Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Duck Wilde)
(Scientology)
Line 46: Line 46:
 
*'''Keep''' Fix don't delete. {{User:MrN9000/sig}} <small><small>03:48, Nov 15</small></small>
 
*'''Keep''' Fix don't delete. {{User:MrN9000/sig}} <small><small>03:48, Nov 15</small></small>
 
*'''Keep'''. {{tl|fix}}. --{{User:Under_user/sig3}} <small><font color="navy"><i>10:57, Nov 16</i></font></small>
 
*'''Keep'''. {{tl|fix}}. --{{User:Under_user/sig3}} <small><font color="navy"><i>10:57, Nov 16</i></font></small>
  +
*'''Keep''' fix, don't delete; this is part of the series on $cientology, it wouldnt really do to have a series without the eponymous article. this was one of the first groups of articles i read here, and i actually think there is a lot of funny here (sometimes the truth is the funniest). the nom comments by Teh Rote seems a bit harsh- i submit it is possible that they are a true believer, and therefore understandably offended.
 
|-
 
|-
 
||'''Delete'''||
 
||'''Delete'''||

Revision as of 22:21, November 16, 2008

Puppy2 Please head over to VFH and cast some votes for good articles.
If VFH voting does not pick up by next Tuesday, Roman Dog Bird will delete this puppy.


Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.
Un-vfd

VFD: Where bad articles go to get recycled.


Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):


Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


Duck Wilde

Keep
Delete
  • Delete I tried fixing up this article but is complete random crap. I copied the entirety into the classic Oscar Wilde page to preserve it for its slight in-joke value. (it can always be removed later from there)--Mnbvcxz 00:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just reads like random rubbish to me. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:01, Nov 16
  • Delete. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 14:19, Nov 16
  • Ugh. --Mr. Monkey Sockmonkey Pant-hoot here. 17:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Scientology

Keep
  • Weak Keep If someone prunes it, they might be able to short, decent remnant from the article.--Mnbvcxz 01:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep I agree with the "Mixed Feelings" note under "Comments" -tinyubuntu.jpg Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 01:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Fix don't delete. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 03:48, Nov 15
  • Keep. {{fix}}. --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:57, Nov 16
  • Keep fix, don't delete; this is part of the series on $cientology, it wouldnt really do to have a series without the eponymous article. this was one of the first groups of articles i read here, and i actually think there is a lot of funny here (sometimes the truth is the funniest). the nom comments by Teh Rote seems a bit harsh- i submit it is possible that they are a true believer, and therefore understandably offended.
Delete
  • Delete. This isn't an article, it's an all-out attack. I would be fine with that if it was a remotely funny all-out attack, but I personally read all 39 f***ing kilobytes and didn't even smile. Get rid of this shit before it's too late. Teh Rote 00:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. TL;DR, shitty attack. Longneck Bottle 00:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
  • Mixed feelings. This page is definitely too EDesque for Uncyclopedia. We exist to satire, not to attack. On the other hand, I think the problem is probably better dealt with through the editorial process than outright deletion. Teh Rote, why not run through it, and anything you see that is not satire, but is instead an unfunny attack, chop it out? Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 00:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
projects