Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Encyclopædia_Dramatica: my comments)
Line 234: Line 234:
<s>Keep - Irony at its finest!</s> '''UNSIGNED & VOID.''' --{{User:King In Yellow/sig}} 17:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
<s>Keep - Irony at its finest!</s> '''UNSIGNED & VOID.''' --{{User:King In Yellow/sig}} 17:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
*Bah, '''smashz0r.''' --{{User:Hinoa4/sig2}} 20:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
*Bah, '''smashz0r.''' --{{User:Hinoa4/sig2}} 20:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' {{User:Caliph/sig}}

Revision as of 01:52, March 19, 2006


Without a continuous stream of user votes, VFD tends to overflow making it even slower than it already is. Please take the time to read through a few articles and vote as to whether you think they should be kept or deleted. We appreciate any help that you provide, especially on articles with few votes. Remember, the V is for vote.

1. Read: Uncyclopedia:Deletion Policy
2. When adding an article to VFD, place {{vfd}} at the end of the article to mark it nominated for deletion.
2.1. Votes on unmarked articles may be invalidated; please make sure that you place {{vfd}} on all articles put up for voting.
3. Sign your votes and edits! Use --~~~~ or the "Sign" button (Button sig). Signed votes are more credible.
3.1. Multiple votes on the same entry from one person (using sockpuppet accounts) is a bannable offense.
3.1.1. No, really, it is, and it doesn't matter how 1337 U R, it's really bloody obvious.
3.2. MAKE SURE YOUR VOTES ARE CLEAR. Please put your vote in bold text. Make all the witty comments you want, just make sure your vote is visible and explicit. Example: 'Fucking delete this piece of dogshit article! It sucks!' --slack 06:27, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)*
3.2.1. *(maybe not that explicit) *Unless you have Tourette's Syndrome.
3.3. Please use bullets * at the start of your comment for the sake of organization.
4. For pages that are created as a form of vandalism, contain no content, or are plagiarized, use QuickVFD.
4.1. If the article contains very little or very poor content, consider using {{NRV|~~~~~}} to indicate that the article has No Redeeming Value; unless it is improved, the article will be automatically deleted after 1 week.
4.1.1. NRV tags may be removed from an article if the article has been substantially modified or rewritten.
4.1.2. NRV tags may be replaced with a vfd tag if you feel that the article has value as is or with minor modification (do not forget to list the article here).
4.1.3. NRV tags may also be replaced with {{WIP|~~~~~}} or {{construction}} tags by the author (since these serve a similar purpose) as long as the page is being worked on (within ~48 hours).
4.1.4. The individual who originally placed a NRV tag may remove it at any time.
4.1.5. Removal of NRV tags for any other reason is considered a bannable offense.
5. For archived discussions, see the Archived VFD Discussions.
6. For a list of unused images, click here: Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages2
7. Templates up for deletion voting are here: Pages_for_deletion/templates
8. If you edit VFD disruptively or unnecessarily, you will be banned without warning.
9. Each section header on this page normally contains a link to the item being voted upon; please use [[:Image: and [[:Category: ...]] instead of simply [[Image: or [[Category: ...]] when linking to non-text.
10. SysOps, check the page history before deleting if you see something like it suspiciously changed titles. Archive old entries when they start to clutter up the page. Also, create a new archive page when the one in use gets ridiculously big. And also, get me a sandwich.
10.1. Never remove a serious VFD entry from the VFD, even if it fails. Failed VFD entries get archived along with the successful ones. A record of failed VFDs is important for future reference.
11. New candidates goes on top
12. Don't put underscores in your links. Underscores make them look funny. Use spaces, it'll still link to the same article.
13. Please give all nominated articles a section of their own: this makes voting easier to do and easier to interpret.
13.1. If you feel the articles don't deserve their own sections, they're probably not worth voting on; please use QVFD or {{NRV|~~~~~}} instead.
13.2. If you're grouping them because you're too lazy to give them individual sections, then you're being a dick and making more work for me; fuck off!

See also

Also see these fine pages for all of your deleting needs:

Pages for deletion

New candidates on top.
Mark votes with ONE *.


Without a continuous stream of user votes, VFD tends to overflow making it even slower than it already is. Please take the time to read through a few articles and vote as to whether you think they should be kept or deleted. We appreciate any help that you provide, especially on articles with few votes. Remember, the V is for vote.


See how nominating anything for deletion is really bureaucratic? That's so you don't. If it's really short or mostly crap, put {{NRV}} on it. If it's complete shoot-on-sight crap, list it on QVFD. Only list here if it's almost that bad but you can't improve it.

My Duel with ADD

  • Delete --Nytrospawn 21:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep because it's mine, dagnabbit. --KATIE!! 22:06, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP IT!!! If this isn't kept, then I wi--oh, cool, a new video game's out! --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 22:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Maple Story

  • Delete. Immature people ruined it... It was nice and clean until more people started coming. -- 00:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wow... some guy tried to improve it, but it just can't be fixed. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, for the love of god and all that is holy!! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|VFP|+S 20:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm laughing hard enough that asphyxiation is becoming a genuine concern! Holy god this is some terrible writing... Can I just go ahead and move this to my userpage, so I have it filed away for my "All time Shittiest" idea? TD -- 20:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. A page like this belongs on Encyclop*dia Dramatica, not here. UNKNOWNFILE on 20:29, 18 March 2006 (EST)

Moved to User:TD/Maple Story, as requested by TD. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|VFP|+S 01:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Paris by Night

  • Delete. Nearly qfvd'd it, but decided to show some mercy. TD 19:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Rolandas Paksas

  • Delete. Just because a person is capable of writing an Uncyclopedia article doesn't mean that they should write an Uncyclopedia article. A for Effort, an F minus minus for execution. And Execution is just what this article needs TD 19:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Get better

  • Delete: Just a list, not a funny one, needs work, and the effort required to make this article not suck wouldn't be worth it. Much like filling the gas tank on a 1974 Ford Pinto, you could technically do it, but you'd be better off finding a whole new make & model, and just buying that instead. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 16:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - NRV it into the stone age. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 16:28, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Chinese Room

  • Deletestacize: Nice attempt, poor execution. Blagh. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 15:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Pyramid Head

  • Is this funny, or shall we just delete it now? Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 14:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - It's so funny, in fact, I have awarded it the WWGAE. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • See, another example of pages that need to be archived under an "Uncyclopedia's Worst" project. This is an excellent example of barely coherent (provided you try hard enough) writing, about a bad topic, to use a poorly implemented joke which isn't working. Delete if we must, but if there's a place to store our "Top 100 shitty articles", I'd say that's a primo choice. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 15:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete it. --Jdisbell 16:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Stan Smith

Alexander Hagen

Useless, unused, or redundant templates

---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 06:50, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Huff them all. --Splaka 06:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, maybe except random-rewrite with "Can we fix it?" merged into it. - User:Guest/sig 08:42, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I like "can we fix it", "Why You!" and "Burn" (which happens to be used on qvfd if I'm not mistaken...The rest can be flushed, I guess TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:22, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Burn is unused. The one on QVFD is a copy of the code. And can we please delete all of them so they don't proliferate again? Maintenence is growing to be an increasingly large job and I would like it to be less of a joke and more of something official. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


Destroy: this piece of crap only serves to insert itself into otherwise usefull maintanence pages. And it makes my eyes bleed. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 06:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Excessively difficult to read and understand, which taken by itself is rather funny, but this page tries too hard to achieve too much, and in doing so, fails. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 14:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. In-jokes are undeletable. To strip categories from all those templates, see UN:HAX. - User:Guest/sig 14:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Blast this article to bits. It makes my butt hurt. UNKNOWNFILE on 20:37, 18 March 2006 (EST)

Hair band

  • Consider it Nerved! The people have spoken, and as such, we may consider the Voting Closed! TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

King George III

  • I quite nearly nerved this, but decided to show mercy and compassion by putting it to a vote. I still say delete, but others may disagree. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 19:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Seems like a bit of a random rant to me. I wouldn't argue against NRV Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 23:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


