Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(incorrect usage of Vfd)
Line 103: Line 103:
'''Keep as rewritten''' - The original was listed here as it had images but no text, an article has since been written around this. --[[User:Carlb|Carlb]] 17:57, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
'''Keep as rewritten''' - The original was listed here as it had images but no text, an article has since been written around this. --[[User:Carlb|Carlb]] 17:57, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
==three articles==
I'd like some views on these two articles and one edit. Delete, rewrite, keep as is?
*[[Jimbo Wales Jr.]]
*[[Uncyclomedia Foundation]]
*[[http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Nonsensepedia&diff=0 edit to Nonsensepedia]]
Thanks! --{{User:Ogopogo/sig}} 00:53, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
== [[Kevin Moore]] ==
== [[Kevin Moore]] ==

Revision as of 22:54, November 16, 2005

Important Points to note

1. Read: Uncyclopedia:Deletion Policy
2. Please remember to sign your votes and edits! Use --~~~~ or the "Sign" button (Button sig). Signed votes are more credible.
2.1 Multiple votes on the same entry from one person (that is, one using puppet accounts) is considered agenda-pushing and is frowned upon. You will be sent to the Gulags for any egregious breech of this policy.
2.2 MAKE SURE YOUR VOTES ARE CLEAR. Please put your vote in bold text. Make all the witty comments you want, just make sure your vote is visible and explicit. Example: 'Fucking Delete this piece of dogshit article! It sucks!' --slack 06:27, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)*
2.2.1 *(maybe not that explicit)
3. For pages that are created as a form of vandalism, or that are plagiarized, use QuickVFD.
4. For archived discussions, see the Archived VFD Discussions.
5. For a list of unused images, click here: Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages
6. If you edit VFD disruptively, you will be banned without warning. That sort of behaviour is annoying and unnecessary.
7. Each section header on this page normally contains a link to the item being voted upon; please use [[:Image: and [[:Category: ...]] instead of simply [[Image: or [[Category: ...]] when linking to non-text.
8. SysOps, please check the page history before deleting if you see something like it suspiciously changed titles. And please archive old entries when they start to clutter up the page; also, create a new archive page when the one in use gets ridiculously big. Also, get me a sandwich.
9. Latest candidate goes on top:

Pages for deletion

Asian Chicks

Delete: Nothing is stupider than a bunch of horny British expats who think they're funny. An article on Asian Chicks could be so much funnier than a list of fucking hackneyed stereotypes and Pataya jokes. --Dr. Destructo

Cash on delivery

Delete: Not funny and the claim of wikipedia plagarism rubs me the wrong way, true or not. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 08:11, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Zaphod Beeblebrox

Delete. The page is nothing but a Ballmer quote and a See Also: section. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Graham Coxon

I almost huffed it, but just in case, I googled it. Turns out that the guy is a member of the band Blur (I must have missed them while listening to Asleep at the Wheel). He's even warranted one of these crazy things: Wikipedia:Graham Coxon. So, does that mean that this article stays? It could use a little work, but then, couldn't we all. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:49, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

gah! The man's a musical genius but nevertheless i've read funnier obituaries than that article. Rewrite please, some kind soul with more comedy talent than me. And if we can't do that, get out the two-by-four and prepare for whacking season. Then huff it. Karma Llama 01:22, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)


another AAAAAAAAA! clone --Willy on wheels! 20:32, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep This one's full of girly goodness. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:56, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
You can never have enough one-letter-endlessly pages! Hooray for the number 9! Karma Llama 01:27, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep Since it has pictures, its good enough to stay --Nytrospawn 01:42, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Kill Willy's right, its a AAAAAAAAA! copy, no more please. Distorto November 16, 2005
Keep, and undelete BBBBBBBBB! - I want these for every damn letter! Each one is funnier than the last.

Keep, but give a swift kick in the ass to anyone who makes any more AAAAAAAAA!likes. --EvilZak 06:37, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete: Not only is it a clone, but it's not as well done as AAAAAAAAA! If it were better, I'd say keep it, but as is, it's unoriginal and half as funny. Any clone that isn't as good as the first dilutes the quality of the original. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:29, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nigger Claus

Delete. It wasn't funny and is guaranteed to offend a good amount of people. --neoEva88 23:18, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Surely the whole purpose of Uncyclopedia is to offend as many people as possible! Nevertheless, load your rifles with Delete ammo, it's crap. Karma Llama 01:22, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)


It's a bit too long for unilateral huffage, but still crap. --Spintherism 22:34, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

This is a list of what the author doesnt like, from the way its worded. Immediate huffication with extreme prejudice--Nytrospawn 23:59, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Contrary to what it may look like I like most of the stuff I put in there. It alredy has the editme template, so feel free to "neutralize" its point of view or change it as you like, but I think deletion for this article is a bit harsh. Acid Ammo 00:07, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pointless, unfunny, smells of fish, has 2 noses. Enough about me, the article's bollocks. SegwayVader has spoken, DIE BITCH DIE. Karma Llama 01:48, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I like the reason for the counting crows ban, but I don't like the reason for the rest of the article. Deletezorz. Distorto November 16, 2005

Keep: I reformatted it a little to make it less hate inspiring. I'd say that it just needs a lot of work now, instead of being huffworthy. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:45, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)


I'd reverted an anon-IP blanking this one, but in retrospect it's likely slandanity/rubbish and should be taken out and shot. --Carlb 21:35, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I believe it should be kept. It does look stupid, but it could go somewhere, I think.

Deleted. Article was pretty much crap that belonged on someone's LiveJournal, and it seems to be a crap magnet to boot. It got stuck to my feet all last week, and I'm not in the mood to keep scraping it off. But I could be wrong, in which case, some other admin can restore it (and possibly ban me from playing Admin until Tuesday when I've settled down). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 16:56, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)


We can do better. --neoEva88 20:05, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete or redirect to World of Warcraft (that's what it stands for, right?)

--Paulgb 20:52, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC) --Ueland 17:10, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bobby-Sue, fetch my shotgun, it's killin' time... Karma Llama 01:25, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep: It's been turned into a redirect to World of Whorecraft, which ate World of Warcraft. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:50, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Maybe I just don't get it, but it doesn't seem funny at all. --neoEva88 20:00, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hind quarter fractured, will never race again. Take it out and shoot it. --Carlb 20:08, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Most Horrific Act of Mass Murder in the History of Time

errrrr... does anybody really want this? It's been around for a while, but seems not to be much improved. Delete --DWIII 15:16, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Now I appreciate gratuitous boobies as much as anybody here, but really... Delete --DWIII 02:46, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep; need I speak as to why? Nay, sirs; nay. As for the "gentle-...man..." that voted for delete, I vote you delete your man breasts in favor of those that belong to a fine young harlot. Huzzah. user:BlackMage!! 11:39 PM, November 13th, 2005

Keep - I will make it my personal mission to rewrite this "article" just to save this area of outstanding natural beauty. For Sophia -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Keep as rewritten - The original was listed here as it had images but no text, an article has since been written around this. --Carlb 17:57, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kevin Moore

Delete. --neoEva88 14:21, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Delete I don't care if it's an inside joke. It's a dupe of Vitamin (without the I's). --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 00:27, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete or at least change the font --RaRanax 00:44, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hasn't this been discussed before? And didn't someone bring it up again about a week ago? --Paulgb 01:03, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Maybe, but it's still there. --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 01:19, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

If I remember correctly, the decision was keep each time --Paulgb 03:32, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh, its in the village dump right now. I don't understand this...

(VD Discussion)
It's an inside joke! Keep it, for god's sake! You'll never understand! --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 02:36, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
(Next day, VFD Discussion)
Delete I don't care if it's an inside joke. It's a dupe of Vitamin (without the I's). --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 00:27, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
... split personality?

You got a problem with that? At least I fixed it. --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 21:47, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete You Have Two Dicks was a much funnier copy-and-change-something article, and even that couldn't be saved. --EvilZak 21:08, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete We have AAAAAAA now, we dont need this article --Nytrospawn 00:01, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep' I have gone to delete this article 3 times now. Each time I feel guilty for thinking about deleting it. It's not fantastic, but it's not bad. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02:40, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Moved from QVFD. Delete; methinks we don't need to dilute the breathtaking poetic brilliance of AAAAAAAAA!. --DWIII 23:58, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete It sucks, formatting was actually in leet for some reason. --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 00:27, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep About the formatting, it's unfinished. I actually just ran the thing through a 1337 translator. I'l finish the article. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 01:52, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete There are already too many original content-less concept pages (AAAAAAAAA!, the morse code one, Nihilism, etc.) let alone unoriginal modifications of them. --Spintherism 02:49, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Looks like spam to me. If I were in full control of the 1337 language edition of Uncyclopedia this would be on QVFD so fast...--Foo21 01:02, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete You Have Two Dicks was a much funnier copy-and-change-something article, and even that couldn't be saved. --EvilZak 21:08, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Pure crap. --Curious Larry 01:16, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Threeve, Zeight, Eleventy

The articles are too short on their own. I'll be combining them with the Making up numbers page. All the content I'll need has already been moved, so go ahead and delete these suckers. --neoEva88 23:09, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep I wrote a different article on eleventy before you did, and I want to see it kept. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 01:50, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Deleted I deleted these once for being unfunny stubs. neoEva88 whined, so I restored them until they were added to the main Making up numbers article he was working on, so that we had 1 big article, rather than 6-8 short stubby ones. A similar fate will be in store for the rest of the other number articles that I restored. Once they are merged into the main article, they can be whacked. And btw, the main article is starting to look pretty good. Kudos on taking small piles of crap and making them into a nice bit of artwork. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 16:54, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comment One thing to watch when doing merge-and-delete is that you lose the article history and info on who wrote the darned thing. Merge and redirect is therefore often preferable if there's anything in the history worth keeping. --Carlb 04:18, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Martian colony pages

Not that it really needs voting on, but where else can I post it...

MarsMoon1, MarsMoon2, Sedna, XC9-412 & Who knows, who cares? were pages relating to Martian colonies which have now been merged to that one page. I have changed the links and the five pages can be sent to the bat fuck insane MarsMoon1 residents and deleted. --theRealSheep 15:23, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Short, dumb, & not worth Undic. -- T. (talk) 14:50, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

This page is only advertising some russian forum and not funny at all. And above all, it's telling the truth! Delete it since I don't think someone will be willing to rewrite it. I, personally, has no desire to be funny about some unknown club. --Norro 03:16, 11 Nov 2005

Delete it. Author only writing about himself. Not funny and really annoying. --Norro 03:16, 11 Nov 2005

Deleted The fact that I can tell it sucks even with my very limited Russian comprehension means it must have been vary bad indeed.

The same as previours - Delete this piece of crap. There is no fun to read someone's praises to himself. Well, it whould be fun if there was a good humor about it, but there is not. It's just annoying. --Norro 03:16, 11 Nov 2005

Delete It looks pretty bad, but my Russian isn't so good so I won't delete it outright. --Spintherism 18:43, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)


If this is an 'in joke' it should be marked as such. An admin has edited it at one point, so it must have some value I don't see. -- T. (talk) 05:33, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I believe it's an inside joke for Robyn Hitchcock and Glen Baxter fans, and possibly some other landmark cultural figures I'm less familiar with... Keep? --Johnny C. Raven 08:00, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Peppermint Patty

Didn't find it funny, at all, was short, random and somewhat based on the actual plot of the comic (And most likely stolen from Family Guy). Beleet. --ENeGMA 03:16, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Perhaps not funny, definitely short, not at all random, definitely somewhat based on the actual plot of the comic as it is an attempt to be satirical and is a gesture at deconstructing Schultz's work, and not at all stolen from Family Guy, since I have never seen the show. Keep --Curious Larry 09:41, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep It's not a bad little article, it just needs a little love! I hope someone does come along to make it longer and funnier but in the mean time, hopefully the picture I added will save it from deletion. Naughtyned 16:01, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

With the addition of the picture, perhaps I'll reconsider my hasty decision.  :) --ENeGMA 23:46, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Expand or Delete: It's pretty short and not that funny. The picture doesn't make it a good article, just a mediocre article with a pretty girl. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:22, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Tourette's Syndrome

Highly insulting towards TS sufferers including myself. This article was deleted before but the author just put it back up again. --DrPoodle 23:11, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Actually, the article was never deleted. You already lost the argument at the talk page, give it up. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 02:45, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC) --> The page was blanked by a mod so basically it was deleted. -- 22:58, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Um, where was it blanked by a mod??? --Carlb 04:32, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete Not because it's offensive (I wouldn't have you thinking I'm sensitive or anything) but because it's lacking any originality whatsoever. It's like the horribly prevalent ADHD joke "[throwaway text] - hey, let's ride bikes!" If I never see it again it will be too soon.
I'm not sorry if I've offended anyone with this vote. --—rc (t) 04:35, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep The article itself isn't very funny at all but I think the talk page is hilarious. Juan Kerr 12:08, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Comment Attempted partial rewrite to be the words of someone swearing at Uncyclopedia's authors for accusing them of swearing all the time, added {{SeeTalk}} and link to the real {{Wikipedia}} article up top. Now it's a mess of templates. :(
An article by this name was deleted once after being overwritten by User:DrPoodle with a "how dare you make fun of this" rant or utter rubbish a few times (user was warned, see User_talk:DrPoodle, and the text moved to the talk page). And yes, Adrian==DrPoodle, according to deleted article history, which was:
   * 20:23, 9 Oct 2005 Famine deleted "Tourette's Syndrome" (VFD'd)
Page history:
   * 16:36, 4 Oct 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 16:27, 4 Oct 2005 . . DrPoodle (Re-write of insulting article)
   * 04:40, 2 Oct 2005 . . DWIII ({{wikipedia}} for actual info)
   * 11:21, 30 Sep 2005 . . (...and reverted to previous version by Capt. Barnacle)
   * 10:47, 30 Sep 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 10:43, 30 Sep 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 10:39, 30 Sep 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 18:59, 26 Sep 2005 . . CaptainBarnacle (OOPS your edit accidentally wasn't funny)
   * 15:45, 25 Sep 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 22:19, 12 Sep 2005 . . DWIII (linkified & categorized)
   * 18:25, 12 Sep 2005 . . ()
   * 07:19, 28 Aug 2005 . . Daocrat (WHERE IS MY HAIRPIECE?!!)

--Carlb 04:16, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Who doesn't get speared and insulted on this site? Keep. -- T. (talk) 04:46, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep; if you can't take a joke, go to fucking wikipedia. And cry, while you're at it. Oops, I wasn't nice. My mistake. Must be my uber-turrets. User:BlackMage 04:46 AM, 13 Nov 2005 (EST)

Keep? Taking this one step further, I vote to undelete the entire previous history of this article, on the grounds that the previous article, however lame, was likely deleted in error. From Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive14#Tourette's_Syndrome, there was only one vote to delete and the rest were to rewrite: --Carlb 17:26, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

From the original VFD (now closed) on the previous article by this name:

This article is NOT funny and is in fact very insulting towards me and other people with Tourette's Syndrome. 
I have asked the creator to  change it but he just deleted my plea and so I am putting it up for deletion. 
-DrPoodle 03:45 30 Sep 2005

Rewrite (only slightly funny) also, please put back the version that upset you so we can make a judgement on it,
rather than your message that is there now. Thank you. 
--Sir Splaka KUN UotM NotM Bur. VFP SG CM +S © (talk) 11:00, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I am re-writing it at the moment. should be finished in a few days!

Rewrite it has potential (with some tweaking), and if anyone is offended by it, I don't care.
-- Jordon Sometime Around Noon, Oct 6, 2005
Keep, the latest rewrite is very amusing. --Caiman 17:59, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep I love Carlbs changes to it. --Paulgb 18:17, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Got to be Keep for me. I have every sympathy for sufferers, I know someone who has Tourettes, but THIS is what Uncyclopedia is all about. 50% of Uncyclopedia is insulting to someone (or at least in very bad taste), I'd sooner see something like this here, where it belongs, that out there in the real world. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Keep and keep the VFD tag that Carlb made up on it. That ices the cake. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02:41, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

And now someone has put my plea as the main article and covered it with swearwords. That is not funny. I wrote that plea to try and get the author to look deep inside himself and think about all the people he would be insulting over something they cannot control, and that is the petty response I get? I vote this article should be reverted to the one I wrote, which was funny and didn't insult anyone. Thanks to Mhaille for his comment "I have every sympathy for sufferers", but your other point is wrong. This stuff IS in the real world, and it is the internet and other types of distribution that is corrupting people's views. -- 16:22, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comment You say you had text "which was funny"? During the previous vote, you'd replaced the whole article with:

"Tourette's Syndrome" is the singular term for "Tourette's Syndromi" which are deadly super bacteria that are unique in the fact that they only affect other bacteria. A Tourette's Syndromi (named after discoverer John Tourette) is about 10 namometres wide, and lurks in washing-up detergents and soaps. It kills any bacteria it somes into contact with by releasing anti-bacterial bacterio that attack its outer shell and eventually rip the bacteria to shreds. Although scientists believe otherwise, Tourette's Syndrome are the only factor in soap products that gets rid of bacteria. A bacterio, is quite simply, a "foot soldier" in the whole range of bacteria hierachy. It is small and weak, often only living several weeks, but when in a squad with other bacterio, the whole unit (called bacteriom) stregth is fenominal and can easily kill off several million bacteria a day. Bacterio, although efficient at killing in squads, are miserably slow, and require the help of a Tourette Syndromi to help transport them around the bacteria battleground. In short, if bacterio are foot soldiers, Tourette Syndrome are the equivilant of a Battle Tank....

*yawn* --Carlb 17:09, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep The link to the wikipedia article is good enough to clear up misconceptions without ruining the article --Willy on wheels! 23:28, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Neutral Personally I don't think it's that funny, and I agree that is objectionable. But when you showed it to the Vice-Chairman of the Tourettes Association, I am absolutely sure she would be appalled. That is not the point. This is a parody site. If you like, you can include a larger link to the Wikipedia article with a warning or something, but removal for the sake of conservative censorship is not what I will support. Adjusting people's thinking is one thing, censoring what you don't like is another, regardless of whether it is offensive or not. --Sophia 06:33, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Fine, but I object to the fact that my words have been used as the main body of the text. Please can u revert the article to the one in the first place and not have my plea turned into a sick twisted parody. --DrPoodle 19:31, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Technically, every word you commit to any page of Uncyclopedia becomes fair game, under whatever-the-heck license is granted. In fact, I remember reading something to the effect of "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here." Where did I see that? Oh, yeah, it's right in front of me at the bottom of the Edit page! In other words, if you don't want your deep emotions turned into a "sick twisted parody", you might not be playing in the right sandbox. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:44, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

William Ashley

Short, unfunny crap. May be an inside joke/stab at someone. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:08, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Walt whitman

It was funnier here [1]. --Isra1337 23:06, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I concur. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:10, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Mostly factual, politically bent, not funny. -- T. (talk) 21:07, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

32 Quote templates at Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/templates

See this subpage for a list of 25 canned quotes and a variety of variable quotes. Culling time! Please vote on that page. --Splaka 10:34, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC) P.S. Should we have a separate folder permanently for templates specifically? They have their own VFD template, and that template could link people there to 'save' their favorite quote.

As a trial balloon, I've created the template:AnyPersonQuote this morning. This template can allow writers to put in any less-common quote-person's name for the quotation and could allow writers to have a variety of quoter-names while keeping down the number of different templates. (And it would save having to copy and paste code each time.) I'm not sure if such a template already exists (perhaps it already does somewhere) and whether this template would be of interest to others. --Ogopogo 14:51, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I made something like that at template:Quote.Redirect one to the other.--Foo21 17:40, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I say we use the "any person" template. Garby 03:53, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I never saw, and still don't see the over-abundadnce of quote templates as a problem ... --Nerd42 14:56, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Same here --Willy on wheels! 23:33, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Dschinghis Khan

Long, not funny, full of broken links. Pointless. --Staxeon 08:48, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Random does not = funny, only sometimes. Delete Distorto November 16, 2005

  • The whole page was created at once, with only minor edits since. I suspect someone did a cut-and-paste from their LiveJournal, or something. I'm going to delete it and send my condolences (and a bill) to the author. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:10, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pornographic magazine

Pointless. Really. Porn deserves better. -- T. (talk) 02:08, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete I can't tell if its bad or just a really poor attempt at british humor. --Staxeon 08:52, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Seriously: How can you tell the diffrence?
Delete I'm British, and let me tell you, it's bad. Juan Kerr 19:39, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Absolute Crap --Poopy-doo-doo 03:13, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comment; Explain to me why, have you checked the context that the picture is used in? are you simply calling it a racist image (as per your comment in VFP) because I used an image of a black man/ or the word 'brown'? please, indulge me. The article the image is used in is Worst 100 Porn Movies of All Time, and the name 'Bedknobs and Brown dicks' is a phonetic play on the film 'Bedknobs and Broomsticks'. There was, and remains, absolutely no racist intent in this image, is this simply an attack of the ultra PC brigade, what's the issue? --Caiman 04:17, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Based on his other wonderful contributions, I am starting to smell troll. --Splaka 04:28, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep; no one can take offense at it who can't take offense at a hundred other pages first. Plus, it is well done and helps the page it is in. --Splaka 04:20, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Speedy Kept, Poopy-doo-doo is apparently just being an ass. --Splaka 04:53, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Limited-use Templates

Template:Made up numbers and Template:Science3 are both templates with 0 humor and limited use. While Template:Made up numbers has a fair amount of linkage, the articles it is in are pretty stubby, and candidates for VFD themselves. I'm currently (ok, permenantly) on an excessive quoting and template rampage. I'm using up my remaining quota of guilt for this month by VFDing these instead of deleting them on sight. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:34, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Clean-- Anything to trim out the older/newer unused templates. Just be wary of anything starting with "Lang" ^_^ --Splaka 01:43, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment It should probably be worth mentioning there's more then a few (these two included) which aren't listed in Templates. While I'm not sure about the usage of these particular templates, it should probably be taken into account that some templates may be barely used simply because they're not listed. MadMax 21:38, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I finally found where it was that people decided to kill my entries. I think I have a right to be furious since a Vfd tage was never added to any of the articles and I was never informed, but I won't be.

Anyways, it was said that:

"While Template:Made up numbers has a fair amount of linkage, the articles it is in are pretty stubby, and candidates for VFD themselves."

Which I think is a ridiculus argument. (A) I was still working on the series of articles. (B) They weren't especially stubby. Plus, even if they were "stubs" take a look at some of the alphabet articles from Template:alphabet. Plenty are even more stubby.

So, I guess the only argument left is that the articles weren't funny. I can't say much to that, it's a matter of opinion, but I liked them.

Overall, I would at least like to at least be informed before my articles are deleted. I could at least have saved them an worked on them myself and maybe added the articles again later.

Go ahead and delete Brazillion too. --neoEva88 20:46, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I wasn't going to delete that right yet because it was under construction. But I sure can if you'd like me to. Just add it to QVFD. As for the Alphabet template, I randomly clicked on ~, 1, Q, and W and they were all a page to a page and a half long. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 20:57, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Little heath school and Arlen pettitt

Crap pages about a gay school. I dont want info about gay schools or it's founders on this "wonderful" encyclopedia.--Foo21 20:42, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Seriously,wtf?--Foo21 20:17, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Zoey Jones

Huff; It seems to be vanity, as there is nothing noteworthy on google or en.wp. --Splaka 09:10, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ignore; The origin of Zoey Jones is in the husband article. It's not vanity, it's just an entirely made up piece of crap. -- 17:40, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)The Natch

Longest Words

Delete; unfunny & much too factual. --DWIII 03:33, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

|)3L337--Spintherism 01:03, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)


The content itself has potential, but it would be less effort for someone to make a completely new Ring-Wraith than try to rescue this partially aborted page. --Moosemanmoo 22:07, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Foot and Mouth

A mess and quite short. Quite possibly [b]anti-funny[/b] if you're over the age of 9. --Moosemanmoo 22:07, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Punch It. Then punch it again. Karma Llama 01:36, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Tony Hawks

Three lines, not funny.--Sweet Indigo 20:52, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Flagged for rewrite. --DWIII 04:16, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bruce Almighty

It's a mess. Not funny.--Sweet Indigo 20:52, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • I must break you. Keep Jack Cain 00:54, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

-It's only not funny to you because you either 1. Didn't read the Bruce Campbell article or 2. Have no sense of humor. I vote to KEEP it.Devkyu 01:30, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

OK, perhaps I was a little harsh. Keep it then. The problem is a I don't have a sense of humor, merely a sense of humour :)--Sweet Indigo 15:21, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Its cool. If you liked my stuff, most of the stuff in Category:Dominion is mine too. Jack Cain 16:30, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Kept. --Splaka 22:27, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Not in any way funny. It's a collection of random statements about a language named after an obscure Finnish town. As honorable as it is to mock the Finns at every possible opportunity, this page just lacks any cohesion or readily-accessible humor. --Dschinghis 3:28, 8 Nov 2005 (EST)

Delete, I live next to Espoo and don't find anything amusing in this. --Ruubio 14:22, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The People of Moldova

Stupid --Willy on wheels! 16:44, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

This is totally in spirit with that delightful mess that constitutes Uncyclopedia's world-famous Romania series of articles. KEEPSIES! --DWIII 04:23, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

IRC Wars (video game)

Yeh, Idon't really get this. At all. It's a dump of an IRC convo. Not an encyclopedia article.--Fatal Error 02:41, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep. It's hilarious. --Nintendorulez 17:19, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Comment This happened in the Uncyclopedia IRC channel, so it is kinda an inside joke. Wikicities has a page for IRC quotes [2], which applies to #uncyclopedia quotes as well, but we have more funny quotes happen in #uncyclopedia so maybe we should have another page at uncyclopedia. --Paulgb 22:36, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Utter genius. Especially the lines by that 'Codeine' bloke, whoever he is. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:18, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Would be salvagable if not for those lines by that Codeine dude. --Savethemooses 01:41, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Since I'm not in there, it couldn't be funny. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 01:54, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
The opposite of whatever the next vote is --Spintherism 02:55, 7 ;Nov 2005 (UTC)
Neutral vote --—rc (t) 03:32, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Comment Cleaned up a bit and reformatted as per the other wargames. It also makes a perfect home for at least one orphaned image. MadMax 21:47, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Awesome. Had me laughing easily. User:Justplainuncool 9:19, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Oh look, an article about anal rape. Pity the author forgot to make it funny. --Carlb 23:50, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bleh! Kill it --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 10:00, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete sooner than possible. --DWIII 22:48, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Spintherism 02:57, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. This should've just gone on QVFD. --Nintendorulez 12:42, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Baleeted. --Savethemooses 13:00, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)


