysterious siren in Vanilla Sky secured my vote. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Indeed yes. After I had snorted out big laughter-chunks at the image, the rest of the article fell into place. 09:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. The humor is obvious and deserves to be noticed.-- 15:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• For: funny, and made me pull out my old Palm to see if http://www.freewarepalm.com/mature/gaydardeluxe_v22a.shtml still worked. --  !!! ??? 01:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Yesses.' Mostly for the Gaydiation picture. Dumitru 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• No thank you -Heh heh funny, but not enough for VFH. The picture is gold, though. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against IMO, it just doesn't have that classic burning sarcasm that some of my favorites have. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 03:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For because it was started by a friend of mine --Huffers 20:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For but I'm not for Gay marriage for straight people. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 00:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Gaydiation. LOL --Savant13 21:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• sorta For takes a concept and runs with it but maybe wants trimming a bit. A little tumescent for my tastes. Pewpewpew 02:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Erraticus

• Nom and For - Was a Poo Lit Surprise contest winner.--Mister Nosey 00:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• This self vote for can be yours for $19.99 a month! Ask me how!--Procopius 20:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For More deserving that most of the other PLS stuff. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's a little short, but it's incredibly funny. --  !!! ??? 23:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Tough decision, but falls just short for me. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 05:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I like it! Maybe a bit heavy on the random humour side, but great!Aaadddaaammm 09:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• For my favourite entry in the PLS. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 00:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 16:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against.Just 'cause something does not translate into any official language DOES NOT MAKE IT FUNNY. I mean, easy on the jibberish, ya mean? GRUNG! -Unsigned. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 20:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, I wish it was a bit longer, but still wonderful-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 19:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Thanks for the vote. It's true, (as Falcotron noted as well) it's short. I think I ran out of ideas. Either that, or historiography is the bitch child of comedy.  :)--Procopius 21:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• For. Another fun historical romp courtesy of Procopius. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 06:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• For It could be better...but I do have a weakness for this sort of humor. —rc (t) 03:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. This gets saved from stagnation removal because it made me laugh.--<<>> 15:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Woo yay! 83.233.241.7 22:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Learn Hebrew

• Nom and For. A great one from Mordillo. Possibly the most abusive and erudite HowTo. And it's got this line: The proper way to pronounce this letter is take a nut and shove it down your throat as far down as possible and then observe the sounds you make as you try to cough it out. Got it? There is your Chet.--Procopius 23:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's not Mordillo's best work, but that doesn't mean it's not hilarious. P.S., Mordillo, can I have a picture of you for the Self-hating Jew article? --  !!! ??? 00:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

• ([[Talk:HowTo:Learn Hebrew#From VFH|discussion continued...]])

• For --Mister Nosey 00:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against Didn't like it then, don't like it now. Sorry. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I chortled. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nice. Nearly as much fun as deliberately mixing up your salaams and shaloms in Jerusalem. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 04:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, as per nommer. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 09:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Well, it got a warm mention in the PLS AND I wrote it, need to vote for it nes't pas? :) -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 16:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. One of my favourite articles from Poo Lit. -- Hindleyite 18:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• B+E+D+. Means for. But don't even ask how to pronounce it.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 00:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Hitlerbear says For - David Gerard 21:48, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For- Wow, Hebrew sounds really dangerous. Seriously, I thought I was going to choke on that chet thing. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 14:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. And I should say that there ARE vowels in Hebrew. We put them under our letters. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 00:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Only if it's a book for children or poetry, or for beginners. Trust me we don't write the vowels 99% of the time.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 14:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Against. Sorry, only made me laugh once. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 05:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against Cornbread is one laugh ahead of me. "A" for effort, though.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC) For, it's grown on me.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Not featureworthy, because. --ZniLe 12:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

commentWhich was always a good reason...-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 18:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• For. Language humor is the best.--<<>> 19:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Damn and i actually tried learning Hebrew... too funny.--Lutskovp 20:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. I already know Hebrew, which made this article even more funny! Bravo to the creator!! (besides, I even helped out with some modifications) --User:Llama-Llover
• For. I don't know a lick of Hebrew, but after reading this I'll act like I do. Nice addition of sound files, too. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 06:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. I love this article. It pokes fun at the native English speakers (namely, me) and the picture at the end with Windows in Hebrew was hilarious. --User:Armodeus
• Against While I like this article and appreciate the effort and humour involved, it's just a bit too angsty for my tastes and certainly not feature-quality, sadly. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• For An orgasmically conundroumousifacilicious escapade. Bravo. -- 21:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH
• For Quite, quite funny. --Thetanmancan 06:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Kinda messy and not that funny. --Jordanus 14:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against its just not funny --Hooplah!!!!
• For -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 17:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For- I thought dabbling in ancient hebrew would be worth a chuckle, how terribly wrong I was. --