How did this article survive for so long? printf("%s", "[copyrighted word removed per request, please don't sue me]") - User:Guest/sig 18:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Hey! Smashy's MY line! --H. 20:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete!: This article is terrible. And stubby. And nowhere near as good as Duel Masters. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 20:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Probably owing in part to having consumed large amounts of my namesake tonight, I can see that this has a little potential. I'm happy for delete but would also encourage NRV to give the author a brief chance to improve it. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 23:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • No redeeming values, delete. --Johnfn 13:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

ACS/SovietSquirrel, Acs

Allowed vanity (or I'd have NRVed them), but they're also drooling, incoherent, badly spelled and suck royally. Salt the earth. - David Gerard 19:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

  • I dunno. This is so dumb, and poorly written, I almost enjoy it for it's horrendous quality. Lord knows that if something is just bad enough, it can become an uncyclopediatric hit... I have to Abstain from voting for now. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 20:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete ACS, Keep Soviet Squirrel. TD was right - Soviet Squirrel kind of lured me in with its earnest stupidity. ACS has got to go, though. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Wow, I didn't notice there were two pages here... All 3 people named in the Acs page should be shot. Their user pages are frighteningly incoherent, and serve only to validate my inherent mistrust of strangers. Acs should be deleted. User:TD 19:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

The Thirteen Days of Christmas

  • I put this up for vfd a while back, but apparantly never followed up on it. My bad. Fortunately, it's a mistake easily Corrected. Delete. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)17:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The ending made me laugh, but it could do with a rewrite to make it stronger. --Johnfn 13:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Dead baby jokes

  • This really has to go. A stupid stub that oscillates between "dead baby jokes aren't funny" and "dead baby jokes are hilarious" (to paraphrase) and then a list of unoriginal material. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Q: What is not red, unfunny and has no chance of survival? --Imrealized 04:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Microwave it with the baby. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 11:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Keep - If we're happy with lists, then I'm happy. The jokes aren't bad and if that sort of thing is okay here, then okay. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 23:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • A list of dead baby jokes? That's fuckin' classic. Of course, I snagged the whole thing and dumped it to an ODT file for posterity, and having saved them for later enjoyment, we can Delete this article. -see below- User:TD 15:44, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Unlike a truckload of bowling balls, you can unload this article with a pitchfork. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: I'm going to have to go against the flow and I'd like to explain why. Uncyclopedia is devoted to parody and satire but we also harbor other forms of humor and despite being kind of old, dead baby jokes are funny sometimes. So, really, what reason is there not to serve as a repository for some bad jokes; Hell, if it stays around, I'll know somewhere that I can go if I ever want more dead baby jokes. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:25, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I'm nothing if not impressionable. I change my vote to Keep and follow gwax's lead... like a sheep. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 22:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy with the pillow-hammer (ie. "weak delete"). Keep in mind that, while dead baby jokes are witty by definition, this is not much more than an extremely long LIST of them. --H. 06:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Could use a rewrite with the best ones on the page, because really I didn't find it funny at all. --Johnfn 13:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


  • Deleteness!: Is this even funny? Am I living in Bizarro world? Or is this just too british-centric for an American like me? The article appears to have a point, but the humor is either too subtle for me, which is awfully gosh-darn impressive, or it sucks ass, which is awfully fuckin plausible. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 22:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • FixI agree that its pretty strange and/or confusing, but it looks like there might be (might be, not is!) something there kindof funny. --Mrfrence 22:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • rewrite needs work, has potential to be funny --ThEBaGmAn 23:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I'm not seeing the potential (it would take a serious overhaul)...but maybe my vote should be halved since I'm new and an occasional idiot. --Imrealized 07:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep - Irony at its finest! UNSIGNED & VOID. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


  • Delete - Ehhh, no. Much more could be done with this topic. --Some user 07:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I can see humor here, it's obtuse and strange, but I think a person in the know could expand the living daylights out of it, and give us something really good.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is a good stub. --Chronarion 23:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - If this stubby were expanded with quality content, this would feel out of place and end up excusing itself anyway. Let's show it the door early. --Imrealized 07:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 20:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - No. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. Possibly funny. --Johnfn 13:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Tom Osborne