It's overused to the point that it's no longer funny. Nobody seems to like it, and blanking the template makes no sense, as it is mostly a waste of diskspace. If someone wants to make a quote similar, they can hard code it and the Category:Steve Ballmer's Hitlist in the article itself. --sColdWhat 21:11, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

You're about a month too late on this. The template was VFD'd and blanked, until we had killed all the references to it on various pages, to avoid just making red-links which would encourage it to be recreated. Instead of simply un-blanking it, why don't you read the comments in it, and check the VFD history, eh? Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 22:59, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pussy Girl

Defeated --—rc (t) 19:05, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

A bad article.--Spintherism 04:36, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 10:02, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. --neoEva88 18:46, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Utter crap. Bye now please. -- T. (talk) 19:01, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Another bad article.--Spintherism 04:36, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

And it's not even spelled correctly. Change to a redirect --Nintendorulez 20:36, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Deleted, a crappy article with the titel speled worng has no chance. The only link to it is this page. This is QVFD material. Not redirected because nothing links to it and it is not a common enough misspelling. --Paulgb 22:31, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Coprolites (Fossilized Crap)

Taking a look at Special:Ancientpages turned up an interesting web (heh) (you'll get it later) of stories that I think are ripe for the huffing.

I'd like to KILL THEM ALL!!!1``1!! um, sorry, I mean I would like to suggest their removal as part of a healthy hygeine regimen. I don't think their author will mind, as he hasn't come to visit since April. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:22, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)


I thought it was funny, eg [[3]], but others don't agree. What say you? Juan Kerr 10:48, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I think its got a lot of potential....but then I work in a related industry to Marketeering -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Keep. I think it's incredibly hilarious.
However. If a lot of people don't understand the joke and we have to compromise it, I think if we somehow make a reference to game systems it would work better. (GameCube, GameBoy, PlayStation, XBox) Especially since Uncyclopedia's visitor profile pretty much matches gamers. (Dudes, adolescent to early twenties, it's so true.) --neoEva88 20:19, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)
One week later, two people like it and nobody else cares. I'll put the references to this template back into those pages. Juan Kerr 12:29, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)


2 edits, same user, one month apart, no work in the last month = Broken Pencil. -- T. (talk) 05:39, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Redirection circles (Redirect, Recycle, The song that never ends)

Killed Redirect and Recycle, and redirected The song that never ends to The Song That Never Ends. --Algorithm 23:41, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

One of these is more than enough. I'm undecided on the song that never ends, but Redirect and Recycle should be deleted. --Algorithm 01:48, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Agreed, a pain. I periodically clean out Special:Doubleredirects, ugh! I vote keep Recycle, change The song that never ends to non-redirect links (a link chain, as redirects it isn't as funny, it skips every other one), and delete the other. --Splaka 02:03, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Ditto. MadMax 23:23, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • I say burn the first two, and I second Splaka's solution for the song that never ends. --neoEva88 11:57, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I'd have deleted them already if there weren't so damn many of the things. --sping

Addendum: Category:Infinite_loop_pages, I have to delete this sort of thing once in a while too. More pruning? --Splaka 01:02, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ring around the Planet Day

What is this, even?

Delete. I have no idea, but I suspect it's a really screwed up inside joke or vanity page. Whatever it is, it should be burned. --neoEva88 01:36, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The Real Truth About the Brazilian Political Crisis of 2005

Symbol wtf vote WTF? It's too long for QVFD, but too pointless to keep IMHO. Or do we keep it and add an appropriate "wtf" template? Obviously, though, {{wtf}} isn't the appropriate "wtf". wtf is? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:12, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

... (Actually it is a joke about the mindless - or is it? - concoctment of pseudofacts by mainstream brazilian media, but if you wish to delete it, feel free...) Greetings

Well, that's not a vote, technically, even if you did sign it. Man, I want to KILL (sorry), but the article is *so* long. Can anyone find a way to patch it into Brazil? Or should it just go home with the kittens? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:13, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

New Terrible Jesii

Deleted Jeezus, Jezus and Crocodile Jesus --—rc (t) 04:36, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pruning the Jesii is like fighting the hydra. Props to the author of Disco Jesus, though. It pleases me.

  • Jezus Short and pointless
delete--Sarducci 13:15, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. --neoEva88 01:41, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Jeezus Poorly written, not funny, gratuitous hurricane Katrina Joke, crimes against humaninty
delete --Sarducci 13:15, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. --neoEva88 01:41, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep -- if you could. I probably shoulda stubbed this. Just wondering how to make a contribution. If it's that poorly written to you guys though after i get the next part in, please delete it. Don't wanna let a limp article live to be pointless and add nothing I suppose.
There are en awful lot og jesii pages already, and I don't see where this is going. A better way to contributeto the Jesii would be to rewrite/expand one of the minor Jesii that already exist, like dark or purple jesus or Jeez.--Sarducci 18:33, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Good idea -- alright. nuke it. ill try to put some more meat on the other minor jesii. yeah. delete
Delete --Sarducci 13:15, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. --neoEva88 01:41, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I gotta say, you certainly have your hands full, but you're doing a great job. I hope I have as much success with the Month Project. --neoEva88 01:40, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • I found a new one: Jesus hendrix. Is it worth fixing the capitalization? It does have a halfway decent pix. I haven't been following the Multiple Jesii project, though Jesus is just alright with me, Jesus is just alright, da da da da da (air guitar solo). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:26, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, looks good. I think I will roll Jesus of nazareth into Jesus Hendrix, though. --Sarducci 21:07, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

A Perfect Circle (band)

Delete. Didn't seem funny, and is a mess to look at. If anybody wants to fix this article up, go ahead, but I say burn it. --neoEva88 23:10, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Going against character, I say keep. The band isn't all that bad, and listening to them a little too loud on your iPod is a great way to pick up Goth Chicks. The article just needs a generous sprinkling of capital letters (or maybe they were just whispering so as not to ruin the mood). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:32, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Too factual and lacks humor. Basically a fan's history of the group with an obvious attempt and failure at humor (and grammar).--Kleptonis 14:11, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Delete. Didn't seem funny, but I wouldn't know, I never finished it. :) --neoEva88 22:52, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Charlie Chaplin

