Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{Mike Cosgrove}})
({{VFDc|Mike Cosgrove}})
Line 288: Line 288:
 
*{{Keep}} In fact, UU, I ''am'' happy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}} <small>03:17 4-Nov-09</small>
 
*{{Keep}} In fact, UU, I ''am'' happy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}} <small>03:17 4-Nov-09</small>
 
*'''Keep'''. I wouldn't go so far as to call myself "happy," considering that I just gave blood and am a bit dizzy, but UU has improved this article. {{User:Hyperbole/sig}} 21:20, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
 
*'''Keep'''. I wouldn't go so far as to call myself "happy," considering that I just gave blood and am a bit dizzy, but UU has improved this article. {{User:Hyperbole/sig}} 21:20, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  +
*'''Keep.''' {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''04:09, 5 November 2009''</small>
 
|-
 
|-
 
||'''Delete'''||
 
||'''Delete'''||

Revision as of 04:09, November 5, 2009

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.
Un-vfd

VFD: Where bad articles go to get recycled.


Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):


Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


Philosophy of Control

Keep
Delete
Comments

Vijay

Keep
  • Keep Definitely a real noteworthy person. His name is Joseph Vijay. If anything at all the article should be improved. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stupidis4eva! (talk • contribs)
Probably says it's the usual fare on VFD: Two pages of aimless free association around an otherwise notable topic. The vote by "Stupidis4eva!" could be taken as an offer to fix this; that would divert him from his recent edit war. Spıke ¬  14:19 4-Nov-09
Delete
Comments
  • Old versions suggest that Vijay is a Bollywood actor or producer; Wikipedia lists four such, two relating to Tamil, mentioned in the article. So the article isn't vanity. That doesn't mean it's any good. The most significant thing to happen to it in 2009 was repeated blanking. Perhaps notify the authors and give them a week to type something that makes sense. Spıke ¬  01:51 4-Nov-09

The Liars

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Random as anything, incoherent, and pretty well pointless. Plus, nothing links to it except this page. Get rid. --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:10, Nov 3
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Seven months ago, Sycamore inserted {random}, which gently suggests that they "might want to edit it so that it's actually about something! " They didn't. Spıke ¬  14:08 3-Nov-09
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. After the first paragraph it's not random, it doesn't get any better but it's not random. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:51, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol EXTERMINATE vote small EXTERMINATE!  Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:02, 4 November 2009
Comments

THE NIGELS

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. It's short, it's crap, it should have had an ICU. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:58, Nov 3
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. After submitting essays like this to the third-grade teacher, who will correct the grammar, authors really ought to delete them. Spıke ¬  13:06 3-Nov-09
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Stuff like this should be written privately then burned in secret. --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:04, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol EXTERMINATE vote small EXTERMINATE!  Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:27, 4 November 2009
Comments

🔒 What was that? H D Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. WHAT IS THIS?! --Killer_3.14 23:05, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak delete to counter Hyperbole. Recently in the Forum, several editors expressed support for the unconventional; but this breaks the encyclopedia canon completely. It is slapped-together performance art. Spıke ¬  23:21 2-Nov-09
Comments

