Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 119: Line 119:
 
*'''Kill''' the foo'!--[[User:Ryoske|Ryoske]] 08:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Kill''' the foo'!--[[User:Ryoske|Ryoske]] 08:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Maul''' - It's gotten to the point that the ''moment'' I read "Chuck Norris" I just start roaring and throwing things. Shaun and others like him need to stop - I'm running out of things to throw. {{User:Wild Weasel/sig4}} 12:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Maul''' - It's gotten to the point that the ''moment'' I read "Chuck Norris" I just start roaring and throwing things. Shaun and others like him need to stop - I'm running out of things to throw. {{User:Wild Weasel/sig4}} 12:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  +
*'''Don't Delete''' the person this is about is a progedy runner and is so unbelievably against everything chuck norris jokes about it is rediculous. let this one slide haha --[[User:Some user|Some user]] 05:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
   
 
==[[Gammabet]]==
 
==[[Gammabet]]==

Revision as of 12:41, March 9, 2006

WE NEED YOUR VOTES!

Without a continuous stream of user votes, VFD tends to overflow making it even slower than it already is. Please take the time to read through a few articles and vote as to whether you think they should be kept or deleted. We appreciate any help that you provide, especially on articles with few votes. Remember, the V is for vote.

PLEASE VOTE!
1. Read: Uncyclopedia:Deletion Policy
2. When adding an article to VFD, place {{vfd}} at the end of the article to mark it nominated for deletion.
2.1. Votes on unmarked articles may be invalidated; please make sure that you place {{vfd}} on all articles put up for voting.
3. Sign your votes and edits! Use --~~~~ or the "Sign" button (Button sig). Signed votes are more credible.
3.1. Multiple votes on the same entry from one person (using sockpuppet accounts) is a bannable offense.
3.1.1. No, really, it is, and it doesn't matter how 1337 U R, it's really bloody obvious.
3.2. MAKE SURE YOUR VOTES ARE CLEAR. Please put your vote in bold text. Make all the witty comments you want, just make sure your vote is visible and explicit. Example: 'Fucking delete this piece of dogshit article! It sucks!' --slack 06:27, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)*
3.2.1. *(maybe not that explicit)
3.2.1.1. *Unless you have Tourette's Syndrome.
3.3. Please use bullets * at the start of your comment for the sake of organization.
4. For pages that are created as a form of vandalism, contain no content, or are plagiarized, use QuickVFD.
4.1. If the article contains very little or very poor content, consider using {{NRV|~~~~~}} to indicate that the article has No Redeeming Value; unless it is improved, the article will be automatically deleted after 1 week.
4.1.1. NRV tags may be removed from an article if the article has been substantially modified or rewritten.
4.1.2. NRV tags may be replaced with a vfd tag if you feel that the article has value as is or with minor modification (do not forget to list the article here).
4.1.3. NRV tags may also be replaced with {{WIP|~~~~~}} or {{construction}} tags by the author (since these serve a similar purpose) as long as the page is being worked on (within ~48 hours).
4.1.4. The individual who originally placed a NRV tag may remove it at any time.
4.1.5. Removal of NRV tags for any other reason is considered a bannable offense.
5. For archived discussions, see the Archived VFD Discussions.
6. For a list of unused images, click here: Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages2
7. Templates up for deletion voting are here: Pages_for_deletion/templates
8. If you edit VFD disruptively or unnecessarily, you will be banned without warning.
9. Each section header on this page normally contains a link to the item being voted upon; please use [[:Image: and [[:Category: ...]] instead of simply [[Image: or [[Category: ...]] when linking to non-text.
10. SysOps, check the page history before deleting if you see something like it suspiciously changed titles. Archive old entries when they start to clutter up the page. Also, create a new archive page when the one in use gets ridiculously big. And also, get me a sandwich.
10.1. Never remove a serious VFD entry from the VFD, even if it fails. Failed VFD entries get archived along with the successful ones. A record of failed VFDs is important for future reference.
11. New candidates goes on top
12. Don't put underscores in your links. Underscores make them look funny. Use spaces, it'll still link to the same article.
13. Please give all nominated articles a section of their own: this makes voting easier to do and easier to interpret.
13.1. If you feel the articles don't deserve their own sections, they're probably not worth voting on; please use QVFD or {{NRV|~~~~~}} instead.
13.2. If you're grouping them because you're too lazy to give them individual sections, then you're being a dick and making more work for me; fuck off!

See also

Also see these fine pages for all of your deleting needs:

Pages for deletion

New candidates on top.
Mark votes with ONE *.

WE NEED YOUR VOTES!

Without a continuous stream of user votes, VFD tends to overflow making it even slower than it already is. Please take the time to read through a few articles and vote as to whether you think they should be kept or deleted. We appreciate any help that you provide, especially on articles with few votes. Remember, the V is for vote.

PLEASE VOTE!

Template:Vandalize

Outdated business models

Stub, probably QVFD-able, but I wasn't 100% certain. --Some user 02:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Lady Romana

Worthless drivel, sorry. --Some user 02:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Shaun Boedicker

Suspected vanity. No en.wp article and only 130 google hits. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 21:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep! it was funny haha
  • Smashy. Change the B to an N and it's closer to the truth. (Sorry, couldn't resist.) --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, though it might be worth keeping if it were "Tara Reid" instead. --Some user 02:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill the foo'!--Ryoske 08:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - It's gotten to the point that the moment I read "Chuck Norris" I just start roaring and throwing things. Shaun and others like him need to stop - I'm running out of things to throw. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete the person this is about is a progedy runner and is so unbelievably against everything chuck norris jokes about it is rediculous. let this one slide haha --Some user 05:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Gammabet

Steven Seagal

Kzstksnxnmsk

  • Defnufjbdsj vkn bmeiewh. Fipisand Huff duyiewu!--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • ... what he said. Smashy. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 07:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Get rid of it quick before the author manages to turn this into another vanity universe. --Some user 07:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff. Nonsensical, unfunny garbage. --Xoid 08:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 'Kzstksnxnmsk'. For great justice.--Ryoske 08:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Crap. --Spang 09:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Super Nerd

It smells like vanity, but reads like an energy bar, er, vanity. Lots of google hits for that name but no en.wp article. Common name? Huff! --Splaka 02:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Oswald

External Pictures. No content. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 02:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

King_Henry_the_Whatever

Hanging chad

Limewire

Rev. Fred Phelps

Stupid vanity that's not funny, evem if it happens to be some pop culture icon that I don't know about. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 01:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ritz Hotel London exterior.jpg

  • Delete this copyright image from the hotel's own website is not being used to satirise the hotel. This image is being used to satirise Abu Ghraib. Fair root of the razorblade, mate! --Skyring 22:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • ...and the problem with satirizing Abu Ghraib with a picture of a fancy-shmancy hotel is...? Keep, and I'm not sure pictures go in VFD--ask Gwax about that. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Normally we don't deal with images here and I don't really want to start; my hands are already full enough without images or the masses of NRV content ever making it to VFD, someone else can do it if they want. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
      • I'm new here and if there's a better place to put up unsuitable images, it's not obvious to me. I noted that there were other images listed here and followed suite. There is no problem at all with satirising Abu Ghraib with a photo of a fancy hotel. In fact it's a bloody good idea. The problem comes with using a copyrighted photograph from the hotel's own website to do it when the hotel itself isn't being satirised in the article. That's not fair use. --Skyring 20:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
        • As it stands, there is no suitable place to nominate images for deletion but if you can find an admin to spearhead it for you, power to you, but I will not be that admin; I'm already plenty busy and I just don't care about image detritus as much as I care about article detritus. Incidentally, someone has already up and deleted these images. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ritz Hotel London palm court.jpg

  • Delete this copyright image not being used to satirise the subject. This image is being used to satirise Abu Ghraib not the Ritz Hotel. Fair suck! --Skyring 22:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Babel:Ja/ハ ハ ハ!

Babel:Zh-mps/ㄅㄆㄇㄈ

--Hant 02:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Weak for This would probably appeal more to people who can't read or don't know what the fuck Bopomofo is.--Ryoske 06:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

IAG

Gustavus Adolphus

Bananana

  • Concept of imaginary fruit has potential, but execution lacking . Delete or complete rewrite. Unsigned vote removed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Ditto the above. --Iritscen 16:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Peel it. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 22:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep? I rewrote the article the other day, does it have hope? --Matusao 01:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • It has hope. Keep. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 07:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Making fruit funny is no small task. This has potential. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 15:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, eat or redirect: It's the wrong spelling of banana and as such should be eaten or nuked outright. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Pulatsovania

Hellmo

  • Keep --Baalking It's my article, and I feel that it's improved. It used to be NRVed.
  • It's not that bad. It could use maybe a small fix or two, but nothing major. Keep. -- The Larrikin, 2 March 2006
  • NRV.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 04:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It needs work, but has promise. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I don't like the joke, but with elaboration it could be moderately funny. --Matusao 01:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. Must.... know.... more..... --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 07:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Krismas

Archived VFD Discussions

Archived Votes:

01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10
11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20
21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 (current)

Personal tools
projects