1. Read: Uncyclopedia:Deletion Policy

2. When adding an article to VFD, place {{vfd}} at the end of the article to mark it nominated for deletion.

2.1. Votes on unmarked articles may be invalidated; please make sure that you place {{vfd}} on all articles put up for voting.

3. Sign your votes and edits! Use --~~~~ or the "Sign" button (). Signed votes are more credible.

3.1. Multiple votes on the same entry from one person (using sockpuppet accounts) is a bannable offense.

3.1.1. No, really, it is, and it doesn't matter how 1337 U R, it's really bloody obvious.

3.2. MAKE SURE YOUR VOTES ARE CLEAR. Please put your vote in bold text. Make all the witty comments you want, just make sure your vote is visible and explicit. Example: 'Fucking delete this piece of dogshit article! It sucks!' --slack 06:27, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)*

3.2.1. *(maybe not that explicit)

3.2.1.1. *Unless you have Tourette's Syndrome.

3.3. Please use bullets * at the start of your comment for the sake of organization.

4. For pages that are created as a form of vandalism, contain no content, or are plagiarized, use QuickVFD.

4.1. If the article contains very little or very poor content, consider using {{NRV|~~~~~}} to indicate that the article has No Redeeming Value; unless it is improved, the article will be automatically deleted after 1 week.

4.1.1. NRV tags may be removed from an article if the article has been substantially modified or rewritten.

4.1.2. NRV tags may be replaced with a vfd tag if you feel that the article has value as is or with minor modification (do not forget to list the article here).

4.1.3. NRV tags may also be replaced with {{WIP|~~~~~}} or {{construction}} tags by the author (since these serve a similar purpose) as long as the page is being worked on (within ~48 hours).

4.1.4. The individual who originally placed a NRV tag may remove it at any time.

4.1.5. Removal of NRV tags for any other reason is considered a bannable offense.

5. For archived discussions, see the Archived VFD Discussions.

6. For a list of unused images, click here: Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages2

7. Templates up for deletion voting are here: Pages_for_deletion/templates

8. If you edit VFD disruptively or unnecessarily, you will be banned without warning.

9. Each section header on this page normally contains a link to the item being voted upon; please use [[:Image: and [[:Category: ...]] instead of simply [[Image: or [[Category: ...]] when linking to non-text.

10. SysOps, check the page history before deleting if you see something like it suspiciously changed titles. Archive old entries when they start to clutter up the page. Also, create a new archive page when the one in use gets ridiculously big. And also, get me a sandwich.

10.1. Never remove a serious VFD entry from the VFD, even if it fails. Failed VFD entries get archived along with the successful ones. A record of failed VFDs is important for future reference.

11. New candidates goes on top

12. Don't put underscores in your links. Underscores make them look funny. Use spaces, it'll still link to the same article.

13. Please give all nominated articles a section of their own: this makes voting easier to do and easier to interpret.

13.1. If you feel the articles don't deserve their own sections, they're probably not worth voting on; please use QVFD or {{NRV|~~~~~}} instead.

13.2. If you're grouping them because you're too lazy to give them individual sections, then you're being a dick and making more work for me; fuck off!

See also

Also see these fine pages for all of your deleting needs:

• QuickVFD
• Undictionary deletion: A-C D-K L-R S-Z
• Pages for deletion/clones
• Pages for deletion/templates
• Unusedimages and more unusedimages

Pages for deletion

New candidates on top.
Mark votes with ONE *.

Boolean Logic

• Booooo!(lean logic)--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Pro-Test

• Deleteness!: Is this even funny? Am I living in Bizarro world? Or is this just too british-centric for an American like me? The article appears to have a point, but the humor is either too subtle for me, which is awfully gosh-darn impressive, or it sucks ass, which is awfully fuckin plausible. TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 22:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• FixI agree that its pretty strange and/or confusing, but it looks like there might be (might be, not is!) something there kindof funny. --Mrfrence 22:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• rewrite needs work, has potential to be funny --ThEBaGmAn 23:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Deprogramming

• Delete - Ehhh, no. Much more could be done with this topic. --Some user 07:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I can see humor here, it's obtuse and strange, but I think a person in the know could expand the living daylights out of it, and give us something really good.TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a good stub. --Chronarion 23:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Tom Osborne