Kept MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 03:51, Nov 5

Gay nigger sex

Keep
  • Keep Fags. IMO... if you are offended by the word "Nigger" you are part of the problem which is racism. That's what makes this article funny. It needs more pics, and more niggers. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 23:13, Nov 2
I've lovingly watched over Niggers for a couple months. Not the word but its senseless, hostile, unfunny overuse in the article is what offends me. Spıke ¬  23:26 2-Nov-09
Theoretically, we could salvage any damn page on VFD. Theoretically, Communism works. So far the first two salvage attempts have been less than stellar. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:36, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
I even made another explanation to keep on the (1) section of the comments since a reply on there segued into another reason to keep. --Shock Jock 22:58, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
YEAH, LETS DO THIS SHIT! I think to see an article about gay nigger sex would just be rad if it because featured on the main page! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT! --Shock Jock 22:58, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Hey dude, check this out! I made the most totally offensive, in-your-face article on Uncyclopedia! What? It's also supposed to be funny and well written? Fuck that! Competent writing is for fags. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:56, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Dittoes. The only thing better than VFD for this would be QVFD. Spıke ¬  23:06 2-Nov-09
MrN has made the writing masterfully clever throughout; it's no longer "the most totally offensive." But with no link to reality, it is still a vehicle for gratuitous, pre-adolescent epithets. Uncyclopedia makes great sport of Jews and their stereotypical behavior. Compare that to an article on "Dirty Jew sex" that bore no relation to the stereotypes. Spıke ¬  12:32 3-Nov-09
  • Delete. I am not offended by the word "Nigger." I enjoy Dead nigger storage and Niggers. I sort of, kind of enjoy Nigger Dogshit Sandwiches. But this article fucking sucks and should be disposed of in a way befitting it, such as being sucked up the asshole of a gay nigger. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:21, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
    Thank you Hyperbole! Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:33, 3 November 2009
  • Delete. Per The Count. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 03:20, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Unfunny and racist. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:49, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. What Matt lobster said. Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 00:00, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. One for KKKPedia. It is so moronically stupid it deserves removal. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 07:27, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  • Ehhh... Laughed once (in the HowTo section), but one lol doesn't redeem this IMO. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:54, Nov 4 2009
  • Delete OK. Sorry dude. I tried to help you I really did. I did see some humour in what you were doing to begin with, but apparently you don't understand what I was trying to do with my edits. What you added (and added back) was just more well... Shock rather than humour? It's the funny we are looking for. Maybe you are looking for a different wiki. However, I will do my best to uphold your wish of being shocking and follow your style and shockingly huff this article directly following all the carp I have spouted so far on the vote. Shocking eh? But was it funny??? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 03:49, Nov 5
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. This article is so pathetically desperate to offend that it's rendered totally unoffensive. That only makes it funny in the sad little way that most terribly written, juvenile articles can be considered "funny". --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:23, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • No your missing my point. It's funny (to me) because some people are offended by it. Often those people are against racism. IMO that actually perpetuates racism... I find it funny that people who are trying to fight racism are actually making the problem worse. I removed some of the more retarded stuff and added a pic. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 00:39, Nov 3
  • Armpit odor is also offensive, but does that make it inherently funny. I'd love to hear your reasoning on how "some people" are making the problem worse. I suspect that would be quite comical. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:43, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
    Sure. My reasoning is mostly described here. Also... sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never hurt me? If you allow a word to hurt you that gives power to those who want to sustain racism. When no one cares about the words... Then we will not have racism. Please, vote delete if you don't think this article is funny. Please don't vote delete because you think it's racist. That's kinda all I'm saying. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 13:00, Nov 3
    Hahaha! See what I mean, fucking hilarious. Apparently racism will go away if we ignore it. Yeah, it's not a vicious cycle of emotional and social issues, it's just the verbal equivalent of a staring contest, if you get offended and flinch you lose. The atmosphere of paranoia and distrust, the xenophobia and social stigmata, the ability to divide society that's nothing. It's just an elaborate ploy to cause mild irritation to certain people. When no one cares about words people will still be shunned for being the wrong race. They can still be denied respect, acceptance or jobs and opportunities because of race. There will still be that undertones of elitism and paranoia that infect communities with a sort of low grade insanity when there's a fracture along racial lines.
    If words could never hurt you we wouldn't have laws against slander and defamation of character. Let's not forget that racism has, silently and suddenly jumped right into sticks and stones territory with blood spattered intensity. Your concept of racism, the belief that it was or is a system of racists having power simply because of their power to offend people is a foolish understatement unsupported by history or reason. Racism is often the abuse of existing power, be it financial, political or the raw and reckless power of majority opinion. You remind me of South Park believing simpletons and their 2 dimensional oversimplifications and head-up-the-ass philosophy of "apathy is bliss" and "everything is alright if you pretend it's alright." --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:48, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
Dude. My concept of racism is not "the belief that it was or is a system of racists having power simply because of their power to offend people". It's obviously a lot more complicated than that. You obviously did not read the article I linked you to and wrote. Personally I think racism is something which we are evolving away from because the reasons why it evolved are disappearing. 30 years ago it was VERY taboo to use the "N" word in a film. These days it's far less so. That's cos the world is less racist now. Jesus said... "Turn the other cheek" :P MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 14:57, Nov 3
No, I read the article. I just forgot to pack a fucking marlin spike and sailing manual to untangle the dense Gordian knot of color related puns in order to extract the profound wisdom allegedly in the middle. 30 years ago it was very taboo to use the "N" word. Wrong! You've obviously never seen such movies as "The 6000 Dollar Nigger" (1979), "Boss Nigger" (1975) and "Legend of Nigger Charlie" (1972) or its sequel "The Soul of Nigger Charlie" (1973). These are real movies, you can look them up on IMDB. Even well know movies such as "Blazing Saddles" (1974) and "The Shining" (1980) had little problem with that word. Fluctuations in the word "nigger"'s usage or popularity are hardly indicative of and certainly not a cause of changes in overall racism in a culture.
You said "If you allow a word to hurt you that gives power to those who want to sustain racism. When no one cares about the words... Then we will not have racism." You also said "Dude. My concept of racism is not "the belief that it was or is a system of racists having power simply because of their power to offend people". It's obviously a lot more complicated than that." I think it's time to take a shit or get off the commode. For the record I voted delete on this article because it is so badly written. The point of my little parody quote was to convey that someone was trying so hard to make an offensive article that they forgot to make one that was written well. You couldn't glean that obvious theme yet you expect others to decipher the hidden moral of The Color Problem? What's wrong with you, man? --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:41, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
Am not in favor of racism or of the reverse-racism of treating groups with kid gloves. We often achieve humor by shattering these barriers. This article will neither cause blood to be spattered nor further racial equality. But it's gratuitous, pointless name-calling. Spıke ¬  14:02 3-Nov-09
  • I have just made some BIG IMPROVEMENTS to this article. And I don't want it deleted because I feel it was such a revolutionary endeavor for Uncyclopedia's virgin standpoints of humor. Articles pertaining to nigger culture humor me; but even racism doesn't stop me from reading Uncyclopedia. --Shock Jock 07:15, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
Virgin standpoints sounds like something that happens on the first night you have sex.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 07:34, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
The BIG IMPROVEMENTS are to the length of the article. MrN's pass made me soften but not remove my No vote; having it in book length is no better. Spıke ¬  10:27 4-Nov-09
(1) But since my username is Shock Jock; I might as well live up to it. Uncyclopedia was made to be a parody of Wikipedia with more room for shock jockery; so I might as well live up to my name one way or another! I even have a friend on YouTube who reminisces buttfucking moments of gay nigger sex when he comments videos. http://www.youtube.com/karlslasher80 . So, at this rate, we might as well just keep this total masterpiece. --Shock Jock 22:58, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
If you really wanted to live up to your name you could fade into relative obscurity 5 years ago. Anyway you simply reinforce my point "shock" no matter how desperately sought after does not equal humor. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Template:EDfact