Delete. Just doesn't seem funny. --neoEva88 03:27, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. Why do so many people think that pages full of randomness are funny? I've been having to fend one of those off a page I wrote, recently.  :P Rei 22:12, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC) agreed. This sucks. what the hell is pretending to be a pretend Nazi impersonator mean? thats like 4 negatives in one sentence. sounds like a child. --neoEva88 20:21, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hold. It's been revised by someone. It still needs to be slapped around a little more to make it funnier, but it doesn't look worthless to me anymore. -- T. (talk) 19:06, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The continental US except for Hawaii because you can't play baseball if you are hawaiin or however it is spelt. Alaska can though

I almost used my Godlike admin powers for the first time to delete this article. If I'd caught it when it was born, I could have -- it was a one-line stupidity. But User:LeeHarveyKennedy added mucho content and made it funny... but not funny enough to overcome the f'upid (fucking stupid) title. I posted a note to LHK suggesting he merge the content into Hawaii and let us know here when the original, overly-titled article is ready to be sent to Soul Society (obscure anime reference, you wouldn't understand). If he doesn't do it, I or someone else will -- but I wanted to try out my new "giving advice to others as though I'm not a n00b myself" mode. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 22:53, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep No, don't delete it. Move it to Why You Can't Play Baseball in Hawaii or something --Nerd42 23:02, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Moved page "The continental US except for Hawaii because you can't play baseball if you are hawaiin or however it is spelt. Alaska can though" to "USA except Hawaii because you can't play baseball". --Carlb 23:13, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Move it again, this time to a page that actually makes sense. I think it's a good article, definitely worth keeping. Maybe just, "Hawaii can't place baseball" or something like that. --neoEva88 03:29, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Moved, as per Nerd42's suggestion, to Why you can't play baseball in Hawaii. --Algorithm 01:56, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Removed the VFD tag. The only problem people seemed to have was the inordinately long title. Now that the problem has been remedied, I believe the VFD tag is unnecessary. --neoEva88 20:21, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Boy, a lot goes down when you don't have a computer. Sorry I couldn't voice my opinion on this, but it looks like it all got handled well. Thanks for the compliment, B3. I did what I could, but yeah, glad you guys thought the title sucked ass, too. --Lee


Adding to our existing quote-flood, BorgQuote isn't funny. I vote for deletion and for another ban on Nerd42 for making it and spreading it. Although I bet he'll come by and oppose my vote on that one. ;) Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02:42, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, we have enough (1 is too many) canned quotes templates. Who wants a template that just inserts the same quote over and over? PS: I added the template-for-deletion template to it, to give the users a fair chance to vote. --Splaka 03:24, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
OK. I will stop using it if you like. However, nobody's told me not to, so I haven't disobeyed any admin's order so I don't see a reason for banning me. Did your goldfish just die? --Nerd42 04:15, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Keep on second thought, I'd better turn that into a vote 2 keep it ... but perhaps the quote could be edited to become funnier? --Nerd42 22:15, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete If it's particularly relevant to one or two pages, put the code directly on those pages. No need for a templaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaate. ---Spintherism 02:39, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Template:BorgQuote relevancy is irrelevent. resistance is futile ... j/k I mean it's part of Template:Killquote now, you know? --Nerd42 14:20, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

We need to get rid of all these bloody quote templates, they just encourage people to be forumlaic. That Ballmer thing wasn't even funny the first time I saw it, by the 100th time it hadn't got any funnier. --Carlos the Mean 03:53, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Febrewery and various other fake months

Has gotten out of hand. I have taken measures to attempt to return the teh funnay to Template:Months. I suggest any months not there be merged or deleted. General Specific 15:52, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

All the above are one-liner stubs that would have been deleted long ago if not for the 23 months template.

Delete I could probably safely delete these, but I might as well leave it open for voting. --—rc (t) 04:02, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Merge into one article. They're all one-liners, seems to me like the content should all be combined into some sort of list article. Like, "List of the 13 Months" or something. Alas, I am at school now, but maybe I'll do it later. --neoEva88 20:35, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete --Paulgb 23:48, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Merge into one article' - I like that idea better. --Paulgb 20:44, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Okay, so, here's what I've done so far. I created the Wildean Calendar as a sort of repository for one-liner/stub month articles. I've added most of the months of the month template, however, there are more months that need to be added. The article is in need of a lot of help. The other thing I have noticed is that the articles for actually months seem about as shitty as some of the stubs for made-up months, in some cases they're even worse. So, I propose a Month-Project similar too of Sarducci's Jesii Project. IMO the deletion discussion is over, and so I plan on starting a discussion section for the months in the Village Dump. --neoEva88 23:05, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Delete. This is one of the made-up months I have been working with. The article is a one-liner stub that I don't believe is funny enough to be merged into the Wildean Calendar with the other one-liner months being put in there. --neoEva88 01:34, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Defeated --—rc (t) 17:38, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Ok, well, I'm nominating my own image for deletion so this should get done with pretty quickly. The image was used for The Uncyclopedia drinking game, but it has now been replaced by Image:Hand.jpg. So the image is orphaned and unecessary, burn it. --neoEva88 17:26, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Marvin Kennedy

Just seems like unfunny gibberish. --neoEva88 04:08, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete - I agree with neoEva88. --Cassiejn 00:08, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete, but don't forget to add the content to 1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet. Which character would give this soliloquy? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:04, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Smurf communism

Not only is this page not unencyclopedic but it is also directly copied from wikipeida itsef (at least who ever wrote it cited that...).--Jsonitsac 22:18, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete is in fact only a minor edit of a wikipedia article.--Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Naughty Night Nurses

Nice try, but it just doesn't seem funny to me. --neoEva88 22:15, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete people should be encouraged to write actual articles, not one-three sentece throwaway jokes.-Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)


This article says almost nothing original (try checking out the official website, Welcome To Bucketheadland, and you'll see what I mean) and furthermore the very few original bits are not very funny. The topic itself has some great potential, but it's not being used here. I would support a rewrite. --Zwabaphone 05:07, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete If you know who busket head is this is not funny, if you dont it is only marginaly funny. Burn it to the ground! Illogicalbeats 19:29, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep, flag for a rewrite--Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Vice versa

Not going any where to close to true meaning and no one seems interested in rewrite. Could be very funny with rewrite. Without it i say burn it down! --Illogicalbeats

Rewrite. I rewrote the article. Not my best work, but I kind of like it. Another article with the same theme may already exist, but if so, I'll just work it into mine somehow. --ENeGMA

Absolute Power

Appears to be nothing. About as useful as eating paint chips. --Mosquitopsu 04:30, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete absolutely.--Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. No hope fora rewrite or anything, doesn't even deserve to be voted on. --neoEva88 13:45, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Nope President Chronarion has made that article undeletable, or, he'd kill us if we tried to delete it --Nytrospawn 16:03, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep as the article that defies the rule (also I think you missed the joke, think about it) --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:42, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Still, delete. You are right, Elvis, that I missed the joke. Here is what I have to say: If I missed the joke, and I'm an active uncyclopedian, what are the chances that any other visitor to uncyclopedia, with no experience editing and deleting, will get the joke?? There is more to the entry than I originally saw, but my opinion remains unchanged that it still fails to help uncyclopedia. --neoEva88 20:41, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Ahhhhhhh but there are levels of initiation </wink> --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 17:31, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep tis funny and if you don't get it, you're a MORON --Nerd42 22:11, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
I get it, all right. But A) what's funny is relative, so don't troll and/or flame, and B) does Uncyclopedia need to be filled with one-liners? but whatever, there are plenty of keep votes, so I imagine it'll stay, even without insulting the folks who don't like the page. --Sarducci 23:56, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I wasn't serious whan I said that, ok? twas only joking. I didn't get it at first, until I clicked on the history and edit page stuff and saw the comments ... then i got it. Tis funny! keep it! --Nerd42 01:40, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Ok, I forgive you. --Sarducci 13:09, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep, duh. --Algorithm 02:01, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Whoa! I totally missed the joke. I see it now. The article needs something more, though. The humor is a little too subtle. --Mosquitopsu 16:48, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I'd leave it as is. There are already enough articles as subtle as a 2-by-4 to the skull. I appreciate something on the opposite extreme. -- T. (talk) 19:18, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I get it, I just think it's extremely lame. On the other hand, I guess some people might find it funny. I'm sure there's a way to make it funnier and more universally appealing though. So I'm going to vote for a rewrite. --Carlos the Mean 03:40, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Not funny. Could be rewritten but Just looks to be lost to me. --Illogicalbeats

Delete. It's just random and doesn't go anywhere. --neoEva88 22:43, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hmm. I kinda liked it. The biggest problem was that it wouldn't ever get linked from anywhere... so I moved it to Mucus. Can't believe there wasn't already an article there! -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 22:59, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Cursed Page Series

The Cursed Uncyclopedia Article, Template:CursedUser, and Uncyclopedia:Curse

This page was deleted without a proper vote which is not policy for pages which have had so many edits. So I restored it and put it here. --Paulgb Talk 01:35, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Against deletion - I think this (Uncyclopedia:Curse) is a decent article as long as you can keep it to one page. --Paulgb Talk 01:35, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Poor attempt at cashing off of "The Ring". It's ugly, and stupid tot he point of unfunny. I have given the user a chance to make it presentable and he has invariably failed. Mediocre idea, executed very poorly. Can it. --Sir Flammable KUN 01:38, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep it please The joke requires the use of two pages. But that is it. One page is cursed, the other is not and is a warning. The warning is Uncyclopedia:Curse. Oh, and there's the template Template:CursedUser but if you like, that one can be deleted and removed from the legend. ... I thought it would be kinda fun though ... to have a sort of group of cursed people you know? --Nerd42 01:38, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I think the actual cursed page is unneccisary. It makes the legend less mysterious for the page to actually exists. I am against having more than one page for this idea. --Paulgb Talk 01:42, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

oh, and if this series does get deleted, please give me time to copy all the code and images of the latest version so I can host it on my own wiki when/if I start one. --Nerd42 01:40, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete didn't make me laugh anyways. --Splaka 01:49, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete The legend is based on the actions of an alleged "corrupt admin". There's no such thing. (Reasonable people that we are, if anybody feels they have any evidence to the contrary, we'd be happy to discuss it with you here) --Spintherism 03:32, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I did not add the corrupt admin bit. Since, may I remind you, this is a wiki, you can edit that bit out. Come to think of it, maybe corrupt admins do exist, the way everything's getting burned instead of edited around here. Why not lock down the entire site? --Nerd42 13:28, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I think perhaps the first article could be deleted. I think the last one about the cursed article should stay, though it begs for a major overhaul. I think we should keep the user template no matter what. --neoEva88 19:43, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
You know what? I've changed my mind. Go ahead. Delete the crap out of it. I'll just move it to another wiki. I've been working on setting up one today ... --Nerd42 20:20, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep and some one replace the template it makes the joke fun... cmon folks lets have some fun. --Illogicalbeats

No, it's been moved to Bluwiki. See my User Page for details. --Nerd42 12:59, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Books and Movies for Nerds

  • Unfunny and vaguely factual. --Sarducci 22:00, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Expand Being factual actually is funnier. Especially with movies that follow the formulaic plot that was described. In fact, someone make an equation out of it, it sounds like a lark. --Nytrospawn 22:57, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep&Expand It looks like it has an awesome amount of potential. (It strikes a bit close to home for me.) Being quite a bit of a nerd myself, I could probably contribute a lot to it once I find the time. --neoEva88 23:00, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mambo Kurt

Nothing on this page but a template. (Which adds no humor so it hardly counts as content.) The creator hasn't done anything to it for a month. I say we give him some time to react to the VFD tag, and if he doesn't do anything, burn it. --neoEva88 19:26, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Comment I suppose you could always move it to a template for German Chancellors. MadMax 21:17, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I beleive I have remedied the situation. Rangeley 21:20, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree with Rangeley, it looks excellent and the matter has been dealt with. --neoEva88 22:10, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Terry McIntosh

Anti-vanity about someone's teacher/lecturer. I was gonna zap it as anti-vanity, but it is in fact sort of amusing. Perhaps we could have a junkpile of anti-vanity articles about teachers and draw upon it to make an article that doesn't suck - David Gerard 18:38, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Other Proposed Jesii Deletions

I think these suck. Messiah should at least be flagged for ye old rewrite. --Sarducci 15:02, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep(for now) Sony Jesus looks like it could be onto something if someone with a little imagination gets at it.--Distinction 15:57, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps a rewrite is necessary, but don't delete Jesus Juice. I think we should tie it in somehow with a Pimp Juice article and write about them as modern alternatives to typical fruit juices. I'm pretty busy working on some other articles right now though, but I may do it later if no one else has gotten around to it. --neoEva88 19:17, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
I took A stab At it, Played off of some of the point the writers was going for and left it open to build on and out of. I think we should keep it and lets see who builds from here. --Illogicalbeats

Delete Sony Jesus and Messiah, Keep Jesus Juice --—rc (t) 03:12, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

sony and juice were revised heavily so deserve to be saved. no one seems to think messiah is worth keeping, so delete? --Sarducci 16:05, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
I've heavily edited Messiah, by, well, taking out all the text. Is it okay now? --Turnip 16:52, 31 Oct 2005

Jesii Project: Phase One

See my initial discussion on cleaning up the Jesii here: Template Talk:Jesii

I think the following random Jesii pages are terrible and should be deleted because of not-funniness and the glut of Jesii:

Consider 'em on a case by case basis, though. --Sarducci 20:49, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete 'em all Ah, I do so love projects like this. --—rc (t) 23:11, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Delete Jesus 2.0, FrankenJesus, Cowboy jesus, Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, the last might have a future... --Splaka 23:19, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Comment Perhaps they can be merged and added to one of the Jesii pages as "Known imposters of Jesus" ? MadMax 02:44, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
If they don't suck, they deserve their own pages. If they do, delete! I'd be willing to accept Splatka's suggestion of leaving PNJ alive but rewrite-tagged.--Sarducci 12:09, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Ah but they suck why pass up the chance for redicule ? MadMax 21:18, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Save Yeah but the Mormons believe in more than one Jesus, don't they? Wouldn't deleting Jesus entries be a violation of their civil rights? I think in the book of Mormon it talked about there being many incarnations of Jesus on the planet at the same time or something. If anything, merge the Pirate Ninja Jesus to one of the Pirate Ninja pages or something, or add it for the talk like a pirate day or something. --Loke 22:39, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • No, Mormons don't believe in more than one Jesus and The Book of Mormon doesn't mention more than one Jesus on Earth at the same time. In case there was any confusion. --neoEva88 22:46, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks for clearing that up. I must have read that in a different version of the bible. Hard to tell them all apart. Maybe reading all the Jesii articles has confused me a bit? --Loke 20:24, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
So with three vfd and one qualified save, can cowboy and franken jesus go? --Sarducci 16:02, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
FYI: The Book of Mormon does not say there were multiple re-incarnations of Jesus. The LDS Mormon church probably does though ... --Nerd42 20:24, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for that fact. I thought I read or heard it from somewhere that somebody or some group or some bible said that Jesus can take on multiple forms. Maybe he can form his own musical band or baseball team? Anyone want to write an article about Jesii themed music bands or baseball teams? Now playing on the drums Jesus, on the horn Jesus, on the guitar Jesus, on the cowbell Jesus. Now playing first base Jesus, second base Jesus, third base Jesus, etc. :) --Loke 20:24, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Software piracy

Copyright violation copied directly from [4], [5], [6], [7] just to name a few. MadMax 20:14, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Copyright violations with source can be put through QVFD instead because they do'nt need voting, but it seems someone got to this one quickly anyway. I recreated it as a redirect to Piracy --Paulgb Talk 22:49, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Making up Matrix quotes

--delete - Its not really an article, just a bunch of quotes. --Paulgb Talk 00:06, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I wouldn't say it's worthy of deletion. --neoEva88 00:23, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Delete My rationale:
1. We have more than enough quote pages and quotes already.
2. This one hasn't seen much action except by the author.
3. I don't think The Matrix is quotable in the way Oscar Wilde or Winston Churchill are. I mean, the "real" Matrix quotes are made up in the first place, they aren't as well known as those by Wilde or Churchill or Einstein, and they're mostly dumb to begin with. --—rc (t) 00:33, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
zot Citing regulation 4.912 "List Excess"--Sir Flammable KUN 01:25, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Not to be. Not really a good faux-quotable source, imho. --Splaka 01:28, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep I'm the author. The idea, (as noted in Talk:Making up Matrix quotes) is still being worked on ... but basically it's going to eventually be a page that reveals that all the quotes (from Oscar Wilde, Mark Twain and others) on uncyclopedia are fake, as if the Fake Quotes are like the Matrix and people actually believe they are genuine and need to "free their minds." Example:

"As long as the fake quotes exist, the Wikipedia Universe will never be free."

~ Morpheus on making up quotes.

It's not supposed to be as quotable as other making up quoets pages, it's supposed to make fun of them, and make fun of the Matrix philosophy books, which quote the movies in a similar fashion. --Nerd42 16:56, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Give Time to Get Shit Together --Spintherism 18:41, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
its getting better ... look at the page again. Eventually I'm gonna make some kinda images of the Red Pill and the Blue Pill for it ... only it has to have an even funnier angle to be worth that much trouble ... i'm workin on it suggestions? Talk:Making up Matrix quotes --Nerd42 16:46, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Keep - it's getting better already. This idea does in fact have potential IMAO.

--keep - it definitely needs work, but i actually think it's very funny, and has a lot of potential - could be pretty great if the article just pulled together a bit more. --Oracleoftruth 00:11, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Keep As a parody of the Oscar quotes --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:38, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--yay that's five Keeps vs two Deletes, am I allowed to remove the VFD tag? who does that? --Nerd42 22:12, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • I say take the VFD tag out. Besides just the 5-2 voting, the page now is undeniably hilarious. The first quote makes me fall out of my chair, it alone makes the article an Uncyclopedia classic in my opinion. There's some other golden quotes in there too. If it gets any funnier I expect to see it in the VFH. --neoEva88 00:09, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • wth? it's not really that different ... you know alot more things could improve like this that get deleted instead (i.e. the Cursed Page Series) ... but enough griping. who is allowed to remove VFD tags? I started this article, if I do it it'll prolly not stay gone --Nerd42 20:21, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • KEEP This arcticle is 100 times funnier than 90% of the articles here, and that's true 87% of the time. For a site that prides itself on frivolity and humor there sure seems to be a lot of 'clenched anus' attitudes around here. Did I accidently get redirected to Wikipedia when I wasn't looking? Wiki Tiki God 16:08, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Pointless, unfunny random-humour. (Don't be phased by the Canada template as Swaziland isn't a Canadian province anyway.) --Ogopogo 02:07, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • It appears to now be about the real Swaziland, so I would oppose a deletion. Rangeley 21:57, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Priest of Cthulhu

I'm a big fan of the mythos and everything, but I don't understand how this could be considered funny. It seems like it belongs more on a Lovecraft fan-site than a humourous encyclopedia... --Malleus 04:34, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

deleteI agree --Sarducci20:51, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

-- delete - yeah, it really seems like the author just didn't get the point of uncyclopedia when he made this. --Oracleoftruth 00:14, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep So obscure that it's factual, yet weird. --Chronarion 17:46, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep Unless anyone knows a Cthulhu wiki we couold tranwiki it too. --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:37, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete Whoever wrote this is the only one getting a hard-on from it. --barf 20:14, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Pure LOTR/fantasy drivel. Who comes up with this stuff, anyway? --Johnny C. Raven 03:37, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Archived VFD Discussions

Personal tools