Not nominate yourself. You can vote for yourself, but you can't nominate yourself.
Not have been banned for more than a day in the previous month, but post-nomination bannings do not disqualify a candidate.
Consistently write crap.
If you have a specific gripe or mutual hate with someone who doesn't exactly fit the requirements, don't take it here. This award is a joke. Please realize this and nominate only as a joke, or unless the person is really, really, really deserving. Underhanded nominations that are bound to cause drama will have you dealt with accordingly.
Who to Vote For?
Nominate the Writer who has contributed the most "point free" articles or inane edits over the past month. Additional points may be awarded for bad grammar, lack of punctuation, and images created in MS Paint.
Fabulous Prizes
Winners will get:
"Looked at" funny
Mocked by their "peers" until their ears bleed
Huffed mercilessly
The chance to add the prefix "Pleb" to your name, and wear it like a silly little hat.
A fancy template to put on their user page: {{GOTM}}
NOMINATE!!!
Go ahead and nominate now. Only signed votes will count. Users can only vote once, and new vote supersedes old vote. Please use the level two headline format for the name of the nomination with an optional comment and mandatory signature underneath.
Also add {{VoteGOTM}} to the nominee's user space.
Because because because because because because of the wonderful things he does! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:51, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Because where else can I have power over what happens to an admin? Besides that, Dr. S has won it three times and also for the entire year of 2009. Nobody can be that useless. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:05, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
Nom and For. He's won too many awards. Also his name sounds like poopy. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 23:59, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
Completely for! In addition, he has many helpful contributions and funny articles! He must be a gobshite. —Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 22:15, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
Jesus, yes A long-time vandal, Puppy has gotten by on his good looks and double-down gambling instinct for two decades on Uncy. I've begged him to leave my articles alone, just to leave them alone. Now, after the begging and crying has stopped, it has finally come down to this. Aleister in Chains 00:08 7 Feb. MMX
Against. I nominated him for Uncyclopedian of the Month, and he went on this massive monologue about how he's not worthy. The dude makes Hamlet look like an extrovert. He doesn't deserve any awards. --Matfen 00:03, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
But of course I cannot think of a user more deserving! :D •••Necropaxx(T){~}Monday, 16:41, Feb 8 2010
For. His sig makes me homicidally angry. pillow talk 19:40, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
Abstain. I can vote once and nobody said there are any limits in kinds of votes. I may abstain in that situation. SirPtok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 23:34, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
I counter abstain, and raise you a PRESENT!Aleister in Chains 1:04 10 Feb. MMX
I'm affraid I don't understand you ;p. Well... I know what the words mean etc. but it doesn't make any sense for me :P SirPtok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 14:58, February 17, 2010 (UTC)