• DE-STROY!!! (same as below) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy! I think I'm going to vomit. 'Scuse me... (barf) --–H. 19:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Lose it. --Spang 20:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• weak keep: I dunno, man. A reference to both naked jell-o twister, and the time warp, in the same article... That's kinda hard to come by these days. I gots no clue who the fuck Tom is, but I've seen worse... Far worse.TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)20:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite - Tom Osborne really will be the next Governor of Nebraska, and nude jello wrestling is the new in thing in Congress. That being said, it needs a good rewrite. Jlove1982 20:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• eak-way eep-kay ith-way ewright-ray(weak keep with rewrite) could use immprovement, and the nude jell-o twister is funny... --Bilbobaggins 23:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Joe Rogan

• ELETE-DAY I don't find it funny, and it's like omething I'd write (anything I write=crap)--Bilbobaggins 16:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Admitting you have a problem is the first step to recovery. Smashy. --–H. 17:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• I dunno, it has this certain quality to it... weak keep. The thing about kicking people in the leg... I find it amusing. TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The Punisher

• Weak delete. Aside from some really weak political humor and some obtuse pirate references this is a factual article about The Punisher. A rewrite would do it right, though if deleted we won't really be losing much.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - This reads like a manual for how not to write an article. Forgotten in the process: jokes. — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP ^{(Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!)} 12:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy! --–H. 17:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Lots of effort. No humor. Leave all that "truth" crap to the wikipedians.TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It is hard to write an article on The Punisher without getting into the facts. There are other factual articles that are kept. I got some compliments on this article before, and I was told I was going in the right direction. But what do I know, there is a conspiracy against me anyway? --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The Secret Society of People Who Can Recognize Articles That Suck is out to get you. WoooOOoooOoooOOOOoooo scary!!!--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:52, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Theory of Random Timing

• Delete: I find a complete lack of humor here. --Sir gwax (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• I see the humor in the horrible timing, but... not much. Smashy. --–H. 03:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep with rewrite tag - David Gerard 10:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• rewrite. Idea has potential, sounds too good to be casually tossed away. TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)18:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or maybe Rewrite... its an interesting idea and could go places... maybe.--Mrfrence 02:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I thought it had potential too, I even read it over a second time - but sorry, it's hopeless. If someone rewrites this, it should be called Non-Linear Time Theory instead, which is more "trekkie"-sounding. Someone who may or may not be a user 08:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This can be rewritten properly. As is it is a good stub. --Chronarion 23:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Homestar Runner

• Keep: It was NRVed and then deleted but I liked it a bunch so I undeleted it and am putting it up here. While I admit that the article isn't the best one out there, I would like to point out that for anyone who knows them both, the juxtaposition of Homestar Runner and Jerkcity is one of the funniest things ever made. While it appears as though all of the comics were created by simply photoshopping Homestar into Jerkcity comics, I feel that such an action is a work of comic genius. Beyond that, I would love it if someone could write an article that was worthy of Homestar, Jerkcity and the bastard amalgamation of the two that someone has seeded. Perhaps, if I can find time, I shall be just such a revisionary someone. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• teh rewrite. it's got some promise, but it sux as of now. Scythe33 21:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: This isn't funny at all, it's just mean and innapropriate. My 8 year old brother (who loves the homestarrunner website) came across this and was really disturbed. Now he is not only uncomfortable 24/7, but he doesn't go to the website anymore. User:67.160.2.191 14:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep your 8-years-old brother away from Uncyclopedia. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Seriously, the internet in general and Uncyclopedia in specific is not a very safe place for an 8-year old to be playing around. --Sir gwax (talk) 02:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and Expand.--Jtaylor1 03:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 03:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite: Sewiously, Pom Pom. We can come up with something better than THAT. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 06:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite. And make the pictures bigger. - Ghelae^talk_contribs 16:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite or Expand. Far too short, and it's not like it's original comedy. ~–H. 17:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Homestarrunner is not now, and never will be funny. The only thing mildly amusing is strongbad's email. I say we deliver a mercy killing, a flashcomic focusing on a mental retard does not do it for me. However, the thing about a bathtub full of warm piss is fuckin' classic.TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)TD 21:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Archived VFD Discussions