  • DE-STROY!!! (same as below) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy! I think I'm going to vomit. 'Scuse me... (barf) --H. 19:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Lose it. --Spang 20:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • weak keep: I dunno, man. A reference to both naked jell-o twister, and the time warp, in the same article... That's kinda hard to come by these days. I gots no clue who the fuck Tom is, but I've seen worse... Far worse.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)20:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite - Tom Osborne really will be the next Governor of Nebraska, and nude jello wrestling is the new in thing in Congress. That being said, it needs a good rewrite. Jlove1982 20:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • eak-way eep-kay ith-way ewright-ray(weak keep with rewrite) could use immprovement, and the nude jell-o twister is funny... --Bilbobaggins 23:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 05:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Demolish. Boring and too many god references imn the first 2 paragraphs. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Theory of Random Timing

  • Delete: I find a complete lack of humor here. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 02:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I see the humor in the horrible timing, but... not much. Smashy. --H. 03:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • keep with rewrite tag - David Gerard 10:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • rewrite. Idea has potential, sounds too good to be casually tossed away. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)18:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or maybe Rewrite... its an interesting idea and could go places... maybe.--Mrfrence 02:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I thought it had potential too, I even read it over a second time - but sorry, it's hopeless. If someone rewrites this, it should be called Non-Linear Time Theory instead, which is more "trekkie"-sounding. Someone who may or may not be a user 08:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep This can be rewritten properly. As is it is a good stub. --Chronarion 23:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Demolish. Seems too serious to me. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Homestar Runner

  • Keep: It was NRVed and then deleted but I liked it a bunch so I undeleted it and am putting it up here. While I admit that the article isn't the best one out there, I would like to point out that for anyone who knows them both, the juxtaposition of Homestar Runner and Jerkcity is one of the funniest things ever made. While it appears as though all of the comics were created by simply photoshopping Homestar into Jerkcity comics, I feel that such an action is a work of comic genius. Beyond that, I would love it if someone could write an article that was worthy of Homestar, Jerkcity and the bastard amalgamation of the two that someone has seeded. Perhaps, if I can find time, I shall be just such a revisionary someone. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • teh rewrite. it's got some promise, but it sux as of now. Scythe33 21:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: This isn't funny at all, it's just mean and innapropriate. My 8 year old brother (who loves the homestarrunner website) came across this and was really disturbed. Now he is not only uncomfortable 24/7, but he doesn't go to the website anymore. User: 14:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Keep your 8-years-old brother away from Uncyclopedia. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
      • Seriously, the internet in general and Uncyclopedia in specific is not a very safe place for an 8-year old to be playing around. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 02:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and Expand.--User:Jtaylor1/sig 03:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. - User:Guest/sig 03:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite: Sewiously, Pom Pom. We can come up with something better than THAT. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 06:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. And make the pictures bigger. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite or Expand. Far too short, and it's not like it's original comedy. ~H. 17:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Homestarrunner is not now, and never will be funny. The only thing mildly amusing is strongbad's email. I say we deliver a mercy killing, a flashcomic focusing on a mental retard does not do it for me. However, the thing about a bathtub full of warm piss is fuckin' classic.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)TD 21:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. Going into MSChat with a Homestar avatar is what passes for an Uncyclopedia article now? --Andrusi 13:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment: If you've ever seen the comic Jerkcity, you will understand that they have done something far cleverer than just use MSChar. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Gwax, by this article and by the way you've defended it on here I can see you have some talent, but I just don't think that a bastard amalgamation of two very fringe, obscure or otherwise irrelevant comics (or whatever) should exist in this world...it just ain't right. Hobbling around, barely breathing - can't you see it's in pain, man? Plus, I don't want marijuana related to this, um, this...whatever. Let it go and focus your talents on, well, something else. --Imrealized 14:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Jerkcity may be obscure, but Homestar isn't. - User:Guest/sig 14:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - If the comics in this article are representative of jerkcity.com, jerkcity.com is in trouble. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Deleted but a copy has been saved at User:Gwax/Homestar Runner in case anyone (like me) ever wants to rewrite it. Voting closed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Archived VFD Discussions

Archived Votes:

01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10
11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20
21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30
31 (current)

Personal tools