Rorschach Inkblot Acid Test

• Self-nomination. OK, as far as Swiss psychiatrists go, everyone knows Jung. But Hermann Rorschach deserves a bit of recognition. Plus, I did a great deal of field research on this one. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 12:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• +1 For hilariousness--Savant13 14:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• For --Shandon 18:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I looked at this while it was in progress, and almost felt obliged to nominate it myself. Great work Immy! -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 21:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• For I see a beautiful lady in that inkblot. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 22:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Great mix of dumb puns, brilliant satire, and silly drug references; what more could you want? Oh, pictures. They rock too. --Falcotron 06:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• For all my childhood issues rushing back into my head.--Procopius 11:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Once again, Immy comes through with the cerebral hahas. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• for, it's a trip. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Absolute-Lookatthebirdie!! --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me|. 20:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• A butterfly on a flower. Why are we bothering to vote? Just feature it instantly. 13:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Love it. Very, very clever. I'll have what you're having. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 07:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good heavens, feature this immediately. It's hilarious. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nice!  c • > • cunwapquc? 02:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. What an excellent community evaluation this has been. Psychologically adorable. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I save this from stagnation! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 19:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Jeez, how come I never voted for this before now? -- Hindleyite 20:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I thought I had already voted for this. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 15:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Not to be a nay-sayer, but I just don't find this very funny. It seems more random than it does funny. I do like the pictures, though. --Thetanmancan 06:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against I agree--Jordanus 17:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I just finished reading Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test.. great book, almost as good as this.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Pentium 4

• Self Nomination - I have worked on it for some days and it's time for it now to face the final test. (I have removed most of the comments I posted here. See discussion page for more details.)-- The Colonel (talk) 12:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 13:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• What the hell is wrong with u ppl? Saw this when it was under development and liked it then. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 15:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - I liked it. It's not very often that an article up for nomination mentions a recently featured article (Idiocrates). Plus it was funny. --emc! + 20:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Took me a while to decide, because it was kinda confusing the first time I read it, but after re-reading, its funny and the images are good. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 05:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I'm one of the poor bastards that bought a Pentium Pro and I'm still holding a grudge. Modusoperandi 00:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, you know why... --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Cleverly done. This is why I own a Compaq. Wait a minute . . .--Procopius 12:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is a sympathy vote for a nice try. Seriously, WTF is this (see [1])? Go to Hades? That's some funny shit there Swordman. So is this article. I've no sympathy at all, actually. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For...I never owned a dog named Patches, thusly go Smackintosh! --HP talk 05:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• See here. -- The Colonel (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Do not click the link "See here" in the above line, you may regret it!!!!!!!!!! --HP talk 03:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• For I have an AMD64 in my laptop too...-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• for mentioning Idiocrates. Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 11:28, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. - satire of computer stuff, only cleverer - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 11:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 15:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• For —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.153.188.49 (talk • contribs) (diff) <- Unsigned = no vote, yes? --Jordanus 14:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 69.164.111.26 15:37, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• For because it hasn't gotten a single Against yet, and because it needs to be featured eventually. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For It doesn't have the same comedic punch as some of the other stuff I've read, but it has some nice jokes. I especially like the "Four Least Efforts." --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 20:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Why did I vote for this originally? Maybe to get rid of Swordman...I do like the pics, but it didnt make me laugh once. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 22:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hey, I worked hard on it! -- The Colonel (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

*For. I added an extra core layer. Let's get this thing out to the market. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

(Discussion continued)

• For - How long has this thing been on here?! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 21:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against While I thought the introduction and "Least Four Efforts" were very funny, after that it all went downhill and lost its appeal. --Thetanmancan 03:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Obscure computer humor = no laffs --Jordanus 07:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, No one likes a crazy Swordman 10:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• What did rc say about unsigned vote, Tom? Grr... -- The Colonel (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry 10:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Against. This article is not funny (though the ensuing fracas has been).--<<>> 14:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

Fire hydrant

Featured —rc (t) 06:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• A-Nom-ynous and For. Somewhat short but hilarious biography of a...fire hydrant :(? Zanno 06:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC) -Unsigned, Nom doesnt count, should be removed. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 05:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

  There, I registered. Happy? Zanno 06:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Against. 07:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It was nice, but boring and unexceptional. John1728 10:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For - I laughed out loud. Last line is a winnah - David Gerard 11:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Winner. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - ~~~~~ 15:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Only mildly amusing and kind of short, like my penis. --Anyone 16:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• (discussion continued...)

• For - Since, like a hydrant, my penis gushes when properly manipulated  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 19:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For - I like this, it's so completely different from anything I'd do. --Nydas 19:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'd say it borders on a tremendous shaggy dog story, but fire hydrant's aversion to dogs, shaggy or not, and their profoundly misguided sprinklings will not allow me. Excellent subtlety, not boredom, abounds. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against Why? It's retarded. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• This is not retarded. All you have to do is read it the whole way through (the WHOLE WAY THROUGH, mind you), and then after you've read the last line, read it all again. Then suddenly it's the funniest thing you've ever read. I think. For. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• I change my mind. Definitely Not retarded, and actually pretty amusing. Strong For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 00:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For I didn't want to like it, but I did. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Suprised me, because it was actually good. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I didn't expect this one to be good. Nicely done. --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 03:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Not the funniest article in the world, but I reward cleverness. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I thought it was retarded until I did what, ahem, 'Weppy, the Wehpudicabok' said, at which point it became funny, and certainly VFH-worthy. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a button. 11:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• For --Kwakerjak 20:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I read parts of it, then I read it completly and it was funny...it just hit me.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 13:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, cause i think having "fire hydrant" be a person is real clever --User:Lolster884
• For. I like it. 14:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• FOR If I could, I would give it more than a +1 Savant13 21:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• For The realistic pics are swell.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 22:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• For- excellent job --The Llama Llover
• For Clever! —rc (t) 20:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Archives

• Archive 1
• Archive 2
• Archive 3
• Archive 4
• Archive 5
• Archive 6
• Archive 7

Awards, Decorations and Honours
	Awards	Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
	Ranks & Honours	Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Foolitzer Prize Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners
	Limelight	VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · Hall of Shame
	Prix citron	Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
	Events citron	Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions