Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Marty Friedman

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ok, I have reverted this edit, and I am ready for you to submit a new one with the CURRENT article and a TABLE for me to review with. Lets roll!)
m (I'd say this more wittishly but it would go over your head. You are not smart enough to review this article, or even revert the pee review for this article.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Menu}}
 
{{Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Menu}}
   
===[[Marty Friedman]]===
+
===[[User:Monika/Marty]]===
 
<!-- <nowiki> Put comments, requests, etc below here - or even delete this whole part. </nowiki> -->
 
<!-- <nowiki> Put comments, requests, etc below here - or even delete this whole part. </nowiki> -->
   
Line 8: Line 8:
   
 
[[User:Monika|monika]] 18:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 
[[User:Monika|monika]] 18:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  +
  +
<!-- Of course, feel free to use this table if you want to, but yeah...
   
 
{{Pee Review Table
 
{{Pee Review Table
|Hscore=7
+
|Hscore=
|Hcomment=I see what you did here, You simulated what seems to be a Wikipedia article and turned made it seem like vandalising in the progress.
+
|Hcomment=
|Cscore=9
+
|Cscore=
|Ccomment=What you did here was amazing, with seperate revisions, each of them having different humors and different styles. You even created a history page and a fake userpage just for your article, I'm impressed with all the effort that's put into this.
+
|Ccomment=
|Pscore=8
+
|Pscore=
|Pcomment=I kinda liked the style of the seperate revisions but some of them could use more effort then others. Other then that, I see no errors in grammar or spelling.
+
|Pcomment=
|Iscore=7
+
|Iscore=
|Icomment=Well it kinda varies from each revision but you do get a 7 for a large variety of articles on every page.
+
|Icomment=
|Mscore={{pee|7|9|8|7}}
+
|Mscore=
|Mcomment=Averaged
+
|Mcomment=
|Fcomment=You know, I came in expecting to find a bad article. But what you've done is unique and special, though I was surprised by the end by that Wikipedia like style entry. I would say expand the userpage a bit and make the revisions a little more vandalious and exciting (except the last one). But other then that, it's a unique article. I don't think It'll get VFH but it's a decent article.
+
|Fcomment=
|Signature=[[User:Nekami|Nekami]] 16:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
+
|Signature=
 
}}
 
}}
   
Thanks. I'm glad you saw what I did there. (I was really worried people wouldn't see what I did there.) Do you have any specific suggestions for which revisions could use additional effort? (I have been thinking about expanding the userpage, but I'm not sure what I want to do to it yet, so if you have any suggestions there, I'd appreciate them.) --[[User:Monika|monika]] 21:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
+
-->
 
 
[[Category:Pee Review]]
 
[[Category:Pee Review]]

Revision as of 21:02, March 19, 2008

FAQ

User:Monika/Marty

So, um, I'm kind of looking for a completely different type of feedback here. I'm wondering what someone who is not me (for example, you) thinks is going on in this piece - what the message is, where the jokes are hidden, what you noticed and how you read the thing, that kind of stuff.

monika 18:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects