Uncyclopedia:Noob of the Moment

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 23:53, August 16, 2010 by Brutiss (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Noobaward

Noob of the Month badge

“Vote for me!”
~ Oscar Wilde

Welcome to the voting page. AHA! Indeed it is.

This is where we nominate n00bs for n00b of the month. The official recommendation for Noob of the Month is me.

Eligibility Requirements

In order to be considered a noob, you must:

  • Be a MEMBER of no more than 30±3 days membership (Unless you are Rcmurphy).
  • Not nominate yourself. You can vote for yourself, but you can't nominate yourself.
  • Have written at least one "full" article or have created at least 5 "decent" photoshopped or otherwise modified images.

Nomination and voting process

Nonoobs

You can't nominate yourself, n00b!

Nominate the noob who you think has made the most high-quality contributions in their short time here.

Nominations end one week from the end of the month. At this time you may vote ONCE for your favorite noob. Do your research! Vote for who makes you giggle. On the first of the next month, the winner will be announced.

Only signed votes count! Please use a level two headline format for the nomination. And do add {{VoteNOTM}} to the nominee's userspace.

Attention citizens, due to the horrible mess in March, make sure you vote only once, whether it's a joke vote or not. An against vote is considered as a vote. Andathankyouverymuch

Fabulous Prizes

Winner will receive:

  • Spotlight on front page
  • Fancy template to put on your user page

(Note: Contrary to what some may consider to be popular belief, winners of Uncyclopedia's Noob of the Month Award® will not be entitled to complimentary beef jerky at their local grocery stores.)

Past Winners

ChronarionRadicalXSlackerboyMellomehSplakaUtarEmpireBobBobBobTodd LyonsWhywhywhyMoneySignCount of Monkey CriscoSpangHardwick FundlebuggyNydasZombiebaronShandonProcopiusQuiraAnyoneBraydieGneomiThe BardContestantRAHBMichaelHaxPigeon۞Dr. SkullthumperGerrycheeversThe UnIdiotJim GroovesterMrN9000AEDJ IrreverentLuvvyMightydandylionYesTimeToEditCheapinitrealThe WoodburninatorMrmonkey72RcmurphyMultiliteralistNachladerPaddyAtkinsonDrStrangeTagstitGuildensternensteinSonjeYouKnowWhatTheMusicMeansClemens177StaircasePuppyOnTheRadioSequenceWhy do I need to provide this?BlueSpiritGuyPuffskeinAleister in ChainsLisaKacholdHELPMEJoyce Carol Hall-and-OatesTragicbootyEnglish peasantMsuCarencroJohn LydonNonchalantCaterpillarLordarcadian


For full details, see Past Winners

Official Nominations for August

Fudgemobile (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +2
  • RocketNom and For. With over eight correct contributions to the Uncyclopedia:Proofreading Service[1] (beating the only other contributor in recent times by a factor of 4.) As well as offering to help the community fix the incorrect and wrongs[2] of the written works of others. Successfully uploaded an image and placed it in an article. Has taken indirect direction[3]. I believe this user has what it takes to win this award despite not writing an article (or creating 4 of the 5 required images) needed as a normal prerequisite to qualifying for such.  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  16 Aug 2010 ~ 06:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote Keep. Because I've Proofread a total of 11 Articles, and currently doing another. (PS, In most of the articles are about Wrestling (thats why i don't have more)) The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fudgemobile (talk • contribs) 07:27, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote Keep. fudgemobile is cool and sexy Brutiss 23:37, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

  • Sign your posts with four tildes, kid! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 07:27, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Ineligible for now. Has to write a full-length article or several shorter ones or several well-chopped images first (doesn't look like the image he uploaded was original, either), maintenance ain't enough. Which reminds me, weren't we supposed to reconsider these eligibility requirements? --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 07:27, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
    Yes, seems unfair to me. For example, completely ignores PEEING. Or just general good Uncyclopeding? —FUCKTARD WHORE MafiaHatBlack Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [10:40 16 August 2010]
  1. That more people should be using & contributing to, IMHO (including myself).
  2. I'm "Currently on Uncyclopedia 1-6 Hours a day, ask me to fix or spellcheck pages, I'm bored so please, PLEASE, give me something to do"
  3. Corrected editing mistakes after viewing my comment here and researching what he did wrong.

Thatdamnedfollowspot (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +6.6853
  • Symbol against vote Against. this guys sucks camal d1ck dont give him the award fudgemobile deserves it ....

fark u ub3r l33t h4xer u made other acc's and voted for urself this guy does not deserve it fudgemobile does !!!!!!!!!! this guys sucks donkey balls and camal d1ck

Personal tools
In other languages
projects