Keep
  • Keep This is used on some pages. I certainly don't want it used on any more pages, but it's fine where it is. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 14:00, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. Useless template. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Hardly used and annoying. Transclude it where it currently exists and nuke it from orbit. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:13, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nuke. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:46, Nov 4 2009
Comments
  • This set of templates seems to facilitate intrusive, garish graphics. It isn't "useless"; I simply don't like the use (any more than overuse of fonts, or "ransom-note typography"), but that's a policy question I'll leave to youse. Spıke ¬  11:08 2-Nov-09

Template:SmoothRainbow

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Looks like a useless template. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty much a failed experiment.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:05, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. So ugly, I would rather take a dump, fish it out of the toilet, frame it, hang it on my wall, and look at that. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:14, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:44, Nov 4 2009
Comments
  • Comment. Can't see a reason people would use it. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Docile, when putting templates on VFD, please remember to use <noinclude> tags. Otherwise you're tagging every page that uses the template for VFD. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:18, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Template:Rainbow

Keep
  • Symbol keep vote Keep. Just because it's useless doesn't mean several people aren't using it.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:07, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Comment. Can't see a reason people would use it. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Would you say that you can't see a reason people would use it, then? Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 00:15, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Template:Fifty

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Looks like a useless template. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete We don't need this. Just subst this into the page where it's used. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:08, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Subst into the ED article - maybe - but I'd hate to see this used anywhere else. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:35, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:42, Nov 4 2009
Comments
  • Comment. Can't see a reason people would use it. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Potentially useful to tile a background image, as I tried to do recently (Forum:CSS background-image). In actual use only in one article, which would improve immediately by not doing so. Spıke ¬  10:52 2-Nov-09
Nope. Useless. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:08, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Template:Rainbowpyramid

Keep
  • Keep Pretty. Shows our support for the homosexual community. That's right. There is only one homosexual community. It's called... CANADA! Or was it Australia? No... It was China. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 22:39, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. Useless template. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Horrifying eyesore that I hate. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:37, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:40, Nov 4 2009
Comments
  • Seeks to achieve an animation. This template was blanked by a vandal four months ago and no one has noticed. It now contains only the {VFD} tag, which is faithfully copied into the few pages that invoke the template. Spıke ¬  11:01 2-Nov-09
Understood, though Syndrome got to it first. Indeed I was and am reluctant to replace an article with a historical version while a vote is active. Spıke ¬  12:36 3-Nov-09
MrN9000 would tell you that it's a requirement to do so. See rule 2.1 in The Uncyclopedian Rulebook Part IV: Them List of Rules at the Top of the VFD Page. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:22, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
I see it; but "you" in rule 2 would be the nominator (Docile Hippopotamus), to whom I wrote the above note--comparable to the one you wrote to him (above, and with a more specific fix) in the case of Template:SmoothRainbow. Spıke ¬  01:29 4-Nov-09
  • Comment. Dexter deserves to be raped in the face. That is all. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:14, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto: Australia

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Oh dear God this is horrible. Oh the humanity! Pup
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. I think my brain cried a little. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:44, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Junk. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 07:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Starts out non-awfully but then nose dives into listcruft. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:37, Nov 4 2009
Comments
  • Comment. I don't know, maybe somebody can make something of this. I do like the opening quote. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 04:08, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Red Hot Chili Peppers

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Bleh. —Paizuri MUN (Talk Contribs Poll!)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Am not a RHCP fan but am sure a real one would have no use for this page o' randomness. Spıke ¬  02:01 31-Oct-09
  • Delete. An abject example of course work submitted by fans of the Randumbo school of writing. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 07:04, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
    I like "Randumbo," and "Randumbo School of Writing" sounds like the name of an article. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:20, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  • Bleah. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:31, Nov 4 2009
Comments

Babel:1337/1337

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 Mike Cosgrove H T D Oldvfd

Keep
  • Keep Freakazoid bitches. Freakazoid. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 23:24, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. On the condition that Dex tidies it up a bit. I don't know - maybe it's because it's a friday, but it amused me somehow. Trim the stoopid, keep the "hey, cut that out" stuff, and it could be OK. --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:27, Oct 30
  • Keep. If it's being tidied up. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:40, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote Keep. In fact, UU, I am happy. Spıke ¬  03:17 4-Nov-09
  • Keep. I wouldn't go so far as to call myself "happy," considering that I just gave blood and am a bit dizzy, but UU has improved this article. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 21:20, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:09, 5 November 2009
Delete
  • Delete. This is apparently not vanity. However, another thing that it's not, is that it's not not retarded. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 16:18, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Intro does everything wrong; nonsense date, man né woman, unreadable last line to work in a swear. Again, watch a TV-show episode and go blab on your keyboard. Spıke ¬  17:08 29-Oct-09 rescinded 13:01 3-Nov-09
Comments
  • Comment Are we really casting "conditional keeps" based on work that, as far as I can see, Dexter has no intention of doing? Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:34, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
    OK, I've done it. Happy? --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:50, Nov 3

Kept MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 03:54, Nov 5

Blue Beetle

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Whoever tagged this "rewrite" was so generous that if he were an Olympic judge, I would win the bronze in figure skating. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 16:11, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
  • For Hype entering the Olympics. Delete this though. --UU - natter UU Manhole 16:58, Oct 28
  • Delete. Can I come second in the rowing? --ChiefjusticeDS 14:39, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. I liked Blue Beetle in Yellow Submarine. Or is he that Olympic gymnast who wears the blue leotard? WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:03, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
Comments

August Strindberg

Keep
  • Weak keep I don't know anything about the subject, but this stub seems to provide at least something of a start. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:15, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. As Syndrome says, there is enough here for someone to salvage. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:37, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
projects